Monday Morning RxPile:
Purple Row: A Colorado Crush Blog
Alright, I'll admit I've got pent up issues stemming from yesterday to deal with here. I'm going to try to keep them buried for as long as I can, but I can't promise that this post won't veer off into NSFW or children language. I'll just make sure if that happens that I keep it in the comments or read more section so you have some way of not engaging. Seriously, yesterday's loss caused me some real angst. I'm talking PTSD angst. Okay, what was that, exactly? Anyway, I've got some bloggerly duties to attend to:
What has been politely suggested that the Rockies need to do to fix the team:
- That thing we don't talk about regarding the manager.
- XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX XXX O'XXXX XXXXXX on his XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX. (portions blacked out under Congressional seal for 25 years)
- Trade Byung Hyun Kim for Jorge Julio. While we're at it, we should also trade John Mabry for Willie Bloomquist and Steve Finley for Brad Eldred. There. Didn't that instantly make us a better team?
- Move to Portland.
- Sell to Kroenke.
- Trade Todd Helton to contender X for a scrap of dignity.
- Send Chris Iannetta back to the minors for walking too much and Omar Quintanilla back for how he played last year.
- Blow up the bullpen.
- Invent a time machine
- Sign Roger Clemens or another of the Grade A free agent pitchers last year. Like Jason Schmidt.
- Oh, while we have the time machine, I liked this one I saw today: Go back and get our "ace" Jason Jennings back and give back Willy Taveras, Jason Hirsh and Taylor Buchholz. You are a super smart guy, Woody Paige.
What will really make this team better:
- Okay, so he's right about lopping off Mabry and/or Finley. Too bad none of us saw that train wreck coming... Barker and Spilborghs should be welcome. Joe Koshansky's not ready.
- Replace Josh Fogg in the rotation with Greg Reynolds. The team's afraid of pushing it's youngsters, but Reynolds' Pac-10 draft mates Morrow and Lincecum are already in the majors and doing alright, Reynolds was as polished as either of those coming out of college last year.
- Keep Buchholz on a short leash.
- Jamey Carroll needs to only be used against left handers, and even then judiciously until he can break out of his slump. Otherwise use Q.
0 recs |
29
comments
Comments
I like the Crush
Now to make the playoffs, and beat the Rush.
As for the Rockies....well....my mom said if you can't say anything nice.....
by Redhawk on May 14, 2007 11:41 AM MDT 0 recs
Renck
On Hurdle's job, Renck believes the two-year contract extension gives him security. I don't exactly buy that but with the Monforts it's more than likely going to mean security. Yet, I'm just giving a general overview of the arguments back in April. So unproductive . . .
by Russ on May 14, 2007 11:57 AM MDT 0 recs
fair enough
in all seriousness ive been a little down on quintanilla in the past but hes looking better these days. so i take that back, at least somewhat. if it came down to keeping him or carroll at this point id go Q all the way.
in all not seriousness, do you know what our record would be if someone else (like joe girardi) were managing the team this year? i ran a simulation on this website and it turns out wed be 42-11 so far. no typo there. thats our record after 38 games without our current manager, according to www.clinthurdleisaresponsibleforallourproblems.com.
by LarryB303 on May 14, 2007 1:07 PM MDT 0 recs
That URL
by Redhawk on
May 14, 2007 1:35 PM MDT
up
0 recs
it might have been .net
by LarryB303 on
May 14, 2007 1:42 PM MDT
up
0 recs
found it
by Redhawk on
May 14, 2007 2:04 PM MDT
up
0 recs
where
by roxfan4life on
May 14, 2007 3:28 PM MDT
up
0 recs
Move around the deck chairs.....
The sad fact about the Rockies is that when they went young and cheap a few years ago, the hope was also that we'd have good enough talent to compete. Instead, we have insufficient talent.
Holliday is as solid a young OF hitter as there is in the league.
Atkins can rake and, as we've seen so far this year, can also disappear for 40-game stretches.
Hawpe has a nice arm, good patience at the plate, and just can't quite seem to ever get it going with the power we all THINK he has.
Helton has done a great impersonation of Wade Boggs this season, and probably secretly hopes he can display it where Boggs was in his prime.
We are an underpowered, uninspired collection of talent. Dave Krieger said it all today - He said the intangible infecting this ballclub is a "culture of losing". I have thought the same thing for years.
So suggest all the roster changes you want, and in the end, we will be in the same place no matter what O'Dowd & Co. do. That culture of losing is hard to overcome, and since we cast our lot with a bunch of nice young kids with insufficient talent, we are who we are.
And it gets no better in '08 without a serious commitment to bringing in more talent from outside since we won't have enough MLB-ready talent in the minors to make a difference.
"Losing becomes us."
by Roxpert on May 14, 2007 1:21 PM MDT 0 recs
Loosing
It's even harder when winning isn't even a goal of the Monforts. (and as the saying goes, it all starts at the top) Not loosing money is the goal.
Which brings me to a relatazation: why do the Monforts not sale? Isn't the only way to MAKE money is sale and cash in? ('cause they don't appear to be making money or a good return on investment in operation cash profit)
by Redhawk on
May 14, 2007 1:40 PM MDT
up
0 recs
Its LOSING, not loosing
Losing means "The Rockies suck".
by Lightning on
May 14, 2007 2:03 PM MDT
up
0 recs
Loosing
by Lightning on
May 14, 2007 2:05 PM MDT
up
0 recs
Highly profitable....
Forbes recently estimated that the Rockies were the 6th most profitable MLB franchise in 2006, generating close to $25 million of income. Actually, nobody knows outside the organization since the franchise is privately held, but it stands to reason that it makes a lot of money.
The Monfort franchise got about $16 million of revenue sharing from the league last year. Keeping costs under control, combined with the "free money" from rev-sharing and the FSRM rights fees can make this a very worthwhile endeavor for the Monforts and their partners in the ownership group.
Our payroll is about $30 million below the major-league MEDIAN, i.e. about half the teams spend over $85 million this year, and half less. We are spending about $55 million.
On the field, we lose, and we lose as fans. Off the field and at the bank, the Rockies' owners win bigtime. So why should they sell???
by Roxpert on
May 14, 2007 2:08 PM MDT
up
0 recs
If those numbers are correct
And if they are making $25 mil a year then the Monforts have succeded in their goal. (which isn't winning) So what do they care if the team is in last place again?
by Redhawk on
May 14, 2007 2:13 PM MDT
up
0 recs
Krieger's column
Too long, the Rockies have allowed themselves to be happy with mediocrity. I don't know how it will change, or when. But maybe (hopefully), like Krieger said, getting the shit kicked out of you a few times might be the motivating factor.
In past years, the Rockies were supposed to be mediocre - it was a rebuilding period, a phase that's clearly still in place. That's fine. Every team has to rebuild at one time or another. I can be patient for a year or three while waiting for young stars to blossom (worked for the Tigers and is currently working for the Brewers, after all). But this year we were supposed to see steps in a higher direction, and we haven't. And it does send a message to the players on this team when the bench is carrying three guys with averages below the Mendoza Line, and the team shows no urgency to improve those spots.
I don't think our talent is as insufficient as you make it out to be - we're not going to win a World Series this year, but we're a sight better than those 73-win clubs that all ran together in the early part of this decade. But even sufficient talent has to be motivated by the knowledge that their jobs aren't safe, and that mediocrity isn't acceptable. I don't think the guys in that clubhouse are happy with being 16-22, but on an unconscious level... maybe lethargy has already set in. And that's a damn shame.
by Franchise26 on
May 14, 2007 1:44 PM MDT
up
0 recs
Helton
by DeepPurple on
May 14, 2007 6:21 PM MDT
up
0 recs
Completely off topic
by stuntdaddy1 on May 14, 2007 2:15 PM MDT 0 recs
Slight correction
by Russ on
May 14, 2007 2:18 PM MDT
up
0 recs
That's right
by stuntdaddy1 on
May 14, 2007 2:36 PM MDT
up
0 recs
Out of baseball for all of 2004,
by Russ on
May 14, 2007 2:46 PM MDT
up
0 recs
Cust
I'm not sure Beane deserves credit here. Cust was leading the minors in HRs this year when Oakland traded for him.....he wasn't exactly "flying under the radar". He just needed a team willing to finally give him the full-time DH spot.
Its Baltimore's fans that need to be depressed right now......Don't forget, Oakland is his 4th major league organization (Arizona, Colorado, Baltimore).....he's an AL guy that just "took a while" to finally stick.
by sg8335aa on
May 14, 2007 2:19 PM MDT
up
0 recs
True
by stuntdaddy1 on
May 14, 2007 2:30 PM MDT
up
0 recs
Also
by stuntdaddy1 on
May 14, 2007 2:32 PM MDT
up
0 recs
Cust
by Franchise26 on
May 14, 2007 2:20 PM MDT
up
0 recs
O'Dowd
I was stunned they gave him an extension. I am stunned he keeps his job. A GM should be judged on W's as their own P and L and his has been absolutely pathetic.
by PinchHitLancePainter on May 14, 2007 4:20 PM MDT 0 recs
Let's really look at what you're saying here
Walker: None of the three arms we got from St. Louis for Larry did anything for us, but one of them (Jason Burch) was used to get Rodrigo Lopez and the extra money saved from trading Larry when we did went towards signing Dexter Fowler, one of the top tools prospects in the Rockies system at present.
Kile: Got a couple solid years from Jose Jimenez out of this trade.
Hampton: Got a monster year from Preston Wilson, a couple servicable campaigns from Charles Johnson, and monetary relief.
Neagle: Wasn't traded.
Castilla(?): OK, Aaron Ledesma and Rolando Arrojo weren't much. But outside Coors, neither was Castilla.
Burks: Was traded in 1998, two years before O'Dowd took over.
Wouldn't hurt to straighten out the facts first, I figure.
Secondly... O'Dowd was roundly - and rightly - criticized early this decade for never sticking to a plan. Well, O'Dowd and the Rox have had a plan since 2004 - they're rebuilding through young talent and the draft. Now, it's success shouldn't be immaterial, but it's way too early to judge the success of O'Dowd's youth movement, particularly since this was supposed to be the first year it began to bear serious fruit. In the meantime, maybe the big club has underperformed, but as far as building up an entire organization, O'Dowd's done a great job. Our farm system is absolutely top-notch at this point, and that's not just me saying that - that's common wisdom saying that the Rockies farm system is among the game's best.
I don't think it's fair to judge O'Dowd on the performance of the big club in the past three seasons and 38 games. He was pretty bad at this job when he started but I think he's gotten better and I'm a lot less outraged that he's got two extra years on his deal than I am that Hurdle has the same deal.
by Franchise26 on
May 14, 2007 5:38 PM MDT
up
0 recs
edit:
"I don't think it's fair to judge O'Dowd SOLELY on the performance of..."
by Franchise26 on
May 14, 2007 5:39 PM MDT
up
0 recs
I'm with you on that
Overall I don't think you could do much better then O'Dowd is doing right now. Building from within is really the only way to go for this franchise, and the only fault you can find in him is that he didn't realize that, and implement this plan sooner.
by stuntdaddy1 on
May 14, 2007 5:49 PM MDT
up
0 recs
There's article in Baseball prospectus
by moomacher on May 14, 2007 7:20 PM MDT 0 recs
Yeah exactly with current levels
by stuntdaddy1 on
May 14, 2007 9:14 PM MDT
up
0 recs






