Final statistics for the AFL and HWL

by Russ Oates on Nov 20, 2008 9:42 PM MST in Pebble Report

Here are the final stats for those Rockies who were on rosters at the conclusion of AFL and HWL play. First the position players:

**Final Batting Statistics for AFL and HWL**
Player	League	G	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	TB	BB	SO	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS
Lars Davis	HWL	20	63	5	14	2	0	1	7	19	4	19	0	0	0.222	0.286	0.302	0.588
Darin Holcomb	HWL	30	92	9	15	4	0	1	7	22	11	13	0	1	0.163	0.291	0.239	0.530
Mike Mitchell	HWL	27	86	9	15	6	1	0	5	23	4	24	8	1	0.174	0.217	0.267	0.484
Michael McKenry	AFL	28	84	16	31	8	0	9*	25	66	6	22	0	1	0.369	0.430	0.786	1.216
Chris Nelson	AFL	29	84	22	27	3	1	6	17	50	11	15	2	2	0.321	0.392	0.595	0.987
Eric Young Jr.	AFL	31	100	37	43	4	1	5	20	64	12	14	20!	1	.430#	0.504	0.640	1.144

* - Second in the league
! - First in the league
# - First in the league

The pitchers:

**Final Pitching Statistics for AFL and HWL**
Player	League	W	L	ERA	G	GS	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	SO	GO/AO	BAA
Austin Chambliss	HWL	0	1	16.79	9	0	0	7	14	13	13	0	6	5	0.88	0.212
Andy Graham	HWL	2	0	1.17	8	0	3	7 2/3	5	2	1	0	2	7	0.60	0.172
Connor Graham	HWL	1	1	6.62	7	7	0	17 2/3	14	14	13	1	20	24	1.00	0.215
Shane Lindsay	AFL	2	2	5.48	7	4	0	21 1/3	22	16	13	3	11	25	0.62	0.272
David Patton	HWL	0	0	2.57	6	0	0	7	2	2	2	0	7	9	3.33	0.095
David Patton	AFL	0	0	9.24	9	0	0	12 2/3	22	18	13	2	5	12	0.92	0.355
David Patton	Total	0	0	6.86	15	0	0	19 2/3	24	20	15	2	12	21	N/A	N/A
Chaz Roe	AFL	1	4	11.48	8	8	0	26 2/3	38	36	34	9	21	27	0.72	0.330

An aesthetic question: Do you prefer the purple highlight when your pointer goes over the table or would a different color be better?

Also, either click into the post or go to wide view for the complete table (since the tables are cut off in the narrow view).

Tweet Comment 4 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

I Like

PURPLE!!!

GO ROCKIES!!! JFK

by jrockies on Nov 21, 2008 4:59 PM MST reply actions

Just a quick question. Why hasn’t Eric Young Jr. been discussed more as a solution to the 2b problem? Not that he’s really dominated any level but he has been remarkably consistent through 3 levels, is incredibly fast and actually has demonstrated some plate discipline. I’m not getting too excited over his AFL numbers since these things tend to be as correlated with MiLB/MLB season performance as spring training numbers but they certainly don’t detract from his value. Anyway, it seems like he’s been discussed more and more as a future utility player at best. Since I feel like the team only has an outside shot at the playoffs next year, EYJ might be a good player to try out at second base pending a solid performance in spring training or some AAA work.

And yea, I realize I just basically said spring training is worthless at predicting season-performance and then suggested a player be given a spot on the team based off of his spring training performance. But two things A. Rookies tend to have more butterflies during spring training and haven’t played with actual MLB players so spring training for rookies has slightly more value than for veterans and B. Who here thinks it’s a worse decision than giving the job to Jayson Nix?

by Resolution on Nov 22, 2008 12:47 AM MST reply actions

Glove work

Most scouting reports and first hand observers say that his glove work is just not acceptable for the Major league level at this point.. especially since the Rockies have targeted pitchers with high GB/FB ratios.

by roxhead on Nov 22, 2008 1:53 PM MST up reply actions