Tuesday Morning Rockpile:
The Rockies continue to negotiate with Atkins, Fuentes, and Hawpe in order to avoid hearings later this month.
And as the main part of that article informs us, Josh Fogg has a new suitor. First, the Reds wanted Fogg, but then the Mariners and Orioles discussed a trade involving Adam Jones and Erik Bedard. So the Mariners wanted Fogg in case the trade fell through, which it did at the time. Nothing happened with Fogg. Then the Twins finally pulled the trigger on a Santana trade some days later, and it appeared as if the Twins have interest in Fogg. Now there are reports that the Twins have little interest in Fogg and would prefer to go with a young rotation backed up by a veteran bullpen. With the Bedard-to-Seattle deal back on, does that leave Fogg to be an Oriole soon? The free agent market is one dragon Fogg hasn't slain yet.
If you're a young player who had success in the past few seasons, this was probably a dream off season for you. Curtis Granderson signed a five-year, $30.25M deal with the Tigers yesterday. This past season's quadruple 20 surely helped spur this deal along.
And something funny to close with: Don't call the Tampa Bay Rays "the Tampa Bay Devil Rays" because the Tampa Bay Devil Rays will send you a letter telling you that you shouldn't call the Tampa Bay Rays "the Tampa Bay Devil Rays". Otherwise, the Tampa Bay Devil Rays request that you donate to the Rays Baseball Foundation.
0 recs |
16
comments
Comments
Fogg
by Jester76 on Feb 5, 2008 10:23 AM MST 0 recs
Fogg
We brought in Kip Wells, and Josh Towers and brought back Mark Redman. All could be a #5 pitcher, and while not as good as Fogg...would be MUCH cheaper, and thus far more expendable (cheap trade or just waive) if/when Morales is ready to start...or even Reynolds.
We are also talking to Shawn Chacon who could possible fit in this group, though I think everyone thinks he's a reliever.
by Redhawk on
Feb 5, 2008 10:56 AM MST
up
0 recs
Just adding to the two comments above:
Greg Reynolds 2.4
Josh Fogg 2.0
Franklin Morales 1.5
Kip Wells 1.4
Josh Towers 1.0
Mark Redman 0.9
I've said before that I think that most projections are off on Morales this season, and it's usually come down to a higher HR rate, but PECOTA's the first one that has also projected a GB%, and I think even at 50% it's a tick or three lower for Franklin than what I'd suspect will happen, leaving me even more convinced that more balls in play will be turned to outs for him than what the spreadsheets are saying. I'm pretty convinced he's going to be more valuable than Fogg this season, and Reynolds almost certainly will be as well.
The three guys we signed cheaply as emergency fills shouldn't be counted on for much, but I think there's a pretty decent shot one of them has the ability to exceed expectations from the get go this Spring. I wouldn't hazard a guess as to which one that is, but the safety in numbers principal seems to apply here.
by Rox Girl on
Feb 5, 2008 11:47 AM MST
up
0 recs
Reynolds over Morales?
by Charlie77 on
Feb 6, 2008 10:03 PM MST
up
0 recs
Rockies sign V. Zambrano; Spring roster released
Non-Roster Invitees:
Pitchers: (11)
RHP Alberto Arias
LHP Micah Bowie
RHP Darren Clarke
LHP Chris George
RHP Brandon Hynick
LHP John Koronka
RHP Zach McClellan
RHP Greg Reynolds
LHP Sean Thompson
RHP Casey Weathers
RHP Victor Zambrano
Catchers: (3)
C Mike McKenry
C Mike Rose
C Neil Wilson
Infielders: (4)
1B/3B Christian Colonel
2B Marcus Giles
UT Matt Kata
SS Chris Nelson
Outfielders: (4)
OF Sean Barker
OF Dexter Fowler
OF Joe Gaetti
OF Scott Podsednik
by malakian on Feb 5, 2008 1:14 PM MST 0 recs
Correction
by malakian on
Feb 5, 2008 1:18 PM MST
up
0 recs
I hope
by Redhawk on
Feb 5, 2008 4:50 PM MST
up
0 recs
Zambrano
Sure, toss him into the 5th man battle royale and let's see what happens.
by BroJB on
Feb 5, 2008 3:07 PM MST
up
0 recs
Is this going to be a Cage Match?
by Redhawk on
Feb 5, 2008 4:48 PM MST
up
0 recs
Colonel
by Franchise26 on
Feb 5, 2008 5:07 PM MST
up
0 recs
Colonel on 40-man?
by malakian on
Feb 6, 2008 9:50 AM MST
up
0 recs
The Devil Rays
by Silverblood on Feb 5, 2008 2:02 PM MST 0 recs
I agree
by Rox Fan in TN on
Feb 5, 2008 2:41 PM MST
up
0 recs
Besides
Devil Rays. Devil Rays. Devil Rays. I was just going to call them the D-Rays, but now I'm going for the full monty.
by Silverblood on
Feb 5, 2008 6:44 PM MST
up
0 recs
Haha Silverblood...
by tulolover on Feb 5, 2008 7:56 PM MST 0 recs








