Purple Row: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


Roy Halladay - Unsatisfied

News: (From MLB Trade Rumors) "Roy Halladay is apparently unhappy in Toronto and has let management know it, and management has apparently responded by doing some quiet surveying of teams (such as St. Louis and the Dodgers) that are far, far away from the AL East in an effort to see what it could get for the 2003 Cy Young Award winner.


Apparently, the returns other teams are getting for top-talent pitchers such as CC Sabathia, Rich Harden and Erik Bedard has inspired the Blue Jays to at least find out what it could get for one of the best pitchers in the American League. It remains unlikely that they'd deal him, but you never know.

Halladay has been ridiculously good this year, and he is signed through 2010 at a below-market rate. Doc is the face of the franchise, though, and if anything the Jays might try to extend him further."

 

Views: OH LORDY LORD ROY COME HOME TO COLORADO, BABY, WE HAVE A WELCOME HOME FOR YOU

 

O'Dowd - did you hear that? Start offering Matt Holliday to Toronto - NOW

Eat. Drink. Be Merry. But the above FanPost does not necessarily reflect the attitudes, opinions, or views of Purple Row's staff (unless, of course, it's written by the staff [and even then, it still might not]).

1 recs | Comment 42 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Best part if this trade happened

would be I would only have to change 2 letters on my Matt Holliday Jersey. hAllAday. I like it.

I actually suggest this a few months ago as a good trade/match. Toronto also needs a good middle infielder and we have a few extras in the organization there too. I really think this is a good match over all. I’d assume we would have to have Holliday/Koshansky and or Sullivan/1 of: Barmes or Q or Nelson or Nix/1 of: Hirsh or Morales or Reynolds to make this happen. Maybe even through in a Matt Miller type.

This would help both teams, and brings Halliday home, which is a plus for any ball player.

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 24, 2008 11:58 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

then the deal is off

as those 2 are untouchable or should be

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 24, 2008 12:06 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

should have added

I’d rather add 2 from Hirsch/Morales Reynolds or Chaz Roe before Chacin.

The Rockies have good talent and depth, supposedly one of the best in all of baseball. If that’s true, there is no reason to give our best hitter PLUS one of our 2 best prospects too. If we have that great of depth, our #4 prospect should be of value, not just our #1, and #2.

Chacin maybe as he’s aways away still, but not Fowler, he’s starting in our OF next year…he’s untouchable.

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 24, 2008 12:12 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I dunno

Calling up Fowler so soon might be a mistake. But yeah, he’s untouchable. We need him. Badly.

It's Tricky to rock a rhyme, to rock a rhyme that's right on time It's Tulowitzki!...Tulo-witzki-witzki-witzki ..... rockiesmagicnumber.blogspot.com

by RockiesMagicNumber on Jul 24, 2008 12:17 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well if we can get Halladay without giving up our two best prospects

then we should make the deal. And I think the Jays would want a more prospect centered deal than a Holliday centered deal.

Second half run?

by moomacher on Jul 24, 2008 12:18 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I disagree

Losing Doc would hurt them, but they need a very real bat to compete with the Manny’s and ARod’s in the division. Holliday is a very real bat, and Toronto could more than likely offer him very real money, that we couldn’t. Just based on VORP, Matt is still more valuable than Doc would be, but with how bad our pitching staff is and how good our offense is, we could make it up.

It's Tricky to rock a rhyme, to rock a rhyme that's right on time It's Tulowitzki!...Tulo-witzki-witzki-witzki ..... rockiesmagicnumber.blogspot.com

by RockiesMagicNumber on Jul 24, 2008 12:29 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well yeah

but my point is….we can flood em with prospects. We have a ton of em. Most of whom will never help the big league club at all as they are blocked. Just not ones named Fowler, cause he’s a can’t miss starter, and possibly as soon as next year.

Hell how bout a starting catcher in Torrealba who’s actually better or at least equal to Rod Barajas and Greg Zaun who is now 37 years old? Or the NL leader in stolen bases (though that would mean 2 starters out from our OF)? We could rebuild the Jays and make them better with our spare parts….and not hurt the Rockies. We have depth…..tons of it.

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 24, 2008 12:30 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Don't go there

Calling Willy Taveras our starting OF is like calling Torrealba our starting C. Taveras is there because Spills isn’t.

It's Tricky to rock a rhyme, to rock a rhyme that's right on time It's Tulowitzki!...Tulo-witzki-witzki-witzki ..... rockiesmagicnumber.blogspot.com

by RockiesMagicNumber on Jul 24, 2008 12:34 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

True

but I was thinking if we trade Holliday, and Tavares Spilly could only play one position at at time, unless Fowler is called up now, which may not be that bad of an idea.

But the Blue Jays have Alex Rios in CF. Not sure Willie T helps them out much. What the Jays need is a power impact bat hopefully a LF, a middle infielder better then D. Ekstien/Mark Scuttero, and a 1b/DH better then Lyle Overbay/Matt Stairs. And a replacement catcher. I love Zaun, but he’s at the end of his career.

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 24, 2008 12:40 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I know

I see what you’re getting at, but LF Spills, CF Sullivan, RF Hawpe. I don’t really LIKE sully in that spot, but we’re talking about a defensive need, and he’s the best we have in that regard.

I’m just concerned about bringing Dex up, watching him get shelled, blow his confidence, and then dump him with the malcontents in AAA. Not a good thing.

It's Tricky to rock a rhyme, to rock a rhyme that's right on time It's Tulowitzki!...Tulo-witzki-witzki-witzki ..... rockiesmagicnumber.blogspot.com

by RockiesMagicNumber on Jul 24, 2008 12:58 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well now, this is all just so very, very interesting....
Rockies manager Clint Hurdle has INF Clint Barmes taking fly balls in the outfield. “I think there’s going to be more opportunity out there for him than a lot of people think,” Hurdle said.

As I said yesterday, this in itself smells like a trade is in the works, and well, now we’re talking Halladay wants out of Toronto, and the Jays need a serious bat in LF, and they noticed the haul Cleveland got for CC, and how the Harden deal went down, and oh my….

I would hate to see Matty leave the Rox, but OMG, if we could get a pitcher like Halladay, well then I could live with it. And I think the fan base will swallow it better with Roy coming home to Denver. (Local boy makes good, and returns in triumph.)

Oh Lord, please oh please oh please, make this happen.

Put me out of my misery. Please!

by rockhead on Jul 24, 2008 1:02 PM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It makes too much sense

Also, there’s no way we resign Holliday. People all are saying “Sell Holliday and bring in TOP PROSPECTS” – well, we’ve BEEN doing that. Now Jeff Baker and Ian Stewart and Troy Tulowitzki and all are here. We can’t just keep farming and farming, it isn’t gonna work. I mean, there’s a line, you can’t just go buy everyone, as we’ve seen, but this would be the major acquisition we’ve been looking for.

It's Tricky to rock a rhyme, to rock a rhyme that's right on time It's Tulowitzki!...Tulo-witzki-witzki-witzki ..... rockiesmagicnumber.blogspot.com

by RockiesMagicNumber on Jul 24, 2008 1:06 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It makes perfect sense

If there was ever a trade match made in heaven, this is it. They have what we need, we have what they need (and then some), pull the dang trigger, Dan!! This could be the deal that changes the NL West for a long, long time.

Put me out of my misery. Please!

by rockhead on Jul 24, 2008 1:11 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Eh

I hope this doesn’t happen.

by onholliday on Jul 24, 2008 1:30 PM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ok...

so what do you propose

It's Tricky to rock a rhyme, to rock a rhyme that's right on time It's Tulowitzki!...Tulo-witzki-witzki-witzki ..... rockiesmagicnumber.blogspot.com

by RockiesMagicNumber on Jul 24, 2008 1:40 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sorry fellas

but focus your attention on Bronson Arroyo, not Roy Halladay. My guess is we send Willy T., Seth Smith and Morales for Arroyo. We’re not trading Holiday and probably never will.

by LW33 on Jul 24, 2008 2:19 PM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Holliday

You think they’re going to be able to sign him? Seems extremely unlikely to me.

by holly96 on Jul 24, 2008 2:34 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why

would we WANT Arroyo? He’s overpriced, lousy, doesn’t pitch to ground balls, and would give up enough home runs to make us thing we lost the humidor.

It's Tricky to rock a rhyme, to rock a rhyme that's right on time It's Tulowitzki!...Tulo-witzki-witzki-witzki ..... rockiesmagicnumber.blogspot.com

by RockiesMagicNumber on Jul 24, 2008 2:39 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Compared to De La Rosa, Redman and Wells

Arroyo is a major upgrade and is signed through next year. He has some quality outings recently. I agree on the ground ball deal and he does give up home runs, but we need to add a starter for this season which is nowhere near over considering our division. The Rockies will never trade Holiday, period. Save your keyboards, he is not going anywhere until FA.

by LW33 on Jul 24, 2008 3:07 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Holliday WILL be traded

as he is worth far more than 2 sandwich draft picks. The Rockies have to get the most they can…and in Matt’s case that means a trade.

And I love Matt Holliday…he’s easily my favorite Rockie. I have the expensive jersey to prove it! Getting a Roy Hallday for Matt is much better than just another slew of maybe’s, other wise known as propects.

And Arroyo has a big contract…and he sucks. I don’t think he’s much of an upgrade over DLR at all in fact lets look at their numbers:
Walks per Innings Pitched: .413 & .353
K’s Per Innings Pitched: 1.06 & .874
ERA: 6.71 & 5.60

Can you guess which one the stat line belongs too? No?...close huh? That’s cause they both are barely a #5 starter. Not what the Rockies need.

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 24, 2008 3:31 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Arroyo

isn’t worth sending Sullivan for…well maybe Sullivan

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 24, 2008 2:40 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thanks!

Good to hear Somebody has already spoken with Dan O’Dowd and JP Riccardi!

Yes, we all know it’s an unlikely trade. Leave us to our fun.

It's Tricky to rock a rhyme, to rock a rhyme that's right on time It's Tulowitzki!...Tulo-witzki-witzki-witzki ..... rockiesmagicnumber.blogspot.com

by RockiesMagicNumber on Jul 24, 2008 2:40 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Both

You think we could get Doc Halladay without giving up Holliday?

Die-hard Rockies fan. On the bandwagon since 7/6/93. Not giving up my seat. EVER!

by rockiesfan4ever on Jul 24, 2008 2:30 PM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Uh

Not if we want to keep Dexter Fowler, Jhoulys Chacin, Ian Stewart, Greg Reynolds….etc etc…

It's Tricky to rock a rhyme, to rock a rhyme that's right on time It's Tulowitzki!...Tulo-witzki-witzki-witzki ..... rockiesmagicnumber.blogspot.com

by RockiesMagicNumber on Jul 24, 2008 2:42 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Doubtful

We can’t keep Holliday…..he walks next year. We can offer him the moon and the sun, but with Boras as his agent, he’s going to till walk, as a New York team will also offer him Mars too.

This would maximize our return for Holliday. A front line ace…...think about it…..an actual ace in a Rockies uniform….who might re-sign after 2010….cause he’s from Denver! Not a bunch of prospects…no Jason Hirsch’s of the world (remember when he was the #1 Astro’s prospect?).....but an ACE!

Also take Holliday out of the mix….and then we have to empty out our minor league system.

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 24, 2008 2:45 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Saving face

Like the rumored Mets proposal involving Beltran this theoretical trade would allow the Rockies management and ownership to take back an impact major league player at a position of desperate need (starting pitching in this case, CF in Beltran’s case) which would make the trade relatively easy to sell to the fans (and the current players).

by MADness on Jul 24, 2008 4:49 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I was on the Rockies Web site

and why isn’t this trade announced yet? didn’t we work out the details?

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 24, 2008 8:53 PM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

LMAO!

Put me out of my misery. Please!

by rockhead on Jul 24, 2008 10:30 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I threw out this question on Blue Birds Banter

of the idea of Holliday plus prospects for Halladay. And not surprisingly, the response was OUR GUY IS GREAT! Our team is great! We don’t need no stinkin prospects! Your prospects must suck, cause we don’t know them!

Their response in general….why do they need Holliday, the Jays need an impact bat at 1b, or DH,not the OF, cause Adam Lind is great! and Holliday isn’t that impact bat and he’s a Coors Field creation as all Rockies hitters are inflated. 2) He walks after next year, and the Jays aren’t going to need a big bat for just one year.

Their basic response of their idea of a trade: Holliday Plus Tulo, Plus a SP that is major league ready (their minor league system is empty of them at the moment, Clayton Kershaw type was mentioned). Plus lower level fillers.

I love how fans over-rate their own talent, and down play the talent of other teams. We do it here on the Row too, just odd seeing it come back.

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 25, 2008 9:29 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hey,

if Tulo pulls a Berroa, then that’s a great trade.

Second half run?

by moomacher on Jul 25, 2008 9:36 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So how doe this package sound?

Holliday plus Tulo, plus Koshansky, plus Reynolds, Plus Roe or Hynrick for Halladay?

I was happy to see Tulo come back with a new stance. He looks less like Angel Berroa now (but it has been less than a week)

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 25, 2008 10:05 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ummmm no that wasn't the response....

The response was….we have two outfielders signed to long contracts and 2 young outfielders we really like. There is no way the team would be signing Holliday for the $20 mil he’s going to ask for. So trading Doc for one year of Holliday (as much as it would be a great deal for Colorado) would be stupid for us. JP is not the brightest GM but he isn’t that stupid.

IF Doc is going to be traded, and despite one story, he hasn’t asked to be traded, he said ‘I’d like to win’ . We’d all like to win. He also said he will be a Jay as long as the Jays want him, in the same interview. He also said he liked the direction the team was going.

Why would he want to go to the Rockies if he wants to win. Jays are 51 and 51….Rockies are 45 and 58. He wants to win and he wants to go to a team 13 games below .500?

Trading Doc would make our strength, pitching, a weakness next year, Burnett is leaving, so our one and two guys would be gone and in exchange we could have 5 outfielders, three of which would be
overpaid and basically untradable. IF we trade Doc, we’d have to get something that would fill a hole we’ll have next year and beyond without it couldn’t open a gaping hole somewhere else. The big hole right now and in the near future is middle infield.

I guess in answer to that last line I’d say ‘I love how fans think that a trade that’s good for their team is something the other team without worrying at all about thier needs.’

by Tom Dakers on Jul 25, 2008 10:56 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thank You

Finally, some clarity. This trade will not happen (thank God), and this is why.

by onholliday on Jul 25, 2008 2:46 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Red Hawk

I love the way you spin it, but at the same time, you are the hypocritical one, overrating your own prospects. This is the post I made over in bluebirdbanter.

There is no way this would ever get through. EVER. I think we can all agree first of all that Roy Halladay is a more valuable commodity than Holliday right now. Aces are more rare than slugging OF. Second, an added value to Halladay is that he is signed through 2010 while Holliday is only signed through next year, 2009. Yes, Holliday plus a couple prospects would make a good package, but this deal makes absolutely no sense to the Toronto Blue Jays.

Scenario #1: We are trying to compete now

If JP decides he wants to compete now, he is not going to trade away the team’s best pitcher, from the team’s strength, pitching. Any gains from getting Holliday on the offensive side is not enough to offset the lost of replacing Halladay with whoever the rockies throw in/Litsch/Cecil/etc… Getting Holliday won’t help us win now.

Scenario #2: Rebuild

If we want to rebuild and start over anew, why would we want Holliday? Someone that is going to help us now. I’d be looking to center the deal around someone like the Dodger’s Clayton Kershaw or the Cardinals’ Colby Rasmus, not Holliday.

Logistically improbable

When Vernon Wells is healthy, our outfield is Lind/Wells/Rios. Both Wells and Rios are signed to long-term deals, and I would argue that Wells’ contract is unmovable, probably one of the worst contracts in baseball right now. Lind has been hitting well since his recall, but let’s say he is expendable, and can be traded for other assets. If we are going to trade for Holliday, we would also want to sign him to a long-term deal. Let’s hope JP Ricciardi or whoever his successor might be is not dumb enough to lock up 3 outfielders to long term deals. That is just an unefficient allocation of resource, especially with Lind being a potential above-average offensive left fielder. Furthermore, the Jays’ top prospect, Travis Snider, is holding his own in AA right now and should make it to the big club sometime next season and hopefully be up for good in 2010. That’s a log jam in the OF if I have ever seen one between Wells/Rios/Lind/Snider/Holliday. We don’t need 5 quality outfielders, and good luck trading any of these assets for an Ace.

And to answer your question, yes bats do come bigger than Holliday (I really like Holliday, but not that much). I am not even going to bother to name names. But there is also a Coors factor (although I think it is overrated) that we have yet to explore, Holliday has a 1129OPS at Coors while a significantly lower but still excellent 859 OPS on the road. Holliday is still very much an unknown (relatively speaking) quantity away from Coors. Again, I don’t think he’ll stop hitting moving away from Coors, but he probably is not a perennial MVP candidate.

I am sorry, but Slugging OF is not nearly as valuable as a top of the rotation pitcher. If the Rockie’s want Halladay, I think the package will be centered around Tulowitzki, not Holliday. Tulowitzki makes much more sense for the Jays than Holliday.

I really do think you are overrating your own prospects. C.C. Sabathia brought back a package centered around Matt LaPorta, who started the year as the #23 prospect in baseball according to BA, and his stock has drastically increased since the beginning of the year due to his incredible performance in AA. Yes, Fowler is having an incredible year at AA, but overall the industry would agree with me that LaPorta is still much more of a sure thing than Fowler. Halladay, much like Sabathia, is one of the few true Aces in the majors. If you don’t have a player like Kershaw or LaPorta in your system, it is not outrageous to ask for your top 2 or 3 prospects for such a player. If you are not willing to give up your top prospect, you basically have to empty your farm to get him, like what Arizona did in the Haren deal. You gotta give up quality to get quality, to say send them Holliday, Barmes, Torrealba, and whoever they want besides Fowler and Chacin to get Halladay is just not a realistic idea. I don’t think J.P. Ricciardi is a good G.M., but he is not that much of an idiot. Besides, the Jays have 4 Catching prospects in AAA and AA (given, half of them are useless), why would we want Torrealba?

I think our basic response is not Holliday and Tulowitzki for Halladay, is we have no use for Holliday at all. It doesn’t make sense given the current make up of our team. Taking the biggest thing away from our team and improving our biggest weakness will merely make us mediocre both offensively and defensively. Which does us any good because…?

by slitheringslider on Jul 25, 2008 1:58 PM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

well, since you came here

yes, fans including myself overate their own prospects cause we are familiar with them, and discount others because they are not familiar with prospects on other teams. The Rockies have tons of prospects. But there are a few that don’t work to trade. Fowler being the only untouchable in our system (as he’s going to start in 09 for us). Tulo is a major leaguer not a prospect. You want a Kershaw type? we have 3 that are in that category (saw Kershaw pitch Tuesday…not that great in fact). You want starters? we have starters? You need prospects to fill out your organization that could have an impact in a few years? we have those too.

You want multiple young superstars that will start today?....you are flat dreaming. The Indians and the A’s didn’t get that. Hell, no one has that to give. In fact what the Dbacks gave to the A’s we could have matched..which is something the Rockies fans aren’t too happy about.

The problem as I see it with the Jays, is they have no idea, what they are. Are they a big market, big money team? or a mid size, make the most of their money team. If the answer is A) They should not trade Halladay unless the get a star in return (Like a Holliday), they should sign Texiera in the off season, plus a DH type and a number 4/5 pitcher type and make a run. If the answer is B) than they should trade Halladay for the most that they can get. If it’s B, Matt Hollliday maybe isn’t a fit as he will be a FA and rebuilding using the B scenario…takes a really long time. We know. But we can give you a whole new AA team we have so many prospects to help out if it’s B and the Rockies would be better trade partners than many others.

My thought was the Jays were A. What they don’t have enough of is hitting. Sorry. They just don’t have anyone in the line up that scares anyone. Holliday is that guy. What I see from you are saying the Jays have no idea what they are but what they have is Roy Halladay, and if they trade Roy Halladay, they won’t have even that. Look I realize that idea isn’t fun. But he’s the Jays biggest asset, which means he brings the biggest return. If Halladay isn’t traded will the Jays make the playoffs in the next 2 years? And if the answer is no…than the Jays should trade him.

To his home town where he has his off season home…..

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 25, 2008 2:44 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It doesn’t matter if the Jays “don’t know who they are” in terms of market size. Both small market teams and large market teams wouldn’t over-stock themselves with outfielders.

Also, I know we all love Halladay because he’s from Colorado, but that doesn’t make the Blue Jays want to trade him more.

by onholliday on Jul 25, 2008 2:48 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am not here to pick a fight

but saying that the rockies have 3 Kershaw type is ridiculous. If you do, you wouldn’t need Halladay. The only pitching prospect better than Kershaw in all of baseball is David Price. You don’t have 3 Kershaws, I am sorry to break that news to you.

Also, obviously the Jays are not going to ask for multiple young superstars in return. Top prospects don’t count as young superstars. The As and Indians didn’t get back young superstars. The Indians got back one of the best hitting prospects in baseball, in LaPorta, and the A’s got (off the top of my head) 4 of Arizona’s top 10 prospects, plus a couple fill ins like Dana Eveland.

I agree with you, the Jays brass have no idea what they want to be. They are confused, that’s why our team sucks. But stockpiling expensive OF is NOT going to take us to the promise land. I ask the question, if Halladay isn’t traded will the Jays make the playoffs in the next 2 years? I say probably no. But would our chances increase if we get Holliday? I would say our chance would actually decrease.

by slitheringslider on Jul 25, 2008 3:47 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I've seen Kershaw

and he’s no great shakes. Our 1st round draft pick this year is already rated in the top 30 of all of minor league prospects. (which I personally find ridiculous) . Greg Reynolds was a #1 pick in 06. Already in AAA. Looks like a right handed Kershaw to me (pitches too much to contact, no out pitch, but good overall stuff). Also Franklyn Morales was one of the top SP prospects in baseball at the begining of the the year and was a lefty that threw 97 mph. J. Chacin is in high A ball and was rated in the top 20 of all prospects. So there is 4. Like I said this organization is loaded with prospects (though of course you don’t know them, and thus dismiss them)

What they are all NOT…is a front line starter TODAY. Will they be in 5 years? maybe, but who knows, that’s the problem with a potential (a fancy word meaning you ain’t done it yet). But the Rockies are built to win right now…if we had that front line starter.

Side comment: Kershaw is a medium throwing lefty with no out pitch. His change up right now is easy to lay off and he currently can’t consistently locate his slider. Which can be fixed and could make him a good pitcher, but he’s not there yet. In fact, from what I’ve seen, I’d take my chances that Morales would figure out his mechanics issues before Kershaw figures out his slider and his change.

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 25, 2008 8:09 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Kershaw

Could you site some sources?

I don’t know what scouting reports you are reading but your description of Kershaw differ’s drastically than any I’ve read. Kershaw is a hard throwing lefty who throws in the high 90s with a hammer-curve that grades out as a 70 pitch (i.e. one of the best in the business) on the 20-80 scale. His curveball has gotten a lot of press and have drawn oohs and aahs over the baseball blogsphere. He doesn’t throw a slider as far as I know. His change-up is average at best. I don’t think anyone will argue that his Curveball is a true out pitch.

Greg Reynolds is not a right handed version of Kershaw. Kershaw has plus-plus stuff while Reynolds have above average stuff. Reynolds was considered the most polished pitcher in his draft but lack upside to be the ace of a rotation. I can pull up top prospect lists from any of the top minor league websites and I assure you Christian Friedrich and Chacin is not anywhere close to that mark. Check out scoutingbook.com, they have a good compilation of the prospect rankings from all the major sources. Reynolds got a B- from John Sickels in his prospect rankings, and his stock is largely unchanged from last year. Chacin’s stock has definitely gone up, but nowhere near the A range. Morales was rated an A- last year, but has largely fallen apart. Kershaw was one of the few A prospected graded out by Sickels.

Saying any of those prospects grade out better than Kershaw is outrageous.

by slitheringslider on Jul 25, 2008 8:56 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My source

me. I watched Kershaw pitch Tuesday in Denver against the Rockies. His curve is more a slurve. I called it a slider due to it’s angle. He couldn’t locate it Tuesday. Now a pitcher having deficulty throwing breaking stuff in Denver isn’t new or unique to Kershaw. I was very unimpressed. I was thinking “This guy is a can’t miss future ace?” He couldn’t locate his slurve, his change sucked, which left his fastball. He was in the low 90 range 91-94 which was more than respectable, but the Rockies hitters just sat and waited on it.

His line from Tuesday:
IP H R ER BB K HR Season ERA
C. Kershaw (L, 0-3) 3.0 10 5 5 3 2 1 5.18

Which brings me up to one of my biggest soap boxes: Future prognostication on prospects is at best an inexact science. What’s the difference from Reynolds not having an out pitch, and Kershaw not having a change? How can anyone say, one will develop what he needs and the other won’t? I’ve seen them both pitch. They are both nice AAA pitchers that need work, and with the right work could/should help a major league team and be solid rotation guys. But an ace? ....I like Morales for that…..before he became a mechanical mess. In fact if I was another team, and if I thought I had good minor league pitching coaches/instructors (which I’m not sure the Rockies currently have), I’d buy low on Morales over Kershaw.

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 26, 2008 9:25 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh, and where I got my rankings

Baseballhub.com

They have Kershaw 19. Chacin 20 and Fredrick 44. I have no idea if this is a respected ranking or not, but their belly button is as good as another’s.

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Jul 26, 2008 9:32 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Colorado Rockies, established 28 April 2005.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Rockies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

P1_iannetta_small
At Bat/Entrance Music: 2009 Edition
Apt_visit_2_small
Some July Wallpaper Coming Soon!
Sleepy_jeff_small
Purple Row Fantasy League End of June Standings
Small
Manny being...cheap
Sleepy_jeff_small
Purple Row Prediction Competition Week 12
October_075-1_small
Making My First Trip to OAK and LA to Watch Rockies, Any Pointers?
Rockies_lost_americana_small
Shop PurpleRowCares!
Gvf_small
2009 Draft Pick Signings
Helton_small
What is Morales worth??
Small
Frontier promotion code?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


GM & Manager

Gvf_small Russ

Li_l_rox_girl_small Rox Girl

Coaching Staff

Liquid_small Silverblood

P1_iannetta_small RockiesMagicNumber

Coorsfield3_small theoldgrizzlybear

67880020--bled-slovenia_small Poseidon's Fist

Sleepy_jeff_small Jabberwocky

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports