Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Terry Collins, David Wright, And The Mets/Brewers Kerfuffle

Friday Morning Rockpile: Standing at 16

So much of Dan O'Dowd's moves in the last five or so seasons as the Rockies General Manager have been calculated to avoid the same sort of riskiness he took in moves made early in his tenure. By not making a move before yesterday's trading deadline, the Rockies didn't get out of risk, and in several cases they have made some very big wagers with a middling team that in effect are saying the dealer's going to go bust.

Let's look closely at the players not moved and see where the risks involved have been pushed to:

1. Keeping Brian Fuentes

By not dealing the team's closer before his walk year, when the Rockies know almost for certain that they will not be able to afford to resign him this winter,  O'Dowd placed a bet that a)Fuentes won't accept arbitration and b) his scouting department will be able to find better players with the two extra high draft picks than he would have been able to get in a trade for Brian.

That Fuentes won't accept arbitration is almost a no-brainer given the demand for his services. The only hang-up is his desire to close, and if no team wants him as a closer, he could decide to take the Rockies before the arbiters. I just don't see that happening, and the Rockies could help guarantee that it doesn't by shifting the closer reigns back to Manny Corpas by the end of the season. At any rate, the risk here is very minimal. The risk with the draft picks, on the other hand, isn't something to take lightly as the Rockies have had limited success with picks in the range we'd expect compensation picks to come from. I'm just going to list the picks the Rockies have made between #16 overall and #75 overall in O'Dowd's reign and you'll see what I mean:

2000: Jason Young

2001: Jayson Nix, Trey Taylor

2002: Micah Owings

2003: Scott Beerer

2004: Seth Smith

2005: Chaz Roe, Daniel Carte, Zach Simons

2006: David Christensen

2007: Brian Rike

2008: Christian Friedrich, Charlie Blackmon

While several of the latter picks still have time to prove themselves, at this point the track record isn't pretty. Out of thirteen picks there's a total of one starting quality MLB player, and he didn't sign with the Rockies but went to Georgia Tech and got drafted by the D-backs. Seth Smith is a solid MLB fourth outfielder. Chaz Roe may turn out to be a decent bottom of the rotation pitcher. Other than that, there are a lot more questions than answers on this list.

Consider it this way, of the players that signed with the Rockies, there are none that we'd be willing to trade Fuentes straight up for, and picking the best tradeable pair (Smith and Roe) would be a somewhat disappointing deal.from our perspective as fans. So O'Dowd and Bill Schmidt and company will have to work against their own history if they want this risk to pay off.

I do have somewhat of a problem with the idea that the accountability for this non-move can be delayed for several seasons as we wait to see whether these picks pan out. So to satisfy those who want to make quicker judgments, the fact is that O'Dowd also placed a large wager on how Fuentes can help the team for the remainder of the season get back onto contention. So there's another aspect to factor into the effectiveness of O'Dowd's non-move; simply, do the Rockies come back in August and September and does Fuentes help them do that?

I was going to go over other non-moves, but obviously this post has gone a little long already, so I'll probably have to continue this discussion tomorrow.  A couple things though, just as it would be the case if O'Dowd had made trades, we can't judge the non-moves immediately and say the team failed. There will be real benchmarks that we'll be able to look at to know, and some will come sooner than others. Knee-jerk reactions at this point should be avoided until some actual evidence to support or go against O'Dowd's decision actually comes in.

Comment 80 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

WEISER PROMOTED TO......

Tulsa….I know this belongs in pebble report but it’s not up yet.

by 91 wins in 08 on Aug 1, 2008 11:38 AM MDT reply actions  

Trust him.

"Keep your head down, and inch toward daylight." - Blade of Tyshalle

Purple Row - Covering all your Rockies needs!

by Russ Oates on Aug 1, 2008 1:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

Good News, if true

I can’t find the report anywhere, but would make sense in taking Francis’s turn in Tulsa rotation.

Heck, maybe he should take JDLR’s spot for the Rox. At least we know he’ll throw strikes.

by RockyMtnRedbird on Aug 1, 2008 12:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

Xavier Cedeno on 7-Day DL

Anyone know why this is? I can’t find any news on it. July 20th was his last start/appearance. It seems Francis took his turn in the rotation, and now would have to guess Weiser will step into the spot.

Phantom disability for sake of others?

by RockyMtnRedbird on Aug 1, 2008 1:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

And would Billings take his place at Modesto?

His no-hitter a couple weeks ago didn’t make much news on this site. But it would seem he’s been pretty successful at Asheville so far this year.

Here’s his line: 21 GS (125.1 IP), 8-8, 2CG, 3.73 ERA, 109 K/28 BB, .249 BAA

His strikeout % is down a bit this year (28.6% at Tri-City to 20.8% at Asheville), but he’s maintained a low walk rate around 5%. Plus, while I believe Rox Girl said early this spring that home runs could be a problem for him in Asheville with his propensity for FBs, he’s only given up 6 thus far and his GB % has gone up considerably to 51% (from 41% at Tri-City last year).

I say, bump him up and see how he fares in Modesto.

by RockyMtnRedbird on Aug 1, 2008 2:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

Other Candidates

Billings throwing a no-hitter is exciting, but there are better candidates to call up from Asheville. How about Cory Riordan or Connor Graham?

Riordan’s line: 21 GS (134.2 IP), 7-7, 2CG (1 SO), 3.48 ERA, 124K/21BB

Graham’s line: 21 GS (116.2 IP), 9-4, 2 SO, 2.16 ERA, 106K/64 BB

These guys are both dominating – I’d probably prefer promoting Graham over Riordan, but you can’t lose in either case.

In fact, looking at Asheville’s starting rotation at the beginning of the year just makes you drool – Chacin, Riordan, Billings, Graham, and Sheng-An Kuo. For a team with little offense, they’ve managed to pitch the team to a first-half division title and a 22-17 second-half record. Wow.

by onholliday on Aug 1, 2008 2:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

Graham

would be my pick too. Billings looks more like a Hynick-type prospect, where the lack of dominant stuff will eventually catch up to him. Graham has the stuff to adjust to higher levels of competition and with a quality fastball with good sinking action, he’s also well-suited to pitching at Coors.

by mattrob on Aug 1, 2008 3:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

What is Billings "stuff"?

I haven’t been able to find any info on how hard he throws or what pitches he throws. This article from MiLB on his no-hitter refers to him as “hard-throwing”, but some other things I’ve read have him topping out on his fastball at around 90.

by RockyMtnRedbird on Aug 1, 2008 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

the latter is closer to the truth

He doesn’t really get far over 90 mph and usually works in the 87-89 mph range.

by Rox Girl on Aug 1, 2008 4:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

93?

And that’s pretty much my understanding as well, even though I did see a report of him throwing 93 in the 9th inning of the no-hitter. Also, he relies pretty heavily on the fastball, as the Rockies brass stated he threw about 100 fastballs and only 10-15 breaking balls in that game.

by mattrob on Aug 1, 2008 4:22 PM MDT up reply actions  

It will be a tough call, for sure

I’d be surprised if Graham gets the call. He was just bad his last outing (Wednesday): 3.2 IP, 4 R, only 3 hits, but 7 walks.

Riordan could definitely be a candidate. In his last start (July 26th) he went 4.1 IP, 3 R (2 ER), 8 H, 2 K, 1 BB. But his two prior, were both complete games. He’s getting hit against a little better, but a lot of that could just be bad luck being his BABIP is .342.

I think I mainly guessed Billings over Graham b/c his spot in the rotation matched up better. Quite frankly, I’d be happy to get all three into Modesto for a few starts before the season’s over.

I want to see some more guys that pound the strike zone march closer up the ranks.

by RockyMtnRedbird on Aug 1, 2008 3:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

Also, for what it's worth...

while Billings is only slightly older, he was drafted as a senior, where both Graham and Riordan were drafted as juniors. So theoretically, he’s got an extra year against hitters under his belt.

by RockyMtnRedbird on Aug 1, 2008 4:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

+1

Yeah, I can’t believe their K/BB ratios, especially Riordan. 124 Ks to 21 BB? That is nasty.

by onholliday on Aug 1, 2008 5:20 PM MDT up reply actions  

There might...

Be other Candidates out there but none of them are Aztecs.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 7:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

(Non)trades

Obviously other than trading or not trading Fuentes, the other things that fans wanted was a trade for a starting pitcher. What I find interesting is that of the starters said to be on the trading block, none were traded at all. That says to me that teams were asking for more than anyone was willing to offer. So without more info on what went on behind the scenes, I’m not sure we can blame O’Dowd for not picking up someone. I’m guessing that some of these pitchers will still be available through the waiver process, so hopefully we can still pick up someone.

by holly96 on Aug 1, 2008 11:41 AM MDT reply actions  

And, wasn't it curious...

that there wern’t any mid-range trades being made. It was either big money-big names or nothing.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 11:43 AM MDT up reply actions  

And

I just read this piece. I’m the first to admit that I don’t know too much about the starters mentioned, but if I were O’Dowd, I don’t think I would have made those trades, either. And he also points out that no starters were dealt, so we were clearly not alone in refusing to give up as much as teams were asking for.

I do hope they are able to get someone halfway decent off waivers.

by holly96 on Aug 1, 2008 12:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

ETA

Just so it’s here:

Frustration was evident in O’Dowd’s voice as he couldn’t match the parts to acquire a fifth starter. The Nationals wanted Ian Stewart as the centerpiece for Tim Redding; the Mariners sought a top prospect — see Dexter Fowler — and wouldn’t cover any of Jarrod Washburn’s $10 million salary next season; and Cleveland’s Paul Byrd had Colorado on his limited no-trade list.

by holly96 on Aug 1, 2008 12:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah, thank God we did not accept any of those.

by onholliday on Aug 1, 2008 12:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

Paul Byrd has a no-trade clause?

And he put Colorado on it? Good, enjoy poop town, it works for you Paul.

by Ghoulowitzki on Aug 1, 2008 12:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

Thing is, though...

To evaluate O’Dowd’s non-trade of Fuentes, we’d have to know what he refused to take for him. If we could trawl through all of the actual and potential offers and say “Holy crap, O’Dowd shouldda grabbed that deal!” then, yes, Dan blundered.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 11:41 AM MDT reply actions  

This comment

is something I am in total agreement on. Everyone is blaming O’Dowd for doing nothing, and those same people would be irate if we gave Fuentes for some low level prospect. Until we know what was offered for Fuentes we have no idea if it was worth it or not. I think asking for a prospect ready to step into the rotation was a fair asking price and we had no takers, so you move on. If Washington wanted Stewart for Redding and probably others, do you really think we could have had someone better or equal to Redding for Fuentes, doubtful.

Please let us know if you are aware of a trade we missed out on, some players we could have had for Fuentes and then we can re-evaluate.

by smokinRox on Aug 1, 2008 12:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

Fortune favors the bold

I know a lot of guys that stand on 16 in Vegas. They always enjoy playing for a few hours, a few free drinks, and inevitably walk away from the table without any chips.

by Teekalong on Aug 1, 2008 11:44 AM MDT reply actions  

But the odds don't...

‘Course, getting off a plane at all in Vegas means you’re wearing a “Take My Money, I Don’t Mind” T-shirt, in the first place.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 11:53 AM MDT up reply actions  

Of course that's true

but you don’t win if you don’t play. What’s the old quote, you miss 100% of the shots you don’t take?

by Teekalong on Aug 1, 2008 11:56 AM MDT up reply actions  

I agree

And if O’Dowd didn’t call anyone about anybody or take anybody’s calls about anybody then, yep, let’s light some torches and chase his a** out of town.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 12:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

Posted too early

But to really know what he didn’t do and why, we’d have to know what he passed up or, what he tried to offer for whom.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 12:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

if the odds are bad, you shouldn’t play.

by onholliday on Aug 1, 2008 12:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

Not really actually

though my wife thinks I’d be generally a much happier person if I wasn’t a Rockies fan. Though her recommendation that I become a Dodger fan seems like an even worse strategy.

Do I really come across as angry in a thread that seems to be filled with nothing but blackjack/sports cliches? Sheesh.

by Teekalong on Aug 1, 2008 2:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

When we win...

...it’ll be that much sweeter, given how we suffer.

by onholliday on Aug 1, 2008 2:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

I play hold on 16 against a 7 or above

And honestly, I end up winning more than my buds that won’t stay below 17. Too many hight cards in a deck, the odds of busting is greater. And it amazes me how often a dealer flips the higher of two cards and ends up busting.

I know this wasn’t your point, but I don’t think it is a bad strategy. I know, I know. Take it to a blackjack forum

by Rox R Champs on Aug 1, 2008 3:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

Interesting...

all of my friends are actually in Vegas right now, no doubt trying out all these theories, while I’m here at the office. So this whole thing is getting me down more than the prospect of the next De Los Santos start.

by Teekalong on Aug 1, 2008 3:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

So what do people think

of the rumored Snell for Morales, E Rodgers, and C Nelson trade that Renck talked about in his game piece today? I like Snell but I’m not sure we are the best team to fix broken pitchers…

Second half run?

by moomacher on Aug 1, 2008 11:55 AM MDT reply actions  

+1 on the "broken pitchers" comment

The Rockies organization doesn’t have a real good track records with these types of pitchers. They prefer to do the breaking themselves.

by RockyMtnRedbird on Aug 1, 2008 12:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

I like Snell as much as the next guy

But that’s a ridiculous offer. That’s selling incredibly low on both Morales and Nelson for someone that we’d be hoping to fix at the best. It’s probably better keeping Morales, hiring a couple of new instructors and hoping for the best then getting rid of Morales and Nelson that cheap. I mean, seriously, did we forget what Frankie brought to the team last year that quickly???

You know you want to check out Matt's Korea blog: http://koreamatt.wordpress.com

by MattTheRock on Aug 1, 2008 12:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

Right,

I might build something around Nelson and Rogers but I still think is a long-term winner. I’m not ready to part with him in favor of Snell.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 12:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

Morales is capable

of putting up the same numbers as Snell at the Big League Level right now, so why would we do that and throw in our possible future 2B as well. Morales is younger, controllable for longer, and has better upside (along w/ being LH). I would be upset w/ this trade. I know Nelson has been injury prone and not shown anything yet, but I think even giving up Morales straight up would not be worth it. But I guess its obvious I have been a fan of Morales, more so than most here.

by smokinRox on Aug 1, 2008 12:23 PM MDT up reply actions  

Worried.....

what the message is to Atkins and Holliday with the lack of a move to bolster the rotation. The front office is treading on razor thin ice with both of these guys, and I still think management has yet to prove to anyone that they will put a winning MLB team together. They have this winter to sign both of these guys, or this team will be blown apart by this time next season. The truth hurts. In addition, my problem with O’Dowd is timing. We could have used a reliable starter at the back end of the rotation in friggin April or May when the prices were much different. Once again, O’Dowd’s timing is brutal. They had better give Matty their best offer soon, or they’ll get more sandwich picks for him as well.

by LW33 on Aug 1, 2008 12:30 PM MDT reply actions  

More of the same.

The front office is telling us now the same thing they told us this winter. It’s something along the lines of “there were some possibilities, but we didn’t pull the trigger because we felt we would give up too much and/or overpay.” What if overpaying is the only way to get better? One can argue the Brewers overpaid for CC Sabathia, but it still made the team better. The Rockies are 8 games out of first and 12 games under .500. Perhaps the front office should be less concerned about overpaying and more concerned about having a lousy baseball team take the field every night.

Aut Vincam Aut Periam

by PioneerSkies on Aug 1, 2008 12:43 PM MDT reply actions  

Sabathia

Seeing how Milwaukee was dismantled at home by Houston and Chicago last week, I’m not sure they’re as happy with that trade now. One thing is for certain, they’re getting their money’s worth out of CC. He’s throwing a TON of pitches right now.

by mattrob on Aug 1, 2008 1:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

And

Sabathia’s a free agent this winter. If we were in a better position to contend, that deal might have made sense for us too. If you’re sayying we should bid on Sabathia this off season, I might agree.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 1:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

I

agree that they are too much in love with their prospects. Florida has the right idea. You have to give to get. Becket for Sanchez and H. Ramirez. I don’t know if O’Dowd is capable of making those kind of moves. But you have to go for the Harens and Hardens to make a difference and quit bottom feeding. You can’t build a consistently decent team without occasionally picking up pieces through decent trades.

by DieHardRox on Aug 1, 2008 12:56 PM MDT reply actions  

Huh?

In your example, Florida traded away a starter for two prospects – and it paid off. We can trade Cook or Atkins for prospects if that’s what you want. I’m not saying you’re wrong about trading prospects to get value or bidding higher on free agents.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 1:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

For example

Washington wanted Stewart for Redding. We didn’t want to trade Stewart. But if we think he is the 3B of the future, then shouldn’t we be looking to move Atkins when his value is high?

Second half run?

by moomacher on Aug 1, 2008 1:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

Depends

Do we consider Atkins the 1B of the future? If so, we need to keep both him and Stewart. If not, then we certainly need to try to move him this offseason. The biggest fear of the FO though, imo, is that Holliday will be upset if Atkins is moved and they will have to start from scratch.

by mattrob on Aug 1, 2008 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

Where does Helton go in that situation?

I doubt we are going to pay him $15 MM a year to sit on the bench. Also the players have no right to bitch about trades when they are 12 games under .500.

Second half run?

by moomacher on Aug 1, 2008 1:20 PM MDT up reply actions  

We are going to be paying him regardless

so, if he isn’t the best player…he sits.

Well, at least I think so, but that’s not the way pro sports works

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Aug 1, 2008 1:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

Helton

Helton’s such an unknown at this point. If that back is as big an issue as I think it is, he isn’t going to be spending a lot of time on the field anyway. And I really don’t see Todd as the kind that will hang around the IR or bench. He’s made his money, he’ll retire and spend his summers fishing.

by mattrob on Aug 1, 2008 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

And you're still...

Selling your startes for still more prospects. If we’re going to win, we’ll have to lock down our stars, like Atkins and Holliday – even if it costs us.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 1:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

I agree

but I don’t see it happening.

by DieHardRox on Aug 1, 2008 1:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

In that case...

I’m ready to rip the FO a new one.

But I’m fine with O’Dowd not making a move that wasn’t there.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 1:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

Remember

when it comes to “Locking Down” stars, the players get a choice too. I’ve seen a lot lately, that the reason Atkins and Hollliday haven’t signed long term is cause the Rockies just haven’t offered. Like the Rockies can MAKE them re-sign long term contracts

Atkins publicly chastised Frances for taking a below market deal . Matt Holliday’s agent is Scott Boras. Neither is going to re-sign before becoming Free Agents and getting the best offer they can get.

We control Holliday through 2009. We control Atkins through 2010. Then they are gone. If the Rockies are the highest bidder, we might get them back…...like the Rockies can out bid the Yankees or the Red Sox.

Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.

by Redhawk on Aug 1, 2008 1:55 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sure...

By locking down I meant paying them the going rate. And if they still go somewhere else, well, that happens to the best of ‘em.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 2:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure

Trading Beckett was moving salary for a couple of top prospects, I don’t think I’d consider that a bold move on the Marlins part. I do agree that the FO waited too long this year, as prices escalated toward the deadline. The Haren and Harden trades are looking better all the time.

by mattrob on Aug 1, 2008 1:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

Unless...

Manny bashes the Dodgers past ‘Zona and the snakes sit home in October – just like us. Harden on the other hand, if he stays healthy, could propel the Cubs.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

Haren trade

Haren wasn’t just a rental, thus the reason that they had to give up so much to get him.

Rumor is that good progress has been made on his signing an extension in Arizona.

by MADness on Aug 1, 2008 5:23 PM MDT up reply actions  

I know

I was just thinking ‘08 impact.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 7:54 PM MDT up reply actions  

Future of the Rockies - How it should be...Long

As I sit here in my frustration about not having added a starting
pitcher since April, I look to next season and what the Rockies can
and should do to ensure they continue to improve at the Big League
level. First of all, I think Holliday is a goner and I think the
real value is in signing Garrett Atkins to a long term deal. I
would move Holliday for three pitching prospects, two elite looking
AA starters and a high quality bullpen guy. I would ink Atkins to a
six year deal worth 75 million. I would trade Todd Helton to anyone
who would take him, and be willing to eat 8-10 million per season
over the remainder of the contract (but I would hope he thinks long
and hard about hanging it up). I would also move Willy T., and
Torrealba this offseason and I would look to sign a veteran starter
for the back end of the rotation, or keep whomever we get at the
waiver wire this season.

The new lineup would look something like this…

1) Spilly / Seth Smith
2) Tulo
3) Atkins
4) Hawpe
5) Iannetta / Baker
6) Stewart
7) Ianetta / Baker
8) Dexter Fowler

Out of the box, this would almost certainly be the best defensive
team in baseball. The lineup would take a hit w/o the big man in
the middle, but the defensive makeup of this unit is absolutely
stellar.

The starting rotation would look something like this…

1) Cook
2) Jimenez
3) Francis
4) Veteran picked up in offseason or off waiver wire this season
5) Morales / Hirsh

Starting pitching looks similar but looks can be deceiving at the
Major League level. With the trade of Holliday, the Rockies have
loaded up their system and now have five potential arms to call on
when health issues arise in whomever they acquire, Jhoulys Chacin,
Greg Reynolds, Morales or Hirsh. This is a huge upgrade over what
we have had for the past five seasons or so. A bigger issue next
season will be the bullpen. It shakes out like this…

1) Corpas (Closer)
2) Bucholz (Setup)
3) Weathers (7th)
4) Vizcaino (Yuck)
5) Grilli
6) De La Rosa (Lefty specialist)
7) Mattheus?
8) Morillo?

De La Rosa has a future in the bullpen, but the Rockies will need to
add another left hander out there to be successful. Herges needs to
go as does Wells, and they’ll likely need to add another arm via
free agency.

All in all, this team is quite similar to the one we currently trot
out there, but this lineup is young once again, and with Helton
coming off the books, management should have the financial latitude
to essentially keep the core together for quite some time. Adding
two AA arms makes up for past mistakes in the pitching category and
gives the organization more time to find the next up and coming
hurlers in the system.

As much as I hate to say it, the most prudent thing for the Rockies
to do long term is to deal Matt Holliday and get solid pitching in
return. When you think about it, Ian Stewart is light years ahead
of where Holliday was at 23 years of age. If he continues to
improve at a rapid pace, we might not miss his bat as much as we
currently think.

by LW33 on Aug 1, 2008 2:28 PM MDT reply actions  

I imagine nobody will...

trade for Helton, now.

Fowler is probably not ready for the bigs, yet. I’d at least want to start him in the Springs and see where he is.

What about Greg Reynolds?

Who know what we could get for Holliday but if the Fuentes market was any indication, pithing prospects will be hard to pry loose. And what if Holliday leaving makes Atkins follow?

...just for the sake of discussion.

by Since1993 on Aug 1, 2008 3:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

Good thoughts

And I agree with 90% of it. The only changes I’d make are to hold Fowler back, at least at the beginning of next season, try to add a corner OF’er in the Holliday trade (I love adding arms, but we already have a number of pitchers closing in on the majors), and maybe try to make a trade for a veteran arm. The price for a veteran #4 should go down in the off-season.

by mattrob on Aug 1, 2008 4:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

Twins

waived Livan.

by DieHardRox on Aug 1, 2008 3:31 PM MDT reply actions  

He can't be any worse...

...than Rusch, Wells, de lost Santos, JLDR, etc.

He also can’t have that much left $$$-wise on his contract. Unless the team thinks Hirsh or Morales will actually be able to contribute positively this season, there’s no reason not to pick up Livan. Rusch and de los Santos have both got to exit the rotation, and Francis can only replace one of them.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Aug 1, 2008 4:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

Seems I heard somewhere.....

that O’Dowd regretted not signing Livan last offseason. Now’s his chance.

by GoRoxGo on Aug 1, 2008 4:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

He

does eat innings for sure.

by DieHardRox on Aug 1, 2008 4:24 PM MDT reply actions  

He eats more than inninges

Dude’s large. Not Charlie Kerfeld large, but…you get the picture.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Aug 1, 2008 4:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

Future of the Rockies 2

On the fundamental building blocks, I agree with LW33. I’m not necessarily hung up about getting younger, but we need to start moving lots of the parts more aggressively.
Much as I hate to admit it, Holliday should be traded unless the Monforts are really prepared to resign him. Compensation picks for him two years from now mean nothing.

As for starting pitching (assuming a Holliday trade doesn’t happen), we should all calm down and simply wait for next year when, hopefully, a healthy Hirsch and Reynolds can help. Trading for a 4th or 5th starter is too often a crapshoot and an invitation to give up prospects unwisely. Nevertheless, we need to start trading some of our promising guys. My own perspective is sort of limited to those who I’ve seen in Asheville, but here goes:
1) Either start Stewart or trade him. His year at Asheville was the best of any of our position players that I’ve seen, yet he seems unable to crack the Rox lineup. Make a decision here. I don’t think the FO can afford to hesitate with him for another year without severely impacting his trade value. I don’t know whether Atkins or Stewart is the answer, but decide NOW.
2) Promote Fowler. Forget the Olympics. It’s time to take a look. I wouldn’t expect too much, but any perspective the FO could get by watching him now would help in rearranging the puzzle for next year. Certainly his Tulsa numbers look impressive.
3) Put Barmes at 2nd or trade him. Unless Tulo gets hurt, he’s our shortstop, period. I honestly think Barmes could bring us some value if coupled with some others in a trade.
4) Do something similar to #3 above with Chris Nelson. I must admit to eating some crow here. During blogs last year, I loudly defended him over Hector Gomez. Though I still believe in his defensive capabilites, it looks like last year was an aberation at the plate. I hesitate waiting too much longer with him, assuming he has trade value.
5) Insert Iannetta behind the plate permanently.
6) Overhaul the bullpen. This is the one area any team has the most control over, and the Rox should admit that their “rent a heap” approach so aptly coined by others isn’t working. Gone should be Vizcaino (what a mistake!), Herges, Wells, and DLR. I know that’s a lot, but it needs to be done. We’ve got some talent at AAA and AA—promote them. All these older relievers we keep stockpiling are clogging up the system and doing us no good. Time to purge. This is one area where we need to copy Billy Beane’s playbook. Give Register, Mattheus, Weathers a chance this year.
7) Have more patience with some of the young starting pitchers. I refer specifically to Hynick and Chacin here. Though I haven’t seen Hynick pitch in person, his numbers last year were simply too good to throw him under the bus the way some at the Row have done. He’s obviously having to make some adjustments at Tulsa. No big deal. He’s young and developing. As for Chacin, a word of caution. I blogged earlier this year that he was the best pitcher we’ve had at Asheville in some time. He’s very talented. But no sooner than he gets promoted to Modesto do I read his name in same sentence with that of Cy Young!! Speculation that he’ll be in the Rox starting rotation in late ‘09. This should not/will not happen. Remember, fooling low A (now some high A) hitters with a good change is one thing, doing it on the big stage is another. Again, he is good, but we should give him time to make some mistakes in the minors. He is not overpowering. The report that said he sits in the low 90’s is simply not true. He is a high 80’s, occasional low 90’s guy who is very good at keeping young hitters offstride. It is not unusual for finesse guys to experience such success at the lower levels and then have problems up the chain. Fortunately, he’s very young and should expect to pick up more velocity over the next couple of years. Promoting him too quickly would be a disservice.
7) Fuentes/Corpas. I’m not uphappy in keeping Fuentes, as I never thought the market for him was as strong as some others did. Given Corpas’ early season stumbles, it’s too soon to give the closer role back to him. I say let the two of them do their thing this year, then see if Fuentes leaves, and make a closer decision for next year.
8) Because I’ve written off this year, most of my bullet points are with an eye to the future. We should trade a couple of key vets, promote some of our prospects now, and trade some others sooner rather than later. We’re a middle market team. Treading water by not replenishing the system is starting to kill us. Used equipment from other clubs is just that. Either resign the stars or start clearing out the deadwood with younger talent.

by hobfan on Aug 1, 2008 5:01 PM MDT reply actions  

I ENJOYED YOUR COMMENTS EXCEPT #4....

Chris Nelson’s defense is very questionable at best at this point.

by 91 wins in 08 on Aug 1, 2008 5:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

Young starters available

During the last off-season several young impact starters were traded.

The common theme in the trades involving them was that the team acquiring them gave up established big league talent.

Jair Jurrgens – he was acquired along with Gorkys Hernandez from the Tigers when the Braves traded Edgar Renteria. The Braves had a young replacement ready and capitalized on the perceived value of the veteran offensive shortstop.

Matt Garza – he was acquired by the Rays in a six player trade with the Twins that sent Delmon Young to Minnesota.

Edinson Volquez – He and pitcher Danny Herrera were traded for Josh Hamilton.

The A’s have also consistently acquired young, close to ready pitching over the last several years.

The Rockies are unable or unwilling to make similar trades but to pretend that it is impossible to acquire a premium young starting pitcher without giving up the entire farm system is inaccurate and dishonest.

by MADness on Aug 2, 2008 1:01 PM MDT reply actions  

Trades

I never said we couldn’t have made a trade at some point in the offseason or earlier in the year. My main point in this thread was that it seems clear to me that the trades weren’t to be had at the trading deadline.

by holly96 on Aug 2, 2008 3:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

Agreed on the deadline

That doesn’t get management off the hook for the failure to add or acquire professional (not amateur signings) starting pitching of any quality.

by MADness on Aug 2, 2008 3:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don't blame O'Dowd

Hey guys I’m new here, but figured I’d add my two cents. I don’t blame O’Dowd for not dealing but I probably would have tried to deal Holliday and Fuentes. Basically, I felt Holliday should’ve be dealt now or not dealt at all. If he was dealt now, he could fetch a good haul of prospects. However, next year is looking like a strong year for the Rockies in terms of hitting meshing with pitching and Holliday really fills out the lineup so I don’t blame them for not shopping him hard. I probably would have dealt Fuentes since he’s leaving and although I’m still mildly hopeful for this season, it wouldn’t kill me to see some moves made with the future in mind.

Also, I tend to disagree with the sign Atkins to a long term deal notion. I think he’s a great player but he’s signed on the team through 2010 and if he’s signed to a long term deal I feel like they’d just be paying him some good loot for his years of decline, maybe if he’d settle for a contract to keep him until he’s around 32 I’d be on board, but I doubt Atkins himself would be.

Also, I’m not too big of a fan of Taveras. I’d really like to see him dealt and just have Spilborghs leadoff until Fowler is ready. Yea he has great speed but he just always seems to kill rally’s. Maybe holding onto him is good though because he value is probably low now, if he improves his avg to go with his # of sb’s they could probably get something nice for him. Although getting him, Buccholz and Hirsh for Jennings was one of the better trades that’s happened this decade.

Also, I don’t think Weathers is ready for the bigs, he seems to walk too many guys…

Alright, thanks for listening

by Resolution on Aug 2, 2008 9:47 PM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Colorado Rockies, established 28 April 2005.

Community Guidelines
RockiesRoster.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Kheditorshot_small
Sitting down with Tulsa Drillers first baseman Kiel Roling
Small
This is how the Rockies should look like
Img_1229_small
PRMLB May Thread
Goatee
Purple Row Pick 6
Small
xBABIP part 2
Carloscover_small
Predicting wins with basic stats
12895243481351292663_1_f2092652_small
These guys are hard to take...
Summer_09_wedding_and_frank_084_small
Have you all nicknamed Cuddyer yet?
Small
Expected BABIP and a whole lot more
Small
Another way to eat innings?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Colorado Sports Blogs

Mile High Report (Denver Broncos)
Mile High Hockey (Colorado Avalanche)
Denver Stiffs (Denver Nuggets)
Burgundy Wave (Colorado Rapids)
The Ralphie Report (CU Buffaloes)
SB Nation Denver

Top 30 PuRPs

  1. Drew Pomeranz, LHP - AAA
  2. Nolan Arenado, 3B - AA
  3. Wilin Rosario, C - MLB
  4. Chad Bettis, RHP - AA DL
  5. Tyler Matzek, A (Adv)
  6. Alex White, MLB
  7. Kyle Parker, OF - A (Adv)
  8. Tim Wheeler, OF - AAA DL
  9. Josh Rutledge, SS - AA
  10. Charlie Blackmon, OF - AAA DL
  11. Rosell Herrera, SS/3B - A
  12. Trevor Story, SS/3B - A
  13. Edwar Cabrera, LHP - AA
  14. Tyler Anderson, LHP - A
  15. Rafael Ortega, OF - A (Adv)
  16. Peter Tago, RHP, unassigned
  17. Christian Friedrich, LHP - MLB
  18. Joe Gardner, RHP - AA
  19. Corey Dickerson, OF - A (Adv)
  20. Thomas Field, 2B - AAA
  21. Will Swanner, C - A
  22. Kent Matthes, OF - AA
  23. Albert Campos, RHP - released (4/19/12)
  24. Jordan Pacheco, C/UT - MLB
  25. Cristhian Adames, SS - A (Adv)
  26. Ben Paulsen, 1B - AA
  27. Josh Slaats, RHP - A (Adv)
  28. David Kandilas, CF - A
  29. Jayson Aquino, LHP - unassigned
  30. Hector Gomez, SS - DL
HM:
Edgmer Escalona, RHP - MLB
Dillon Thomas, OF - unassigned
Sam Mende, IF - A
Mike Zuanich, 1B - AA
Dan Houston, RHP - AA

updated 10/25/2011.


Managers

Rox_girl_small Rox Girl

35l7yvb_small Andrew Martin

Staff

Jeff_aberle_small Jeff Aberle

No_bunting_small Bryan Kilpatrick

Avatar2_small Andrew T. Fisher

Wittgenstein_small Greg Stanwood

Special Assistants to the GM

Rockies_lost_americana_small holly96

2rr10yf_small RhodeIslandRoxfan

Pic2_small CBake33

Image_small Rafael Rojas Cremonesi