Sunday Rockpile: Seven Games in Seven Weeks
Three weeks remain in August and then we have four weeks of the month of September to finish this season out. If the Rockies are coming back, they'll have to be one game better per week than the Dodgers and Diamondbacks from here on in. That certainly doesn't mean that they should target just one game a week, the bulk of the ground on LA should be made up in these next three weeks when the easiest opponent the Dodgers will face would probably be our own team (they do play the Nationals, but at Washington, which is always rough). Plus, given that we've got a half dozen games against LA and nine against the Snakes yet to play indicates that we should also plan on trying to making up more ground when we go head to head, but the easy way to gauge progress on a comeback will be to look back at a week with a 5-1 record when they've gone 4-2.
This week in particular seems to loom as our last best chance to make a statement that we want in on the division chase. Looking at the remaining schedule for the three teams shows it to be one of our best opportunities to pick up multiple games on both the Dodgers and D-backs. The key scoreboard watching points, assuming the Rockies can show some legitimate signs of life (and it's not looking good on that front in these last two home series against cupcakes), will include Los Angeles' eight games against the Phillies this month, four this week while we're playing the Snakes, and four more at CBP immediately after we visit LA starting the 22nd. Let's pray that the Rox can somehow take care of business this week first, but then look to see if they can take two of three at Dodger Stadium and wear down the Dodgers bullpen in the process before sending them on a brutal West Coast to East Coast road trip while we fly back home to face Cincinnati for three.
We should also be rooting for the Cardinals to remain in play for the Wild Card and NL Central, as the Diamondbacks have seven games left to play against St. Louis in September.
The Rockies have the easiest remaining schedule of the three teams, they have fifteen head to head contests remaining against their two rivals. There's every opportunity available to them to make at least a little noise in the division, but that requires 25 guys playing like a team that's deserving and worthy of contender status. There have been maybe two points in the four plus months of this season that the Rockies have actually looked to be this caliber of a team. I'm not confident that they''ll suddenly be able to flip the switch this time around, but I'm just saying now is the time to do it if they're going to.
0 recs |
22 comments
Comments
It's over.
Over, over, over, over, over. If this team can’t even compete at home wit the likes of the Nationals and the Padres, there is no reason whatsoever to waste even a second contemplating a pennant run.
I truly hope the D-Backs go on a tear so this illusory “pennant race” comes to an end and the Rockies fans, players, coaching staff, front office and ownership are finally and clearly confronted with the sad reality of this season.
by BroJB on
Aug 10, 2008 2:32 PM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
and I'd much rather it be the D-Backs
and not the Dodgers winning the West.
It’s not going to be the Rockies. This was a terrible home stand.
Thought Clint Hurdle should be fired before it was cool.
by Redhawk on
Aug 10, 2008 2:46 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks, I suppose.
Damning us with faint praise?
Manny Ramirez and the Dodgers: Filling the dubious shoes left open by Barry Bonds and the Giants.
by DbacksSkins on
Aug 13, 2008 1:01 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well, if its any consolation
i’d rather have the rockies win it than the dodgers if it couldnt be the dbacks…
are you suggesting coconuts migrate?
by utahdbacksfan on
Aug 13, 2008 4:42 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Time for happy talk....
about making up 7 games in 7 weeks to end. This team is what it is – a major disappointment after they did the unthinkable last year. It truly is and will remain a losing franchise as long as the same people who were around when Hampton and Neagle were signed are calling the shots. They did nothing, NOTHING, to improve our team during last offseason, sat on their laurels, and wasted what little money the owners had lying around on such stalwarts as Wells, Vizcaino, and Livan. Relying on Nix as our starting 2B into the season was the tell. This braintrust obviously became deluded into thinking they had the Midas touch such that even a Jayson Nix could emerge as an impact rookie. What a joke.
Last season is a beautiful memory, but an anomoly. It didn’t change the fact that the Rockies have been a losing team every other year in the 2000’s. Or that they are a team that we have to expect to be a loser again in 2009. Long-suffering fans have more suffering ahead of us, I’m afrraid.
by GoRoxGo on
Aug 10, 2008 4:43 PM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Just re-watch
21 Days. I did it last night after Cook’s meltdown, and it instantly made me feel a lot better. Then today happened…
by Teekalong on
Aug 10, 2008 5:39 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
OK, so...
Relying on Nix who was just the MVP of the World Championships for Team USA and after coming off a big season in triple-A was an obvious bad idea? Signing Vizcaino was a joke after he ruled the Yanks bullpen was a plain-as-day waste? We even beat out a few other suitors for Wells.
I’m not saying everything worked out just fine and this season isn’t miserable. Moves by O’Dowd and Co. have backfired and misfired and sometimes failed to fire at all. But you also have to credit managment with developing Holliday, Atkins, Tulo, Stewart, and Iannetta. We’ve discussed trying to reclainm scrapheap pitchers here at length and we’re aware it’s probably three misses to a hit.
Maybe we should have thrown the farm system at Oakland for Dan Haren. Should we have beaten Houston’s offer for KazMat? I think Clint Barmes has held down 2nd just fine. Has Clint Hurdle Blundered? Sure. Who should we have replaced him with? Could we have thrown a fortune at Joe Girardi?
My point here is that I personally can’t point to huge screw-ups by O’Dowd (save for the Greg-Reynolds-instead-of-Andrew-Miller draft pick.) that merits his summary dismissal.
But I’ll put it to you: What should the Rockies have done?
by Since1993 on
Aug 10, 2008 6:50 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If I were O'Dowd......
here is what I would have done last offseason:
1) Thank Todd Helton for being an inspiration, and then ask him to waive his no-trade and FINALLY trade him and part of his remaining contract to a big-market team. No more futzing around waiting for a DelCarmen or Hansen to pull the trigger.
2) Sign Kyle Lohse or some halfway useful backend rotation pitcher. Wells was one of the worst starters in MLB last season, and represented real dumpster diving.
3) Trade for or sign a veteran starting 2B. Nix having a nice World Championships is not indicative of MLB readiness. I probably would not have kept Matsui, but Nix was clearly an unproven commodity.
4) Trade Taveras and give Spilborghs every opportunity to claim the starting CF job.
5) Tell Clint that Iannetta is to get 70% of the starts.
6) NOT re-sign Torrealba, and replace him with a serviceable cheaper backup to allow CDI to take over.
I could go on. Clearly, even if O’Dowd had done everything perfectly and not whiffed on all those pitcher signings, we probably would not make the playoffs this year. Heck, we probably weren’t a legit playoff team last year on paper, but got super hot at the right time.
As I wrote, this team is what it is…..a perennial loser that fooled us into thinking they were better than that given the anomoly of 2007. DOD is not a good GM, Hurdle is far from a good manager, and ownership is too cost-conscious and small-market minded. That’s why we are losers.
by GoRoxGo on
Aug 10, 2008 7:07 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can agree
w/ a lot of the moves you are suggesting, but I don’t think you would have said the same before the season started. Maybe I’m wrong on this, but its easy to say I would have picked up Lohse as opposed to going w/ Morales or the other guys 3 quarters of the way through the season. If I could start now and make some choices it would be a lot easier, but you can’t predict those things. Also which 2B would you have signed that would be a known upgrade over the #’s from Baker and Barmes.
As far as not being a legit playoff team, I think that’s a little ridiculous. If there is one thing I have learned this year, a legit playoff team and a team that finishes 10 games out are not that different. Much of that is luck, injuries, and 2 out pitches and hits. Last year we got those pitches and hits, and we stayed much more injury free, and we didn’t seem to play every team after they had just got hot. If you look at the talent of this team, they can play w/ anybody. I agree we could use another starter or 2 and some new BP guys, but we have some replacements, and if 2 of 3 could pitch to theri talent level (Hirsh, Morales, Reynolds) we still have a team capable of competing in ‘09.
Do you see the D-Backs, who will probably win the division, being light years ahead of the Rox? If so, I am not seeing the same. Webb and Haren are not far ahead of Cook and Jimenez in terms of talent, and the rest of our possible ‘09 rotation has potential that can give us a competitive rotation.
by smokinRox on
Aug 10, 2008 7:56 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Precisely!
Half-empty and half-full are separated by a decidedly thin line. Baseball’s a really hard game to predict year-on-year. I’ve been a fan since 1977 and still have not seen a magic formula.
by Since1993 on
Aug 10, 2008 8:18 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm a fan since 1961.......
and agree that there’s a thin line between contenders and also-rans. Unfortunately, the Rockies have been on the wrong side of that line for about 14 of their 16 seasons.
Do you detect a pattern there?
by GoRoxGo on
Aug 10, 2008 9:08 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I do and...
I don’t disagree with you…entirely. Hell, maybe we should have paid Lohse the $4-$10 million Scott Boras wanted for him or maybe we should have swung a Mark Ellis/Brian Roberts deal. I don’t know. I don’t. And that’s my point: It’s easier to call a man an idiot after the fact. But look at Billy Beane – an undisputed genius, right? Except he trails O’Dowd one pennant to zero. Theo Epstein? Uh…hey look! Is that a quarter on the floor over there?
by Since1993 on
Aug 10, 2008 10:45 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
Right with you here “1993”. Aside from Haren, there just wasn’t an impact move to make, and I still think O’Dowd made mostly the right decisions at the time. Hindsight may say otherwise, but that is what it is…. Hindsight. On the Haren thing…. How many other teams were left wishing they had pursued him harder and would have ultimately topped Arizona’s offer? And how is Oakland feeling about that right now? I’ve got some issues with Hurdle managerial moves (although I do like the guy), but I’m actually pretty content with O’Dowd.
by IowaRockie on
Aug 10, 2008 8:19 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not trying to be an apoligist...
GoRoxGo makes a very valid point: You can’t lose 14 out of 16 seasons and expect your credentials to be unquestioned. But O’Dowd did come off a league championship with a good young team. Many of us thought along with him that a tweak here and a couple of role players there and we’d be back at it again. Just didn’t happen.
by Since1993 on
Aug 10, 2008 10:51 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That was a fun week
Going 2-5 against two of the worst teams in baseball… at home.
And realistically they could have lost the 2 they did win. They had to wake up and score in the 7th and 8th inning to win the one on Tuesday and they were out hit in Friday’s victory.
by roxhead on
Aug 10, 2008 6:12 PM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Does anyone else feel like
Cook is out of gas? I watched him get smoked twice this week against two of the worst offensive linupes that I’ve ever seen (at least, they didn’t have Q and Sully at the top, so maybe I’m underrating them) and he looked nothing like the guy we’ve seen for most of the year. I don’t know what else to blame it on, but its got me pretty scared. At this rate, he’ll finish the season well over a 4 era which won’t do him justice…
by Teekalong on
Aug 10, 2008 6:22 PM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes.....
His innings total is likely tiring Cook out. I don’t think it’s a physical injury, but the fatigue is evident. He’s leaving WAY too many pitches up and over the heart of the plate. That’s the tip-off.
by GoRoxGo on
Aug 10, 2008 7:08 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i thought sinkerball pitchers were better
with tired arms. Or was the Clint Hurdle’s theory….
by holliday5 on
Aug 11, 2008 10:30 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Subtle difference
It isn’t so much ‘tired’ as ‘not amped up’ that they are looking for.
Cook hasn’t ever pitching a full MLB season so it probably shouldn’t be shocking if he tires out (or simply has a slump while he adjusts or recovers a bit).
by MADness on
Aug 11, 2008 4:21 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs












