Monday Pebble Report
Colorado Springs, L 6-7: Ryan Spilborghs is a good player--a good player for the Rockies. But last night, he did well for the Sky Sox. He collected three hits last night, one being a homer. It actually tied the game in the bottom of the seventh, but Steven Register allowed a run in the eighth to lose the game. Jason Hirsh allowed six runs in six innings. Four of those runs scored on two two-run homers.
Tulsa, L 1-3: Tulsa only had four hits last night. Chris Nelson had one of them and also walked twice. Chaz Roe went seven innings and allowed the runs (one on his 15th homer allowed). He did strike out seven. Zach McClellan needed only six pitches to get through his inning of work.
Modesto, L 4-5 in 10 innings: Will Harris was charged with the loss since he allowed the eventual winning run on base to start the 10th by walk (he allowed the next batter to reach on a single). Tommy Baumgardner replaced him and struck out the first batter he faced. Then Baumgardner committed a throwing error (the ball went into center field) to allow Lancaster the victory.
Simon Ferrer allowed three runs in five innings and struck out four. Jon George had two innings of clean relief after that before Will Harris entered. Harris allowed the other two runs. Mike McKenry hit his 16th homer.
Asheville, L 2-5: Jeff Cunningham collected both RBI when he hit his 18th homer of the season in the eighth inning. Mike Mitchell and Bo Bowman both had two hits, just like Cunningham. Mitchell, however, was caught stealing and picked off twice.
Bruce Billings allowed all four runs in 6 1/3 innings, two off a two-run homer and one each on a sac fly and a double. The former two runs scored in the first and the latter two scored in the eighth. Billings allowed a triple to start the eighth. He walked three and struck out five.
Tri-City, W 5-2: Juan Nicasio went 4 2/3 innings and allowed two runs. His six strikeouts were the most since he K'ed eight on July 9. That was the last time Nicasio won, but he didn't pick one up last night. Carlos Luna won the game after pitching the next 2 1/3 innings, He allowed two hits and struck out two. Michael Marbry alloweda hit and struck out one in the next inning, and Tyler Trice recorded his first save.
Chad Lembeck's solo homer (3) and Jordan Pacheco's two-run double in the sixth proved to the important inning. Those runs were sandwiched in between a Patrick Rose RBI single in the fourth and a Kordan Pacheco RBI single in the eigth. Rose swiped his 11th base and Charlie Blackmon his 13th. Blackmon extended his hitting streak to 13 games.
Casper, W 15-4: The heart of the Casper lineup turned things on during the heart of the game. The Baby Rockies (they'll always be that to me--damn Ghosts!) scored five runs in the fifth and the sixth and three runs in the seventh. They also caused Orem to use six pitchers.
Maikol Gonzalez and Orlando Sandoval led the way with four hits each. While Gonazlez drove in three runs, Orlando Sandoval, who drove in two, fell a triple short of the cycle. Wilin Rosario, Jose Gonzalez, and Jimmy Cesario, who collected three hits, each chipped in with two RBI. Carlos Martinez went 3-for-5 with three runs scored and two stolen bases (18). Sandoval stole his eighth, Gonzalez and Rosario their fourth, and Cesario his second.
Dan Houston went four innings, allowed three runs on five hits, and struck out three. Brandon Dill allowed a hit and struck out two in his two innins of work. Juan Rodrgiuez picked up the save after pitching the final three innings of the game. He allowed a run on two hits and a walk. He also struck out four.
0 recs |
7
comments
Read Related
Comments
According to Tulsa World
Fowler and Weathers will be reporting back to Tulsa. Is it likely that at least Fowler will get a September callup or will both just finish out in Tulsa?
by smokinRox on Aug 25, 2008 7:34 AM MDT 0 recs
Tulsa's season
ends Sept. 1, so it’s really up to the Rockies and what they want to do. I’d lean to a “yes.”
"Keep your head down, and inch toward daylight." - Blade of Tyshalle
Purple Row - Covering all your Rockies needs!
by Russ on
Aug 25, 2008 7:42 AM MDT
up
0 recs
Modesto L 4-5 in Modesto in 10 innings?
I think you might want to change that.
by Rox Girl on Aug 25, 2008 7:56 AM MDT 0 recs
GOOD POINT ROX GIRL.......
they win that game if it was in Modesto but with gale forces blowing out, routine fly out homer cost them a much needed win, in Lancaster. Playoffs still a good bet.
by 91 wins in 08 on
Aug 25, 2008 11:15 AM MDT
up
0 recs
Happy news about Giants draftees and a note on DSL
This helps keep Charlie Blackmon’s performance in a positive perspective. Conor Gillaspie got demoted back to the AZL after only hitting .167 for Salem-Kaizer in eight games. He wasn’t really hitting well on their complex league team to begin with, so I’m not sure why they promoted him other than that’s how they roll. Gillaspie was supposed to be their Blackmon type of polished bat, and I frankly thought he was a pretty decent pick. Right now, it’s looking a little more doubtful that this will be the case. Brandon Crawford, meanwhile, tore up the AZL (which really doesn’t say much for a college pick) before getting the call S-K. In his first game he went 0-2 with two errors before leaving with an ankle injury.
I’m feeling better about how our draft is comparing to them, and a little worse about how it’s stacking up with the Padres, who’ve seen quite a bit of success from Dacker, Tekotte and others. I’m still not sure what to make of the Dodgers, I just don’t trust that their draft is as bad as it appears right now, but I think it’s because I have too much faith in Logan White to find gems. The D-backs’ draft still looks weak.
With the DSL season over, this is a department where I worry the Giants will make up for a misfire or two on the draft and then some. They had a really strong team this summer and I think we’ll start to hear more and more about their strength in Latin America. The Padres weren’t bad either, but they paid through the nose to get there. As for the Rockies, I’ll have a full review later. On the surface it doesn’t look like we had as good a team, but a lot of that boils down to differences in organizational philosophy. The Rockies are more willing to take risks by stockpiling unpolished natural athletes that don’t have a lot of evident baseball skills, or projectable frames on pitchers without the developed pitches.
The intended result is that fewer of our players will get off the island, but those that do will have pretty high upsides. This strategy has worked with pitchers like Jimenez and Chacin, but we haven’t seen the same sort of success from position players yet. Right now a ranking of top Latin America signed position prospects would have Hector Gomez on top followed by a big drop before you got to the Everth Cabrera/Daniel Mayora/Leo Reyes/Carlos Martinez group. I’m wondering if the organization should shift philosophies with Latin position players or remain patient with the current plan? Are we doing enough?
by Rox Girl on Aug 25, 2008 8:53 AM MDT 0 recs
Are they really taking a bigger risk...
or are they just opposed to paying the signing bonuses required to lure the more polished product? I tend to think it’s a little bit of both and I do think they need to change the philosophy a little bit. I don’t know about $2-$3 million bonuses for 16 year olds, but I’d like to see the Rockies in the running for some of the prospects in the $500k-$1m range. Everyone focuses on the major league payroll, but if this team would just commit another $1-$2 million a year to signing bonuses for draftees and latin players, that could equate to another 3 or 4 really solid prospects every year. As a mid-market team, that sounds like a solid investment to me.
by mattrob on
Aug 25, 2008 1:00 PM MDT
up
0 recs
I think bigger risk and not spending the money go hand in hand
The whole reason teams are willing to go with larger bonuses is that they feel there is less risk in those players. I think where I may have not been clear in the earlier post is that while the Rockies are taking on higher risk, the upside, while high, isn’t going to be higher than that for the big bonus players.
Rockies = High risk, high upside, steep downside, lots of drops
Big Spenders = Lower risk, high upside, less downside, fewer drops
Over time this approach will yield fewer players, but if the team can maintain a one or two high impact MLB player return per season, than it won’t matter much as they’ll remain ahead of or at least equal to the league wide curve.
by Rox Girl on
Aug 25, 2008 1:57 PM MDT
up
0 recs











