Quick notes on Cole Garner, OF, Tulsa
I'm far from a scout. I'm far from understanding what makes minor league players tick. I read the numbers. I see what they've improved on by what rates have improved and what numbers I should get excited about.
PF and I began a bit of a discussion about Garner when asked if the Rockies have any OF coming up the pipe. My immediate reaction was that Charlie Blackmon, OF, Modesto, would be the next impact - or potential impact anyhow - player coming from the farm. For the record, he's looking alright, good AVG/OBP mix in A+ ball.
Anyhow, PF pointed out Cole Garner, so I took a look at him.
Click past the jump for a breakdown on Garner.
Garner looks to be an interesting mix of power and speed. He snagged 35 bags for Asheville back in 2006, caught 13 times, and hit 19 homers, good for an overall .302/.353/.519/.872 (AVG/OBP/SLG/OPS line for those of you who were wondering what I was doing past the first 3) line in the Sally league. 2009 was the first year since then where he's taken over 10 bags, and also the first since 2006 with over 10 long balls.
While it appears Garner's running game has been more or less shut down since 2006, at least in terms of stealing, he's remained an above-average runner, at least according to Fangraphs' Speed Score. Take it with a grain of salt; it's really just an indicator of how much extra a guy gets on the basepaths, on a scale of 1-10.
2009 looked to be a big step for Garner, posting a .834 OPS in AA Tulsa. As a reference, the Pioneer league averaged .266/.340/.391/.732 this season.
2 things stuck out for me in Garner's 2009. First, his power. His overall OPS isn't fantastic, but it's decently above average. What caught my eye is his .204 ISOP (SLG-AVG) as compared to the league's .125 ISO. That's a decent extra bit of club he has there. Second, his strikeouts. He dropped his K% to 19.7% from 26.6% in 2008. While it's still relatively poor (and by relatively I mean this guy is a free swinger), it's at least showing signs of improvement.
Going forward, I just don't see him being much of a threat to take anybody's job in the majors. He'd be a passable power option as a PH, but past that, meh. He doesn't walk enough to keep himself productive during slumps. That is to say, you can't even say "Well, at least he's..." because when AVG goes, so goes OBP and SLG. Still, his toolset creates an interesting possibility moving forward. I wouldn't be surprised to see him in CSprings next season.
|
Season |
Team |
G |
AB |
PA |
H |
1B |
2B |
3B |
HR |
R |
RBI |
BB |
IBB |
SO |
SB |
CS |
|
2006 |
Asheville (A) |
120 |
464 |
512 |
140 |
79 |
40 |
2 |
19 |
100 |
88 |
25 |
0 |
127 |
35 |
13 |
|
2007 |
Modesto (A+) |
96 |
319 |
352 |
68 |
38 |
18 |
4 |
8 |
39 |
33 |
20 |
0 |
115 |
7 |
5 |
|
2008 |
Modesto (A+) |
50 |
192 |
206 |
61 |
43 |
14 |
2 |
2 |
27 |
17 |
9 |
0 |
51 |
7 |
5 |
|
2009 |
Tulsa (AA) |
112 |
396 |
440 |
114 |
69 |
25 |
4 |
16 |
65 |
64 |
23 |
2 |
78 |
13 |
5 |
|
Season |
Team |
BB% |
K% |
BB/K |
AVG |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
wOBA |
ISO |
Spd |
|||||
|
2006 |
Asheville (A) |
5.1% |
27.4% |
0.2 |
.302 |
.353 |
.519 |
.872 |
.395 |
.218 |
7.4 |
|||||
|
2007 |
Modesto (A+) |
5.9% |
36.1% |
0.17 |
.213 |
.274 |
.370 |
.644 |
.283 |
.157 |
6.3 |
|||||
|
2008 |
Modesto (A+) |
4.5% |
26.6% |
0.18 |
.318 |
.361 |
.443 |
.804 |
.356 |
.125 |
5.8 |
|||||
|
2009 |
Tulsa (AA) |
5.5% |
19.7% |
0.29 |
.288 |
.342 |
.492 |
.834 |
.374 |
.205 |
6.4 |
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
So he's not Matt Holliday II?
NEVER SURRENDER DREAMS
Purple Row - Covering all your Rockies needs!
by Russ Oates on Oct 16, 2009 11:16 AM MDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Garner may be my Weiser
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
by Andrew T. Fisher on Oct 16, 2009 11:20 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
hi five for borderline guys
FREE CHRIS IANNETTA
At least against LHP, I mean COME ON
by Andrew Martin on Oct 16, 2009 11:22 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Matt Daley may have something to say about borderline guys
I love the Matt Daley story more than almost anything else about this team.
by biondino on Oct 16, 2009 1:11 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Seems a little Barmes-ish to me
It’s nice that he cut his K’s down but he still had a pretty bad BB:K ratio and a low OBP. He wasn’t young for the league, so no help there. I agree, seems like a longshot for him to be an “impact” bat.
Leave Dexter alone! You're lucky he even performs for you!
by FooMan on Oct 16, 2009 5:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
It will be interesting to see what the Rockies do.
Garner is eligible for the Rule 5 draft, and it will be interesting to see if the Rockies will protect him on the 40-man roster. My gut instinct is that he’ll get squeezed, and somebody else will snap him up in the Rule 5 as a PH/5th OF type.
by Tom (RFTN) on Oct 16, 2009 8:58 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
pretty much this
we already had jeff baker, you know?
FREE CHRIS IANNETTA
At least against LHP, I mean COME ON
by Andrew Martin on Oct 17, 2009 12:51 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















