Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Which Players Will Join The 3,000-Hit Club?

Groundballs and the Bullpen: Do we need them?

In the Rockpile today, Poseidon's Fist linked an article by Dave Cameron of Fangraphs discussing the Rockies' postseason rotation. He breaks it down to Ubaldo-Cook-DLR-Hammel, leaving Marquis off of the rotation. But it isn't just "lol marquis is teh awfuls," he raises a really good point:

Marquis would give the bullpen something it doesn't have right now - a guy to come in and get a ground ball in order to induce a DP or a play at the plate.

He raises a good point. The bullpen we have going into the postseason is very strikeout-heavy, pretty much bereft of groundballers. But is that such a bad thing?

Name 

GB/FB

GB%

FB%

K/9

BB/9

K/BB

HR/9

AVG

WHIP

Aaron Cook

2.30

56.7%

24.7%

4.44

2.68

1.66

1.08

.282

1.41

Jason Marquis

2.00

55.6%

27.8%

4.75

3.31

1.44

0.64

.260

1.36

Ubaldo Jimenez

1.85

52.3%

28.2%

7.98

3.44

2.32

0.55

.232

1.24

Juan Rincon

1.41

47.7%

33.8%

8.77

7.01

1.25

0.70

.199

1.48

Jason Hammel

1.51

46.3%

30.8%

6.75

2.16

3.12

0.88

.290

1.39

Jorge de la Rosa

1.32

44.7%

34.0%

9.35

4.10

2.28

0.99

.251

1.4

Joe Beimel

0.83

40.4%

48.9%

6.60

2.40

2.75

1.20

.287

1.4

Matt Belisle

1.03

40.4%

39.4%

6.23

1.48

4.20

1.78

.284

1.29

Randy Flores

1.08

40.0%

37.1%

10.03

1.54

6.50

1.54

.299

1.37

Jose Contreras

1.25

39.5%

31.6%

9.00

4.50

2.00

1.29

.288

1.64

Huston Street

0.92

39.1%

42.4%

10.29

1.94

5.31

1.04

.202

0.93

Matt Daley

0.59

32.8%

55.5%

9.77

2.84

3.44

0.89

.223

1.13

Rafael Betancourt

0.60

29.5%

49.2%

10.13

1.88

5.40

0.38

.201

0.92

Franklin Morales

0.54

27.1%

50.5%

9.30

4.76

1.95

0.91

.233

1.39

Joel Peralta

0.50

24.7%

49.3%

8.03

4.38

1.83

1.09

.280

1.58

It's interesting to note that the strikeouts and groundballs seem to be inversely correlated, but that's a different study entirely.

Contrast this bullpen with the guys in 2007, just based on GB%:

Name

GB/FB

GB% 

FB%

K/9

BB/9

K/BB

HR/9

AVG

WHIP

LaTroy Hawkins

3.03

63.3%

20.9%

4.72

2.6

1.81

0.98

0.25

1.23

Aaron Cook

2.46

57.9%

23.6%

3.31

2.39

1.39

0.81

0.275

1.34

Manny Corpas

2.03

57.4%

28.3%

6.69

2.31

2.9

0.69

0.223

1.06

Franklin Morales

2.07

54.9%

26.5%

5.95

3.2

1.86

0.46

0.235

1.22

Jeremy Affeldt

1.63

53.0%

32.5%

7.02

5.03

1.39

0.46

0.22

1.36

Matt Herges

1.22

46.5%

38.0%

5.55

2.77

2

0.74

0.199

1.01

Ubaldo Jimenez

1.26

46.4%

36.7%

7.46

4.06

1.84

1.1

0.232

1.3

Jeff Francis

1.19

44.4%

37.2%

6.9

2.63

2.62

1.04

0.278

1.38

Ryan Speier

1.38

41.5%

30.2%

6.5

4

1.63

0.5

0.283

1.56

Mark Redman

0.96

41.3%

42.9%

6.41

2.75

2.33

0.92

0.275

1.37

Josh Fogg

1.00

40.0%

40.0%

5.11

3.21

1.59

1.25

0.293

1.53

Brian Fuentes

0.83

35.9%

43.1%

8.22

3.38

2.43

0.88

0.21

1.13

 

Click past the jump and we'll break these numbers down.

Star-divide

In 2009, our 3 most extreme groundballers are all starting pitchers. Which makes sense, more or less, it helps mitigate damage via the double play and it keeps pitch counts down by getting more balls in play early in the count.

In 2007, however, 3.5 of our 5 most extreme groundballers were in the bullpen, and only Aaron Cook was in the rotation. Morales' role in the postseason was somewhat mixed, so that's why he gets the .5 for pen and .5 for rotation.

So in a casual sense, yes, we'd like a groundballer in the bullpen. But it seems, for the rationale listed above, that the groundballers are better suited to the rotation, as they are more prone to giving up hits (at least in terms of Marquis and Cook), and typically with bullpen duty, you want to get the outs as lock-downingly as possible, as to mitigate potential inherited damage.

So let's get a quick look at how 2007 and 2009 stack up in summation.

2007

GB%

K/9

tRA*

Rotation

45.71%

5.61

4.96

Bullpen

50.01%

6.46

4.44

2009

GB%

K/9

tRA*

Rotation

51.24%

6.69

4.33

Bullpen

38.48%

8.02

4.06

You could probably just look at that little chart and say "well, the Rockies just are a better pitching team this year" and I wouldn't argue with you at all. But it does seem that in sacrificing GB% for K/9, we made our pen better, and by further emphasizing GB% in the rotation, it made it better there as well.

The two pitchers I'd like to single out kind of embody the balance between the two measures presented: Ubaldo Jimenez and Manny Corpas.

I don't think I need to say much about Jimenez. 7.98 K/9 and 52.3% GB and he throws 700mph and he runs on clean burning biodiesel.

Corpas, however (and I'll keep this somewhat brief, I want to touch on his season more after we're all wrapped up with 2009), strikes out a decent amount, has excellent control of the strike zone (as in he never walks anyone), and still throws his slider very effectively. He also has a career GB% of 51.4%.

His sinker/2seamer/whatever we're calling it lost something this year, and there's a distinct chance we could chalk some of that up to a damaged elbow causing him to overthrow or something (this really isn't my area of expertise). He got hit a lot harder than we'd like to see, but I really think he'll rebound in 2010. He still gets a good number of ground balls, still doesn't give up many fly balls, and actually posted a lower FIP in 2009 than '08 or '07.

Frankly, and I know he was kind of awful this year, but I do think the pen missed having Corpas just for the different toolset he brought along. I mean, clearly we didn't miss him TOOOOOOOO much, but we had to rely on guys like Flores to come strike one LHB out (and he did do that pretty well: 11K to 1BB v LHB) when we had a jam to get out of. Season-long, yeah, Corpas was trouble, but situationally, he might still be a good tool to have around. But again, next season.

As for the original issue, having Marquis in the pen WOULD present us with a groundballing option, but I'm not 100% convinced I want to bring him into tight situations, especially with how wild his last start was in general. If you want a situational groundballer, you need a guy who can come in and paint corners with either  a nasty changeup or a strong sinker, locating low and getting the big double play outs. I don't see Marquis being able to do that.

Mopup guy? Sure. 3 inning relief? Sure.

Situational groundballer? ehhhhhhh I wish we had Corpas still.

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The way Hammel pitched the other night...

if Marquis pitches well in LA, Hammel will be the odd man out.

by margabelle on Oct 2, 2009 1:14 PM MDT reply actions  

Interesting...aside from walks

peripherals suggest Rincon has been awesome

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Oct 2, 2009 1:24 PM MDT reply actions  

but that's just the thing

why hit him if he’s just gonna walk you? That 7+ BB9 is just inexcusable

EXECUTE: It's the Clutch thing to do

by Andrew Martin on Oct 2, 2009 1:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

My big problem with your final conclusion

is that you seem to be writing under the impression that every time a reliever is needed it’s a “tight situation.” The truth is most are not, and we already have our tight situation relievers accounted for in Street and Betancourt. The analysis needs to be more tailored for how Marquis would be used, which as far as I could tell would either be

A) as the primary long man if another starter runs into trouble or runs up their pitch count early,
B) as a 6th/7th inning bridge pitcher to allow Tracy to pinch hit for the starter if a good scoring situation arises after the fifth inning
C) as a DP inducer when the force is in play and less than two outs, probably only against RHB’s.

Only C would be a high leverage situation when he enters, and given what you’ve pointed out, I don’t know if there’s a better option for this role on the staff. Hammel as a reliever could fulfill A and B fine, but would be inferior in situation C.

by Rox Girl on Oct 2, 2009 2:52 PM MDT reply actions  

Well for starters

Marquis to the pen was more of a bridge into how completely different our bullpen looks this season as to Rocktober 1

as for A and B

Mopup guy? Sure. 3 inning relief? Sure.

It’s kind of assumed that the left-off starter is gonna be a long reliever.

As for C, that commentary is directed almost exclusively at Dave Cameron

Marquis would give the bullpen something it doesn’t have right now – a guy to come in and get a ground ball in order to induce a DP or a play at the plate. The Rockies have relievers who can do other things, but they don’t have a sinker specialist in relief. Marquis would provide an option for Jim Tracy if he finds himself in a situation where he needs a groundball in a high leverage situation.

Only C would be a high leverage situation when he enters, and given what you’ve pointed out, I don’t know if there’s a better option for this role on the staff. Hammel as a reliever could fulfill A and B fine, but would be inferior in situation C.

And that was kind of the point of the article, that we don’t have a groundballer in the bullpen. It’s all strikeout guys. Hence the 3 paragraphs about Corpas and how his absence is kind of apparent when you look at the numbers.

EXECUTE: It's the Clutch thing to do

by Andrew Martin on Oct 2, 2009 2:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

Just saw a new Passan article on Yahoo

It’s about the different paths the Rockies and Dbacks have taken since 07. Good read. It just got posted, so it’s got some typos.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;ylt=AsR8EidEEdmoo.cxMuHZVARvLYF?slug=jp-rockiesdbacks100309&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

by fatheadX on Oct 2, 2009 3:43 PM MDT reply actions  

You have one team that’s executing routinely and winning.

EXECUTE: It's the Clutch thing to do

by Andrew Martin on Oct 2, 2009 3:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

Just noticed your signature.

I snickered out loud (truly, I did).

by holly96 on Oct 2, 2009 4:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

"The difference between the two clubs was evident: They just outexecuted us," Hinch said.

by biondino on Oct 2, 2009 4:51 PM MDT reply actions  

Inverse Correlation

Unless there’s some factor with the fly ball-rate, it only makes sense that strike out rates and ground ball rates seem inversely proportional. After all, a pitcher only gets a finite number of outs to pitch, and each ground ball out is an out that cannot be a strike out, and vice versa.

by Yokel on Oct 2, 2009 7:02 PM MDT reply actions  

Which is true

but GB% isn’t necessarily indicating outs. It’s just groundballs, so they could squirt through for hits as well.

At least, that’s my understanding of the number.

EXECUTE: It's the Clutch thing to do

by Andrew Martin on Oct 3, 2009 10:54 AM MDT up reply actions  

Good Point

Maybe it’s indicative of a stellar infield scooping up the ground balls. Or maybe it’s a function of the different pitching approaches: pitching to contact vs. pitching to make the guy miss. It is interesting how it appears they’re both all-or-nothing methods, though.

by Yokel on Oct 4, 2009 12:23 AM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Colorado Rockies, established 28 April 2005.

Community Guidelines
RockiesRoster.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Musical Analysis of Baseball

Recent FanPosts

Paul_by_jerichasmall_small
PRMLB February Thread
Small
New Tulo FB page Please Join!!!
Img_1229_small
Better Things: Starting Pitching in 2012
Rockies1_small
2012 Projected Opening Day Payroll
2009__1_small
Opening Day & Fireworks Tickets
Img_1229_small
Mount Olympus on Lake Otsego
Img_1229_small
PRMLB: The January Thread
Avatar_small
Off Season Picture Time
Happy-face_small
Taking Out The Trash (And How Michael Cuddyer Can Help Us Do It)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Colorado Sports Blogs

Mile High Report (Denver Broncos)
Mile High Hockey (Colorado Avalanche)
Denver Stiffs (Denver Nuggets)
Burgundy Wave (Colorado Rapids)
The Ralphie Report (CU Buffaloes)
SB Nation Denver

Top 30 PuRPs

  1. Drew Pomeranz, LHP - AA/MLB
  2. Nolan Arenado, 3B - A (Adv)
  3. Wilin Rosario, C - AA/MLB
  4. Chad Bettis, RHP - A (Adv)
  5. Tyler Matzek, A (Adv), A
  6. Alex White, AA/MLB
  7. Kyle Parker, OF - A
  8. Tim Wheeler, OF - AA
  9. Josh Rutledge, SS - A (Adv)
  10. Charlie Blackmon, OF - MLB
  11. Rosell Herrera, SS/3B - Rookie
  12. Trevor Story, SS/3B - Rookie
  13. Edwar Cabrera, LHP - A (Adv)
  14. Tyler Anderson, LHP - unassigned
  15. Rafael Ortega, OF - A
  16. Peter Tago, RHP, A
  17. Christian Friedrich, LHP - AA
  18. Joe Gardner, RHP - AA
  19. Corey Dickerson, OF - Low-A
  20. Thomas Field, 2B - AA
  21. Will Swanner, C - Rookie
  22. Kent Matthes, OF - A (Adv)
  23. Albert Campos, RHP - A
  24. Jordan Pacheco, C/UT - AAA/MLB
  25. Cristhian Adames, SS - A
  26. Ben Paulsen, 1B - AA
  27. Josh Slaats, RHP - Low-A
  28. David Kandilas, CF - Rookie
  29. Jayson Aquino, LHP - DSL
  30. Hector Gomez, SS - AA/MLB
HM:  
Edgmer Escalona, RHP - AAA/MLB
Dillon Thomas, OF - Rookie
Sam Mende, IF - Rookie
Mike Zuanich, 1B - AA
Dan Houston, RHP - AA

updated 10/25/2011. 


Managers

Rox_girl_small Rox Girl

35l7yvb_small Andrew Martin

Staff

Jeff_aberle_small Jeff Aberle

Poison-the-well-the-tropic-rot_small Bryan Kilpatrick

Avatar2_small Andrew T. Fisher

Wittgenstein_small Greg Stanwood

Special Assistants to the GM

Rockies_lost_americana_small holly96