A New and Improved Way to Measure Closers
In the Rockpile earlier today SDcat09 and Hizilla made comments comparing Brian Fuentes's and Huston Street's save totals. This inspired me to create a new statistic. OK not really but I haven't seen it on any baseball site so I thought I would share in my first FanPost.
The Issue: Saves are often used to determine a closer's effectiveness. Unfortunately measuring a closer by the number of saves he racks up during the course of a season is asinine. This is because not every closer receives the same number of save opportunities. Some teams like the Angels hand out save opportunities to their closer like its candy on Halloween, while others like the Nationals may provide a save opportunity once every time the moon cycles.
A Potential Solution: For me a closer's job is to convert save opportunities into wins. That's it, plain and simple. It doesn't matter if a he gets 60 save opportunities or six; the closer's job is to convert them into wins. So instead of just looking at how many games each closer saved, let's look at the percentage of save opportunities the top 25 closers (according to save totals) converted into wins during 2009.
First a look at the top 25 closers by saves this year.
|
Player |
Team |
Saves |
|
|
1) |
Top of Form Bottom of Form |
Angels |
48 |
|
2) |
47 |
||
|
3) |
44 |
||
|
4) |
42 |
||
|
5) |
39 |
||
|
6) |
38 |
||
|
7) |
38 |
||
|
8) |
38 |
||
|
9) |
38 |
||
|
10) |
37 |
||
|
11) |
37 |
||
|
12) |
36 |
||
|
13) |
35 |
||
|
14) |
35 |
||
|
15) |
31 |
||
|
16) |
30 |
||
|
17) |
29 |
||
|
18) |
27 |
||
|
19) |
27 |
||
|
20) |
26 |
||
|
21) |
26 |
||
|
22) |
25 |
||
|
23) |
25 |
||
|
24) |
D'backs |
24 |
|
|
25) |
23 |
Now if we take those same 25 players and look at their percentage of save opportunities converted into wins, it looks like this.
|
Player |
Team |
Saves |
Percentage of Save Opportunities Converted |
|
|
1) |
Top of Form Bottom of Form |
Angels |
48 |
87.2 |
|
2) |
Twins |
47 |
90.4 |
|
|
3) |
Yankees |
44 |
95.7 |
|
|
4) |
Padres |
42 |
87.5 |
|
|
5) |
Reds |
39 |
90.7 |
|
|
6) |
Red Sox |
38 |
92.7 |
|
|
7) |
Cardinals |
38 |
88.4 |
|
|
8) |
Mariners |
38 |
90.5 |
|
|
9) |
Giants |
38 |
84.4 |
|
|
10) |
Brewers |
37 |
90.2 |
|
|
11) |
Tigers |
37 |
97.4 |
|
|
12) |
Dodgers |
36 |
85.7 |
|
|
13) |
Rockies |
35 |
94.6 |
|
|
14) |
Mets |
35 |
83.3 |
|
|
15) |
Phillies |
31 |
73.8 |
|
|
16) |
Royals |
30 |
90.9 |
|
|
17) |
White Sox |
29 |
82.9 |
|
|
18) |
Braves |
27 |
87.1 |
|
|
19) |
Pirates |
27 |
84.4 |
|
|
20) |
Athletics |
26 |
86.7 |
|
|
21) |
Marlins |
26 |
78.8 |
|
|
22) |
Astros |
25 |
86.2 |
|
|
23) |
Rangers |
25 |
86.2 |
|
|
24) |
D'backs |
24 |
82.8 |
|
|
25) |
Cubs |
23 |
76.7 |
Now let's rank them in order by percentage of save opportunities converted into wins.
|
Player |
Team |
Percentage of Save Opportunities Converted |
|
|
1) |
Tigers |
97.4 |
|
|
2) |
Yankees |
95.7 |
|
|
3) |
Rockies |
94.6 |
|
|
4) |
Red Sox |
92.7 |
|
|
5) |
Royals |
90.9 Top of Form |
|
|
6) |
Reds |
90.7 |
|
|
7) |
Mariners |
90.5 |
|
|
8) |
Twins |
90.4 |
|
|
9) |
Brewers |
90.2 |
|
|
10) |
Cardinals |
88.4 |
|
|
11) |
Padres |
87.5 |
|
|
12) |
Angels |
87.2 |
|
|
13) |
Braves |
87.1 |
|
|
14) |
Athletics |
86.7 |
|
|
15) |
Astros |
86.2 |
|
|
16) |
Rangers |
86.2 |
|
|
17) |
Dodgers |
85.7 |
|
|
18) |
Giants |
84.4 |
|
|
19) |
Pirates |
84.4 |
|
|
20) |
Mets |
83.3 |
|
|
21) |
White Sox |
82.9 |
|
|
22) |
D'backs |
82.8 |
|
|
23) |
Marlins |
78.8 |
|
|
24) |
Cubs |
76.7 |
|
|
25) |
Phillies |
73.8 Bottom of Form |
I was disappointed to see that Fernando Rodney was ranked as the best closer using this method because I think we all know better. (The justification for this is Rodney had a 1.91 ERA in saves and a 6.08 ERA in non save games. Apparently he just turned it on when it was needed.) However there were some things that I did like including Huston Street moving up 10 spots, Joakim Soria moving up 11, and Brian Fuentes falling all the way to 12th. Even Poseidon's guy Andrew Bailey moved up 6 spots. I realize this can still be improved by doing something like weighing one run saves more than three run saves and penalizing closers more for blowing multi run leads but it's still an improvement over what currently exists.
I'm sure someone has done this before but I have never seen it. Anyway I think it's a more accurate way to rank closers than just looking at save totals.
Eat. Drink. Be Merry. But the above FanPost does not necessarily reflect the attitudes, opinions, or views of Purple Row's staff (unless, of course, it's written by the staff [and even then, it still might not]).
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm just happy
that something I said inspired someone. I think that i’ll have some more thoughts on this later, but I like where you’re going with it.
Good work
Huston was very good at converting saves all season long.
A couple of things to consider. Not all save opportunities are the same. They differ in the number of outs to get, size of lead, whether there are runners on.
The Save is a fairly arbitrary sort of statistic as it is. Finish the game, not the winning the pitcher, tieing run … blah blah blah. I think win percentage added is a fairly useful stat to evaluate the quality of a save. Of course that doesn’t take into account the quality of hitters being faced.
I agree with the idea that the save is an arbitrary statistic
Just for fun here is how WAR ranked these 25 closers
1) Jonathan Broxton: 2.9
2) Andrew Bailey: 2.4
3) Brian Wilson: 2.4
4) Heath Bell: 2.0
5) Mariano Rivera: 2.0
6) Rafael Soriano: 2.0
7) Jonathan Papelbon: 1.9
8) David Aardsma: 1.9
9) Joe Nathan: 1.9
10) Joakim Soria: 1.8
11) Huston Street: 1.5
12) Trevor Hoffman: 1.5
13) Francisco Cordero: 1.5
14) Chad Qualls: 1.2
15) Frank Francisco: 1.1
16) Ryan Franklin: 0.9
17) Jose Valverde: 0.7
18) Brian Fuentes: 0.4
19) Bobby Jenks: 0.4
20) Fernando Rodney: 0.3
21) Francisco Rodriguez: 0.3
22) Kevin Gregg: -0.3
23) Matt Caps: -0.4
24) Brad Lidge: -0.7
25) Leo Nunez: -0.8
Now I know why Poseidon voted Bailey AL rookie of the year.
I'm still hoping to wake up from that nightmare I had about the 9th inning of Game 4.
by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Oct 22, 2009 12:04 AM MDT reply actions
This is interesting because there are some huge differences between WAR and percentage of saves converted to wins
Broxton: 17th to 1st
A. Bailey: 14th to 2nd
B. Wilson: 18th to 3rd
Rafael Soriano and Heath Bell from 11th and 13th into a tie for 4th
Fernando Rodney: 1st to 20th
Francisco Cordero: 6th to 13th
Huston Street: 3rd to 11th
I'm still hoping to wake up from that nightmare I had about the 9th inning of Game 4.
by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Oct 22, 2009 12:15 AM MDT up reply actions
Now I know why Poseidon voted Bailey AL rookie of the year.
That’s part of it for sure
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
by Andrew T. Fisher on Oct 22, 2009 5:22 PM MDT up reply actions
Sorry should have clarified that better
If the closer blows the save he is penilizied by this measure.
Ex: Huston Street did not get credit for converting a save opportunity into a win when he blew the save against the Brewers in the 9th and CDI hit the HR in the 11th.
I guess it should say save opportunities converted into saves.
I'm still hoping to wake up from that nightmare I had about the 9th inning of Game 4.
by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Oct 22, 2009 10:21 AM MDT up reply actions
Perhaps you'd need to weight the leads the closer took into each save opportunity
It would make SSS comparisons (such as one season) a lot more accurate. Also, adjustments for closers who work more or fewer than three outs? Closers who inherit baserunners? Would you also include park factors? What about quality of opposition?
I think for the hardcore sabr dudes there’s plenty to work with to hone a perfect stat.

by 

















