Purple Row: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Headlines: BC Beats BU 4-3 in 58th Beanpot Championship

NL West in Review: 1st Basemen

One man stood tall above 26 other NL West first basemen in 2009.

More photos » Elaine Thompson - AP

One man stood tall above 26 other NL West first basemen in 2009.

Introduction

Baseball is still being played out there somewhere, but for the Rockies, it is sadly the offseason.  Before the hot stove really heats up and we start looking forward to 2010, I thought I would run a series reflecting on the great season 2009 was. 

Over the next three months or so, I will be breaking down each of the five teams, position-by-position, starting today with first base.  The series will be comparable to what Brendan Scolari did for TrueBlueLA before the season, although it will be using actual performance rather than projections.

 

Method

These articles will indeed utilize WAR heavily.  I understand SABR stats have been contentious around here lately; however, if you're one of those fans who thinks "who cares?" to wOBA and WAR, don't just tune this all out.  I have included all traditional statistics as well, so you are welcome to take or leave any information presented as desired.

Positional splits for traditional statistics can be found anywhere.  However, value statistics like WAR and wRAA are not broken down anywhere for each player's ABs by position (at least that I have found). Thus, I had to compute them on my own so that, for instance, only Garrett Atkins' ABs as a 1B count here.  The methods for doing this are clearly outlined by Purple Row's own Jabberwocky right here.

UPDATE:  After posting, many noted that the PA's I reported from Fangraphs were inconsistent.  After contacting David Appelman, I confirmed that those PA's represent PA in games where the player played first base at one time, not necessarily at the time of the PA.  I reworked everything from the Baseball-Reference database.

In addition, I reworked the park factors.  Instead of utilizing an assumed universal linear weight, I used Statcorner's component factor for each offensive event for home games (I assumed away games yielded a net neutral effect).  This is not how Fangraphs does park effects pertaining to WAR, so their numbers will look different.  Appelman told me they will have value position splits this offseason, perhaps by February, in time for this series to be over.  Note that these numbers are not perfect.   They are best used for window-shopping comparison rather than hard evidence.

 

Results

First base is a classic premium offense position, but the 25 men that played first base this season in the division are collectively uninspiring (save a couple).  Brendan Scolari's projections had the Padres finishing first, followed by the Rockies, Dodgers, Diamondbacks and Giants.  Here's how the five teams shook out in 2009 (wOBA* is my park-adjusted wOBA):

Teams

Players

Avg

HR

RBI

OBP

SLG

wOBA*

WAR

1. San Diego

4

.275

41

103

.403

.539

.421

6.45

2. Colorado

4

.310

17

97

.403

.467

.388

4.65

3. Los Angeles

3

.283

13

100

.357

.397

.342

1.92

4. San Francisco

6

.271

17

80

.328

.405

.327

1.81

5. Arizona

8

.228

19

88

.321

.396

.311

-0.90

Aside from Arizona's complete collapse, we saw essentially what was expected.  On the strength of Adrian Gonzalez' stellar season, the Padres trounced the rest of the division at first base.  Pablo Sandoval's offense and Travis Ishikawa's glove (worth one whole win?) almost pushed the Giants past Los Angeles, but not quite.

The Diamondbacks utilized eight different men at first, with only Mark Reynolds capable of hitting north of .222.   It isn't surprising then that the Diamondbacks were collectively below replacement value at first base.  That's right - they could have perhaps gotten more production at first had they signed Joe Koshansky out of spring training and given him the job.

For a graphical comparison, here are the five teams plotted by component RAR (Runs Above Replacement, or WAR times 10). 

Nlwest1b2009_medium

Since we are comparing only first base, every team as a positional RAR of -12.5.  Replacement is essentially the same for each team, just slightly varied, as it is defined as 20/600*PA.  The definition is explained here.

For a closer look at each team and each player, take the jump.

Star-divide

Instead of posting the entire database of all 25 first baseman, here are the top and bottom five:

Rank

Player

Team

PA

Avg

HR

RBI

OBP

SLG

wOBA*

UZR

WAR

1

Adrian Gonzalez

SDP

670

.275

39

97

.407

.546

.426

4.3

5.18

2

Todd Helton

COL

643

.325

15

86

.415

.489

.399

-1.4

3.75

3

James Loney

LAD

645

.384

13

90

.359

.403

.346

0.8

1.73

4

Travis Ishikawa

SFG

349

.283

9

39

.330

.393

.322

10.4

1.31

5

Pablo Sandoval

SFG

97

.385

5

17

.423

.648

.480

-0.1

1.09

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

21

Jeff Baker

COL

4

.000

0

0

.000

.000

.000

-

-0.08

22

Ryan Garko

SFG

120

.250

2

12

.325

.352

.289

-1.7

-0.35

23

Rich Aurilia

SFG

73

.174

0

9

.188

.171

.236

2.8

-0.38

24

Chad Tracy

AZ

230

.221

4

28

.291

.348

.282

0.3

-0.40

25

Brandon Allen

AZ

115

.204

4

14

.287

.388

.287

-4.2

-0.60

 Of all qualifying players (arbitrarily chosen as 100 PA), the high is in bold and the low is in italics.  The full table and accompanying calculated spreadsheet can be found here in Google Docs.  If anyone wants the Excel file to view derivations, you may email me.

 

After getting the PA right, Pablo Sandoval's contribution lessened to a more understandable fifth in the division, and Garrett Atkins turned out to not be such a deadweight after all, though he is ranked 15th.  Part of that was due to a generous defensive score, which did not help Jeff Baker out.

 

Going Forward

Provided the Padres don't sell off A-Gone (and he doesn't want to be traded), the top two teams and the top two players will return in the same role next season.  The Dodgers will continue with James Loney in hopes that his bat wil return to 2006/07 form after a two season hiatus. 

Arizona looks like they will try to groom 2009 rookie Brandon Allen, though a dark horse could be Conor Jackson.  He was terrible this season before catching Valley Fever - if he is retained, he could be insurance for Allen after the emergence of Gerardo Parra in left field.  The Giants will bring back Travis Ishikawa and Ryan Garko so that Bruce Bochy can find a way to ineffectively use them.

 

Next week, I'll move on to second base.  Where will Clint Barmes and his 23 home runs land?

0 recs  |  Comment 30 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'm surprised Atkins actually accumulated 107 PAs at 1B over the season.

Assuming ~4-5 PAs a start, give or take, that means he’d have started 20-30 games there. That seems like way too many.

by WolfMarauder on Oct 26, 2009 12:23 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

i thought so as well but thats what fangraphs has

It took so long to accumulate the stats for each player, so I didn’t double reference their integrity. But if fangraphs is wrong on their splits, that would be an exceedingly large thorn in my craw

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Oct 26, 2009 12:59 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Hmmm

Looking at Baseball Reference’s splits for Garrett, Any game where he played at first, all his plate appearances for that game are counted.

by KindredSprites on Oct 26, 2009 2:56 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can't find the splits for Atkins on Fangraph but I think I know what might have happened.

Both Fangraph and Baseball Reference agree that Atkins had 399 Plate Appearances this season. In the 2009 splits section of Baseball Reference for Garrett Atkins under defensive positions, it breaks down those 399 Plate Appearaces as 288 PA’s at 3B, 20 PA’s as a DH, 28 PA’s as a pinch hitter, and 63 PA’s at 1B. That checks out because those breakdowns add up to 399 at bats. The question now becomes what does Fangraph’s AB’s by defensive positioning add up to? (I can’t find them so I don’t know. Do you need to be registered to see those?) Anyway I bet they add up to more than 399 because when I looked at Garrett Atkins’s game log on Baseball reference I added up all of his Plate Apperances in games he appeared at first base and all of his Plate Appearances in games he appeared at first base PLUS some other position. For games he just appears at first, he has 47 PA’s, but when you add in ALL of his PA’s in games he appeared at multiple positions you get 107 PA"s.

I'm still hoping to wake up from that nightmare I had about the 9th inning of Game 4.

by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Oct 26, 2009 3:49 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

When I say 399 at bats in the forth line after the title

it should say Plate Appearences

I'm still hoping to wake up from that nightmare I had about the 9th inning of Game 4.

by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Oct 26, 2009 3:50 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually anywhere it says AB's it should say Plate Appearances

I don’t need to make this anymore confusing than it is

I'm still hoping to wake up from that nightmare I had about the 9th inning of Game 4.

by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Oct 26, 2009 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

to see the splits on fangraphs

Go to the main screen, click the “teams” tab, choose the rockies from the dropdown box and choose first base

Ill get to the bottom of this. Its strange because my sum of each team’s PA make sense

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Oct 26, 2009 3:59 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the info

After looking at it I think Baseball Reference’s 63 PA are correct. When I go under 1B stats in FanGraph it says 1B/3B next to Atkins name while it just says 1B next to Giambi and Helton. (That would lead me to believe they are counting all of his PA’s in games he appeared at both positions) When I looked at Atkins stats at third base and as a DH, he had 300 PA’s at 3B and 21 PA’s as a DH. When I add in his 28 pinch hit appearences I get 456 PA’s which is way more than than the 399 total that both fangraph and baseball reference agree on each player’s homepage. Fangraph has Atkins for 44 extra PA’s at first base, (107-63) 12 extra PA’s at third base, (300-288) and one extra PA as a DH. If you add those together (44 + 12 + 1) it accounts for the extra 57 PA’s fangraph has.

My conclusion: Fangraph is counting some Plate Appearances twice when there are games a player appears at multiple positions. It probably does not show up with the sum of each team because there the correct 399 PA’s is used. However when Fangraph breaks it down position by position it has extra PA’s

I'm still hoping to wake up from that nightmare I had about the 9th inning of Game 4.

by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Oct 26, 2009 4:25 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Josh Whitesell

Wasn’t DBS touting him during ST? Suppose that didn’t turn out that well for them. Hopefully I’ll get to see Brandon Allen at the AFL.

by Hizilla on Oct 26, 2009 1:02 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

yes he was

though he was better than almost all of the guys they trotted out there. I would prod him for seeing the minor league player of the year flame out, but we had our own in hirsh. Plus, he drafted stew and spilborghs in fantasy after hearing us tout them so much

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Oct 26, 2009 1:15 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Yea

I feel like we had the same thing with Nix too, maybe not quite as high expectation but similar.

by Hizilla on Oct 26, 2009 4:57 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well

We thought we were going to get a good season from Brandon Webb, too.

"Spam headline: 'YOU ARE CHOSEN!' Oh, Morpheus, you're getting pretty lazy."
"Or they are informing you you are Jewish in a very lame conversion campaign."
"In either case, sending me spam is not the way to invite me to Zion."

by kishi on Oct 26, 2009 9:13 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Batting .194 and blowing out your shoulder are not quite the same though. Hopefully for you guys BA is legit.

by Hizilla on Oct 27, 2009 5:44 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm looking forward to this series

"We're only gonna score 17 points? Hah hah" - some clown.

by ES46NE10 on Oct 26, 2009 3:24 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

PF is doing a bit of refining here

The top 1B in the division, you can probably take them at face value. The bottom guys, there are some issues with PA at 1B and such, so the bottom guys are probably all out of order.

Hope got in my eyes

by Andrew Martin on Oct 26, 2009 7:48 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

This is a good post Poseidon

What strikes me is how mediore the NL West is as a whole at 1B. Seeing the Giants having the third best WAR in our division at 1.26 is pretty weak. (Even that is probably inflated because of the games Pablo Sandaval played there.) When you look around baseball there are some unbelivable first baseman. Guys like Pujols, Fielder, Youkilis, Miguel Cabrera, Derek Lee, Teixeira ,Howard, Votto, and Morales all have better WAR’s than Helton, and we know how good he is. (Morneau, and Carlos Pena were not far behind him either)

With rumors of Adrian Gonzalez going to Boston floating around, the potential exists for the NL West’s 1B as a whole to become a joke. Imagine how redicules that first chart would look of you took Gonzalez’s 6.4 WAR out of the division.

And as far as Gonzalez leaving I think it might happen. Apparently Kevin Towers, (the former Padres GM) told Bill Madden of the New York Daily News that “it’s not a matter of will the Padres trade Gonzalez, it’s a matter of when”. In addition, the Padres new GM is Jed Hoyer who’s previous job was………….Assistant GM of the Boston Red Sox.

I think I know what will happen next in this story.

I'm still hoping to wake up from that nightmare I had about the 9th inning of Game 4.

by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Oct 26, 2009 11:08 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

It's not all bad though

At least we’ll have an advantage over everone else with Helton’s 3.64 WAR

I'm still hoping to wake up from that nightmare I had about the 9th inning of Game 4.

by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Oct 26, 2009 11:10 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

Though it has proven to be a far more slippery and difficult proposition than I expected or than it ought to be. I updated a few things, notably correcting the PA issue and fixing park effects, and the Giants fell back down to fourth (which honestly makes more sense anyway)

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Oct 27, 2009 12:39 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the updated version, and I agree the Giant thing makes more sense

I’m curious to know if the Rockies and Dodgers jumps in WAR had more to do with Park factor or their plate appearance numbers. It’s interesting how one team in a hitters park and one in a pitchers park both saw their WAR’s increase like that. (If figuring this out is going to require any more major calculations on your part you don’t have to bother. I realize you have probably already spent hours putting these numbers together and I don’t want to create more work for you)

The one thing that really caught me off guard here was Adrian Gonzalez’s drop from a 6.4 WAR to a 5.18 WAR. I would have guessed that if anything his WAR numbers would have gone up when factoring in park factors considering he put up those offensive numbers in Petco.

Very interesting numbers overall though. I can’t speak for everyone here but I really appreciate the work you put in to make these stats as accurate as possible.

I'm still hoping to wake up from that nightmare I had about the 9th inning of Game 4.

by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Oct 27, 2009 6:05 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know you're probably sick of me but I have one more thing

Change Rich Aurilla’s team from Colorado to San Fran. I don’t want any part of him.

I'm still hoping to wake up from that nightmare I had about the 9th inning of Game 4.

by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Oct 27, 2009 6:11 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

3 of them K's

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Oct 27, 2009 7:29 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

You note that away parks will have a net neutral factor...

but the unfortunate thing is that this just isn’t true. For a Padres player, they get to play more games than usual at Coors and Chase and therefore likely have a greater park factor. I’m sure that you know this, though, and have to ignore it because it would be incredibly difficult to account for (I know that I’ve tried and failed in that regard).

Eschew Obfuscation!

by Jeff Aberle on Oct 27, 2009 8:58 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

yeah

I recognize that, but for the purposes of this, it gets pretty close. I also ignored sb and cs, because (what a treat) BR’s positional splits for those are inaccurate as well. The rockies didn’t get 25sb from 1b and 9 from cf. There’s a lot of assumptions, which is why there’s some variance. But by and large, its close

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Oct 27, 2009 9:09 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

hence the phrases

I assumed away games yielded a net neutral effect

Note that these numbers are not perfect. They are best used for window-shopping comparison rather than hard evidence.

It’s kind of a quick-and-dirty. It works for the sake of this evaluation, as there’s going to be a pretty big dropoff from Gonzalez to Helton, Helton to Loney, and then Loney to whoever. Because of the magnitude of those jumps, you can probably just ignore the park effects for right now.

It’ll be trickier when you compare guys like Furcal and Cabrera at SS.

Hope got in my eyes

by Andrew Martin on Oct 27, 2009 9:10 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

that is to say that most scientifically minded people

will drop that “assume” phrase in just to make a formulation or evaluation simpler.

Hope got in my eyes

by Andrew Martin on Oct 27, 2009 9:11 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Assumptions

the greatest thing ever in science

JFK

by jrockies on Oct 28, 2009 12:53 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

assume laminar flow

oh look at that friction factor

Hope got in my eyes

by Andrew Martin on Oct 28, 2009 12:58 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Boy that Garko move was a winner

"It breaks your heart. It is designed to break your heart." - A. Bartlett Giamatti

by Rawktober on Oct 27, 2009 11:35 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Colorado Rockies, established 28 April 2005.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Rockies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Tailgateapproved_small
Rockies fans...get what Foxsports.com Fantasy 2010 Guide says...
Tailgateapproved_small
Calling ALL Rockies fans in Missouri
Img_0128_small
Stewart and Mora
Hoodie2_small
Rockaholics Anonymous: The Things That So Easily Upset Us
Spring_break_128_small
(OT) The super Superbowl thread
Fire2_small
Which Evil Empire Team do we hate the most?
39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Small
O'Dowd Radio Interview
Bucco_bruce_small
2010 Rockies
2079194195_835e49fc8a_small
MLB.com 2010 Top 50 Prospects

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Blogroll

Colorado Sports Blogs

Mile High Report (Denver Broncos)
Mile High Hockey (Colorado Avalanche)
Pickaxe and Roll (Denver Nuggets)
The Ralphie Report (CU Buffaloes)

Top 30 PuRPs

  1. Christian Friedrich, LHP
  2. Tyler Matzek, LHP
  3. Jhoulys Chacin, RHP
  4. Esmil Rogers, RHP
  5. Eric Young, Jr., 2B/CF
  6. Wilin Rosario, C
  7. Hector Gomez, SS
  8. Michael McKenry, C
  9. Rex Brothers, LHP
  10. Casey Weathers, RHP
  11. Chris Balcom-Miller, RHP
  12. Tim Wheeler, OF
  13. Charlie Blackmon, OF
  14. Samuel Deduno, RHP
  15. Nolan Arenado, 3B
  16. Brandon Hynick (traded to CWS), RHP
  17. Chris Nelson, SS/2B
  18. Juan Nicasio, RHP
  19. Cole Garner, OF
  20. Chaz Roe, RHP
  21. Kiel Roling, 1B
  22. Parker Frazier, RHP
  23. Delta Cleary, OF
  24. Darin Holcomb, 3B
  25. Shane Lindsay, RHP
  26. Matt Reynolds, LHP
  27. Mike Zuanich, OF
  28. Scott Robinson, OF
  29. Edgmer Escalona, RHP
  30. Ben Paulsen, 1B
updated 9/14/2009


Managers

Rocktober_shirt_small Russ Oates

Rox_girl_small Rox Girl

Staff

Liquid_small Silverblood

Seth_smith_0004_2_small Andrew Martin

Sleepy_jeff_small Jeff Aberle

Coorsfield3_small theoldgrizzlybear

67880020--bled-slovenia_small Andrew T. Fisher

Rowbot Radio

Deep_forest_small WolfMarauder