NLDS Preview: Ballpark
A playoff series deserves more attention than a regular season series. For that reason, I will be adding more information to my previews. To make things easier to digest, it will be a three part series. The first will be the ballpark. Later today, the offense and defense. Some time tomorrow, I'll post a scouting report on the Phillies pitchers, injuries and any other interesting information.
Citizens Bank Park

Image courtesy of www.ticketwood.com
Citizens Bank measures just 329' to the left field corner, 360' to the LF-CF power alley, 401' to dead center, 396' to the corner to the right of center, and 330' to dead right field. A wild card to the park is the sunlight/shadows. With Games 1 and 2 set for 2:37 EDT, evening shadows figure to play a part in the visibility on the field, much as it was in 2007.
The Phillies' home park has a reputation of being a "Little League Field" due to the short porches and large numbers of home runs hit. That reputation isn't a mirage, but it's not nearly as deserved as it has been suggested to be.
According to Baseball Reference, Citizens Bank has favored hitters, but only slightly. As I did in August 31st's NL West Report, I have average the pitcher/hitter effects for simplicity.
|
2009 |
Multi-year |
|
101.5 |
102.5 |
Find the surprising context after the jump.
Following are all 16 National League parks and their Baseball Reference park factors, sorted first by the 2009 score, then by the multi-year score as a tie-breaker.
| Ballpark | 2009 | Multi-year |
| Chase Field | 108 | 107 |
| Coors Field | 105.5 | 107 |
| Great American Ballpark | 1045 | 104.5 |
| AT&T Park | 103.5 | 102 |
| Wrigley Field | 103 | 105 |
| Minute Maid Park | 103 | 98.5 |
| Citizens Bank Park | 101.5 | 102.5 |
| Nationals Park | 101.5 | 101.5 |
| Turner Field | 101 | 99 |
| NL Average | 100.06 | 100.53 |
| Citi Field | 99.5 | 99.5 |
| Busch Stadium | 98 | 99 |
| Miller Park | 97.5 | 100 |
| Land Shark Stadium | 97 | 99 |
| Dodger Stadium | 94.5 | 99.5 |
| PNC Park | 94.5 | 95.5 |
| Petco Park | 88.5 | 89 |
According the above table, Citizens Bank is just the 7th most offensive park in the National League (if one chooses to sort by the multi-year factor, they place fifth). Sure, it provides some offensive support, but why then is it perceived as being such -time offensive park?
The reality is that home runs influence the perception of a park more than anything. The Phillies have been in the top 3 in the NL in HR 6 of the 7 years playing at Citizens Bank, including first each of the last two seasons. They finished with 34 more home runs than any other NL team this year. Part of that is their supreme home run hitting talent, but it's also because it's the second best HR-hitting park in the league. Here are the NL Parks sorted by their HR/FB factor, as shown at StatCorner:
| Ballpark | HR/FB Factor |
| Coors Field | 121.6 |
| Citizens Bank Park | 116.4 |
| Wrigley Field | 115.6 |
| Chase Field | 115.3 |
| Great American Ballpark | 112.3 |
| Dodger Stadium | 111.1 |
| Miller Park | 105.9 |
| Minute Maid Park | 105.8 |
| NL Average | 103.28 |
| Turner Field | 99.1 |
| Land Shark Stadium | 92.3 |
| PNC Park | 90.9 |
| Busch Stadium | 87.2 |
| AT&T PArk | 86.1 |
| Petco Park | 86 |
It's no accident that the above table probably aligns more closely to the average fan's (and commentator's) perception of NL parks as hitting/pitching parks. (Note: Citi Field and Nationals Park are too new to be listed on StatCorner's park factor section). So obviously, Citizens Bank Park is kind to home runs, but for it to be nearly neutral, it must favor pitchers for other events other than home runs. That is indeed the case. The following are Citizens Bank Park's park factors for twelve different offensive events:
| STAT | FACTOR |
| K | 103.6 |
| BB | 99.3 |
| 1B | 96 |
| 2B | 95.2 |
| 3B | 98.3 |
| HR/FB | 116.4 |
| GB | 102.3 |
| OF | 97.1 |
| LD | 99.9 |
| IF | 93 |
| HBP | 104.2 |
| R | 102.7 |
For every other way of reaching base, CBP favors the pitcher.
Conclusion: Citizens Bank Park is indeed a hitter's park, but its potency is greatly exaggerated due to its admitted leniency for home runs. The smothering effect it has on other offensive events lead it to be only slightly more of a hitter's park than average.
These black and white numbers are not perfect and should not be taken to be perfectly precise. Decimals probably should not be included. Their variance can be exhibited in the difference from some parks in 2009 related to their multi-year factors. However, the factors are based on a great deal of empirical data, so the trends they exhibit are still representative of the physical effects we have seen.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Coors Field has total ownage in the number of gates.
Funny Dog to Make Life Worthwhile
by frightened inmate #2 on Oct 6, 2009 10:10 AM MDT reply actions
Interesting tidbit from a Baseball Prospectus article about Park Factors
CBP had the third-highest platoon split for favoring right-handed hitters, trailing only Detroit and Texas. That’s coming from the extra-base hits, with double/triple/homer Park Factors of 116/105/116 for the right-handers, and only 97/75/92 from the left, and comes despite the fact that the dimensions are a little shorter to right field than they are to left.
I suppose this is a point in favor of “OH NOES LEFTY STARTERS PLAY ALL RIGHTIES!!!!” Or it isn’t, I don’t know, just something to consider.
"You spend a good piece of your life gripping a baseball and in the end it turns out that it was the other way around the whole time." - Jim Bouton
Park effect
Does baseball-reference.com make any attempt to normalize for the fact that there is an unbalanced schedule? In other words, having a bunch of dramatic pitcher’s parks in your division could make a neutral park appear to be a big hitter’s park, due to downward skewing of road stats. The fact that you play significantly more games against division foes gives their parks more weight in the road stats.
(Note: I’m not suggesting that this is the case with CB Park, just that some of the more simplistic park effect models are susceptible to this skewing)
Reviews of some great baseball sites and other cool stuff on my web magazine @ The Casual Observer
i dont know for sure
I would guess baseball reference does employ an iterative approach. It is generally very stable, unlike espn’s park factors, hich I believe had chase as one of the top pitchers parks in 02, just because schilling and rj dominated at home
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
by Andrew T. Fisher on Oct 6, 2009 11:23 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions
ESPN's are about as raw as can be
Pretty much just:
total of stat in home games for one season
-———————————————————————————
total of stat in road games for one season
No correction for anything, as far as I can tell.
Leave Dexter alone! You're lucky he even performs for you!
I don't know of anyone who normalizes to that extent
Do you know of someone who does? I guess the it’s hard to know since most people don’t explicitly define how they do their park effects.
bb-ref has quite a detailed explanation of its park adjustments. They do not normalize for distribution of games in the fashion you discuss.
In discussions of park adjustments I’ve read, it seems that most people don’t seem to believe that such normalization introduces enough of an improvement in precision to warrant the correction given that they’re are not that many extreme parks. I guess if you had multiple Petco’s in your division it could make a difference. Or one pre-humidor Coors, really; an if that were the case, it’s probably easier to throw out games at the really extreme park.
Leave Dexter alone! You're lucky he even performs for you!































