Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: More Televised Winter Baseball, Please

MLB Transactions Part Two: The 40-Man Roster and Option Years

By popular demand (comments in last week's salary arbitration article), in this session of Purple Row Academy, we're going to continue our miniseries on transactions. This week, I explore 40 man roster construction, mostly as it applies to prospects, and in particular, those pesky minor league options.

Subsequent transaction topics for the Academy will include (but are certainly not limited to) sessions on waivers, the DL, trades, the Rule 5 draft, and free agency (topics not necessarily in that order). After all, baseball transactions are a huge topic, and I don't have 2500 word articles in me every week. So, without further ado, let's take the red pill and see how deep this rabbit hole goes!

Minor League Rosters

First, a word about minor league roster sizes, as at any point in time there are quite a few prospects floating around our system that will soon require 40 man roster protection. Courtesy of Cot's, here's how the active rosters stack up by level (and where the Rockies have each type of affiliate):

  • AAA clubs (Colorado Springs): 24 players.
  • AA clubs (Tulsa): 24 players (first 30 days of the season), 23 players (day 31 to August 10) and 24 players (August 11 to the end of the season, including the playoffs).
  • A clubs (Asheville, Modesto): 25 players, with no more than two players with more than five years of minor-league service time.
  • Short-season A clubs (Tri-City): 30 players. No more than 25 players may be used in a single game. As of July 1, the Active List must include at least 10 pitchers. No more than four players may be 23 years old or older. No more than three players may have four or more years of minor-league service time.)
  • Advanced rookie clubs (Casper): 35 players. No more than 30 players may be used in a single game. As of July 1, the Active List must include at least 10 pitchers. No more than 12 players may be 21 years old or older, and no more than two players may be 23 years old or older. No player may have more than two years as a professional, and no player may have three or more years of minor-league service time.
  • Rookie clubs (none): 35 players. No more than 30 players may be used in a single game. As of July 1, the Active List must include at least 10 pitchers. No more than 8 players may be 20 years old or older, including two drafted players and four undrafted players who are at least 21 years old. No player may have more than two years of minor-league service time.

The reserve list limits are as follows: 38 players for AAA clubs, 37 for AA clubs, 35 for A clubs and below. What this essentially means is that at any given time, the maximum amount of players the Rockies can have in their farm system is 215 players (163 of them active)! Of course, teams don't always max out their minor league affiliates with players, especially on the reserve lists. Even so, that's a lot of infrastructure for a 25 man active major league squad.

The 40-Man Roster

Now that we've determined that there are indeed a lot of minor league prospects vying for a shot with the big club, let's look for a minute at how (and why) major league rosters are constructed as they are. First, some delineation between the two, and then some clarification about the 40 man roster.

Obviously, the 25 man roster consists of those players that are eligible to dress for a game for the major league club, while the 40 man roster (officially known as the Major League Reserve List) also includes people on the 15 day DL and minor league prospects. Also well known by fans is that the 40 man roster is eligible to dress and participate in games from September 1st on--a very controversial rule that sometimes leads to glorified minor league games, especially when two teams that are out of playoff contention play. However, what is less known is what differentiates those 15 from other minor league prospects. In other words, what is the rhyme and reason of the 40 man roster?

The answer and more after the jump...

Star-divide

Why put a prospect on the 40-Man Roster? And how does this happen?

Quite simply, players are added to the 40 man roster so that a club can continue to exert control over a player, primarily by protecting them from the Rule 5 draft (to be discussed in a later session of PR Academy) Long story short: a club has 5 years to evaluate a player who signs his first pro contract at 18 years old or younger (from the June 5th preceding signing his contract), but only 4 years to decide on a player who signs at age 19 or above. Those prospects who are not placed on the 40 man roster that meet these requirements are eligible for the Rule 5 Draft. As a result, teams must place their most valuable prospects on the 40 man roster. This year, the Rockies protected prospects such as Dexter Fowler, Hector Gomez, EY2, Chris Nelson, Samuel Deduno, Shane Lindsay, Ryan Mattheus, and Esmil Rogers from the Rule 5 draft.

Another reason for putting a prospect on the ML Reserve List is if they are ready for the Show before their 4 or 5 year evaluation period is up, as was certainly the case for Tulo, Jeff Francis, and others. The procedure is that the major league club must purchase the contract of the prospect from his minor league team (even though they already pay his salary) so that they can sign him to a major league contract--coming with better pay, benefits, MLBPA membership, and the satisfaction of being on the fast track to the Show. For instance, as I pointed out in my Rockpile yesterday, Greg Reynolds, a member or our 40 man roster, will be paid $114,795 in the minors and $402,000 in the majors.

Other ways to add a player to the ML Reserve List is to claim them off of waivers, through a trade, or through free agency. But that is a topic for another article.

Now that a player has been signed to a major league contract and is on the 40-Man Roster, what options does his team have?

Get it? Options? I'm really too much. When a player is first added to the 40 man roster, he is given a total of three option years. While they are often referred to as options, this is a little misleading. In a given option year, a player may be sent down to the minors and recalled as often as the team pleases while only using one option. In other words, an option is a season during which the club may to move him to and from the minor leagues without exposing him to other clubs. Basically, options are another measure of control that a team has on its prospects--one that allows a club to send its prospects that need a little seasoning or are blocked at the major league level down to the minors, where they can get in some good at-bats and work on their issues. There are a couple of exceptions to this rule, however.

One of these exceptions is that a player optioned to the minor leagues may not be recalled for at least 10 days, unless the club places a player from the 25 man active roster on the disabled list during the 10-day window, in which case the prospect may be recalled. Another is that a player with 5 years of Major League service may not be sent to the minor leagues on an optional assignment without his consent. Thus, teams don't have options on some arbitration eligible players due to their service time, as well as all players eligible for free agency. These players are usually designated for assignment, a topic that will be explored later in the waivers session. Let's just look at the prospects for now.

After his three option years are exhausted, a player is out of options. Beginning with the next season, he must clear waivers before he may be sent to the minors again.

An option year is used:

  • If a player is on the 40-man roster in spring training but optioned to the minors before the season begins. This will be the case for a number of our prospects this year, most likely including Fowler, Nelson, Rogers, and EY2.
  • If a player is sent down to the minors during the regular season--even if a player broke camp with the team, like Franklin Morales last year
  • However, an option year is NOT used:

  • If a player is not sent to the minors during a year (obviously). This includes players with options like Tulo and Francis.
  • If a player’s optional assignment(s) to the minors total less than 20 days in one season. However, this is very unlikely to happen as a minimum assignment is ten days. I'm not clear on if this rule also applies to when a player is sent to the minors immediately following Spring Training, but all indications are that it does.
  • If they are called up in September, because as I mentioned above, during September the 40 man roster is technically the active roster.  
  • Also, in very rare cases a player may be eligible for a fourth option year if he has been optioned in three seasons but does not yet have five full seasons of professional experience--where a full season is defined as being on an active pro (major or minor) roster for at least 90 days in a season--thus short season leagues like the Pioneer and Northwest leagues don't count as a full season for players.

    This exception is really quite rare though, as teams would have to sign a player to a major league contract immediately (like Matt Wieters or Buster Posey was, I believe), then keep that player in the minors for three full years. It doesn't happen often, as most players are signed to a major league contract when they're about ready to contribute on the major league level.

    So those are minor league options--and since this is a Rockies blog, I'll conclude this session by looking at their 40 man roster, outlining who has options and how many they have.

    The Rockies and Their Options

    Note: This list was compiled based on educated guesswork and might not be completely correct. This information isn't too easy to find in one place. Also, some of these players with less than 3 years' major league service time that have no options (like Morillo, I believe) may be outrighted to the minors--younger players must accept this the first time it happens. I'm still not sure if I completely understand it.

    Three Option Seasons Remaining: EY2, Nelson, Mattheus, Deduno, Gomez, Lindsay, Rogers, Smith (Greg),  Fowler

    Two Option Seasons Remaining: Reynolds, Register, Smith (Seth),  Iannetta, Koshansky, Tulo, Ubaldo, Corpas

    One Option Season Remaining: Stewart, CarGo, Morales, Murton, Hirsh

    One Option Season Remaining (Service Time Constraints): Francis, Hawpe, Street

    No More Options: Speier, Morillo, Quintanilla, Barmes, De La Rosa, Spilborghs, Atkins, Grilli, Buchholz, Baker

    Options Ineligible (Service Time): Embree, Helton, Torrealba, Cook, Marquis

    So there you have it. The Rockies have a couple players that they need to make decisions on this spring--particularly with Speier, Morillo, and Quintanilla.

    Hopefully, after reading this article you have a better grasp on minor league options and the 40 man roster. I'm sorry that I could not go into more depth on some things...but if I'd done that, I wouldn't have future topics to discuss and this article would have been roughly the same length as a scholarly paper.

    Sources and Additional Reading

    These sources were invaluable in writing this article and are highly recommended as supplementary reading:

    Minor League Rosters: Courtesy of Cot's Contracts' Jeff Euston

    Options: Jeff Euston

    Rockies 40 Man Roster

    How the 40-Man Roster Works: Courtesy of Brew Crew Ball

    Cot's Baseball Contracts (Colorado Rockies)

    Comment 44 comments  |  3 recs  | 

    Do you like this story?

    Comments

    Display:

    Great article

    Thanks for helping sort this out.

    by pedalpusher on Feb 12, 2009 12:24 PM MST reply actions  

    Great Stuff

    Who would’ve thought it would be that complicated? Really interesting stuff. Thanks for the great info!

    by BaronBill on Feb 12, 2009 12:26 PM MST reply actions  

    Good to get the info on Option Years

    I keep forgetting how it works.

    Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

    by Andrew Martin on Feb 12, 2009 12:27 PM MST reply actions  

    Most excellent work!

    Just what I needed. I’ve even printed this out so I can study it further. Looking forward to your next one!

    I cannot say whether things will get better if we change; what I can say is they must change if they are to get better. -Georg C. Lichtenberg:

    by rockhead on Feb 12, 2009 1:23 PM MST reply actions  

    Schooling away from school

    is fun if there is baseball involved. I thank you for this useful bit of information. I think Hawpe needs to be optioned to CS to work on his defense, if only our offense could handle the load without him.

    Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah, 1983
    JFK

    by jrockies on Feb 12, 2009 3:30 PM MST reply actions  

    As much as he is our defensive whipping boy

    He’s gonna rebound to somewhere between Dunn and Manny levels of play.

    Which, sad to say, is far better than last season.

    Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

    by Andrew Martin on Feb 12, 2009 3:44 PM MST up reply actions  

    Yeah

    Of course, if his offense were also at Manny’s level of play we would have far fewer complaints about his defense.

    by Tom (RFTN) on Feb 12, 2009 3:46 PM MST up reply actions  

    HA good point

    It IS however at almost Dunn levels.

    Dunn Career wOBA: .383

    Hawpe Career wOBA: .369

    Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

    by Andrew Martin on Feb 12, 2009 3:52 PM MST up reply actions  

    wOBA?

    I’m not familiar with that statistic.

    by Tom (RFTN) on Feb 12, 2009 4:00 PM MST up reply actions  

    wOBA's a good one

    Tom Tango developed it. I haven’t made too many fans of Tango thanks to my swearing by his defensive spectrum and positional translations, but he did a lot of stuff by simply crunching truckloads of data.

    It’s made by weighting the run values of each of the possible positive things that happen at the plate by how many runs they’re worth (and I can explain this more if needed), and then divided by plate appearances. I think it’s basically “runs per plate appearance” but I might be wrong there. Point is, it gives a more fair weight to everything.

    You can read more about it here: http://www.insidethebook.com/woba.shtml

    Fangraphs also lists it in the advanced batting statistics.

    Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

    by Andrew Martin on Feb 12, 2009 4:05 PM MST up reply actions  

    Thanks for that

    Since I’m no math whiz (I might have been if I cared, but I’m in law school because I don’t) I don’t understand some of the more advanced stats, though I at least get the limitations of relying on Triple Crown stats.

    by Tom (RFTN) on Feb 12, 2009 4:19 PM MST up reply actions  

    but he has one of the best arms I’ve ever seen.

    by onholliday on Feb 14, 2009 1:46 AM MST up reply actions  

    Strength, yes

    His accuracy has decreased a bit. His range is quite frankly atrocious.

    "Winning doesn't really matter as long as you win." - Vinny Jones

    by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 14, 2009 8:03 AM MST up reply actions  

    Outrighting players

    You’ve got the general idea. A player who is out of options must clear waivers before being sent to the minors. A player may be outrighted to the minors without his consent only once in his career.

    The exception is called veterans’ consent. If a player has more than five years of service time, he must give his consent any time his team wishes to send him to the minors, regardless of whether he has been outrighted to the minors before. That’s why Fogg (who has 7.030 years of service time) went ahead and said that he would accept a minor league assignment; he has enough service time that the Rockies would have to get his consent to send him to the minors.

    If a player refuses a minor league assignment the team either must release him or keep him on the major league roster; if they release him they’re on the hook for the remainder of his contract.

    by Tom (RFTN) on Feb 12, 2009 3:59 PM MST reply actions  

    Thanks for that...

    I was going to do research on that (and veteran’s consent) for my column on waivers, but had to mention it as an option for Hirsh this year. I’ll probably still incorporate that information into the column, but I might borrow your examples to illustrate those transactions if that’s okay with you.

    Eschew Obfuscation!

    by Jeff Aberle on Feb 12, 2009 4:03 PM MST up reply actions  

    I plucked most of it

    straight from the Wikipedia article on MLB transactions.

    by Tom (RFTN) on Feb 12, 2009 4:04 PM MST up reply actions  

    A little more

    I’m not sure exactly how this works, but I know that the Rockies agreed to something similar with Mark Redman last year, where they agreed beforehand that he would accept a minor-league assignment and so they didn’t have to pass him through waivers to send him down to Colorado Springs. Maybe they made a similar agreement with Fogg, but then he’s in camp on a minor league contract anyway.

    by Tom (RFTN) on Feb 12, 2009 4:07 PM MST up reply actions  

    Using Wiki as a reference?

    Shame shame, don’t you read Schillings blog?

    Keepin' warm by the hot stove season.

    by Charlie77 on Feb 12, 2009 5:00 PM MST up reply actions  

    A quote from my Professor

    “If you look it up on Wikipedia check it with another source, it might be right.” Dr. Ron Miller

    Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah, 1983
    JFK

    by jrockies on Feb 12, 2009 5:03 PM MST up reply actions  

    I hated Dr. Miller

    the guy was so condescending, and he played favorites awfully. Get some new shoes you idiot, those chuck taylors make you look like you’re a child and your mother still dresses you.

    Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

    by Andrew Martin on Feb 12, 2009 11:04 PM MST up reply actions  

    Where did you go to school?

    And where are you currently getting your MS?

    Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah, 1983
    JFK

    by jrockies on Feb 12, 2009 11:28 PM MST up reply actions  

    CSM

    and CSM

    How else would I know Dr. Miller

    Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

    by Andrew Martin on Feb 13, 2009 8:25 AM MST up reply actions  

    Good friend of mine

    started out there undergrad, but transferred to the UofA.

    By the way, the AZSnakepit does not take responsibility for, nor condone, any alcohol-related accidents or injuries incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of reading this website.

    by DbacksSkins on Feb 13, 2009 11:59 AM MST up reply actions  

    It takes a certain kind to go to Mines

    They call them “Masochists”

    Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

    by Andrew Martin on Feb 13, 2009 12:38 PM MST up reply actions  

    Thats us.

    Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah, 1983
    JFK

    by jrockies on Feb 13, 2009 12:39 PM MST up reply actions  

    I know a great many

    former masochists that gave up the lifestyle for a more practical Aggie life.

    "Winning doesn't really matter as long as you win." - Vinny Jones

    by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 13, 2009 3:03 PM MST up reply actions  

    Yeah well,

    my boy ended up graduating a year late from Arizona and is now getting his PhD at Texas A&M.

    By the way, the AZSnakepit does not take responsibility for, nor condone, any alcohol-related accidents or injuries incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of reading this website.

    by DbacksSkins on Feb 13, 2009 4:50 PM MST up reply actions  

    Nice...I have a few friends in College Station

    although I was referring to Colorado A & M

    "Winning doesn't really matter as long as you win." - Vinny Jones

    by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 13, 2009 10:33 PM MST up reply actions  

    I assumed as much,

    which is why I specified Texas — just thought it was a bit amusing since my friend had a connection himself.

    By the way, the AZSnakepit does not take responsibility for, nor condone, any alcohol-related accidents or injuries incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of reading this website.

    by DbacksSkins on Feb 13, 2009 11:28 PM MST up reply actions  

    That's what's great about Wikipedia,

    aka The Supreme Arbiter Of All Knowledge. Their articles usually have general information that’s exactly right, but also link to primary sources.

    I’ve never used Wiki as a source per se in an academic paper, but I’ve certainly used it to point me in the right direction.

    By the way, the AZSnakepit does not take responsibility for, nor condone, any alcohol-related accidents or injuries incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of reading this website.

    by DbacksSkins on Feb 12, 2009 5:19 PM MST up reply actions  

    That's why I...

    Steal the quotes from Wiki for my academic papers. What Curt Schilling don’t know won’t hurt him.

    Keepin' warm by the hot stove season.

    by Charlie77 on Feb 13, 2009 12:50 AM MST up reply actions  

    Reading this over again...

    in the category of the 40 man roster “One Option Season Remaining (Service Time Constraints):” in which I placed Francis, Hawpe, and Street…that of course assumes that they accrue that ML Service time. If they are sent down this year (and stay down), which is unlikely, they will still have another option year next year too. That’s what happens when players go quickly from being drafted to the big club—they have unused options for several years until they get to that 5 year mark.

    An aspect that I didn’t get into (but will in the future) was the fact that teams signing Latin American players need to evaluate those players for 40 man Rule 5 protection much earlier than American prospects. This was the case with Cabrera, a player we didn’t protect probably because of inexperience, youth, and/or positional glut. But that’s a topic for a different article.

    Eschew Obfuscation!

    by Jeff Aberle on Feb 12, 2009 4:00 PM MST reply actions  

    “No More Options: Speier, Morillo, Quintanilla, Barmes, Hirsh, De La Rosa, Spilborghs, Atkins”bq.

    Obviously JDLR, Spilborghs, Barmes and Atkins are projected to be on the opening day roster. Which of the others are we most hesitant to lose, and who will not be chosen by another team if place on waivers? I don’t think Quintanilla will be claimed but the pitchers are a different question all together.

    Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah, 1983
    JFK

    by jrockies on Feb 12, 2009 4:54 PM MST reply actions  

    Morillo...

    might be picked up, simply because of his fastball velocity…but I think he’d pass through waivers as well. Speier might not, since he’s a more proven pitcher—but his stuff is less potent.

    Hirsh…I might be wrong on the number of options he has, because the Rockies don’t seem too worried. Anybody want to double check my work?

    Eschew Obfuscation!

    by Jeff Aberle on Feb 12, 2009 5:32 PM MST up reply actions  

    Options

    Hirsh has an option remaining. Buchholz and Baker have none. Grilli is not ineligible due to service time, but is out of options. Other than that, the list looks accurate.

    by Greg Stanwood on Feb 12, 2009 9:46 PM MST reply actions  

    Oh...

    And Greg Smith should still have all 3. His contract wasn’t purchased until his callup, and he was never sent down.

    by Greg Stanwood on Feb 12, 2009 9:48 PM MST up reply actions  

    Thanks for doing that...

    I realized that I counted Hirsh’s action last year as an option when his action occurred in September, while Baker and Buchholz were both clerical errors. Those have been fixed.

    As for Greg Smith…if his contract was purchased by the A’s and he was assigned directly to the Show…that’s a gray area, but I don’t think that those circumstances mean that he didn’t use an option. Until something more definitive arises, I’ll leave Greg right where he is.

    Eschew Obfuscation!

    by Jeff Aberle on Feb 13, 2009 12:09 AM MST up reply actions  

    Hmm

    I actually thought Hirsh’s option action occurred last July, and did count. The year that Hirsh was not optioned was 2007.

    Here is Hirsh’s contract history as far as I can tell:
    - Purchased before Spring Training 2006 by the Astros.
    - Optioned down before the season began (1)
    - Called up mid 2006
    - Traded to Rockies
    - Made Rockies out of Spring Training 2007
    - Transferred to DL
    - Returned from DL
    - Transfered to DL again for the rest of season (no option used)
    - Began 2008 on DL
    - Returned from DL and optioned down to AAA (2)
    - Called up in September

    by Greg Stanwood on Feb 13, 2009 11:11 AM MST up reply actions  

    You, of course, are right.

    Thank you for correcting me!

    Eschew Obfuscation!

    by Jeff Aberle on Feb 13, 2009 1:36 PM MST up reply actions  

    It's Times Of Confusion Like This...

    … that make us all wish that somewhere, someone just kept an easy tally of all of the player options on players across MLB. That would make things so much easier for us fans. It took me literally three or four days of on and off research to figure out what Jason Grilli’s deal was (seriously, I’ve never seen any other player with more weird ups and downs in the contract than he)

    You should definitely keep a running tab on all of the options for us. It’d help the fans a lot (at least the ones who care about roster moves)

    by Greg Stanwood on Feb 13, 2009 10:36 PM MST up reply actions  

    I'll probably do an update after Spring Training...

    when many players will be optioned to the minors.

    Eschew Obfuscation!

    by Jeff Aberle on Feb 14, 2009 11:11 AM MST up reply actions  

    So

    do rehab assignments ever become part of this mess?

    by Resolution on Feb 13, 2009 7:38 AM MST reply actions  

    No, and thank you for bringing that up.

    Rehab assignments are exempted from options…a player is technically still on the disabled list, so he’s not part of the 25 man roster at the point. People on the 15 day DL are still on the 40 man roster, but are allowed to participate in limited minor league action—don’t ask me how limited, because I simply do not know.

    Eschew Obfuscation!

    by Jeff Aberle on Feb 13, 2009 10:48 AM MST up reply actions  

    Comments For This Post Are Closed


    User Tools

    Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Colorado Rockies, established 28 April 2005.

    Community Guidelines
    RockiesRoster.

    FanPosts

    Community blog posts and discussion.

    Recommended FanPosts

    Paul_by_jerichasmall_small
    PRMLB February Thread

    Recent FanPosts

    Getattachment_small
    # 2 Tulo ...
    Rockieshat1_small
    Purple Row Cares: In memory of Thomas Harding's son
    Small
    On Addiction and Major League Baseball
    Small
    Musical Analysis of Baseball
    Rockies1_small
    2012 Projected Opening Day Payroll
    2009__1_small
    Opening Day & Fireworks Tickets
    Img_1229_small
    PRMLB: The January Thread
    Avatar_small
    Off Season Picture Time
    Happy-face_small
    Taking Out The Trash (And How Michael Cuddyer Can Help Us Do It)

    + New FanPost All FanPosts >

    Colorado Sports Blogs

    Mile High Report (Denver Broncos)
    Mile High Hockey (Colorado Avalanche)
    Denver Stiffs (Denver Nuggets)
    Burgundy Wave (Colorado Rapids)
    The Ralphie Report (CU Buffaloes)
    SB Nation Denver

    Top 30 PuRPs

    1. Drew Pomeranz, LHP - AA/MLB
    2. Nolan Arenado, 3B - A (Adv)
    3. Wilin Rosario, C - AA/MLB
    4. Chad Bettis, RHP - A (Adv)
    5. Tyler Matzek, A (Adv), A
    6. Alex White, AA/MLB
    7. Kyle Parker, OF - A
    8. Tim Wheeler, OF - AA
    9. Josh Rutledge, SS - A (Adv)
    10. Charlie Blackmon, OF - MLB
    11. Rosell Herrera, SS/3B - Rookie
    12. Trevor Story, SS/3B - Rookie
    13. Edwar Cabrera, LHP - A (Adv)
    14. Tyler Anderson, LHP - unassigned
    15. Rafael Ortega, OF - A
    16. Peter Tago, RHP, A
    17. Christian Friedrich, LHP - AA
    18. Joe Gardner, RHP - AA
    19. Corey Dickerson, OF - Low-A
    20. Thomas Field, 2B - AA
    21. Will Swanner, C - Rookie
    22. Kent Matthes, OF - A (Adv)
    23. Albert Campos, RHP - A
    24. Jordan Pacheco, C/UT - AAA/MLB
    25. Cristhian Adames, SS - A
    26. Ben Paulsen, 1B - AA
    27. Josh Slaats, RHP - Low-A
    28. David Kandilas, CF - Rookie
    29. Jayson Aquino, LHP - DSL
    30. Hector Gomez, SS - AA/MLB
    HM:  
    Edgmer Escalona, RHP - AAA/MLB
    Dillon Thomas, OF - Rookie
    Sam Mende, IF - Rookie
    Mike Zuanich, 1B - AA
    Dan Houston, RHP - AA

    updated 10/25/2011. 


    Managers

    Rox_girl_small Rox Girl

    35l7yvb_small Andrew Martin

    Staff

    Jeff_aberle_small Jeff Aberle

    Poison-the-well-the-tropic-rot_small Bryan Kilpatrick

    Avatar2_small Andrew T. Fisher

    Wittgenstein_small Greg Stanwood

    Special Assistants to the GM

    Rockies_lost_americana_small holly96