Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Gift Of The 2003 Tigers

Who are the other 103????

This A-Rod implication bears some serious issues.  I saw one guy post on ESPN the other day that every baseball player he beloved of his generation (Bonds, Arod, McGwire, Clemens, Sosa, etc) has been put to the task and he questions the legitimacy of the sport.  I have a 15 year old who begs me to buy him creatine so he can bulk up and swing for the fences.  I refuse to let him citing health issues and dad never did it so you don't have to either.  Where does that mindset come from?

My concern is that an entire generation of fans have no knowledge of the game when it was pure.  They have never seen Willie Mays runs so graceful in the OF, Mickey Mantle smash a ball 500 feet on two bad legs, Hammerin Hank ignite those explosive wrists, Bob Gibson working so fast and effective.  Their baseball memories of a wonderful game are a fraud home run race, a congressional hearing, the Mitchell Report, or the latest offering from the new ladder-day prophet Jose Canseco.

There are 103 names yet to be divulged.  One wonders when suspect participants such as Todd Helton and Nomar Garciaparra, whose numbers fell off the table post -testing, may be implicated.

One can argue the Union goofed up or someone leaked grand jury information (it has happened throughout history).  At the end of the day the truth always seems to worm itself our of any forced cocoon created for it. 

Baseball leadership must be forced out (Selig, Fehr, Orza) the whole lock ,stock, and barrel.  Baseball should put itself under the guise of the World Doping Association where independence, control and accuracy is at a premium.  The Feds and Mitchell Report realize that the baseball testing plan is a sham.  They have pushed for independent testing but baseball refuses to comply.  Why is that?  What more do they have to hide?  How much more damage lurks behind the curtains?

 Legitimize the game before the game destroys itself.  The game is a great game but the people who run it stink!

 

 

Eat. Drink. Be Merry. But the above FanPost does not necessarily reflect the attitudes, opinions, or views of Purple Row's staff (unless, of course, it's written by the staff [and even then, it still might not]).

Comment 137 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

A Rod was baseball's last hope to put it all behind us.

Roll it back, Selig. Roll it back to Maris and Aaron.

I wouldn’t doubt the generational thing is to blame, PHLP. Stand firm on that one.

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 9:35 AM MST reply actions  

103 means.....

Each team, on average, will have 3 players on the list.

Assuming the Rockies have 3 on the list, who would you bet tested positive?

I, for one, believe Helton did the ‘roids. Whether he was dumb enough to keep taking when he knew testing was upcoming is an open question, but my bet is he’s one of the three.

Another Rockies player who wouldn’t surprise me is Larry Walker. His chronic injury troubles could have tempted him to try to find something to help him heal and recover from nagging problems. Andy Pettitte uses this excuse for his past use.

The third player is probably someone who isn’t a core player. Looking at the 2003 roster, I’d have to say Bobby Estalella (a known juicer) is on the list. Denny Neagle is certainly someone who was exposed earlier, so who knows…..maybe the Rockies had five or six players among the 103. Tim Kurkjian of ESPN hinted yesterday that at least some of thenames on the list could be made known as early as this week.

by GoRoxGo on Feb 9, 2009 9:54 AM MST reply actions  

Selig made, what, $18M in 2007?

Is that in the best interest of baseball?

"If we never try, we shall never succeed." - Abraham Lincoln

Purple Row - Covering all your Rockies needs!

by Russ Oates on Feb 9, 2009 9:54 AM MST reply actions  

Curt Schilling

agrees with you.

"If we never try, we shall never succeed." - Abraham Lincoln

Purple Row - Covering all your Rockies needs!

by Russ Oates on Feb 9, 2009 10:01 AM MST reply actions  

Wait...

Curt Schilling has an opinion? Really??

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 1:50 PM MST up reply actions  

this comment greatly amused me.

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 4:06 PM MST up reply actions  

::bows::

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 4:36 PM MST up reply actions  

Great minds think alike, apparently.

By the way, the AZSnakepit does not take responsibility for, nor condone, any alcohol-related accidents or injuries incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of reading this website.

by DbacksSkins on Feb 12, 2009 9:16 AM MST up reply actions  

AHAHAHAH

Schilling reportedly spent the next several hours perusing the Internet to see if anyone had made a comment about him to which he should respond; finding none, Schilling played five hours of video games without a shirt on.

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 12, 2009 9:40 AM MST up reply actions  

Where have you gone Joe DiMaggio?

Simon & Garfunkel were crying about the lost innocents of baseball way back in the 60’s. I remember looking at the funky uniforms and the bland stadiums of the 70’s and moaning about that. In the 80’s it was the beginning of the salary explosion, while the 90’s gave us expansion and watered downed teams.

It’s always something yet the game continues to thrive. Whine about, cry about it but get over it… it’s just the way of things.

by roxhead on Feb 9, 2009 10:03 AM MST reply actions  

Folks who aren't familiar with the pre-drug era

have no idea how pure the game was. It will never be the same.

by pedalpusher on Feb 9, 2009 10:39 AM MST reply actions  

Yeah, let's take it back to the old days

Where players just popped good old-fashioned amphetemenes like they were freaking Skittles. Purity!

Seriously, I’m against steroid use. It’s illegal. If you take them, you’re breaking the rules. That makes A-Rod, Bonds, Clemens, etc. morally suspect for sure. It makes them rule-breakers and they should be punished as such.

But as far as how I view these players… and this generation… well, Rob Neyer put it perfectly, so I’ll just blockquote him from this article:

…whatever happens, I’m not going to change my opinion that he’s a great baseball player. Like many of the greatest players, he’ll do whatever it takes to be the best player he can be. For a stretch of five or 10 years — and yes, perhaps even today still — being the best player could have meant cheating. Maybe the cheaters were wrong; that’s the direction in which I lean, probably because I’ve got a streak of the moralist in me. But I will not sit idly while great athletes looking for an edge — not all that different from the many generations before them — are demonized by the high priests of baseball opinion. I will not.

I want all of us to do two things. First, let’s quit acting like steroids and performance enhancers were invented by Jose Canseco in a secret underground lab in 1998 and that before that every baseball player subsisted on Flintstone vitamins and a strong cup of morning coffee. Secondly, let’s quit pretending we can undo what’s already done and focus on cleaning up the game’s future instead of decrying the game’s past.

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 10:55 AM MST up reply actions  

I agree, however....

That does not mean you overlook any of it when it comes to HOF voting time.

Why? Because the HOF is so much based on a player’s statistical output. And if those stats are juiced because of ’roids, then the player does not get credit for those stats.

Who’s to say that A-Rod would have ended up with more career HRs than, say, Dale Murphy, or more MVP awards, if he never roided up? You can’t say that he would have. So you can’t vote A-Fraud into the HOF and leave Dale Murphy out.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 11:06 AM MST up reply actions  

The Hall

I think we’re going to look back on the Roid Era and judge all the players that came from it much differently 20 years down the road than we do now. I think we’ll have more of an understanding on how widespread it was, and if the game can be cleaned up with more stringent drug testing, we’ll have a better idea of the type of numbers people put up in the post-Roid Era. From there, that’s where HOF credentials for the Roid-Era players, users and non-users alike, will be judged. And, as they say, time heals all wounds.

There’s an exhibit at the Hall for the Black Sox, I believe. I would think there will be something similar for the Roid Era. A celebration of the great players who may have benefitted from an advantage that was later deemed illegal.

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 11:21 AM MST up reply actions  

I think we're seeing some of it now

Look at the HR leaders for 2007 and 2008. Heck, look at A-Rod’s numbers for 2008. 35 HRs versus 50+.

I agree, there will be a exhibit regarding the historical significance of the roid era — but there’s no members of the Black Sox inducted into the hall. But such an exhibit can explain why McGwire’s not in the hall (and perhaps why Sosa/Bonds/Clemens aren’t in the hall, if it turns out that way).

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 11:32 AM MST up reply actions  

Pre-steroids, you didn't go to the ballpark wondering who was juiced.

Did some guys take greenies? Sure. But there wasn’t a feeling that it was changing the game. If anything, an argument could be made that it hurt performance.

But I’ll guarantee you that there was no widespread suspicsion pre-PEDs as to who was juiced and whether or not their records were tainted.

I’ll agree that we can’t undo what’s happened. I would just like to get back to the point where the players are accomplishing whatever they are accomplishing on their own skills and not based on the skills of their chemists.

by pedalpusher on Feb 9, 2009 2:07 PM MST up reply actions  

But what you're looking for

isn’t a meaningful change in how players conduct themselves, but the bliss of ignorance. Players have always looked for the edge. The only thing that has changed is that huge increase in money that’s poured into the sport has increased the lengths players can go to acquire PEDs and the incentives for rouge chemists and suppliers to profit from it.

But I’ll guarantee you that there was no widespread suspicsion pre-PEDs as to who was juiced and whether or not their records were tainted.

As I said, that’s not a change in the attitude of the era, it’s a change in the level of media coverage and the attitude of its reporting. Greenies changed the game by allowing players to play a 156 game schedule without so many off days. The only reason that it seems like steroids have had such a warping effect on the game (the era of offense), is that it’s been combined with a number of other factors that have combined to push offense through the roof: the general change in beliefs starting in the 80’s that weight lifting was no longer taboo, expansion diluting the quality of the average pitcher, a change in understanding that has placed an increased value on walks and power, the demise of the pitcher friendly multi-use parks and the rise of the mini-stadium (Great American Ballpark, Citizen’s Bank Park), expansion to cities that by nature are offense-oriented (Phoenix, Colorado), the desire to create more revenues in parks that led teams like the Dodgers to drastically reduce the amount of foul territory in the park in order to add more premium seating.

The game isn’t static and it can never go back to being what it was like in the 70’s. That being said, I think what you consider to be the “steroid era” is a confluence of many effects, most of which have nothing to do with the drug. The feeling you have that they are changing the game is largely the result of media hype and self-righteousness.

by dahlian on Feb 9, 2009 4:15 PM MST up reply actions  

Except that the reason there's controversy here

is because none of those other changes are explicitly illegal, and those changes you mentioned affect players evenly.

You’re right, of course, in that it’s not so cut and dry, though.

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 5:05 PM MST up reply actions  

Are Steroids really cheating...

If pretty much everyone used them. 103 tested positive. It’s very likely that that is only a fraction of the total amount that had used. Some probably got lucky or had enough sense to stop before any tests were done. You can easily argue that at least half the players used steroids.

by mkorpal on Feb 9, 2009 11:11 AM MST reply actions  

Cheating is cheating.

Breaking the law is breaking the law. Doesn’t matter how many people did it.

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 11:14 AM MST up reply actions  

There were over 1000 tests

10% isn’t anything like “pretty much everyone”. There’s a very large % of MLB players who did not test positive.

While you can “easily argue” your point, there’s a huge difference between arguing, and actually making a valid argument. In fact, you can now more easily argue that only a small percentage of players were using steroids.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 11:34 AM MST up reply actions  

Not all who were on roids tested positive

Barry Bonds was not one of those 103 with a positive test, and there’s evidence to show he was using a non-detectable steroid in that time frame.

"Winning doesn't really matter as long as you win." - Vinny Jones

by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 9, 2009 11:37 AM MST up reply actions  

Yes, this is true

However, the following are also true:

a) there are positive tests on the books with regard to Bonds (whether or not they are admissible in cour);
b) his “undetectable” steroids came via BALCO, and there’s no evidence that anyone else worked with BALCO who hasn’t already been implicated in BALCO paperwork and leaked;
c) no one else had their head explode in size x3 over the years in question

Seriously, if the “non-detectable” steroid was anywhere near as prevalent, then why is it that all of the athletes in other sports tied to those steroids, also tied directly to BALCO? In other words, there’s no indication that the issue of non-detectable steroids is a significant number of players.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 11:42 AM MST up reply actions  

If Steroids were legal, would you have a problem with it?

by mkorpal on Feb 9, 2009 11:15 AM MST reply actions  

No, because that's my only problem with it.

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 11:16 AM MST up reply actions  

I see. So the government is creating the problem, not the players?

by mkorpal on Feb 9, 2009 11:18 AM MST up reply actions  

Not at all

Steroids are illegal because they have been scientifically proven harmful. The government is not the problem here. If they were not illegal, then it wouldn’t be cheating. But it’s not the government’s “fault” that steroids are illegal. Steroids are illegal because they should be illegal.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 11:36 AM MST up reply actions  

What if

they weren’t banned by the US government, but they WERE banned by the sport?

Baseball has had steroids on its banned substances list since 1991. (But w/o testing)

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 2:21 PM MST up reply actions  

But w/o Testing

Don’t do those steroids..that got the whole world excited about baseball like Sosa and McGwire did with their home runs now kiddos!

Wink, Wink, Nudge, Nudge

"Suck it monkeys, the Rockies will win this year", Rox Girl 1-11-2009

by Redhawk on Feb 9, 2009 5:52 PM MST up reply actions  

But if the question is the lawfulness of steroids,

as it is for many people here, testing is irrelevant.

By the way, the AZSnakepit does not take responsibility for, nor condone, any alcohol-related accidents or injuries incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of reading this website.

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 7:15 PM MST up reply actions  

Lets take this debate and apply it to another. Maple bats. They may or may not actually improve performance. They are used by a very high percentage of players. And they are dangerous. The only actual difference is one is legalized by the government, the other is not. Would you disqualify a player because he used a maple bat while the league allowed them?

by mkorpal on Feb 9, 2009 11:18 AM MST up reply actions  

I wish I could edit these posts. I meant to say disqualify from the HOF.

by mkorpal on Feb 9, 2009 11:19 AM MST up reply actions  

Gaylord Perry's in, isn't he?

Perry lubed up the ball his entire career, which was legal once and wasn’t legal when he played. He got his 300 wins and he’s in Cooperstown.

I don’t know that I’d keep any steroid user out of the Hall of Fame. It’s hard to say one way or another, from where I sit. Great players are great players and great players belong in the Hall. Some would say that if you voted Bonds, Clemens, etc. in, you’d have to let Pete Rose and Joe Jackson in too. And I don’t know that I wouldn’t be OK with that. But I’ll likely never have a vote, and I think the people that do have built up such a pious moral outrage that we won’t see plaques for the greats of this era who are known steroid users, only an exhibit the likes of which might say “Hey, these guys were great but they thrived in an era where steroids were commonly and frequently used. Judge them how you wish. But they are here. They belong here.”

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 11:25 AM MST up reply actions  

You don't need to have moral outrage to keep them out

It’s plain and simple, really. It’s that the HOF is numbers-based, and the numbers aren’t representative of what they’re true numbers would have been.

As great as Clemens was, if you’ll recall, he was sort of flaming out his last three years with the Red Sox. In fact, it’s not at all unlikely that that was the point when he started roiding up. And while it’s likely he had at least a near-HOF career by that point, it’s not an absolute dead cert that he was.

Bonds had never hit more than, what, about 37 HR in a season prior to indications he was roiding.

My point is simply that you can’t say these players absolutely, uncontrovertibly were HOFers prior to their numbers being inflated via cheating. So how can you say they’re still automatic HOFers, when you can’t reasonably state what their career totals would have been?

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 11:47 AM MST up reply actions  

Are you bleeping kidding me?

Clemens and Bonds were ABSOLUTELY Hall of Famers before they allegedly began juicing. I’m not even going to debate that. And A-Rod was well on his way to a HOF career before he allegedly began juicing – which, at this point, we don’t even know.

And even with that, I’m very hesitant to say that a player wouldn’t have been great if he hadn’t took steroids. Otherwise we’d be arguing Larry Bigbie and Ryan Franklin’s HOF credentials. Steroids sure didn’t make them legends.

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 12:08 PM MST up reply actions  

And Pete Rose was ABSOLUTELY Hall of Famer...

…before he gambled and lied, and all that other stuff.

That’s my point.

Your point seems to be that it doesn’t matter how much someone cheated or violated federal law, during their career, that if their stats were good enough, they’re absolute hall of famers. Am I incorrect?

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 1:38 PM MST up reply actions  

Hold on a second.

Now you’re making a different argument. Pete Rose’s numbers as a player wouldn’t have been affected by his gambling, as you charge the numbers for the Roid Era players would have been affected by steroids. That’s not apples and oranges, that’s apples and desk lamps.

Pete Rose is a Hall of Fame player. The rules are keeping him out of the Hall of Fame. Bonds, Clemens, A-Rod et. al. are Hall of Fame players, too. Whether they get in to the Hall of Fame isn’t for me to say, but their numbers make them deserving, just as Pete’s make him deserving.

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 1:43 PM MST up reply actions  

How the arguments relate

Their numbers are deserving, but it’s not just about numbers.

Whether you like it or not, all of these people cheated.

Heck, you can make an argument that Rose is more deserving, because he earned his numbers honestly. The fact that Rose remains out is a greater argument for keeping the roiders out, because they in fact cheated the game of baseball to get their HOF-worthy numbers.

You cannot make a presumption that all of them would be in the HOF anyway, because of the effects of the roids. The Red Sox considered Clemens near washed up in 1996, when he didn’t even have 190 wins. You can’t simply say that because we only have evidence of use in the 2000s that he was absolutely clean before, when he performance did a 180 during 1997. Not now when we know he was juiced for years. So how can you say he was absolutely a HOFer? You can’t.

Once someone’s a cheater, the burden of proof is on them to prove the negative, because they’ve already been proven to have cheated. And that is the crux of the problem.

So A-Rod’s admitted to 2001-2003. Well, that does not mean he’s been clean since then or before then, because a) he’s already been proven to be a liar about his roid use, b) Orza’s been accused of warning at least one player about an unannounced test, c) there’s no reason for him to come clean about pre-2001 because he hasn’t been faced with evidence yet.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 1:51 PM MST up reply actions  

I think where we differ

is that you’re more sold on steroids having a major effect on the skills of a player than I am, and thus are less sold on the legitmacy of the careers of any known steroid user than I am. Which is fine. To each his own, particularly when it comes to this topic. I don’t think we’ll ever know for sure if steroids allowed Bonds to hit THIS MANY more home runs than he would have, for instance.

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 2:23 PM MST up reply actions  

Well, here's what we do know (and sorta what we don't)

Steroids don’t help hand eye coordination. Yes, hitting a pitched ball is the most difficult thing to do in sports. And steroids don’t give you a better swing.

Steroids allow you to work out harder, longer, etc, and build up muscle mass. So they allow you to hit the ball harder and further. You’ll have a stronger leg kick. You’ll probably maintain your maximum bat speed later through your career.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 2:39 PM MST up reply actions  

Here's the difference

Every clubhouse has a sign above the door that says “No Gambling”. It’s been a rule in baseball since its inception. The 1919 White Sox broke that rule, and as such, Shoeless Joe Jackson is barred from the Hall of Fame.

Steroids were “banned”, but which ones? Baseball never had a rule that completely said “No performance enhancing drugs, chemicals, injections, creams, rubs, marinades, condiments, anything.” So how can you really pin these guys down and say “OMG YOU DID ROIDS” when what they did may have been (at the time) perfectly legal?

What Pete Rose did was Explicitly Banned.

What Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa, Jose Canseco, etc did was banned in spirit, but no real language existed to say “You may not do any of this crap”

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 4:29 PM MST up reply actions  

Not just banned in spirit...

Banned under federal law, which says you may not do any of this crap.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 4:43 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes

but McGwire never has tested positive for steroids…is he guilty by suspicion?

"Suck it monkeys, the Rockies will win this year", Rox Girl 1-11-2009

by Redhawk on Feb 9, 2009 5:54 PM MST up reply actions  

He refused to talk about it at the Senate hearing

We don’t know that he’s never tested postive, but his complete copout speaks volumes. It’s not the same as a court finding him guilty, but the court of public opinion carries as much weight here.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 6:27 PM MST up reply actions  

Clemens and Bonds were ABSOLUTELY Hall of Famers before they allegedly began juicing. I’m not even going to debate that. And A-Rod was well on his way to a HOF career before he allegedly began juicing – which, at this point, we don’t even know.

And even with that, I’m very hesitant to say that a player wouldn’t have been great if he hadn’t took steroids. Otherwise we’d be arguing Larry Bigbie and Ryan Franklin’s HOF credentials. Steroids sure didn’t make them legends.

Something about this argument makes me uncomfortable — somehow, it’s like France arguing that they won World War II.

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 3:30 PM MST up reply actions  

Well,

victory has many fathers. But France is more like the father that left for a pack of cigarettes one night, didn’t come back, and then shows up years later wanting back in.

"If we never try, we shall never succeed." - Abraham Lincoln

Purple Row - Covering all your Rockies needs!

by Russ Oates on Feb 9, 2009 3:44 PM MST up reply actions  

Heh....

I sorta assumed that comment would draw you out of the reeds. Or else the comment about spotter cards.

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 3:47 PM MST up reply actions  

I don’t know that I’d keep any steroid user out of the Hall of Fame. It’s hard to say one way or another, from where I sit. Great players are great players and great players belong in the Hall.

I’m probably not doing you a favor by mentioning that I believe Colin Cowherd frequently makes this same point…

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 3:26 PM MST up reply actions  

I just shuddered involuntarily.

Thanks a lot, man.

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 3:31 PM MST up reply actions  

That was sorta

the reaction I was gunning for.

On the positive side, you’re probably more qualified to host your own sports talk show.

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 3:36 PM MST up reply actions  

This is a strawman argument

Maple bats are not “legalized” by the government. The government has not addressed the issue of maple bats one way or the other. Baseball can ban maple bats without the government outlawing their use and possession. I’m thinking you may wish to edit your thought process while editing your posts.

Furthermore, maple bats are under study, and may in fact ultimately be banned. But no one has ever intimated that their use is cheating.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 11:38 AM MST up reply actions  

AFAIK

maple bats don’t cause cancer and “bat rage”, either.

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 11:54 AM MST up reply actions  

Exactly

A guy doesn’t have to put his future health at risk to use a maple bat. Players shouldn’t have to put their health in jeopardy to compete. Thus the guys who are clean and want to stay clean are the ones who everyone should be protecting by rooting out the guys who aren’t.

by holly96 on Feb 9, 2009 12:06 PM MST up reply actions  

Unless you

want to smash the maple bat on the ground and put yourself on the DL with hand lacerations (TULO). Or have shards of wood flying at you when the bat breaks. These are the only health risks of Maple bats.

As for the second comment I find it difficult to know which guys to protect and who to root out because I like baseball too much. I am going to cheer and root for the Rockies to have success and not just the individual players.

Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah, 1983
JFK

by jrockies on Feb 9, 2009 3:46 PM MST up reply actions  

Yeah!

And while we’re at it, let’s ban that dangerous venison!!

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 3:50 PM MST up reply actions  

And Terrell Davis' driveway

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 4:13 PM MST up reply actions  

I don't really root for individual players, either.

And I have no idea who is who, either. For the most part I’m not going to be making those types of judgments when I follow the game.. I’m going to cheer for the Rockies just as hard as anyone else here.

My point was that baseball as a whole should be doing whatever it can to flip things around so that the guys who are clean aren’t implicated with the rest. I know there’s no way to go back to the past and know for sure, but they shouldn’t be focusing so much on protecting the guys who cheated at the expense of everyone else. And if guys I like or play for me team get implicated, so be it.

by holly96 on Feb 9, 2009 4:05 PM MST up reply actions  

I agree with you.

Baseball should do something, but let it start with what is happening now, let the past be exactly that. The only way to get over something is to start new. If someone is caught now punish them; 50 games (1), 100 games (2), forever (3) I think is how they have it set up. First and foremost though, Let’s let them play baseball!!

Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah, 1983
JFK

by jrockies on Feb 9, 2009 4:13 PM MST up reply actions  

I don't believe he's saying they are equivalent

PED’s are a very sensitive subject for baseball fans – thus, emotional arguments are frequently applied. Naturally, maple bats and steroids don’t share all qualities in common – I expect he’s attempting to draw a parallel to something less petulant in an effort to foster arguments based on logic and reasoning.

"Winning doesn't really matter as long as you win." - Vinny Jones

by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 9, 2009 2:33 PM MST up reply actions  

Fair enough.

And you are correct in saying that the arguments are highly charged emotionally.

by pedalpusher on Feb 9, 2009 2:37 PM MST up reply actions  

The only actual difference is one is legalized by the government, the other is not. Would you disqualify a player because he used a maple bat while the league allowed them?

Additionally, as I noted, the league technically HAS banned steroids since 1991.

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 2:40 PM MST up reply actions  

For me it would be.

A problem of a different sort, perhaps. But my main problem with steroids is that it creates a disadvantage for guys who don’t want to do it. I hate that players have felt they had to do that to their bodies to be competitive. Dale Murphy was mentioned above. At this point he’s probably the one and only guy who I would be shocked to find out did steroids. And I would be incredibly disappointed and disillusioned, far more than with any other player. But look at Murphy—if he had been willing to do that (and I’m glad I can be about 98% certain he wasn’t), would he stack up better against some of these guys who did? We’ll never know. It’s guys like Murphy (and I think and hope there are more, I just don’t know who) who should be protected.

That’s one of my biggest problems with the MLBPA’s approach to this, actually. Why are they so quick to protect the guys who cheated at the expense of the guys who weren’t? That’s why I agree with Schilling. All the names need to come out. I know that doesn’t mean those are the only guys who ever did steroids, but at least we would know everything there is to know and could start to move on. And I really hope they start doing blood testing sooner than later.

by holly96 on Feb 9, 2009 12:03 PM MST up reply actions  

That’s why I agree with Schilling. All the names need to come out.

Agreed. That should be the tradeoff for MLB’s decree not to suspend. The league won’t discipline them per se, but will subject them to the punishment of public scorn.

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 3:34 PM MST up reply actions  

A-Rod

Apparently he just admitted to Peter Gammons (they’re doing an interview right now) that he did PEDs from 2001 through 2003. I’m somewhat impressed that he’s actually admitting to it, especially to doing it before 2003 (since that’s the only year we had evidence for). He could have easily claimed he just did it the one year. But it’s probably just because so many other guys keep denying it in the face of mounting evidence. A-Rod (or Boras or whoever) is clearly smarter than that. I’m still disappointed (and I don’t even really like A-Rod to begin with—I just wanted him to pass Bonds). Sigh.

by holly96 on Feb 9, 2009 12:26 PM MST reply actions  

A-Roid's confession

You know what? I’m glad he apologized, and as a fan I accept it. I have a lot easier time buying his ‘I had just gotten a big contract, I was under pressure, I took them for three years and then I stopped because I felt it wasn’t worth it’ apology than the garden-variety ‘It was only a one-time thing and I’m only sorry I got caught’ apology that every other player has gone with.

Nothing about this – his use of steroids and his rationale for starting and stopping use – doesn’t make sense considering the perception of A-Rod as vain and insecure.

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 12:45 PM MST up reply actions  

Wonder how his open admission will be perceived.

People seemed to rake Jason Giambi over the coals — and while nobody can condone what he did, he was one of the few players to openly admit it and apologize for it before being threatened/exposed, and before the Mitchell Report came out. Gotta respect him for that.

I can only imagine that the MLBPA doesn’t particularly like this, either.

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 1:00 PM MST up reply actions  

Giambi

Like you say, that was before all the crap with other players (like Clemens, Palmeiro, etc.) denying it and then evidence coming out. I think now, after all of that, people would much rather have guys do what Giambi and now A-Rod have done.

by holly96 on Feb 9, 2009 1:04 PM MST up reply actions  

Giambi

I don’t think anybody cares anymore that Giambi did steroids. I think fans have been far more willing to move on with him than they were with Bonds and Clemens because Giambi copped to it. The guys who have taken the biggest beating from fans about steroid use are the ones who lied repeatedly even in the face of mounting evidence.

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 1:13 PM MST up reply actions  

It was

past tense — when Giambi came clean, there were still plenty of willfully ignorant fans who instantly hated him. I respected him all the more at the time, since it must have been a terribly difficult decision for him in the face of all the pressure from his peers and otherwise. On the other hand, I’m reminded of a quote from the movie Quiz Show:

Congressman Derounian: I’m happy that you’ve made the statement. But I cannot agree with most of my colleagues. See, I don’t think an adult of your intelligence should be commended for simply, at long last, telling the truth.

The other thing that sets Bonds and Clemens apart from Giambi is legacy on the game. Sure, he won an MVP award, but in another generation, who’s going to honestly remember Jason Giambi’s contributions on the field?

But Bonds and Clemens are clearly in a different situation…

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 2:38 PM MST up reply actions  

I agree it makes sense.

And I do appreciate him coming totally clean (and so far I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt that he isn’t holding anything back). This is definitely much easier to believe than “It was just the one time.” This is still nothing but damage control, though. At least it appears to be honest damage control thus far.

And I’m still disappointed.

by holly96 on Feb 9, 2009 1:01 PM MST up reply actions  

Let's not hold A-Rod up as a saint because of his "confession"

Remember that he categorically denied any use of PEDs in 2007 on national TV. He’s only coming clean now because he got caught.

by pedalpusher on Feb 9, 2009 5:34 PM MST up reply actions  

I never said he was a saint...

I said I forgave him. Big difference. If you want to continue to demonize him as all that is evil in the world and in baseball, that’s your right. But I’m ready to move on.

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 5:41 PM MST up reply actions  

No no no no no.

Barry Bonds is all that is evil in the world and in baseball, not ARod.

Also, Randy Winn. (Snakepit joke)

By the way, the AZSnakepit does not take responsibility for, nor condone, any alcohol-related accidents or injuries incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of reading this website.

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 5:50 PM MST up reply actions  

I never said YOU said he was a saint.

And I haven’t “demonized him as as all that is evil in the world and in baseball……”. I’m just PO’d about what the whole steriod thing has done to baseball and most other sports for that matter.

The only way it will affect me is that now I’ll suspect all his accomplishments where I didn’t before this weekend. I’m not surprised that he had a positive test but until it became public, I didn’t feel one way or the other about his accomplishments.

by pedalpusher on Feb 9, 2009 5:57 PM MST up reply actions  

Definitely no saint

For me the difference is that some guys have continued to deny it even after they got caught. So his confession is certainly nothing that should be celebrated, since he still cheated, but at least he’s not going the Bonds or Clements route, here.

by holly96 on Feb 9, 2009 5:55 PM MST up reply actions  

Oops

Clemens, not Clements. Not sure who that latter guy is.

by holly96 on Feb 9, 2009 6:12 PM MST up reply actions  

Also

I meant to add, I generally find A-Rod very rehearsed and calculated in terms of his public speaking, etc. He’s always seemed way too conscious of his public image. However, from the clip I heard (now I may change my mind once I see video with body language, etc.), he sounded far more natural and sincere than I’ve ever heard him.

by holly96 on Feb 9, 2009 1:08 PM MST reply actions  

It must have been

a bit of a relief for him to quit living a blatant lie.

I’ve never really been so down on ARod as everyone else seemingly has, although that may partly be because I hope he someday breaks all of Barry’s HR records.

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 2:28 PM MST up reply actions  

I used to hope so

But what’s the point of one roider breaking another roider’s numbers?

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 2:40 PM MST up reply actions  

ARod

was only a douche in Seattle, Texas and New York (so far), while Barry was a bigger douche, and in our division.

:-P

Oh yeah. And that whole perjury thing….

If ARod doesn’t do it, there’s a good chance that nobody ever will. 73 will probably never be broken, for example.

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 2:46 PM MST up reply actions  

73 will probably never be broken....

…and neither would 61 have been.

There is no one who has ever hit more than 61 who has not been rightfully clouded by steroids.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 4:04 PM MST up reply actions  

That's not true

You can’t say that with any convenience. Until Ryan Howard is really suspected, I’m going to maintain that he has a shot to break 61. He almost did in 2006.

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 4:17 PM MST up reply actions  

confidence, not convenience.

I’m in class. My professor just said “convenience” and it wormed its way into my sentence.

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 4:17 PM MST up reply actions  

+1

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 4:35 PM MST up reply actions  

I was thinking Howard when I typed it...

But I doubt anyone who K’s 200 times a year will break it. Not impossible, but not likely.

He’s not the first big guy to come along since 1961 who had the power to come close but the whiffability to never truly get close.

I won’t say he won’t do it, but it’s hardly a fait accompli.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 4:45 PM MST up reply actions  

Ah yes, 61

Talk about a guy with the tell-tale track record of a suspected steroid user: Check out his year by year home run totals:

14
28
16
39
61
33
23
26
8
13
9
5

He even had his career cut short at the age of 33 because of physical break downs (presumably, steroid related) – just what happens to all steroid users. Except, of course, for the ones that use the benefit of steroids to have succesful careers into their forties.

by dahlian on Feb 9, 2009 4:28 PM MST up reply actions  

Just so we know,

where do you draw the line of “rightfully clouded by steroids”?

What about Sammy Sosa? He has never failed a steroid test, wasn’t named in the Mitchell report, and has no connections to Balco. The most anyone has on him is the corked bat, and federal agent signing an affidavit linking him to amphetamines, which has been established in this thread don’t count as cheating because they’re not OMG TEH STERIODS!.

I’m curious to know, because it really sounds like “nobody will ever hit more than 61 home runs with the cloud of steroids, because if they hit more than 61 home runs then obviously there will be clouds of steroids around them.”

by dahlian on Feb 9, 2009 4:58 PM MST up reply actions  

I wouldn't put it like that...

Here is where the cloud continues to specifically follow Sosa…

1. His sudden complete loss of ability to comprehend the English language at the Senate hearing where he was to be asked about steroid use
2. His extreme size gain during the mid 90s. We’re talking from skinny kid with zero power, to coming back post strike looking like a bodybuilder.

You’re right, as of now, there is no conclusive evidence of Sosa being ‘roided. But he’s done nothing to eliminate the cloud. His Senate appearance was nothing short of “let’s not talk about the past” (but in Espanol, ’natch)

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 5:10 PM MST up reply actions  

The first example you give

is one of the most ludicrously comical examples of the length people will go to paint someone as a steroid user.

Sosa is not a native English speaker. He can speak well enough to be conversant, but when you’re speaking in front of the Senate of the United States of America knowing full well that every single clause of every single sentence you utter will be parsed to death, he would be an idiot to not have a professional translator there to make sure that what is said is what he actually means. To consider this to be a tacit admission of guilt is absolutely ludicrous. If any American expats face legal trouble abroad and their lawyer says to them “Why don’t you go ahead and give your testimony in a language that you aren’t 100% comfortable speaking in, because otherwise you’ll only look more guilty.” they should fire their counsel immediately.

And what could Sosa have said at this Senate hearing that would have pleased you? It was obvious that the senators weren’t interested in coming up with anything substantive; they had the opportunity to invite Bonds but they declined because he would “steal the show”. It was a ridiculous exercise, only created so that a handful of senators could wag their finger at a bunch of baseball players and try to score easy political points with their constituents by being “tough on drugs”.

That aside, your statement that “His Senate appearance was nothing short of "let’s not talk about the past" (but in Espanol, ’natch)” shows how far you’re willing to go to fit the facts around the conclusion your trying to make. Here is a brief reminder of what people said at the senate hearing. Sosa – “Everything I have heard about steroids and human growth hormones is that they are very bad for you, even lethal. I would never put anything dangerous like that in my body.” “To be clear, I have never taken illegal performance-enhancing drugs.”

So that leaves what, Sosa was skinny in his early twenties and then got bigger as he grew older. But can he float in water?

by dahlian on Feb 9, 2009 6:02 PM MST up reply actions  

Yeah, I see that...
Sosa – "Everything I have heard about steroids and human growth hormones is that they are very bad for you, even lethal. I would never put anything dangerous like that in my body." "To be clear, I have never taken illegal performance-enhancing drugs."

…I see that A-Rod categorically denied use of steroids, too.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 9, 2009 6:29 PM MST up reply actions  

Let me get this straight,

Going in front of the Senate and not talking about the past counts for everything. To quote you from above: “[McGwire] refused to talk about it at the Senate hearing – We don’t know that he’s never tested postive, but his complete copout speaks volumes. It’s not the same as a court finding him guilty, but the court of public opinion carries as much weight here.”

But then going in front of the Senate and categorically denying any use, counts for absolutely nothing. Congratulations, sir, you win at logic.

by dahlian on Feb 9, 2009 6:51 PM MST up reply actions  

Awww. Poor Sammy Sosa. Obviously Mondogarage is just picking on the poor, simple immigrant. Just like all those mean Senators.
Palmeiro denied having used steroids, while Sosa — or his lawyers — crafted an opening statement in which he said he has never used “illegal performance-enhancing drugs,” has never “injected myself or had anyone inject me with anything,” and has not “broken the laws of the United States or the laws of the Dominican Republic.”

From here.

Sosa seems to take a strong and definitive stance — but then his statement doesn’t come off as particularly binding when you take all the qualifiers into account. “Illegal performance-enhancing drugs”. “Never injected myself of had anyone inject me with anything”. Has not “broken the laws of the United States or the laws of the Dominican Republic”.

For a poor, stupid immigrant, he sure chooses his words carefully and leaves himself a lot of wiggle room, doesn’t he, dahlian?

Not that any of the other witnesses’ behavior implicates Sosa, either, but recall that Raffy Palmeiro also said, “I never used steroids. Period. I don’t know how to say it more clearly than that.”

See, Palmeiro should have left himself some room, like Sosa did.

By the way, the AZSnakepit does not take responsibility for, nor condone, any alcohol-related accidents or injuries incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of reading this website.

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 7:35 PM MST up reply actions  

Skins,

I don’t know how you get more definitive than "To be clear, I have never taken illegal performance-enhancing drugs." Your quibble is that he included the qualifier ‘illegal’?!? Legality is the crux of this discussion! If he didn’t include it than they could have charged him with perjury for that time he took an aspirin because a headache kept him from practicing as hard as he could have.

And I don’t understand what your point is with the whole “poor, stupid immigrant” schtick. As has already been said, he was smart and did what ANYONE should do if put in the situation of testifying before heads of state on a legal matter in a non-native language, he got a professional interpreter.

by dahlian on Feb 9, 2009 8:03 PM MST up reply actions  

Why don't you tell us how you really feel?

You know, that steroids are fine, and that no player should ever have to pay any penalty for using illegal substances, or even have to face questions about doing so, and that your heroes shall always be heroes?

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 10, 2009 7:57 AM MST up reply actions  

Not necessarily.

Dahlian also really, really, really likes to argue, to the bitter end.

By the way, the AZSnakepit does not take responsibility for, nor condone, any alcohol-related accidents or injuries incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of reading this website.

by DbacksSkins on Feb 10, 2009 1:26 PM MST up reply actions  

With very long posts

Comprised of many paragraphs, bolded sections, and well thought out arguments.

I can only assume, anyhow. My mind sees his posts and says “WALL OF TEXT” and then skips it and I have to scold my mind and make it go back and read it.

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 10, 2009 1:56 PM MST up reply actions  

I've got it

Let’s just have two sets of records and achievements. One set for the Pre-Drugs Era and one set since the onset of drug usage. That’ll take care of that little problem. And no comparing the two eras. No saying how good Joe Jackson would hit against Roger Clemens. No arguing how Barry Bonds would fare against Bob Feller. And have two wings of the HOF. One for pre-drug era and one after the onset of drug usage.

That way everyone will be happy. Well, maybe. Except the ones who never used PEDs. But hey we’ll never know for sure who they were so no matter.

(for those of you who were unsure, this was written with a heavy dose of sarcasm)

by pedalpusher on Feb 9, 2009 1:35 PM MST reply actions  

And then we can have a set of records

Differentiating 144 game seasons, 154 game seasons, and 162 game seasons.

We’ll just differentiate with a nice little asterisk.

Hey look Babe Ruth is the man again.

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 4:19 PM MST up reply actions  

Ugh

"Winning doesn't really matter as long as you win." - Vinny Jones

by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 9, 2009 4:22 PM MST up reply actions  

Nope.

It’s well known, or at least, suspected, that Babe Ruth tried to gain a competitive edge by ingesting goat testes extract – the testosterone could have provided him a steroid-like effect.

Can you say asterisk?

by dahlian on Feb 9, 2009 4:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Whoa...

you’re going to penalize a guy for eating Rocky Mountain oysters?

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 4:33 PM MST up reply actions  

I also hear

that Roger Connor had drank suspicious Nerve Tonic Elixer before hitting his record setting 131.

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 4:37 PM MST up reply actions  

Apparently,

for years, Sadaharu Oh clandestinely consumed large amounts of a substance called “green tea” as well.

Shun ’em all.

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 4:58 PM MST up reply actions  

You're forgetting

Xnffalrh’rufb Marfbkref who plays for the MoonCo Mooninites in the Moonadium.

Nobody’s gonna ever touch his 8403 dingers.

But he also plays on the Moon.

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 5:02 PM MST up reply actions  

Oh snap!

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 5:07 PM MST up reply actions  

I can't wait

for the separate records when baseball goes to a 180 game season.

"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 4:32 PM MST up reply actions  

I was ranting because of what the Steriod Era has done to the discussion of baseball.

I’m just frustrated about what I feel is a damage to the reputation of baseball. I was being facietious.

by pedalpusher on Feb 9, 2009 5:37 PM MST up reply actions  

And the Live Ball Era

And the raising/lowering of the mound

And the use of (legitimate) technology in plate discipline exercises

And breaking one’s elbow while pitching

And

And

And….

I know you’re being facetious, I certainly was as well. We can find excuses to toss out records and numbers from any era. That’s why when comparing numbers from year to year, you normalize numbers based on the seasons and what everyone around them is also doing.

If you simply want to compare Babe Ruth to Barry Bonds, we can look at OPS+ for a general look at the two, relative to their environment.

I understand it’s hurting baseball’s reputation, and IIRC Tim Kurkjian touched on this in his book “Is This a Great Game or What?” <= excellent read, by the way.

Nobody is doubting for a second that pro football players are juiced out of their minds, but you don’t hear everyone blowing their stacks over such allegations. Why? Because football players are already Mammoth sized men, all very tall and large. They’re juicing? Damn, they already huge! That’s an even BIGGER dude!

Baseball players, however, are guys who could be living down the street from you. Someone you see in the mall. The guy in front of you in line at Chipotle. That kind of stuff. To think that they’re taking PEDs makes you think “Oh that’s terrible. I could never picture Larry doing something like that” because baseball players tend to be so much more human.

Baseball’s history is far dirtier than Steroids could ever make it, anyhow. Just look at Bob Gibson or Don Drysdale.

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 6:00 PM MST up reply actions  

Steroids...The Steroidal Era, and the Hall of Fame

there is only one way to handle this ERA, as we will never know EVERYONE that did steroids during this time period (not sure when to start it, but it ended, one would assume in 2004 with testing) and that is to have all the players those associated, and those not officially associated, get an Asterisk (*).

But they get voted in just the same, as if they were the best of their era, then they are the best of their era…same as the dead ball era, or the Negro Leagues…..but they get a big fat ASTERISK.

Now….the real problem…is records. Baseball is the only sport where Records matter…we all know the Home Run Record. How do we handle that one? I dunno

"Suck it monkeys, the Rockies will win this year", Rox Girl 1-11-2009

by Redhawk on Feb 9, 2009 6:02 PM MST reply actions  

I'll be damned if

I see an asterisk by Sandy Koufax’s name just because he pitched in a pitcher’s era.

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 6:17 PM MST up reply actions  

Wow

100 Fan Posts for a PHLP thread. What is the record for responses to a fan post? I might have it however, I ADMIT TO USING BLOG PERFORMANCE EHANCING DRUGS (BPEDS) does this mean my record is expunged?

by PinchHitLancePainter on Feb 9, 2009 6:16 PM MST reply actions  

Pimping one's own thread is frowned upon.

Way to blow it bigshot.

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 6:17 PM MST up reply actions  

The FanPost

archive goes to 660, and if we don’t include the game thread ones, this holds the record for most responses.

"If we never try, we shall never succeed." - Abraham Lincoln

Purple Row - Covering all your Rockies needs!

by Russ Oates on Feb 9, 2009 6:28 PM MST up reply actions  

NO NO NO

you don’t ADMIT to it, until after proof has come out in public…then you cry like a 4 year old that had his crayons melted.

"Suck it monkeys, the Rockies will win this year", Rox Girl 1-11-2009

by Redhawk on Feb 9, 2009 7:01 PM MST up reply actions  

I was just going to note

hey, Lance, pretty popular discussion.

By the way, the AZSnakepit does not take responsibility for, nor condone, any alcohol-related accidents or injuries incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of reading this website.

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 7:14 PM MST up reply actions  

yeah but too late now

Follow me on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/rockiesmagicnum

by Andrew Martin on Feb 9, 2009 7:17 PM MST up reply actions  

Sweet!

I’ll admit though I never used PEDs while in the Rangers system. I am still a darling to Texas fans. Me, Mitch Williams, Pete O’Brien, Curtis Wilkerson, Bill Sample, Jose Guzman, Geno Petralli, Steve Buchele, Jeff Kunkel, Oddibe McDowell, Ruben Sierra and all the other hacks I shared bus rides around the hotter than heck Texas League with.

by PinchHitLancePainter on Feb 9, 2009 7:20 PM MST reply actions  

Here's actually a serious question for you

if when you were starting to stall…if you could have taken steroids..and boosted yourself to making the show…would you?

Personally…I think I would have. There was so much of a “don’t ask, don’t tell” going on with steroids, it seemed silently encouraged.

"Suck it monkeys, the Rockies will win this year", Rox Girl 1-11-2009

by Redhawk on Feb 9, 2009 7:30 PM MST up reply actions  

Quite frankly

in those early 80’s years there was no such commotion or widespread use Not until I saw Canseco in Huntsville in 1985 did “new era” this even cross my mind. He was beyond freakshow and everyone knew he was a “Golds Gym” product. Remember back then lifting weights and all that was very taboo and thought to lead to injury, decreased agility, and impure swing. I was a speed guy and bulking up was not what a speed guy did. My game was cover ground, go from first to third and first to home, bunt for hits, steal bases, and create chaos.

by PinchHitLancePainter on Feb 9, 2009 11:30 PM MST up reply actions  

I see

that my comments from earlier created quite a commotion. Sorry I wasn’t there to answer to what I said. You know how school and work are.

I just want to finish this whole thing by saying that the fans and sportswriters put these players on such high pedestals that pretty much anything can get you knocked off. No other sport holds their players more accountable for integrity than baseball. Weather or not that is right, I can’t tell. However, it’s just the way it is. Players these days will always be compared to the “golden boys” of yesteryears, when racism was a norm in baseball.

by mkorpal on Feb 9, 2009 9:19 PM MST reply actions  

I think the emotion in the baseball issue is because most people played it growing up.

It’s something we’ve loved for as long as we can remember. It’s something we’ve played through T-ball, Little League, Babe Ruth League, High School, American Legion and some college and professionally and especially in the back yard with the neighbors. We love it. We don’t like seeing it get a black eye.

by pedalpusher on Feb 9, 2009 10:44 PM MST up reply actions  

The game doesn't have a black eye.

Don’t let the media tell you that, and don’t ever believe it. The men who play this game have tarnished themselves. But baseball’s as pure and as beautiful as ever. It survived segregation, rampant game fixing, cocaine, work stoppages, and by God it’ll survive this too. You can’t kill the beauty of this game. I love the game of baseball just as much today as I ever have.

Staying on the sunny side of Blake Street since 1993.
MHCSports - Denver sports analysis from Denver sports fans

by Franchise26 on Feb 9, 2009 11:05 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Great Post

In the end, it’s baseball that defines the players, not the other way.

What do cockroaches and baseball have in common?

They will survive!!!

by mkorpal on Feb 9, 2009 11:11 PM MST up reply actions  

Cockroaches, baseball,

and Gloria Gaynor.

By the way, the AZSnakepit does not take responsibility for, nor condone, any alcohol-related accidents or injuries incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of reading this website.

by DbacksSkins on Feb 9, 2009 11:36 PM MST up reply actions  

That's a nice reply.

Allow me to change “black eye” to “bad publicity”.

by pedalpusher on Feb 9, 2009 11:24 PM MST up reply actions  

Excellent Point

I agree, let baseball run it’s course because people will continue to play it and watch it and enjoy it.

Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything. ~Toby Harrah, 1983
JFK

by jrockies on Feb 9, 2009 11:41 PM MST up reply actions  

+1

I actually think we’re experiencing one of the golden ages of the game. The late ’90s and early ’00s were a little too homer-centric for me, but I think the balance between pitching and hitting and the lack of a clear dynasty is making the game really great right now.

by onholliday on Feb 10, 2009 9:29 AM MST up reply actions  

Parity:

It’s what’s for dinner.

By the way, the AZSnakepit does not take responsibility for, nor condone, any alcohol-related accidents or injuries incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of reading this website.

by DbacksSkins on Feb 10, 2009 10:10 AM MST up reply actions  

Word

defense is making a comeback.

by Resolution on Feb 11, 2009 7:18 AM MST up reply actions  

I'm think I'm warming up to a group forgiveness if

the remaining 103 would come forward and admit it. Don’t wait to be exposed. Just admit it. Group admit. Group forgiveness and we all move on. Otherwise we’re going to go through this whole deal every time a name is leaked out.

And I’d really be impressed with someone who is not part of the 103 coming forward with an admission. Now that will never happen but we’ve got to move past it somehow.

by pedalpusher on Feb 9, 2009 10:52 PM MST reply actions  

I'm pretty sure

When it’s all said and done, we can subtract Arod’s 2001-2003 numbers from his final numbers and he’s still leaps and bounds ahead of anyone else on that ballot. I don’t know what that means entirely, all I do know is that the more I hear about the HOF, the less I care about it…

by Resolution on Feb 10, 2009 8:32 AM MST reply actions  

However, that presupposes...

…that you believe A-Rod this time around.

After all, he’s flat out lied about the use before. Why should anyone give him the benefit of the doubt that he only ever used it AFTER he signed his $252m contract. Why not before, when he was playing for such a huge contract? Some of his greatest power number years, above those of his now-admitted steroid years, came even later.

Why would you believe an admitted liar, when everything else he’s said so far has only been to cover his own ass?

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 10, 2009 9:32 AM MST up reply actions  

Because

I’m a nice (naive) guy?

by Resolution on Feb 11, 2009 7:17 AM MST up reply actions  

Maybe Leo Durocher should chime in here

“Nice Guys Finish Last”.

No, they don’t. But they get lied to repeatedly.

When A-Roid first denied ever using it, it was easy to believe him, because there had been no evidence tying him to steroids, and no evidence he was anything less than truthful.

Now, he no longer has the benefit of the doubt when he makes any statement with regard to his own steroid usage, because we already know he’s a liar. It’s not so much a matter of “guilty until proven innocent”, because he’s already admitted guilt in two areas — steroid use, and the predisposition to lie about them, so he is in fact guilty of both. Going forward, absent actual evidence to the contrary, there’s no reason to believe he did not do steroids prior to, or even after, 2003.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Feb 11, 2009 7:53 AM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Colorado Rockies, established 28 April 2005.

Community Guidelines
RockiesRoster.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Paul_by_jerichasmall_small
PRMLB February Thread

Recent FanPosts

Rockieshat1_small
Purple Row Cares: In memory of Thomas Harding's son
Small
On Addiction and Major League Baseball
Small
Musical Analysis of Baseball
Rockies1_small
2012 Projected Opening Day Payroll
2009__1_small
Opening Day & Fireworks Tickets
Img_1229_small
PRMLB: The January Thread
Avatar_small
Off Season Picture Time
Happy-face_small
Taking Out The Trash (And How Michael Cuddyer Can Help Us Do It)
3451018757_e6a85f909d_o_1__small
Yoenis Cespedes wants to play for the Rockies!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Colorado Sports Blogs

Mile High Report (Denver Broncos)
Mile High Hockey (Colorado Avalanche)
Denver Stiffs (Denver Nuggets)
Burgundy Wave (Colorado Rapids)
The Ralphie Report (CU Buffaloes)
SB Nation Denver

Top 30 PuRPs

  1. Drew Pomeranz, LHP - AA/MLB
  2. Nolan Arenado, 3B - A (Adv)
  3. Wilin Rosario, C - AA/MLB
  4. Chad Bettis, RHP - A (Adv)
  5. Tyler Matzek, A (Adv), A
  6. Alex White, AA/MLB
  7. Kyle Parker, OF - A
  8. Tim Wheeler, OF - AA
  9. Josh Rutledge, SS - A (Adv)
  10. Charlie Blackmon, OF - MLB
  11. Rosell Herrera, SS/3B - Rookie
  12. Trevor Story, SS/3B - Rookie
  13. Edwar Cabrera, LHP - A (Adv)
  14. Tyler Anderson, LHP - unassigned
  15. Rafael Ortega, OF - A
  16. Peter Tago, RHP, A
  17. Christian Friedrich, LHP - AA
  18. Joe Gardner, RHP - AA
  19. Corey Dickerson, OF - Low-A
  20. Thomas Field, 2B - AA
  21. Will Swanner, C - Rookie
  22. Kent Matthes, OF - A (Adv)
  23. Albert Campos, RHP - A
  24. Jordan Pacheco, C/UT - AAA/MLB
  25. Cristhian Adames, SS - A
  26. Ben Paulsen, 1B - AA
  27. Josh Slaats, RHP - Low-A
  28. David Kandilas, CF - Rookie
  29. Jayson Aquino, LHP - DSL
  30. Hector Gomez, SS - AA/MLB
HM:  
Edgmer Escalona, RHP - AAA/MLB
Dillon Thomas, OF - Rookie
Sam Mende, IF - Rookie
Mike Zuanich, 1B - AA
Dan Houston, RHP - AA

updated 10/25/2011. 


Managers

Rox_girl_small Rox Girl

35l7yvb_small Andrew Martin

Staff

Jeff_aberle_small Jeff Aberle

Poison-the-well-the-tropic-rot_small Bryan Kilpatrick

Avatar2_small Andrew T. Fisher

Wittgenstein_small Greg Stanwood

Special Assistants to the GM

Rockies_lost_americana_small holly96