The curious case of Todd Helton
And the most overused article/story title this year, am I right? (stupid Hollywood)
Helton right now is an odd study. His re-emergence as a force in the middle of the lineup has made me smile large and wide, and give a nod and say "Att'l do, Todd". That .335 AVG has me dreaming of the glory days when he flirted with .400 and such. In fact, he's OPSing .907, right where I was expecting him to land. Specifically, I was expecting like a .320/.420/.480 kind of line, good number of doubles, walking a lot, etc. So the AVG is a bit high, it'll balance out a bit an-
Todd Helton 2009: .335/.384/.523
What the hell, he's slugging?
So my next step was to take a little stroll over to Fangraphs and take a look at what's going on with our bearded bag boy. Because something's wrong with this.
One of Helton's greatest strengths is his superhuman ability to take pitches, work a count, and walk an absurd amount, to the tune of a career OBP of .427 and a career IsoD of .099. Right now, Helton is at a .384 OBP, which is nothing to sneeze at, but his IsoD is a mere .049, about half of what it should be.
Were Helton's IsoD in the right place, he'd have a .335/.434/.523 line, good for a .957 OPS, and have him back in the downright elite category. Not that I won't take the .907 OPS, but I just figure it can get better.
I think I have an inkling on what he's doing wrong, too. He's swinging.
Join me after the jump and we'll look at some tables and numbers and all that fun stuff.
Helton has been swinging at pitches outside of the zone at a 5% higher clip than his career numbers. His LD% is a bit down, which means he's making the contact, but he's definitely reaching for more pitches that he used to take.
(Sorry the tables look a little strange. I blame Word '07)
|
Season |
O-Swing% |
Z-Swing% |
Swing% |
O-Contact% |
Z-Contact% |
Contact% |
Zone% |
F-Strike% |
BABIP |
LD% |
|
Career |
17.5% |
69.6% |
43.7% |
74.9% |
90.9% |
87.7% |
50.3% |
54.0% |
.341 |
25.2% |
|
2006 |
21.4% |
71.3% |
47.0% |
82.7% |
92.8% |
90.5% |
51.2% |
57.3% |
.321 |
23.6% |
|
2007 |
17.2% |
64.4% |
40.5% |
83.9% |
94.8% |
92.4% |
49.3% |
54.4% |
.345 |
24.1% |
|
2008 |
16.5% |
66.5% |
41.2% |
80.2% |
90.1% |
88.1% |
49.4% |
54.6% |
.298 |
23.4% |
|
2009 |
22.2% |
74.2% |
47.2% |
78.1% |
91.7% |
88.4% |
48.0% |
51.7% |
.368 |
23.1% |
The fact is, he's swinging more. It kind of sucks to see, but he is. His contact rates aren't really extraordinarily off, but that 4% jump in swinging and the 5% jump in Out-Of-Zone swinging are probably pitches that he would've taken in the past few years.
His .335 AVG helps his OBP be in the "downright good" range, but his BABIP isn't incredibly sustainable, and if he doesn't re-find his legendary plate discipline, he's gonna end up with a .310/.360/.500 line - which isn't bad, mind you, but we're far more accustomed to a .420 OBP Todd Helton packed chock-full of Base on Balls.
I do think Helton has gotten the raw end of the K-looking deal, but I don't think it's enough to halve his IsoD (that is, getting rung up enough that half of his expected walks became backwards K's).
|
Year |
Team |
Level |
P/PA |
kL |
kS |
uBB |
iBB |
|
2006 |
COL |
MLB |
3.93 |
3.9% |
6.0% |
11.7% |
2.3% |
|
2007 |
COL |
MLB |
4.36 |
4.7% |
6.2% |
14.7% |
2.3% |
|
2008 |
COL |
MLB |
4.23 |
5.0% |
8.8% |
14.6% |
2.2% |
|
2009 |
COL |
MLB |
4.32 |
5.8% |
8.2% |
7.0% |
1.2% |
Those strikeout figures are definitely trending higher, which is explained by the higher Swing% we saw above, but at the same time, that doesn't really explain that BB% dropping so drastically. Or maybe it does.
If you take his career k Looking percentage ( or as close as we can get based on the data available), and adjust his K's looking this year to match more his career numbers, he essentially strikes out looking 3 less times, and walks 3 more times (assuming those are on a full count). Adding those 3 BB into his OBP, it actually does hop up to .406, which is a bit more Helton-esque. You can attribute those other 40 points of OBP to the fact that he's swinging at such an elevated rate. (Note: This entire paragraph was entirely a stretch, and I am NOT hanging my hat on it, moreso just bringing it up for the sake of conjecture).
So to summarize, followers of the Beard, Helton needs to cool down and go back to taking some more pitches. His % of pitches taken is down about 4%, and he really does need to just relax and go with it, man.
I know you want another shot at it, Todd, but don't feel like you have to take the entire team on your shoulders. Your back just can't handle it.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
yes....curious...
if you're reading this, it means my undying support for your team will result in its failure.
by fantasyfencing on May 27, 2009 12:41 PM MDT reply actions
This makes me
wonder why he is swinging at more pitches out of the zone. Is he not picking the ball up out of the pitcher’s hand? He is fowling quite a few off because his P/PA is about his average but I don’t know why he would swing and miss this often. I too would like to see Helton with more walks than strikeouts, and I think he will eventually get back to that, but when is the question.
"We made too many wrong mistakes." ~Yogi Berra
"The ballplayer who loses his head, who can't keep his cool, is worse than no ballplayer at all." ~Lou Gehrig
JFK
Maybe he's swinging at more balls out of the zone because he's trying to swing more often.
And it’s a by-product? Kevin Youkilis, a guy with great plate discipline, started swinging a lot more last year and had a big season. There’s a study in there somewhere…
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
I think I remember
reading something similar about how an aggressive approach for Kelly Johnson was working or something. I guess you can’t wait for the perfect pitch and have to wait for a mere great pitch or something…
If Helton was 26 I'd get on board that
But he’s an established veteran with years of doing this behind him.
Matt Murton status: Freed
Garrett Atkins status: Not Traded
Clint Hurdle status: Still Employed by the Rockies
by Andrew Martin on May 28, 2009 8:25 AM MDT up reply actions
Yea, Helton's set in stone
but it might help some of the younger players to take some sort of moderated patience approach
Well in reality
that’s something ALL players should have.
There are, however, some players with such superhuman eye for the ball, such as Adam Dunn, Todd Helton, Jack Cust, Barry Bonds, you want to foster that particular talent, you know?
If a guy is a solid .060-.070 IsoD kind of guy, I’m on board with your “moderated patience” or however we want to name it (we need an acronym). But once you start touching on .100 IsoD and beyond, we’re suddenly dealing with something completely different, and we just need to do whatever it takes to foster that and improve the power numbers, because batting average for those guys will come and go like so much chaff in the plate-discipline wind
Matt Murton status: Freed
Garrett Atkins status: Not Traded
Clint Hurdle status: Still Employed by the Rockies
by Andrew Martin on May 29, 2009 10:27 AM MDT up reply actions
For some reason
I feel as though he’s getting a lot more strikes called on him out of the zone and is expanding his strike zone more. Of course this is purely anecdotal. He could just be being more aggressive at the plate and trying to slug the ball more than just get on base. Perhaps the reason he drew so many walks in the past was because people didn’t pitch to him and now their nibbling a bit more. I have no idea.
I guess the most noticeable thing is his contact rate out of zone is down, not much, but swinging and missing at ball four is certainly one way to do that. Of course it’d be much easier just to re watch everyone of his at-bats, which he’s probably done, so I’m sure if someone asked him, he could tell us.
Do the tables in Microsoft Excel.
Copy and paste it into the editor and then select it. Click the table button and then choose the width of the border you want.
"If we never try, we shall never succeed." - Abraham Lincoln
Purple Row - Covering all your Rockies needs!
Ah.
It pasted alright from Word ‘08 on my mac. That’s weird.
Matt Murton status: Freed
Garrett Atkins status: Not Traded
Clint Hurdle status: Still Employed by the Rockies
by Andrew Martin on May 27, 2009 1:44 PM MDT up reply actions
Your last line alluded to it
but I wonder if Helton is taking a more aggressive approach at the plate to fill Holliday’s void. Not to say that he’s taking every at-bat as if he were trying to replace Holliday, but the guy has to acknowledge himself as one of the bigger run producers in the lineup now that Holliday is gone. Aside from Hawpe we don’t really have anyone to drive in runs (please stop sucking Atkins).
Also, out of the 4 posted years of Helton’s numbers in the first three columns (O-swing%, Z-swing%, and swing%), 2009 most closely resembles 2006, which was Holliday’s first year of prominence (not to mention Atkins and Hawpe also establishing themselves as legit big-league bats) meaning Helton was still THE big bat of the lineup. Of course, I’m comparing this to only 2007 and 2008 and 2008 really doesn’t count so it all could be meaningless.
At least it’s good to see Helton’s contact rates are above is career averages…
It's not that Todd's getting fooled more..
and it’s not that he’s trying to make up for lost Holliday swings. Todd’s feeling Healthy. Look at some of his other numbers, his Slg is the highest it’s been since 2005 and his HR/FB is the highest it’s been- 14.0 since 2004- 15.3 which means he’s stronger on his drives to the outfield. Todd’s feeling stronger this year and so he’s swinging at more pitches. It just shows how smart of a player he is, because when he was hurt he used his great eye to get on base and now that he can drive the ball again, he’s swinging for the fences.
If Todd’s doing things he hasn’t done since 2004-05 that’s good, because those years he hit 20 and 32 HR’s.
Check out my Rockies comic strip at:
Rock Drive 1.4
This is pretty true
and while I love him hitting the ball well, it still doesn’t explain the fact that his OBP is sub-.400. Back when he was batting .340 consistently, he’d have a .430 OBP to go with it. That’s Todd Helton.
I’m not trying to say I want him to be a 1.000 OPS guy again (well, of course I do), it’s unrealistic.
Just for comparison’s sake, let’s look at his wOBA’s the past 4 years.
Season—-AVG——-OBP——-SLG——-wOBA
2005——-.320——-.445——-.534——-.417
2006——-.302——-.404——-.476——-.375
2007——-.320——-.434——-.494——-.399
2008——-.264——-.391——-.388——-.347
2009——-.327——-.379——-.509——-.380
Just taking a look at the numbers, he was batting better in 2007 with a comparable batting average, lower slugging, and higher OBP.
The way the guys up top are having more trouble getting on, his SLG is being wasted, so I’d almost rather see his OBP skyrocket and just ignore the slugging, until we get some good OBP guys up top.
Matt Murton status: Freed
Garrett Atkins status: Not Traded
Clint Hurdle status: Still Employed by the Rockies
by Andrew Martin on May 28, 2009 9:02 AM MDT up reply actions

by 
















