Rockies Review: The only thing that can stop Ian Stewart now is the Campbells
The surprising success experienced against a generally superior team needs more attention than I can actually give it, as this will have to be a shamefully threadbare edition due to my total lack of time and the total domination that my homework is currently exercising over me (like Stewart and Barmes over the Cardinals pitchers. O snap). But after losing three of four to the Astros to open the road trip had us feeling as if it was going to be the same old, same old, the Rockies miraculously decided to flip the "hey let's play good now" switch in St. Louis, and came up with three very enjoyable contests that saw them play the kind of complete baseball that's been missing -- well, for most of the season.
Scores of 10, 11, and 7 attested to the offense's rejuvenation (at least for now). Scores for the Cardinals of 4, 1, and 2 attested to the pitching's general competence (never a given). And despite the hijinks of MLB.TV, they did not, in fact, make 15 errors. They only made one all series, in the eighth inning of today's game when Tulo threw the ball into the dugout, and that didn't result in a meltdown, as a strong Ubaldo Jimenez retired the next three hitters in order. That was a recurring theme. Earlier, in the sixth inning, when he let the batter in front of King Albert reach base, the wise decision was made to put Albert on base as well. Uball then faced Rick Ankiel, whose bush-league antics in the first game had earned the ire of Rockies Nation. Apparently Ankiel wanted a fastball. Well, Uball gave him a fastball. At 98 mph. Which Ankiel looked at to make the third out.
That, my friends, is the kind of combination that will win you ballgames.
/Captain Obvious switch off
In addition, the Rockies enjoyed several novel feelings: being on the fun end of a giant inning (9 runs in the seventh during the series opener) getting production from all fronts (except Atkins) and from bit parts (third-string catcher Paul Phillips enjoyed a 4-for-5, 3 RBI day today) and having one of our players turn into a complete terror to the other team a la Cody Ross, Scott Hairston, Pedro Feliz to us: Ian Stewart's shredding of anything wearing a red hat and standing sixty feet away from him. Stewart didn't confine his contributions to the offense, making an outstanding stab and leaping throw in a game in which he'd already hit two home runs, and although this incendiary run has come out of nowhere (for the team as well as Stewart) it goes without saying that it's a welcome sight to see.
While "unpredictable" might be the understatement of the year when it comes to evaluating the 2009 Colorado Rockies, it sure is a hell of a lot of fun when they finally deploy their considerable talent to something besides inventive failure. Not to put too fine a point on the comparisons, but as has been mentioned by attentive Rowbots, the 2007 turnaround began with a sweep of the Cardinals at Coors. Maybe we just needed some of that Redbird mojo. If nothing else, it's left us just as befuddled as the Cardinals fans: they can't figure out why they're losing to us, and neither can we, but damn, we're enjoying it while it lasts. And we're also getting used to seeing another guy in that #5, who we hope will help define a crowded outfield that has trade rumours swirling around the much-loved Spilly. Hopefully we don't make a trade just to make a trade.
Of course, the Rockies have one more game to go tomorrow, thanks to some wonky schedule-making that sees them complete a four-game series from Friday to Monday, before heading to Milwaukee for a more conventional three-gamer. It goes without saying that they could suddenly decide to leave the lumber in St. Louis and fall on their faces again, since that's the way they like to do things, but then again, they may not.
6-4 in the Tracy era, and the crocuses are poking their noses out. Everyone wants it to be rainbows and unicorns from here on out, but if there's one thing we're sure of, it won't be. The Rockies, despite their recent munificence in letting the Denver denizens enjoy cheap tacos four days running, don't do fat and healthy. They prefer scrawny and miserable. Still. Oliver Twist got the better of Mr. Bumble in the end. Just you remember that.
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
I really and truly don't think we're out of this thing yet but
I do think it’ll be a rare occasion that you don’t see Barmes and Stewart in the starting lineup.
I will be the first to admit that I have not been a big fan of Barmes but he has been nothing short of spectacular since Tracy deposited him in the two hole. My hat’s off to Clint.
Baseball players are smarter than football players. How often do you see a baseball team penalized for too many men on the field?
Author: Jim Bouton
by pedalpusher on Jun 7, 2009 9:14 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't agree more
I don’t know what’s gotten into the Barmes lately, but I like it. I haven’t really been anti-Barmes in the past, but I admit that he’s never been high on my fan list. Shows you what I know. Keep it going, Rox!
So. When is enough enough?
by rockhead on Jun 7, 2009 10:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I keep thinking its too late..
But then I remember 07 and how the Rockies swept the Cardinals on Memorial day weekend, sufferred through a lull in June and then caught fire again…so it’s probably one in a milion shot that this will work…and in the immortal words of Jim Carrey, “So you’re sayin there’s a chance!!”
Check out my Rockies comic strip at:
Rock Drive 1.4
by Charlie77 on Jun 8, 2009 12:42 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
And the literary hits just keep on comin'
Nice Dickens reference tonight, Silver. And an apt one. Crocuses aside, at least this series hasn’t left me feeling so “Bleak” about where the team is headed. Nice work, as always.
So. When is enough enough?
by rockhead on Jun 7, 2009 10:45 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I voted "LOL" because it was in nice big, pretty capital letters and distracted me from the other responses.
And it’s a palindrome. Kind of. Can an acronym be a palindrome?
by WolfMarauder on Jun 7, 2009 10:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Can an acronym be a palindrome?
Wasn’t he a charactor in a Mad Max movie?
Check out my Rockies comic strip at:
Rock Drive 1.4
by Charlie77 on Jun 8, 2009 12:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If it's munificence that keeps me in the tacos...
…..then I loves me some munificence. MYOO-NIFF-AH-SENSE!!!!!!
by TulsaDriller on Jun 7, 2009 10:58 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Seriously though, great post..
….hope my fellow rowbots will buzz this up on Yahoo (please do so by clicking on the “spread the word” icon atop this post). Let’s spread some cyber-love for the PR.
by TulsaDriller on Jun 7, 2009 11:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tacos only have 170 calories and 10 grams of fat per serving..
They’re really not that bad for you. If you can stop at 1 or 2.
Check out my Rockies comic strip at:
Rock Drive 1.4
by Charlie77 on Jun 8, 2009 12:39 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















