Purple Row: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

You're 5 games over .500 halfway through the season, now what? Auditing the schedules of the NL's middle pack

Glad you asked. You've done so much to get this far, I'm very proud of you. Yet you sense that something's not quite complete in your life. Something's still missing. You've beaten good teams, you've gotten through some tough times, and here you sit halfway through the season and are left thinking, "Is this it?"

No. This is not it. You're an idiot for even thinking that. Look at the schedule, moron, there's still 81 games left. Get off your lazy introspective behind and start winning some more.

Okay, of course the Rockies have to get one more of those wins today against one of the two best pitchers in the National League to get back to that five over .500 level, but from there, the major point is not to get in a rut that says "just staying over .500 is fine and we'll win in September." While this has been pretty much the M.O. for National League teams the last five years, the Dodgers are pushing that envelope forward this season, and other teams in the league would be wise to start seeing that the bar for competition is getting raised. Ten over by the start of August should be the Rockies and other contending team's goal, after the jump I'll take a look at what the remaining schedule looks like for the teams that aren't already there (the Dodgers) or have little chance to get there (the Pirates, Padres, D-backs and Nationals).

Star-divide

So there's still a cluster of eleven teams around the middle of the National League standings. I've been saying that things will start to separate more in the month of July, but I haven't really gotten into details of why. A lot of what's going to be happening will be simply a levelling of the schedule. Certain teams that had more difficult schedules early in the year, like the Rockies, are looking at clearer paths to that 10 game over .500 barrier, while other teams like the Reds and Braves will be left scratching their heads why they seem to be running in place, at best.

Just so we're clear which eleven teams I'm talking about (they're in order of the standings before Saturday's games, but the records are updated):

  • San Francisco 44-36
  • St. Louis 44-39
  • Colorado 42-38
  • Milwaukee 43-38
  • Philadelphia 41-37
  • Florida 42-40 
  • Chicago 39-39
  • Cincinnati 40-39
  • Atlanta 39-41
  • New York 39-41
  • Houston 38-41

A lot of pundits are still clumping all eleven together, but this shouldn't be the case. A team like the Giants, which has advantages in their level of performance, their current record, and their remaining schedule shouldn't be categorized with the Braves or Reds, even though only four or five games separates the teams in the standings right now.

I'm going to look at everybody's specific schedule for coming roadblocks (sometimes literally) after a general read on who gets a light level of opposition for the second half. The bottom line is that the Rockies and Giants, who get multiple series against both the Padres and Diamondbacks will have an advantage in the wild card race over East or Central teams who have fewer lightweights. 

 

Advantageous scheduling:

 

 

Remaining home games vs. NL's bottom four (AZ, PIT, SD, WSN):

 

Most:

 

  • San Francisco: 16
  • Colorado, Cincinnati: 14
  • Houston: 13

Least:

 

  • Florida, New York: 7

For the Giants, who have been doing well at home anyway against tougher competition, this seems particularly advantageous.

Remaining road games vs. bottom four:

 

40% of Milwaukee's remaining road games are against the NL's cupcakes, these series should be a lot easier to win than Houston's remaining travel schedule. So while the two teams are both .500 on the road right now, this probably won't be the case for the remainder of the season.

Most:

 

  • Miilwaukee: 16
  • New York, Florida, Colorado: 13

Least:

 

  • Houston: 3

Overall remaining games against the NL's bottom four:

 

Most:

 

  • Milwaukee: 26
  • Colorado, San Francisco: 25

Least:

 

  • Atlanta: 15

Not only is the Rockies remaining schedule home heavy, but because of playing in the NL West, it's also creampuff heavy. This is very nice to see from our vantage point. If the Central and Eastern teams really wanted to establish themselves as the Wild Card favorites, they should have already done so. If the WC doesn't come out of the West, it will be because the Rockies and Giants both choked a very winnable opportunity away, although the Brewers have a pretty easy time of it themselves.

There is a flip side to this, however, as the NL West does have the one league juggernaut in its ranks, and both the Rockies and Giants have several remaining games against the LA PEDgers:

Avoiding LA:

 

Fewest games left vs. Dodgers:

 

  • Philadelphia: 0

Most games left vs. Dodgers:

 

  • San Francisco: 9
  • Atlanta: 7
  • Colorado: 6

Alright, with that background,I'm going to assess each of the eleven so-called contenders remaining schedules and give them pass/fail grades according to whether I see them as conducive to keeping them in this thing or pushing them out:

 

The Schedule Audit

 

These grades are based on each team's remaining schedule and what they've done so far in 2009 to give us reason to suspect they will get through it okay. Consider it sort of like a stress test on a bank's capital. Should some failing team suddenly start winning frequently against stiff competition, it will require a reassessment of their viability. 

****

Atlanta

 

 

The Braves re-appearance as a pseudo NL West team on that facing the Dodgers multiple times list, combined with their lack of easy games in the second half should make people think twice before picking them for a comeback run this season. Frank Wren is looking for help as a buyer at the trade deadline, and Atlanta's making some noise, but they've got some built in disadvantages with the remaining schedule that make me very skeptical they will be real contenders. Nine of their remaining home games are against the NL's best road teams, Philly and LA, plus eleven more against the Mets and Giants at Turner make for a difficult home schedule, for instance, and they've only been a .500 team in Atlanta to begin with. 

(FAIL)

****

Cincinnati

  

 

There are two of these middle pack teams that have been absolute monsters at home this season, San Francisco and Chicago, and as the Astros showed last night, visiting their stadiums has been as bad as getting a heavyweight on the schedule for opponents thus far. Bad news for the Reds, then, as they have nine road games left against these two teams, in addition to having to get their interdivision road trips to the Dodgers, Rockies, Mets and Phillies out of the way as well as remaining road series in St. Louis and Milwaukee. In all, that's 29 road games against the NL's best, and the Reds could easily lose twenty of them. The Reds currently have a record of 14-19 against teams over .500. 33 games so far against good teams marks the lowest total in the NL, and is full 20 fewer than the Brewers. While Cincinnati's home schedule includes 14 games against the non-contenders of the league, that's far too much competition ahead to make me think they will remain viable for long.

(FAIL)

****

Houston 

 

Houston fans have been taking comfort in the fact that their team is traditionally strong in the second half, and while there are comparitively few lightweights in the Astros second half schedule, there are more reasons to be hopeful there than what I'm seeing in the remaining schedules for Atlanta and Cincy. For one, the Astros have mostly completed their play against the NL West, with 14 games against Western foes remaining on the schedule vs 28 against the weaker NL East. They have two road series left in Chicago and one in Los Angeles which they need to avoid sweeps at, with only one "easy" road series remaining in Chase Field, but they should make up for that with a home schedule that includes two visits by Pittsburgh and one each by the Nationals (it could turn out to be a five game series in effect with the completion of this suspended game from D.C. added to the four regularly scheduled) and D-backs. I think they stay close to .500, and there still seems to be a chance that they could make noise with luck. The big problem is that I doubt just .500 cuts it this year, even in the Central, which means Houston will need the luck. With today's loss, they're now three games under .500, they have four rivals ahead of them in the standings in their division, and every team save the four worst in the NL ahead of them in the wild card race. This isn't a winning proposition, especially given the egg they've laid this weekend.

(close, but FAIL)

****

New York

 

While the Mets have a dangerous team, they really are in a fairly precarious spot. Their remaining home schedule features 13 games against the Dodger/Giants/Rockies portion of the NL West, plus St. Louis. Add in four more against Philadelphia, who does well on the road, and it isn't going to make winning streaks easy to come by. Their road schedule makes things a little easier with the 13 games against the NL bottomfeeders. The Rockies, Cubs and Marlins (twice) are their only road series against opponents who currently have winning records at home, but the Mets haven't been a particularly good road team thus far. I'm looking at Philadelphia's easier schedule, at Florida's easier schedule and realizing that if New York's going to pull out a win in the NL East, they're going to have to earn it. It will be even more difficult for the Mets to win the Wild Card at this point, but they have plenty of head to head opportunity against the teams that are ahead of them in that chase and a series sweep or two against these foes would change things quickly.

Like the Giants, the Mets have a ten game road trip right out of the gate after the All-Star break. These can be contention killers, particularly for a team that's not up to full strength. With the Dodgers and the rest of this Philadelphia series before the break, they could easily go 3-6 in the nine games leading into the break and 3-7 in the ten games after it. They then return home and get Colorado. Meaning I see a somewhat decent possibility for a 7-15 stretch here, which would take them from the .500 record they had heading into Friday night's game to eight games under with just two months left to play. Even at 9-13 and 10-12 over that stretch, however, it's likely to be enough of a deficit within the division to make a comeback unlikely. 

INCOMPLETE (I can't get myself to strike them out until the All-Star break, they still concern me, but their record and situation is more dire than they may realize)

****

Philadelphia

 

Look at all the home games on the Phillies schedule in July, broken up only by road trips to Florida and Arizona. The Phillies have been a weak home team this season, but that almost has to be a function of poor luck thus far. At three games over .500 right now, they would need just a plus 16-8 or better in the 24 games leading into their series in San Francisco to be over 10 over. It's hard to imagine Philadelphia coming out of July with less than a five game lead over New York.

(PASS)

****

Florida

 

 

There have to be two strong teams in a division to make for a real wild card contender, however, and if it's not going to be New York or Atlanta, that leaves Florida. Except it doesn't. I've already concluded that they're weaker on paper than other teams in this race, and it will show this month as the Marlins' July schedule takes them on not one, but two tough West Coast road trips with a home series (plus the All-Star break) against those road warrior Phillies in between. They won't have a very easy home schedule the rest of the way, either. I think we see Philadelphia step away from the NL East pack this month.

(FAIL)

****

St. Louis

 

For the St. Louis Cardinals, we start with the advangtage they have in the current standings. Six games over .500 is nothing to scoff at, but they're likely going to need it. The Cardinals second half schedule has brutality coming in every month. They've just started a ten game road trip heading into the All Star break, but then have to come out of it and face a gauntlet of 17 days without a day off including seven straight against the Phillies and Dodgers in the middle of that stretch. August has a West Coast road trip to Dodger Stadium and Petco and their last road trip in September includes a visit to Coors Field. Right now we're going to give them squatter's rights at the top of that division, but Milwaukee's got a clearer path. This means the Cardinals should be the strongest wild card contender for the Rockies besides the Giants, keep on eye on what they do.

(weak PASS) 

****

Milwaukee

 

Milwaukee starts with a very similar built-in advantage in their current record with the Cardinals, but the Brewers have a much easier remaining schedule. They have a rough road trip starting in San Diego at the end of July through the first ten days of August, but after that the schedule clears again and they have relatively smooth sailing until the last week of the season when they travel to Colorado and St. Louis. If things are close, that trip could decide their fate with both the Wild Card and the NL Central. For both, I like their chances better now after looking at the schedules than I did last week when I just compared the teams' strengths and  weaknesses. I'm changing my mind from that assessment and now am more willing to label the Brewers favorites in the Central.

(PASS)

****

Chicago

 

The Cubs have a relatively easy July but a difficult, to say the least, schedule in August and September, before playing the easiest last week in the majors with home series against Pittsburgh and Arizona to finish the season. The questions are where they'll be at the start and finish of that two month drudge in between the soft portions to their schedule. They've got a five win deficit to catch up with the Cardinals and Brewers right now, and while I could see them making ground on St. Louis this month, Milwaukee should stay ahead given that soft schedule of their own.

Thought experiment: A peak month in July would be something like 20-7 for the Cubs, leaving them at 56-45 heading into August. That's if just about everything goes right this month. At that point they're facing the most difficult two months of their NL schedule and it is ugly. Let's say despite this they slog their way to just over a .500 record and are sitting at 84-72 heading into the last six games. Pittsburgh and Arizona roll over at Wrigley and the Cubs sweep both series to finish the season, 90-72. Look at their schedule, though, in that 55 game stretch from August 1 through September 27, they play 32 games on the road including away series at every serious NL contender besides Philadelphia. I think 90-72 is the best possible finish the Cubs could hope for, but keep on coming to the conclusion that the more likely outcomes right now start at least six wins short of that figure. 84 wins isn't going to be enough in the Central this year.

 (FAIL)

****

San Francisco

 

Finally getting to the part you've probably been waiting for, the two NL West teams that right now seem to hold an advantage for the wild card but have only a small hope of winning their division. The good news is that the Rockies have one of the easiest remaining schedules in the majors, the bad news is that, in terms of bottomfeeders on the docket, so do the Giants. The Giants do have important long and potentially difficult road trips in the middle of each of the next two months, both of which end at Coors Field.

I can tell exactly what Giants fans are hoping for from each road trip because it would be almost exactly like our way of thinking: For July, win two at Pittsburgh, split the four game set at Atlanta, and try to win two at Colorado but be okay with avoiding the sweep and taking one for a 6-4 or 5-5 road trip. For August: split in New York, win two at Cincy, split at Coors for a 6-5 trip. As a Rockies fan looking at the G-men's schedule: I'm seeing in July a strong at home Pittsburgh team as trouble for the them right off the bat, hoping Atlanta and their pitching at Turner can take three of four and the Rockies at least two to leave the Giants at 3-7 on their trip to obscurity. In August, the Mets and Rockies are strong teams capable of winning three of four, the Reds could take two, leaving San Fran 3-8. Since Colorado plays a full third of those 21 games, the Rockies should easily be the difference between things going San Fran's way at 12-9 and things going the way I'm hoping for at 6-15 and this can make or break the Giants chances for September.

The bad break for us is that the Rockies will then have to go to AT&T twice in three weeks at the end of August and middle of September, so the Giants will have opportunity for payback if we do whack them down to size. Really, overall the schedule for San Fran is just a little tougher than what the Rockies have to go through and both teams should separate from the rest of the NL when not playing each other or the Dodgers and it's those head-to-heads that will determine who winds up on top.

Since what I wrote last week the Giants have continued one of those stretches that forces re-evaluation. They are seriously thrashing their opponents right now and have a similar can't lose swagger to what the Rockies did in June. I think they chill after the All-Star break, but I no longer can pretend they're going to go away.

(PASS)

****

Colorado

 

The Rockies schedule has a lot of cupcakes and several offdays to recuperate. Their longest stretch of consecutive games in the second half --and perhaps the most grueling portion of the schedule-- will be September 1-16, but given several games against weaker competition, even that stretch could see ten wins should the Rockies still be playing at a playoff caliber. As I alluded to above, the last ten days of August are shaping up to be among the most critical for keeping the Rockies in the playoff hunt: Two series against the Giants, one at Coors, one AT&T, with a home series against the Dodgers sandwiched in between. 6-3 or better should have us sitting pretty, 3-6 or worse could push us into hoping for a Rocktober-esque miracle. The two middle of the road results, 5-4 or 4-5, may only muddle things. Still, even in that stretch, six of the nine crucial games will be at home. The schedule still shows favor to us.

One final hiccup, while I think that the Giants and Rockies both might finish with better records than the NL East and Central division winners, let alone their second place teams, but given that's not at all certain, the presence of series with both Milwaukee and St. Louis in the final homestand may loom large in the wildcard chase. Even if it doesn't, those last three series against the Cardinals and Brewers at home and at Dodger Stadium to wind down the season represent the strongest competition of any NL team's last nine games that I've seen, the Rockies would be wise to have a cushion of some sort heading into the last few games of the season. The bright side with this is the six against Milwaukee and St. Louis are home games and if the NL West remains uncompetitive, Joe Torre may be resting more of his key parts for a playoff run leaving a weaker than normal Dodger team.  

(PASS)

****

Conclusion:

 

The remaining schedule seems to favor Milwaukee, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Colorado, and looks more daunting for the other seven teams. Given that these four are already in a somewhat favorable position in the standings, it gives most of the chasers below them an even greater handicap. St. Louis doesn't have an easy schedule, but has the catbird seat in the Central, and that capital reserve in the win column means that they're likely to remain in the chase.

1 recs  |  Comment 12 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great work.

Glad to see I’m no longer the only one considering the Giants a serious threat. :D

by WolfMarauder on Jul 5, 2009 11:16 AM MDT reply actions   0 recs

And the Giants have enough pitching to easily pick up a bat

which would really make them a daunting adversary. We need to get past them in the standings. The 13 we have left with them could determine the WC.

by Roxfan24 on Jul 5, 2009 12:36 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still think they aren't as strong as they've appeared talentwise...

and I think people overestimate the strength of their rotation. It seems that their practical ability to pick up help might also be exaggerated. I’m curious from a Rockies fan standpoint what you guys think would be an equitable exchange and who you would target if you were the Giants?

by Rox Girl on Jul 5, 2009 12:53 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

This would be a good place to say-

that at the beginning of the season, I vastly underrated the Giants and vastly overrated Arizona. San Francisco has their weaknesses, of course, but they’ve played really well with a difficult schedule.

I am really relieved that April, May, and June are over. Good points all, Rox Girl.

by coolopotamus on Jul 5, 2009 1:00 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't trade Bumgarner or Alderson...

…But a guy like Pucetas, or maybe now the emergence of Sadowski (although it would be lame to trade him after 13 shutout innings), seems like likely candidates to be moved. The Giants could clearly use an upgrade in left over Randy Winn and at first over Ishikawa…

by noelman31 on Jul 5, 2009 5:47 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

Two starts doesn't equal an "emergence"

Sadowski plus Pucetas… so let’s try and look at a team that has hitters available, Jermaine Dye for these two? No. I wouldn’t do that trade if I was the White Sox, especially now that they’ve made a run. Matt Holliday? Absolutely not, those two really aren’t worth the draft picks and are downgrades from the young pitching Oakland already has. Nick Johnson? I might do that if I were in charge of the Nationals, but I personally don’t really think Johnson’s that valuable anymore and Rizzo seems to be looking for more than that from what I’ve heard. Freddy Sanchez? No, not enough. What other players could be had that you’d be willing to trade for an okay fifth starter and a potential middle reliever?

See, this is where I keep getting to. Everybody says that the Giants have young talent to make a deal, but once you get past their young talent that they’ve locked away, the rest just isn’t appealing enough to work with. Either they have to open their vault a little wider and include Alderson and Crawford and a couple of others (I’d still keep Bumgarner off limits) or they can really forget about getting an impact player.

Then the next problem I get to is that I think this still leaves them short. I think they need a bat and an arm and they’re just looking for the former. Johnson’s injury today highlights how shaky that rotation is after their top two. If you’re really sold on Sadowski, I suppose you could ride him, but one look at his peripherals should be enough to tell you that there’s going to be some leveling of the luck eventually.

by Rox Girl on Jul 5, 2009 6:18 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like you, I'm a Rockies fan...

…so speaking intelligently about the Giant’s farm system may be me speaking out my arse, but I’ll give it a shot. I do consider myself to know a thing or two about the game in general. I admittedly have Pucetas in one of my fantasy leagues, so he’s a guy who I follow…

First off, I agree with you on all points. They are going to have to include Alderson if they want Dye or Holliday. If I were the Giants GM, I would consider the Nick Johnson deal you proposed…

I did a quick read on Randy Johnson’s injury. MRI tomorrow. He’s 822 years old, so probably DL is in his future. From what I read, Joe Martinez is the most likely to be called up. He’s the guy who took a ball off his noggin in the beginning of the year. Martinez has good career minor league numbers too, BTW. From what I’ve read, the only reason Sadowski got called up over Pucetas is that KP was on 2 days rest…

From what I have read about Giants baseball (which isn’t much), they’d love to move Jonathan Sanchez to somebody in a trade if they got good value. I think Sanchez could perform well in the pen as a lefty specialist. They could also move Sanchez back into the rotation. Let’s face it, Sanchez is the second coming of a guy the Rockies have: Jorge De La Rosa (they have almost identical career numbers last I looked, but that was at the beginning of this year).

So, that’s my shot. Chips to trade: Pucetas, Sadowski, Martinez, Jonathan Sanchez.

by noelman31 on Jul 5, 2009 7:47 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that Sanchez = JDLR

I’m pretty sure I made that exact point prior to the season to Giants fans who were arguing that the back of their rotation was vastly superior to the back of ours. Of course this year, bad Sanchez has made a few more appearances than Bad Jorge, or maybe good Jorge has made a few more appearances than good Sanchez, but they remain pretty close to on the level as far as talent and their ability to use it effectively.

What this means, though, is that Sanchez is at a pretty low point in value, similar to where JDLR was when the Rockies traded for him. While Ramon Ramirez has worked out tremendously well for the Royals and Red Sox and I’m sure the Giants would be thrilled with that level of production in return, at the time it was considered a trade of necessity for the Rockies to give up Ramirez, and they were looking for anything they could find before releasing him for nothing. JDLR just happened to be the best offer. In short it was a swap of reclamation projects that turned out beneficial to both teams. The Giants aren’t looking for that with Sanchez, or else he probably would have been a Rockie in exchange for Atkins some time ago.

So I think Sanchez is overvalued by Sabean and therefore still immovable. Martinez would be desirable to several teams, possibly including the Rockies, but he’s not going to bring back an impact bat. From our side, the Giants offer Sanchez, Martinez, and Pucetas and want just one bat in return, who are you willing to give them? Spilly? Smith? All three require 40 man roster slots, so we’d have to also DFA a couple of players to make room, who would you cut? Rincon and Flores?

So the potential deal is Sanchez, Martinez and Pucetas for Spilborghs. Rincon and Flores get cut, Sanchez takes Flores’ spot in the pen, Martinez takes Rincon’s and Pucetas provides AAA depth as we call up Murton to replace Spilly. It’s actually not a bad deal for the Rockies. The Giants would never do it. They’d want Brad Hawpe. We’d never give him to them, and I doubt any other MLB team would give them that kind of bat for that package, either. Now if they replace Pucetas with Alderson, some teams might consider it.

by Rox Girl on Jul 5, 2009 8:35 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree good trade for the Rockies

but no way Sabean accepts it much less proposes it.

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Jul 5, 2009 10:53 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Welcome to the PR

I like your thoughts and ideas. Stick around a while.

"We made too many wrong mistakes." ~Yogi Berra
"The ballplayer who loses his head, who can't keep his cool, is worse than no ballplayer at all." ~Lou Gehrig
JFK

by jrockies on Jul 5, 2009 9:51 PM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

You and I see eye to eye, for the most part...

… but I would actually consider Pucetas and Sanchez for Spils. Flores gets cut. Sanchez is our lefty in the pen (in Flores’ spot). Even though Pucetas has been a starter throughout his minor league career, I’d use him in the pen right away if I were the Rox and this deal went down. Like you say, Matt Murton gets called up and all is still good in the outfield (except CarGo keeps starting over Smith for unknown reasons)…

Admittedly, I’m high on Pucetas, but I don’t see what’s not to like. Career minor league numbers here:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=puceta001kev

I think our point is- the Rockies and the Giants could probably work out a trade.

by noelman31 on Jul 5, 2009 8:53 PM MDT reply actions   0 recs

The major drawback with Pucetas is no MLB punch-out pitch.

It’s exactly why they’re willing to dangle him and not some of their other guys who have one. There are pitchers who find some measure of success without one in the big leagues, but there are others, like Greg Reynolds, who struggle. This is why a lot of people see his eventual role in the middle of a bullpen. Still, I like him too, and like you, I think a Sanchez+Pucetas for Spilly deal is acceptable from a Rockies viewpoint, but how much does that help the Giants? Spilborghs’ adds at most one win over half a season, he’s a downgrade from what Randy Winn is capable of in right, he’s probably an upgrade over Fred Lewis, but not a big one, and may or may not be an upgrade over Nate Schierholtz (Spilly and Nate have been equal in value this season) or John Bowker. But I think this is the kind of exchange that the Giants are going to be fronted for the goods they’re offering.

by Rox Girl on Jul 6, 2009 5:43 AM MDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Colorado Rockies, established 28 April 2005.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Rockies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Deep_forest_small
PROJECT LIBRA: An Inventory of the Colorado Rockies
Dsc00370_small
Todd Helton and the Hall of Fame
Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Decii_nd_hawt_yylan__2__small
OT: Great News for Me :)
Small
(A little OT) new member
Tulowitzki_small
21 Days - Showing on FSN.
Coors_field_entrance-713327_small
A View of the Rockies from New New York
Gadsden_small
Spring Training in Tucson: Even with two teams left, it's a small world after all (with pics)
Spring_break_128_small
Greetings from Glendale
Rogermaris374042-thumb_small
The first Dodger president?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

New York Mets starting pitchers Mike Pelfrey, left, Johan Santana, center, and Oliver Perez watch as teammates take part in drills during spring training baseball Saturday, Feb. 27, 2010, in Port St. Lucie, Fla. (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson)

SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: New York Mets, The High Cost Of Low Expectations

Washington Nationals pitcher Stephen Strasburg throws during the second inning of  a spring training baseball game against the Detroit Tigers Tuesday, March 9, 2010 in Viera, Fla. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)

Nationals Send Stephen Strasburg To Double-A Despite Impressive Spring

Seattle Mariners pitcher Cliff Lee speaks during a baseball news conference at Safeco Field in Seattle on Friday, Jan. 22, 2010. Lee was acquired by the Mariners in a trade with the Philadelphia Phillies last December. (AP Photo/John Froschauer) link

Cliff Lee Out With Right Abdominal Strain

More from SBNation.com >

Colorado Sports Blogs

Mile High Report (Denver Broncos)
Mile High Hockey (Colorado Avalanche)
Pickaxe and Roll (Denver Nuggets)
The Ralphie Report (CU Buffaloes)

Top 30 PuRPs

  1. Christian Friedrich, LHP
  2. Tyler Matzek, LHP
  3. Jhoulys Chacin, RHP
  4. Esmil Rogers, RHP
  5. Eric Young, Jr., 2B/CF
  6. Wilin Rosario, C
  7. Hector Gomez, SS
  8. Michael McKenry, C
  9. Rex Brothers, LHP
  10. Casey Weathers, RHP
  11. Chris Balcom-Miller, RHP
  12. Tim Wheeler, OF
  13. Charlie Blackmon, OF
  14. Samuel Deduno, RHP
  15. Nolan Arenado, 3B
  16. Brandon Hynick (traded to CWS), RHP
  17. Chris Nelson, SS/2B
  18. Juan Nicasio, RHP
  19. Cole Garner, OF
  20. Chaz Roe, RHP
  21. Kiel Roling, 1B
  22. Parker Frazier, RHP
  23. Delta Cleary, OF
  24. Darin Holcomb, 3B
  25. Shane Lindsay, RHP
  26. Matt Reynolds, LHP
  27. Mike Zuanich, OF
  28. Scott Robinson, OF
  29. Edgmer Escalona, RHP
  30. Ben Paulsen, 1B
updated 9/14/2009


Managers

Me_small Russ Oates

Rox_girl_small Rox Girl

Staff

Reynolds_small Silverblood

Seth_smith_0004_2_small Andrew Martin

Sleepy_jeff_small Jeff Aberle

Coorsfield3_small Bryan Kilpatrick

67880020--bled-slovenia_small Andrew T. Fisher

Rowbot Radio

Deep_forest_small WolfMarauder