Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Saturday Rockpile: Aaron Cook on his way back, Stewart provides valuable defense

Off the back burner, Rockies Cook sizzles - The Denver Post
As Irv Moss describes in this piece, Aaron Cook did himself - and his club - a huge favor last night. Cook was terrific in his five innings of work exiting after just 76 pitches (no, it wasn't another managing blunder by Jim Tracy - Cookie's on a pitch count at the moment). Aaron looked a heck of a lot like his old self - he was bludgeoning the strike zone with a very good sinker (his 12:2 GO/AO ratio proves that), and he was as efficient as can be. One thing I feel great about is that Cook has either not been available, or has worn down significantly during this stretch of the season in past years. The fact that he just had five weeks off to heal his shoulder and toe (and to clear his mind) has enabled him to be fresh, and solely judging by last night's small sample size (against a powerful offense in a hitter's park), it's quite possible that Aaron is in midseason form. Very good news for the Rox.

St. Louis Cardinals vs. Colorado Rockies - Recap - September 25, 2009
Last night's big win for Colorado was front page news on SI.com.

Stewart playing strong 'D' for Rockies | ColoradoRockies.com: News
Ian Stewart's great looking pick in the third inning on a scorcher by Matt Holliday is one of many terrific defensive plays the young third baseman has made this season. Whether his bat is on or off, there's no arguing that Ian is a defensive upgrade, over anyone else on the roster, at the hot corner.

Quiet Jimenez does his talking on the hill | ColoradoRockies.com: News
Hopefully Ubaldo Jimenez is annoyingly (to the Cardinals, at least) loud and clear on the hill tonight. I don't think I have to tell anybody just how big a series victory over St. Louis would be.

Rockies vs. Red Sox : FoxSports.com Photo Gallery
In the number ten position on possible World Series matchups that Fox Sports would love to see is the Rockies vs. Red Sox. That's a LONG way down the road, but it would be nice to see the Rox reverse that 29-10 drubbing they received at the hands of the BoSox.

Comment 118 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

ossible World Series matchups that Fox Sports would love to see

Boston vs. New York isn’t number one. That’s a surprise

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Sep 26, 2009 10:28 AM MDT reply actions  

Hahaha

Just an average guy with exceptional hair. Nothing more, nothing less.

by Bryan Kilpatrick on Sep 26, 2009 10:37 AM MDT up reply actions  

theres only 16 possible matchups anyway, i’d say we got kind of dissed on this, good thing the media doesn’t determine who wins in the postseason

by nugg on Sep 26, 2009 11:20 AM MDT up reply actions  

sox Rox probably should be higher given 07

But I’m sure the fact we got spanked then. If it were at all even, it would be higher. There’s no natural connection with the other three clubs

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Sep 26, 2009 11:31 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

No help from Nats again today?

The prospects of the Nats helping out the Rockies today doesn’t look good. Their best hitter, Ryan Zimmerman, is not in the starting lineup for only the 7th time this season making an already pathetic lineup (esp with Dunn and Willingham in huge slumps) look even more so. Prove me wrong Nats!

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 10:34 AM MDT reply actions  

well, im sure the braves expected help yesterday

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Sep 26, 2009 11:32 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

4-0 Braves after 1

Anyone expecting the Nats to win even one of the final 6 against the Braves is engaging in some serious wishful thinking (of course, in the 4 game series in Atlanta to finish the season, the Braves miss Lannan).

There’s a distinct possibility the Braves run the table forcing our beloved Rockies to go 6-2 to avoid a one game playoff. So, let’s repeat last night’s performance for the next 6 games!

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 11:31 AM MDT reply actions  

pirates beat the dodgers yesterday

Its possible. Winning ten straight is INCREDIBLY difficult to do, regardless of competition. It can take one stinker start by your starter, a gem by theirs, a bad bounce, a bad call….the bats may only win a third of their games, but that’s a lot bigger than zero

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Sep 26, 2009 11:39 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

That would be a pretty good way to get into the playoffs

I’d much rather the Rockies get in by winning six of their last eight against tough competition than backing in because their lead is insurmountable. Philly and LA have been playing well the last couple of weeks while St. Louis has been relaxing (their 5-7 record since the eleventh is the same as our’s) with their big lead over the Cubs.

That said, you still underestimate the Nationals, or maybe you’re overselling the Braves. As bad as Washington is, they are a major league team and they are capable of beating the Braves on occasion. Probability wise, it’s much more wishful thinking to assume a Braves sweep than it is for the Nats to win one. And of course, the Braves also have to beat the Marlins, who would very much like to spoil Atlanta’s chances.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 11:51 AM MDT up reply actions  

RG

you are correct mathematically, but have you watched the nats lately??

see my post below – they are HORRIBLE – and they don’t even seem to be trying..

watch this space for a soon to be created clever remark....

by RockyMtnCat on Sep 26, 2009 11:57 AM MDT up reply actions  

They are horrible, but they've still managed to win 3 of their last 12

As that great American intellectual and philosopher Tom Petty once said, “even the losers get lucky sometimes.” I’m not expecting them to win either series, but I do expect them to win at least one of these games.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 12:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

i hope so

i sure don’t want to go to LA with a 1 or even 2 game lead in the WC.

watch this space for a soon to be created clever remark....

by RockyMtnCat on Sep 26, 2009 12:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don't care as long as it's a lead.

If we crumble under the pressure in LA and choke, then we don’t deserve the playoffs, it’s as simple as that. In some ways, I’d almost prefer it was close heading into Los Angeles, because maybe that will finally drive the Rockies to beat the Dodgers which would be fantastic for the team’s confidence heading into the playoffs.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 12:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

totally disagree

the rox are a young team, with a VERY bright future.

i think it’s very beneficial to the next few years results to make the playoffs this year, in any fashion and with any results

watch this space for a soon to be created clever remark....

by RockyMtnCat on Sep 26, 2009 12:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure exactly what you're disagreeing with, as I'm on the same page with you on most of this

I’m not saying they don’t have a bright future, they definitely have a psychological block when it comes to playing the Dodgers though, and it’s better to get over that this season than next year. And yes, it would be very beneficial to make the playoffs, but if they’re only the fifth best team in the League, than they aren’t really deserving of it. They can prove otherwise by holding off the Braves.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 12:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

i'm saying i don't care how we get in

i don’t care about getting rid of the dodgers block this year or not.

just make the playoffs.

PERIOD.

to come from the dirt and lead in the WC so long, and then fail to make it would be a major psychological blow…

watch this space for a soon to be created clever remark....

by RockyMtnCat on Sep 26, 2009 12:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

I guess what I'm saying is that just getting to the playoffs. PERIOD. likely requires at least one win against the Dodgers,

maybe two depending on how strong the Braves surge really is and how we do in these next five. You say it’s a major psychological blow to miss the playoffs, I say there’s a psychological block when they play the Dodgers already, it seems to me that the Rockies can get some major therapy taken care of by beating Los Angeles.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 12:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

i surrender*

x

watch this space for a soon to be created clever remark....

by RockyMtnCat on Sep 26, 2009 12:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sorry, I get too intense about this stuff sometimes.

I don’t know how good it does the Rockies to worry about things they can’t control, like an unprecedented miracle run from the Braves compared to the things that they can control like beating the Dodgers in Los Angeles or the Cardinals and Brewers in Denver. If the Braves pull of their feat, what do you do but tip your cap to them? The Rockies have played a gritty, tough season, if they miss the playoffs because Atlanta’s a miracle team, why get crushed about it, particularly if Colorado still hasn’t gotten over the one hurdle (beating LA) that would have had them playoff secure weeks ago?

I guess what I’m saying is, that if we come down to the last game of the season and realize Atlanta’s going to get the wild card or a play in game, it will almost certainly have to be because the Rockies are at that very moment losing to the Dodgers again. We have two games left with St. Louis, three with Milwaukee, three with Los Angeles. Five wins and we’ll likely be in the playoffs without a play-in game. I hope we pull out one of these next two against the Cardinals, but that still leaves four more against the Brewers and Dodgers. I don’t think it’s out of sorts to look at that LA series as potentially crucial and if that mental block is still there, we may well be in the deep trouble a lot of people are saying.

Rather than going BRAVES BRAVES BRAVES, I think it’s much more interesting to look at that series and figure out how the Rockies are going to prove themselves and mature into being one of the NL’s truly elite squads rather than just a peripheral contending team.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 1:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

Nicely said

I agree with this completely. The Rox need to focus on proving themselves capable, instead of hoping on help from somewhere else.

Gladly sharing a name with Dexter Fowler!

by ShadowPenguin on Sep 26, 2009 1:55 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think we clinch by beating the Dodgers in the first game.

And/or by the Braves losing to the Nats that night. I have a hard time coming up with the combo of six Rockies wins/Braves losses until then. I see us winning three of the next five and the Braves winning three of their next five. That would drop the magic number to one heading into LA, but I don’t think we clinch until then.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 3:29 PM MDT up reply actions  

That's my prediction, but there's a real possibility I'm wrong.

If the Rockies only win two of five against STL and MIL or the Braves win four of five against the Nats and Florida, then the magic number’s at two heading into LA and the Rockies might have to win the series. I see this as about as likely as your clinch it before we even get on the plane scenario. It definitely could tilt that way without too much more luck for the Braves going forward.

If the doomsday scenario plays out (Rockies win two, Braves win four) the Rockies will absolutely need a series win and might have to get a sweep of LA to win the wild card outright if Washington doesn’t get in gear. That scenario does require a lot more luck on Atlanta’s part, but like some of these people are saying, it’s out there. I’m not as afraid of it as they are, like I say, I think we clinch with Game 160, but I’m not going to deny that it’s possible.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 3:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

That's all fine and dandy, but now they are even worse than a 100 loss team

in the last few days, the Nats have committed to giving the SS position to Ian Desmond (3 for his 28 entering today) over Christian Guzman, one of their better hitters. Plus, their taking a look at Pete Orr, who is seems is good for an error a game. Plus, they no longer have Nick Johnson traded away at the deadline.

And I just checked and the Braves miss Josh Johnson, the Marlins best pitcher as he goes tomorrow against the Mets. I now need to reverse course and root for the Marlins to win the next two over the Mets so they’ll have something to play for against the Braves.

Of course, should we make the playoffs, we will look back on the Braves strong run and weak schedule as a blessing in disguise as you rightly say you’d “rather the Rockies get in by winning six of their least eight against tough competition”

My last point before I head out for the day is that it amazes me the number of Rockies fans who continue to say that the Braves won’t run the table or lose just one the rest of the way. From a fanbase that witnessed what we did two years ago against much tougher competition, it astounds me.

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 12:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

yeah, let's hope the marlins show a little pride...

x

watch this space for a soon to be created clever remark....

by RockyMtnCat on Sep 26, 2009 12:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

theres no reason they shouldnt start desmond

he’s a hot prospect that they’d like to get some exposure to the big leagues and there’s no reason not to strut him out there so they have a chance to evaluate him and his weaknesses going into the off season.

not good for us though

by nugg on Sep 26, 2009 12:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

Can you even name the last team that won 21 of their last 23 regular season games?

That it came close to happening two years ago doesn’t mean it happens every two years. I know the Braves competition is weak, but it would be a fool’s gamble every time. Those odds are miniscule. Like I’ve been saying, if the Braves do manage it and beat us, kudos to them, but 21-2 for their last 23 is not close to a likely outcome.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 12:33 PM MDT up reply actions  

but, 20-3 is realistic

my goal is talk down the nats and talk up the braves until so the nats can come back from down 6-1 to beat the bravos today – at 6-4 we’re halfway there

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 12:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

It is possible

but very improbable. The Rockies need to continue to show up as they did last night.

EXECUTE

by Andrew Martin on Sep 26, 2009 1:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

they've already gone 12-2, right??

all that matters is the remaining games…

watch this space for a soon to be created clever remark....

by RockyMtnCat on Sep 26, 2009 12:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

btw, two of those wins came against the Dodgers and Marlins,

only one was against a losing team (NYM). It’s just not very likely for the Braves to win out. I wouldn’t be completely shocked if they did because like you say, the Nats are terrible and the Braves at least somewhat decent, but I’m just saying that winning out is not the most likely outcome, and certainly not to the degree that Rocks rock was implying, (that those of us expecting them not to are foolish).

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 12:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

the wishful thinking (i didn't say foolish) was in reference to winning out

against the Nats. plus, they avoid Johnson vs the Marlins who may be deflated should they stumble today / tomorrow. I feel our best hope is the Marlins to steal a game vs Braves and for us to finish 5-3, that would close the deal.

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 12:17 PM MDT up reply actions  

the nats made around 6 misplays in the first two innings

only two were called errors, but the rox would have probably had 5 or 6 outs on the same balls..

just pathetic.

and people wonder why i’m worried about the braves – they are playing against a bad AAA team

watch this space for a soon to be created clever remark....

by RockyMtnCat on Sep 26, 2009 11:57 AM MDT up reply actions  

And

it’s not just this game. The Nats have been looking like the Keystone Kops all week.

by Hizilla on Sep 26, 2009 12:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

Still don't understand

why we are worried about the Braves. They have the curse of John Kruk working against them.

Brad Hawpe - Providing Air Conditioning to Catchers Everywhere.

Hey I'm on Youtube!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gAlLTZsGUg

by wolf213 on Sep 26, 2009 12:22 PM MDT reply actions  

Positive Paulie here:

the ex-Rockie factor (ala Baker and Sullivan) could come through for us with Livan Hernandez getting 2 of the Nats 5 remaining starts against the Braves.

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 12:27 PM MDT reply actions  

he did win his only start against the braves this year, 1 er in 6.1 despite 7h 2bb .304 baa. pretty typical livan line

by nugg on Sep 26, 2009 12:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

PH 3-run homer, 6-4 now!

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 12:31 PM MDT reply actions  

Fear not the Braves, the great Zack Segovia and his 10.80 ERA

just set down the Braves in order!

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 12:41 PM MDT reply actions  

The NLCS Game 4 is on MLB Network

The GOOOOOOOOO…..ROOOOCCKKIEESSS chants gives me chills remembering it.

by Hizilla on Sep 26, 2009 12:47 PM MDT reply actions  

I have these from itunes

I love love love love watching Morales pick off whatshisface

EXECUTE

by Andrew Martin on Sep 26, 2009 1:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ryan Zimmerman, I might add

not a bad bat to be coming off the bench.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 1:13 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm a Ryan Zimmerman fan

For the moment.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Sep 26, 2009 1:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

Not anymore.

The moment’s gone.

Watching the purple row from high atop the big brown monolith on California Ave

by Mondogarage on Sep 26, 2009 1:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

Up to Josh Willingham now,

I think this inning’s probably the Nats best chance to tie or take the lead, with Dunn on deck.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 1:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

Dunn, Dukes and Bard going to be batting in the ninth,

each will be trying for the three run home-run needed for the win. :)

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 1:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

at least the Nats got to the Braves bullpen today unlike yesterday

this is key with Braves having no off days the rest of the way

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 1:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

btw, the no off day thing is why I think they almost have to lose sometime

At the very least they will be drop dead tired on October 5th, so a 162 game tie isn’t the end of the world, just annoying.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 1:22 PM MDT up reply actions  

Can you clear something up for me

The Rockies split the season series with Atlanta. So if there is a play-in game – where would it be?

by Hizilla on Sep 26, 2009 1:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

That's a great question because starting this year there's no

longer a coin flip to determine home field. So, after head-to-head what is the next tiebreaker?

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 1:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm almost sure it will be in Atlanta given our poor in-divison play

“But now that host will be decided by a series of on-field tiebreakers, beginning with head-to-head records. If that’s tied, the next is highest winning percentage within your own division”

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 1:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

Hmm

Well that sucks.

ATL 38-25
COL 32-37

by Hizilla on Sep 26, 2009 1:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

It does suck

but it will not matter. There will be no play-in. (famous last words!)

"I am an optimist. It does not seem too much use being anything else." - W. Churchill

¡Vamos Rocosos!

by Rock Oax on Sep 26, 2009 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

The other thing going against them

is playing so many games against the worst team in the league, is hardly a way to tuneup for the playoffs. The Rockies have to face 2 other post-season contenders and a decent Milwaukee team in order to finish this out, while trying to figure out how to get a slumping offense going. Assuming they get through this stretch into the playoffs, they’ll be pretty well prepared for those games.

The only challenge for Atlanta is 3 against the Marlins

by ddavis539 on Sep 26, 2009 1:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

I kind of spoke too soon

Now that the Braves busted out in the 9th, they get to save their closer Soriano – damn!

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 1:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

So there is no chance that the Nats score 8 here,

Right?

"I am an optimist. It does not seem too much use being anything else." - W. Churchill

¡Vamos Rocosos!

by Rock Oax on Sep 26, 2009 1:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

If ATL was to win

my fantasy team would have preferred he got the save. Drats. But yea, at least he will be slightly more tired from here on out.

by Hizilla on Sep 26, 2009 1:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

Last night's game...

watched it at the Great American Beer Festival. About 100 folks were gathered around the TV. We had some loud Tulo chanting and some good pandemonium when Yorvit delivered in the 9th.

I also had some kickass Vanilla Porter.

by BroJB on Sep 26, 2009 1:30 PM MDT reply actions  

Must've been a lot of fun

I know a couple in S.F. that have a beer blog and they head out to Denver each year for the festival.

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 1:37 PM MDT up reply actions  

In preparation for tomorrow's start for Livan I'm already singing in my head

“And he shall be Levon, and he shall be a good man”

Please Levon, be a good man tomorrow.

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 1:45 PM MDT reply actions  

Against the Dodgers Livan threw two scoreless innings

before giving up like 8 runs in the third

"I am an optimist. It does not seem too much use being anything else." - W. Churchill

¡Vamos Rocosos!

by Rock Oax on Sep 26, 2009 1:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

a moral victory!!!

x

watch this space for a soon to be created clever remark....

by RockyMtnCat on Sep 26, 2009 2:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it was cool

but, unless your a huge beer nerd, the thrill wears off once you have enough samples to get a buzz. Then you realize there’s nothing to do but keep getting in line for more samples. me — when I get a nice buzz going I want to rock out a bit. No rocking out at the beer fest — at least until the Rox win a game in the bottom of the 9th. Then it’s back in line for more samples. :)

by BroJB on Sep 26, 2009 1:46 PM MDT reply actions  

well boys and girls ir looks like we will

have to win 92 or 93 + to win the WC…Braves don’t seem to want to lose ever

we seem to have gotten over that HURDLE

DO NOT CHOKE THIS LEAD PLEASE

by TuLoRocks2008 on Sep 26, 2009 2:06 PM MDT reply actions  

The thing about them

is since they’re in the position we were in 2007 — the chasers playing loose, with nothing to lose — they’re accordingly able to… well, I don’t even know how to explain it, because I’m certainly not going to say that we’re not playing as hard as they are. But I think there’s something psychological about the different mind-set, and really, if someone doesn’t derail them quick…

argh. we just have to win. plz plz plz win.

I love Greg Reynolds. Deal with it, suckers.

by Silverblood on Sep 26, 2009 2:10 PM MDT up reply actions  

91 will win the WC outright.

90 might be enough.

Eschew Obfuscation!

by Jeff Aberle on Sep 26, 2009 3:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

i am being sarcastic (i hope)

since the Braves aren’t losing to anybody…but they are bound to play a few stinkers eh

we seem to have gotten over that HURDLE

DO NOT CHOKE THIS LEAD PLEASE

by TuLoRocks2008 on Sep 26, 2009 4:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

I guess we just gots to man up like we did last night

If the Braves don’t cost us the playoffs, they may likely have us headed back to the World Series as it appears we’re being forced to close out the season in top form.

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 2:19 PM MDT reply actions  

This I agree with.

I like that another team is stepping up with the Giants tanking.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 3:13 PM MDT up reply actions  

btw, i'm rooting for the giants against the cubs, for the small edge

that may give us when it clinches for the cards.

watch this space for a soon to be created clever remark....

by RockyMtnCat on Sep 26, 2009 2:28 PM MDT reply actions  

Any chance they'll pop the bubbly

in the hour or so they’ll have after the Cubs game ends and their own game begins? If they were all drunk it would make this game a little easier!

"I am an optimist. It does not seem too much use being anything else." - W. Churchill

¡Vamos Rocosos!

by Rock Oax on Sep 26, 2009 2:34 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

lol

i hope so!!!

watch this space for a soon to be created clever remark....

by RockyMtnCat on Sep 26, 2009 2:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

And it's at altitude, maybe it'll go to their heads faster

But I bet that Drunk!Pujols is still better than about half the guys on MLB rosters.

I love Greg Reynolds. Deal with it, suckers.

by Silverblood on Sep 26, 2009 2:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

so far, it isn't helping the giants much... sigghhhhhhh

xxx

watch this space for a soon to be created clever remark....

by RockyMtnCat on Sep 26, 2009 3:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

Rockies were once in the Nat's role

Reminded of the Rockies spoiler role at the end of the ‘93 season, when the Giants and Braves were a torrid race for the division title (no WC) in the last week of the season. Giants had won 11 of 12, but the expansion Rockies beat them fair and square in the second game of a two-game series at Candlestick and the Giants ended up losing the division by one game despite 103 wins. They’re still mad at us over this at MCC. My point is that the Nat’s could very well win over the Braves tomorrow, or one of the four games in ATL next weekend. They’re all major leaguers and play to win.

by DeepPurple on Sep 26, 2009 2:46 PM MDT reply actions  

I was thinking about that '93 race with the Nats this afternoon too.

So good point, I’m glad you posted it so I didn’t have to. Although I think I should clarify that the reason the Giants fans are still mad at us isn’t for us beating San Fran per se although that’s part of it, but also because we went winless in thirteen games against the Braves that year. Let’s hope the Nats don’t follow that expansion club example.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 3:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

Cubs up 4-1

Damn the Giants, they can’t even win when we’re rooting for them.

I love Greg Reynolds. Deal with it, suckers.

by Silverblood on Sep 26, 2009 3:22 PM MDT reply actions  

Nah, I'm happy the Giants are loosing

Lets just keep em dropping like flies. We can take care of the Cards ourselves.

Brad Hawpe - Providing Air Conditioning to Catchers Everywhere.

Hey I'm on Youtube!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gAlLTZsGUg

by wolf213 on Sep 26, 2009 3:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah

it’s six of one, half-dozen of the other. I think we’re all just scrambling for the illusion of any sort of edge, and are prepared to go to drastic lengths to do it.

I love Greg Reynolds. Deal with it, suckers.

by Silverblood on Sep 26, 2009 3:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

I agree, as I wrote last night, perhaps we're better off

with the Cards not clinching. Maybe, their hitters were pressing a little last night in trying to get the clinch out of the way, instead of being relaxed and loose were they already to have clinched. Again, six of one, half-dozen of the other.

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 3:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ubaldo has a pretty decent record against most of their hitters

except Rasmus. Should at least be a great game – like last night.

by Hizilla on Sep 26, 2009 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

I pretty much guarantee the Cards don't care about clinching

the division is an afterthought, they want home field advantage and will be playing hard until that is no longer an option.

by Narcoleptico on Sep 26, 2009 4:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

Q

is 3/6 against Wainwright with 2 doubles. Wierd.

by Hizilla on Sep 26, 2009 3:24 PM MDT reply actions  

OMG LIKE START Q

BENCH TULO

;)

I love Greg Reynolds. Deal with it, suckers.

by Silverblood on Sep 26, 2009 3:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

The thing is that Q can play second or third as well...

Those positions are where you start wondering about it. At least I do.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 3:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

I was just pointing it out

I’d be pretty surprised to see him get in the game at all tonight. I wouldn’t sit Stewie for him, or (and I find myself shocked to say this) Barmes (he’s been hitting well lately and his D has been pretty good).

by Hizilla on Sep 26, 2009 3:36 PM MDT reply actions  

Barmes is 1 for 7 vs. Wainwright with a single and a walk

And a .393 OPS. Against RHP’s he only has a .285 OBP this season. I’d definitely consider it with him, but with Stewart probably not.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

I probably would too

but one of the reasons Tracy pointed to for the success after he took over was the lineup consistency. This would seem a bit of overmanaging. I think the odds of Barmes sitting tonight are about as high as me coming in from the Pavilion to pinch run. Even then if he sits I think that EY2 is the next most likely to play.

by Hizilla on Sep 26, 2009 4:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

Lineups

LF Gonzalez
CF Fowler
1B Helton
SS Tulowitzki
3B Stewart
C Torrealba
RF Hawpe
2B Barmes
RHP Jimenez

by Hizilla on Sep 26, 2009 4:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

Not that I can remember

some good quotes in the DP article with lineups about the decision to pinch hit for Brad last night.

by Hizilla on Sep 26, 2009 4:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

I read those quotes.

I have to say, I was a little taken aback by Tracy’s comment that Hawpe might not have understood. I’d be VERY surprised if Hawpe didn’t understand. He’s a professional. It’s almost as though Tracy assumed he didn’t. Or didn’t even discuss it with him. I thought that was kind of weird.

Dear Rockies - Do not make me live in a world where John Kruk is right....

Troy Tulowitzki - THE best SS in the game..nuff said
Yorvit Torrealba - En Fuego con RISP
Brad Hawpe- It's not funny anymore..seriously.
Dexter Fowler - prowling CF, waiting to swoop into the playoffs!

by SDcat09 on Sep 26, 2009 4:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

I didn't mean to imply that I thought Tracy would do it, btw,

I was saying that personally I’d consider it strongly. I actually do like that Tracy’s gone back to a basic approach with the lineup after all the toying around early in the month, but I would like to see Torrealba rested a little more so both catchers are fresh for the playoffs rather than one dog tired and one rusty.

by Rox Girl on Sep 26, 2009 4:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

Barmes?

significantly worse against RHP?

Perish the thought.

EXECUTE

by Andrew Martin on Sep 27, 2009 12:05 AM MDT up reply actions  

man what a waste of space Ryan Garko

has been for the Jints…just pointing that out

we seem to have gotten over that HURDLE

DO NOT CHOKE THIS LEAD PLEASE

by TuLoRocks2008 on Sep 26, 2009 3:53 PM MDT reply actions  

he's turned out to be a brutal acquisition

if Scott Barnes turns out to be a good major league pitcher that will really tick off the Giants.

funny that Barnes was the winning pitcher in the Indians AA championship game against the Giants affiliate last week

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 4:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

I still can't belive

they traded Alderson for Sanchez. Sabean is a moron.

by Hizilla on Sep 26, 2009 5:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

Maybe you can join up with SDcat?

SDcat, will you be attending any of the games?

May the Rockies bring me to paydirt!

by Rocks rock on Sep 26, 2009 4:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

Hey..no, I won't be going. Its a long haul,

to Dodgers Stadium, and unfortunately dinero is an issue right now. But I will definitely be there in spirit!

(I donated money to 3 games this year – 2 here in SD and 1 in Denver):)

Dear Rockies - Do not make me live in a world where John Kruk is right....

Troy Tulowitzki - THE best SS in the game..nuff said
Yorvit Torrealba - En Fuego con RISP
Brad Hawpe- It's not funny anymore..seriously.
Dexter Fowler - prowling CF, waiting to swoop into the playoffs!

by SDcat09 on Sep 26, 2009 4:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Colorado Rockies, established 28 April 2005.

Community Guidelines
RockiesRoster.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Paul_by_jerichasmall_small
PRMLB February Thread

Recent FanPosts

Rockieshat1_small
Purple Row Cares: In memory of Thomas Harding's son
Small
On Addiction and Major League Baseball
Small
Musical Analysis of Baseball
Img_1229_small
Better Things: Starting Pitching in 2012
Rockies1_small
2012 Projected Opening Day Payroll
2009__1_small
Opening Day & Fireworks Tickets
Img_1229_small
Mount Olympus on Lake Otsego
Img_1229_small
PRMLB: The January Thread
Avatar_small
Off Season Picture Time

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Colorado Sports Blogs

Mile High Report (Denver Broncos)
Mile High Hockey (Colorado Avalanche)
Denver Stiffs (Denver Nuggets)
Burgundy Wave (Colorado Rapids)
The Ralphie Report (CU Buffaloes)
SB Nation Denver

Top 30 PuRPs

  1. Drew Pomeranz, LHP - AA/MLB
  2. Nolan Arenado, 3B - A (Adv)
  3. Wilin Rosario, C - AA/MLB
  4. Chad Bettis, RHP - A (Adv)
  5. Tyler Matzek, A (Adv), A
  6. Alex White, AA/MLB
  7. Kyle Parker, OF - A
  8. Tim Wheeler, OF - AA
  9. Josh Rutledge, SS - A (Adv)
  10. Charlie Blackmon, OF - MLB
  11. Rosell Herrera, SS/3B - Rookie
  12. Trevor Story, SS/3B - Rookie
  13. Edwar Cabrera, LHP - A (Adv)
  14. Tyler Anderson, LHP - unassigned
  15. Rafael Ortega, OF - A
  16. Peter Tago, RHP, A
  17. Christian Friedrich, LHP - AA
  18. Joe Gardner, RHP - AA
  19. Corey Dickerson, OF - Low-A
  20. Thomas Field, 2B - AA
  21. Will Swanner, C - Rookie
  22. Kent Matthes, OF - A (Adv)
  23. Albert Campos, RHP - A
  24. Jordan Pacheco, C/UT - AAA/MLB
  25. Cristhian Adames, SS - A
  26. Ben Paulsen, 1B - AA
  27. Josh Slaats, RHP - Low-A
  28. David Kandilas, CF - Rookie
  29. Jayson Aquino, LHP - DSL
  30. Hector Gomez, SS - AA/MLB
HM:  
Edgmer Escalona, RHP - AAA/MLB
Dillon Thomas, OF - Rookie
Sam Mende, IF - Rookie
Mike Zuanich, 1B - AA
Dan Houston, RHP - AA

updated 10/25/2011. 


Managers

Rox_girl_small Rox Girl

35l7yvb_small Andrew Martin

Staff

Jeff_aberle_small Jeff Aberle

Poison-the-well-the-tropic-rot_small Bryan Kilpatrick

Avatar2_small Andrew T. Fisher

Wittgenstein_small Greg Stanwood

Special Assistants to the GM

Rockies_lost_americana_small holly96