Auditing the 2010 Colorado Rockies: Shortstop
So far, I've discussed the chaotic situations the Rockies had in 2010 (and will likely continue to have in 2011) at catcher, first base, second base, and third base (there's hope for that last one). This time, it's nice to write about a successful this year, stable going forward position in shortstop. That's because one of the Rockies' two primary offensive studs, Troy Tulowitzki, manned the position at which defense usually comes at the expense of offense.
Shortstop, according to Tom Tango's positional adjustment scale, is given a +7.5 adjustment when calculating WAR. This is due to the fact that shortstops receive the most fielding chances, by and large, requiring excellent fielding technique, quickness, speed, and a strong, accurate arm. In other words, it is a physically demanding fielding position that his historically been manned by weak Punch and Judy hitters. Several Rockies' shortstops have fit this mold (Walt Weiss and Neifi Perez come to mind). Troy Tulowitzki is certainly not one of them (a weak hitter, that is).
Tulowitzki's fielding technique is a little unorthodox but has thus far proven to be exceptionally effective. He won his second Fielding Bible Award this year and it looks like he's in good shape for his first Gold Glove Award. His great 7.9 UZR in 2010 supports the eye test that Tulo possesses great range and an excellent arm.
As for Tulowitzki's hitting, much has already been written about it. I've already written a little about his season this year, so the results and analysis sections will be a little shorter than usual. In addition, Clint Barmes was Tulo's injury replacement this year, so I'll touch on his stats as a SS too.
For those of you who missed it, here is the premise and methodology of this series. These links will help you if you have questions about statistics that I reference: sOPS+, wOBA, WAR (and wRAA), and wRC+.
Shortstop
Expectations
Coming into 2010 it was clear that Troy Tulowitzki had the potential to be a MVP-type player, posting two separate seasons of 5+ WAR before the age of 25. The problem was that wedged in between those two excellent seasons was an injury-plagued 0.9 WAR disaster of a 2008. In addition, Tulo had started 2009 slowly offensively, waiting until the second half of the season to erupt (.344/.421/.622, 174 sOPS+, and a wOBA well north of .400 with 16 HRs and 55 RBIs in 297 PAs).
So while the Rockies were pretty sure that Tulowitzki was going to be a big contributor for them going into 2010, there was certainly some doubt as to whether he could replicate his great power/speed numbers from 2009 (32 HRs, 20 SBs). In addition, UZR had rated Tulo as only a slightly above average defender (2.4) in 2009, while other metrics had rated his defense as sublime.
In any case, Tulo was entering the third year of a 6 year, $31 million contract signed after 2007, making $3.5 million. Colorado had thus far received quite a return on its investment: a middle of the order bat who also played excellent defense at a premium position. That's what almost everybody expected of Tulo going into 2010.
Results
Tulowitzki started 2010 well enough, putting up sOPS+ months of 113 in April, 162 in May (.319/.418/.543, .423 wOBA, 160 wRC+), and 138 in June (first half total sOPS+ of 138) before his hand was broken when he got hit by a pitch in mid-June. In other words, he'd been having a fine year that was a little behind the pace he set in 2009 in terms of counting stats (only 9 HRs, 34 RBIs, and 7 SBs), even when taking the injury into consideration. However, considering the slow start he'd gotten off to so far in his career in the first half, that 138 sOPS+ first half mark was the best of his career. In fact, it was good enough for Tulo to garner his first All-Star game berth.
In the interim, Clint Barmes slid over to shortstop. Barmes, if you recall, was in the midst of a nightmarish season, but as a shortstop he was a success for the Rockies. Over 156 PAs, Barmes hit .279/.355/.382, which when compared to other MLB shortstops was above average (113 sOPS+). In other words, Barmes actually did a pretty good job of substituting for Tulo.
When Tulowitzki returned (pretty quickly) from injury in late July, many worried that the hand injury would sap his power. Tulo put those concerns to rest with a hot August (.351/.417/.521, .407 wOBA, 149 wRC+, 159 sOPS+). Going into September, Tulo was hitting over .300 but had only 12 HRs and 55 RBI to show for it. September was pretty darn epic. Here's what I wrote about it a few weeks back:
Entering September, Tulowitzki wasn't really on anybody's MVP radar despite stellar play and his first All-Star selection. However, from September 1st on, Tulo hit .303/.366/.754 (that's a .468 wOBA and 190 wRC+) with 15 HRs -- only 14 singles (92 TBs) -- and 40 RBIs (second all-time only to Babe Ruth's 43) and a 208 sOPS+ in 122 PAs. 31.3% of Tulo's flyballs in the month left the yard.
Those are the sorts of numbers that will get you into the MVP discussion. Had the Rockies made the postseason, Tulo would have been a pretty strong candidate in the minds of voters. The crazy thing is that Tulo's September wasn't even the best offensive month by a Rockie in 2010 according to rate stats (in counting stats, it was historic). I'll have more on that next week.
Here's what I had to say about Tulo's season as a whole:
Tulowitzki's 2010 season will be remembered for both his ridiculous September and for what could have been had he not spent 39 days on the DL in June/July. Considering his counting stats (27 HRs, 95 RBI, 11 SB), we are left to wonder if Tulo could have matched CarGo in offensive prowess. Injury or no, Tulowitzki's rate stats (.315/.381/.568, .408 wOBA, 150 wRC+) are incredibly impressive for a shortstop. Tulo's 171 sOPS+ when compared to shortstops (158 sOPS+ overall) reflects this. He mashed at home (172 sOPS+) and on the road (142), against righties (159) and lefties (165), in the first half (138) and the second (179).
Yes, compared to his peers, Tulowitzki was an incredible 71% better offensively in 2010. When Barmes' contributions are added in, Rockies SS were still 57% better offensively than league average in 2010.
In addition, Tulo posted a great 7.1 UZR (12 Rfield at BB Ref) and won his second Fielding Bible Award, with a great chance of winning his first Gold Glove Award. Combining his offensive and defensive contributions, Tulo posted a career best 6.4 WAR season per Fangraphs (though BB Ref had him at 5.6 this year and 6.8 last year).
Analysis
In my opinion, Tulo had a better offensive (and perhaps defensive) year in 2009 due to his injury, but the fact that he was able to come close to that sort of production in 2010 despite his injury is really quite encouraging to me. Before the season, I would have taken Tulo over every shortstop in MLB besides Hanley Ramirez. After this season, I might take Tulo even over Hanley due to his superior slugging and OBP potential. With other positions on the Rockies there are questions, but at shortstop there are none.
On a larger level, when you look at BB Reference's top 10 comparable players for Tulowitzki through age 25, five of them are in the Hall of Fame (including his top match Ernie Banks) and three of the others are Derek Jeter, Nomar Garciaparra, and Hanley Ramirez. That's some pretty heady company, indicative of the skill possessed by Tulo. I'm looking forward to see what he can do in the next few years as he enters his physical prime.
Next up...Left Field
I'll be writing that up after I post my preliminary payroll projections for 2011 on Thursday.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
great writeup, as always.
One question: with Barmes almost certainly gone next year, how do Herrera and Nelson look like as backups at SS (defensively)? I feel like we know what Herrera brings to the table as a hitter (situational hitter) and we’re going to find out sometime next year what Nelson brings to the table. Hopefully we don’t ever have to see Tulo out for a long period of time again, but it’s worth asking.
by black_knight101 on Nov 2, 2010 12:12 PM MDT reply actions
"Almost certainly"?
Don’t be so sure.
Yeah, my username says it all.
by CentralCaliRox on Nov 2, 2010 12:22 PM MDT up reply actions
in what scenario do you see him returning?
I just don’t see one
by black_knight101 on Nov 2, 2010 12:28 PM MDT up reply actions
it is possible
If odowd has money left over from whiffing on FA or trades, Nelson Young and/or Herrera are traded and/or he gets non-tendered yet gets no offers elsewhere. It’ll be real tough for him to be back
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
by Andrew T. Fisher on Nov 2, 2010 2:25 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
If he doesn't get a starting gig that people seem to think he will (and I'm quite sure he won't)
He could come here cheap and be a great super utility player.
Yeah, my username says it all.
by CentralCaliRox on Nov 2, 2010 5:38 PM MDT up reply actions
I see Herrera as a good backup defensively at shortstop (though arm strength might be a concern)
Nelson was a SS prospect coming up and has a ton of experience playing there, but his defense at short has been criticized. He’s got the athleticism for it, but I’m not sure about the rest of the package.
The writer formerly known as Jabberwocky
READ and LEARN about the business of baseball at Purple Row Academy
Eschew Obfuscation!
thanks
that was kind of my guy feeling but good to see it confirmed.
hopefully this is something we don’t have to deal with
by black_knight101 on Nov 2, 2010 12:32 PM MDT up reply actions
Unknowns
With Nelson a new face, and Herrera not having played at short that much, both these guys are unknowns as potential back ups to Tulo. I would thnk we would want to put MM on the list. He has the experience and the quickness to hold down the position.
by Real Perspective on Nov 2, 2010 2:26 PM MDT up reply actions
Look man, I love Mora
But his days as a middle infielder are over. Mora was a horror show at 2B, so I don’t want to see him at SS.
And again, I’m not dogging Mora. I love his hitting approach and he’s still reasonably capable at 3B or maybe LF. But the defensive versatility he displayed for most of his career is gone.
by Rockpile Interloper on Nov 2, 2010 3:37 PM MDT up reply actions
Jeff,
Thanks for doing all these Purple Row Academy articles. They really are informative and help me alot. I know alot of work goes into them and we are better for them ..:)
Thanks
They don’t get a lot of comments most of the time so I wonder sometimes if anybody reads them all the way through.
The writer formerly known as Jabberwocky
READ and LEARN about the business of baseball at Purple Row Academy
Eschew Obfuscation!
I read every article all the way through
(and most of the comments too).
With those who don't give a damn about baseball, I can only sympathize. I do not resent them. I am even willing to concede that many of them are physically clean, good to their mothers and in favor of world peace. But while the game is on, I can't think of anything to say to them. ~Art Hill
JFK
you should try to end them with some questions or bigger points of discussion or something
The articles are great, but at the end if we just see that Tulo was the man, and Barmes was mediocre or worse, well, then there’s not much else to say. Maybe include a poll on things to do next year at the position? Something to engage the audience a little more.
"These are thin mints. I put them in the freezer. My favorites. So good."
--Reds outfielder Adam Dunn, on the girl scout cookies he keeps in his locker
New Extension?
At what point does the team attempt to get a jump on retaining Tulo beyond the three years (plus option) on his contract? The 2014 club option is $15M, and seems likely to be exercised if the current contract runs its course. After next season, Tulo will be 27 and may have established himself as definitively the best shortstop in baseball. It seems like it would be possible to sign him to a long-term mega-contract without it hurting the team that much.
The way to do that would be to sign him to a six or seven year extension (let’s use 7) that nullifies the existing 2012-2014 years, or nullifies the existing 2013-2014 years. That way, the extension is really only 4 or 5 years (depending on which season it kicks in), and he’d only be under contract through his age 34 or 35 seasons.
The AAV of the new extension could be $18-20M per year, and that (let’s say $19M) would represent an increase of:
-If covering 2012-2014: $8M/year, $24M total
-If covering 2013-2014: $6.5M/year, $13M total
before the last 4-5 years of the contract kick in at a total of $76M or $95M.
In all, it would be a lot of money to commit. Having had Helton’s deal really haunt the team financially from 2008-2011, the Rockies might be reluctant to do this. However, it seems favorable to both Tulo and the team.
In exchange for earning a lot more money in his ascending years and more security at a young age, Tulo agrees to forgo the possibility of a few more million per year and a deal that would take him into his late 30s. In exchange for putting up a lot more money during his ascending years, the Rockies get Tulo’s prime with cost certainty and get to have Tulo’s contract expire just as his decline should be firmly settling in.
It would be pretty awesome to know that Tulo will be around at least until he’s 35. He’d be part of an attractive core (hopefully with Ubaldo, Chacin, etc) that great teams could be built around. And when his contract expires, maybe he’ll have moved to third and continued to perform at a high level, meriting another decent contract.
Maybe that AAV is a $2-3M low, but if the team can get by carrying two underperformers (Helton and Cook) at ~$26M/year, it can probably figure out how to keep Tulo and Ubaldo at about $36-40M.
I like this idea
like you (and anyone) the Helton thing makes me a bit leery, but overall it appears at this time to be a smart idea to consider. His injuries to date don’t really scare me as they are more “freak” type injuries than indiciative of some “glass Joe” problems, and I tend to think he will age well insofar as increased maturity will compliment his already high-level work ethic. And just like Helton, the idea of Tulo in some other jersey makes me sick.
Agree re the type of injuries
The thing I like most about this is also the thing that makes me most dubious that it’s possible: the contract ending as he goes into his 35 or 36 season. He may not be willing to become a FA at that age.
However, if he continues with his current deal he may not become a FA until after his age 29 season (making him 30 when he signs the contract). In that case, the Holliday-esque deal might not be there, at least not if he wants to earn $19-20M/year over seven years.
GOOO ROKIES!
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
by Andrew T. Fisher on Nov 2, 2010 8:45 PM MDT reply actions

by 


































