Purple Row: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

Just how improved will the Diamondbacks be in 2010?

The chic pick for most improved NL team in 2010 is almost unanimous - Arizona. After all, they practically lost their 2008 Ace and cleanup hitter to injury for the entirety of last season. They added depth to their rotation and bullpen and could get some notable turnarounds from young hitters.

In this article, I'll outline the roster locks, Spring Training Battles and after the jump, analyze each position in more detail, with a little different format than last time.

Roster Additions: Edwin Jackson, Ian Kennedy, Adam LaRoche, Kelly Johnson, Aaron Heilman, Bob Howry, Zach Kroenke

Roster Subtractions: Max Scherzer, Daniel Schlereth, Eric Byrnes, Doug Davis, Yusmeiro Petit, Jon Rauch, Scott Schoeneweis


Roster Locks

Rotation: Dan Haren, Brandon Webb (if healthy), Edwin Jackson, Ian Kennedy

Bullpen: Chad Qualls, Aaron Heilman, Bob Howry, Clay Zavada, Juan Gutierrez

Infield: Mark Reynolds, Stephen Drew, Kelly Johnson, Adam LaRoche, Ryan Roberts, Augie Ojeda, Miguel Montero, Chris Snyder

Outfield: Justin Upton, Chris Young, Conor Jackson, Gerardo Parra

 

Roster Battles

Fifth Starter: Billy Buckner had the most experience starting of any candidates and is the favorite heading into Spring Training. Bryan Augenstein, Kevin Mulvey and Rodrigo Lopez will more than likely get a start sooner or later if they don't start the team there. Pick: Buckner

Two Bullpen Spots: Zach Kroenke is all but assured of being in the bullpen after being a Rule 5 draft choice (though the D-Backs scrapped that plan with James Skelton early last year). If Kroenke doesn't make the team, Zavada would be pushed into a LOOGY role. Blaine Boyer has the edge for long man, with Leo Rosales, Esmerling Vazquez and to lesser degrees the losers of the fifth starter battle in contention. Picks: Kroenke and Boyer

Bench: There was talk that Augie Ojeda would be traded with the acquisition of Kelly Johnson, but it appears he'll stick around. All AJ Hinch will need to decide is his 25th man. With Parra as the lone outfielder on the bench, that might lead to an outfielder, though Ryan Roberts' ability to play OF allows for an infielder or relief pitcher as well. Twenty-five year old outfielder Cole Gillespie would seem like a logical choice, though 31-year-old 1B/LF Jeff Bailey seems to have a chance as well. Pick: Gillespie

 

 

Offense

Below, I have attempted to quantify where Arizona will improve/decline. To do this, I took CHONE projections for the projected starters and distributed value from bench players across positions they would play. This ignores injuries and other players, but CHONE was chosen in part due to generosity in projected playing time to balance that out. There will still be more ABs than can be taken, but I chose to choose the most optimistic approach for Arizona to see what the damage is. To compare how they changed, I used the positional WAR I calculated this offseason.


First Base

Adam LaRoche was brought in this offseason to refurbish a completely broken first base position. No matter what he produces, he'll far outproduce the -0.90 WAR Arizona got last season. In fact, LaRoche projects to 2.0 WAR from CHONE, and with Ryan Roberts getting some of his ABs there, the D-Backs figure to get about 2.5 WAR from the first base position. ADDED value for 2010: +3.4 Wins

The rest follows after the jump.

Star-divide

Second Base

Despite not having a full-year starter in 2009, Arizona was actuallyvery solid at second last year. Rusty Ryal, Ryan Roberts, Augie Ojeda and Felipe Lopez were all very strong contributors. Still, Josh Byrnes went out of the organization to bring in Kelly Johnson. The sum of Johnson's CHONE projection with partials from Roberts and Ojeda yields 3.7 WAR, far worse than the 5.97 WAR they got last season. LOST value for 2010: -2.25 Wins

 

Third Base

Mark Reynolds split some time between third and first base last year due to the black hole A.J. Hinch had at first, but with the arrival of LaRoche, Reynolds will be a constant starter at third this year. CHONE projects a small dip in value from Special K after his tremendous season in 2009. LOST value for 2010: -0.3 Wins

 

Shortstop

One of Arizona's more disappointing hitters last year wasStephen Drew, who was considered better than Troy Tulowitzki by some less than 12 months ago. Weird. Drew is one reason to suspect Arizona can turn around, especially if he can capture his 2008 second half. I calculated the shortstops from Phoenix to have about 2.5 WAR in value last year. With Drew's CHONE projection and partial value from Augie Ojeda, they project to 3.4 WAR in 2010. ADDED value for 2010: +0.9 Wins

 

Catcher

Miguel Montero will return as the starter and cleanup hitter after swiping Chris Snyder's job last season. The increased playing time in 2010 for the superior hitting Montero over Snyder figures to add a little bit of value. However, CHONE sees nearly a full WAR dip in production from Montero (due mostly to a nonsensical drop in playing time). Additionally, Snyder could be dealt at some point, meaning John Hester would be the backup. ADDED value for 2010: +0.0 Wins

 

Left Field

After nearly all of 2009 from Valley Fever, Conor Jackson is primed for a big return in 2010. He has not appeared rusty in Spring Training so far, but he does have only one MLB home run since the end of July 2008, but he's projected for 1.8 WAR in 2010. Adding in a little extra value from Cole Gillespie and Gerardo Parra, and CHONE's projections come out about 2.9 WAR, about 0.8 WAR more than Arizona got from Byrnes, Parra and Sons last year. ADDED value for 2010: +0.8 Wins

 

Center Field

Chris Young falls into Stephen Drew's category, but far more. The former leadoff hitter found himself in AAA last year after spending most of the season hitting under .200. Led by his apalling season, Arizona was over a win below replacement in 2009, but CHONE is buying a bit of a comeback from Young. Add in some AB's from Gillespie and Parra, and the projection looks good for Arizona. ADDED value for 2010: +3.0 WINS

 

Right Field

Justin Upton is 22 and just signed a contract for over $50million after a bit of a breakout year last season. Predictably, CHONE predicts some regression from Punkton. Even adding value from the bench, Arizona projects to lose a little off the their pace from last season. LOST value for 2010: -0.67 Wins

Total Value GAINED from offense: about 5.0 Wins over 2009

 

 

Pitching

CHONE does not have WAR projections posted for pitchers. Instead, I have compared pitchers' Fangraphs value in 2009 to "Fans" projections from Fangraphs. In some cases, the Fans projections (IP, FIP, etc) are more conservative than CHONE, sometimes more liberal. For this cursory look, I'm assuming that pretty much cancels out.
Rotation
Ace - Dan Haren

Dan Haren posted 6.1 WAR in 2009, even with a small stumble from his ridiculous first half. The 29-year-old is certainly capable of more as his 2008 can attest, but Fans have predicted a 6.0 WAR. It should be noted that CHONE predicts a higher FIP and less IP, so CHONE's WAR would actually be less than 6.0. LOST value for 2010: -0.25 Wins

 

#2 - Brandon Webb

Webb is reason #1 cited for a D-Backs turnaround, but he may not even be healthy enough to be in the Opening Day rotation. Fans on Fangraphs were optimistic for Webb, predicting 179 IP, far more than CHONE's 128 IP. If he's in the upper area of that range, he's about a 4.0 WAR pitcher. If he's in the lower, he's about 3.0 WAR. As we have discussed here on PR, Arizona needs Webb to be a #2 pitcher even more than Colorado needs Jeff Francis to be a four. Replacing Webb with Kevin Mulvey is a bigger drop than Francis to Greg Smith. In the 2-spot of the rotation in 2009, Max Scherzer posted a 3.2 WAR, so Webb could be anything but a -0.2 to +0.8 improvement over last season. Let's be nice to the Snakes and assume the worst for the NL West. ADDED value for 2010: +0.8 Wins

 

#3 - Edwin Jackson

Jackson is getting some perhaps overly optimistic love in some channels too after a breakout season in 2009 and move to the NL. Fangraphs readers have predicted about a 2.4 WAR season from Jackson in 2010, right about in line with CHONE but over a win less than his value in 2009. Still, that's better than the 1.7 WAR season Doug Davis provided in the same role last year. ADDED value for 2010: +0.7 Wins

 

#4 - Ian Kennedy

Kennedy has never had more than nine starts in a MLB season, but he is being counted on at the back end of the rotation, especially if Webb is down for significant time. Fangraphs readers predict 1.6 WAR and just 117 IP. That jumps to about 2.4 WAR with a full season of innings, which is about as optimistic as I would be comfortable projecting, even if he's capable of more. Jon Garland's season in 2009? 2.4 WAR. ADDED value for 2010: +0.0 Wins

 

#5 - Billy Buckner/Bryan Augenstein/Kevin Mulvey

The position in the rotation was held mostly by Buckner and Yusmeiro Petit last season, worth about 1.0 WAR. Using Fan projections, the above trio is worth about 1.5 WAR in 2010. ADDED value for 2010: +0.5 Wins

Total Value GAINED from rotation:about 1.75 Wins over 2009

 

Bullpen

There are no readily available projections for relief pitchers, but even if there were, the volatility of a MLB bullpen's personnel makes it impossible to project. They were middle of the pack last year, so there's not any grounds to superficially assume regression in either direction. They essentially will swap out Jon Rauch, Esmerling Vazquez and Leo Rosales in favor of Bob Howry, Aaron Heilman and Zach Kroenke, which appears on paper to be an improvement.

 

Conclusion

Okay, I know this is doing open heart surgery with a butter knife if ever there was such a thing. There is certainly room for improvement above projections from some, but I think these predictions are certainly on the optimistic side of things. It assumes no injures, no personnel flux, at times includes more ABs than are possible for a given position, and assumes Kennedy and Webb stick to their workload potential.

Assuming marginal improvement from the bullpen, this roster looks to be about 7.0 wins better than they were in 2009. That equates to 77 wins. Or - if you utilize their 2009 Pythagorean, an 82-80 record. So - are you scared of the Diamondbacks?

0 recs  |  Comment 22 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

No, I'm not scared, especially with the Webb situation. I predict 78-84 and fourth place for the Snakes.

The writer formerly known as Jabberwocky
READ and LEARN about the business of baseball at Purple Row Academy
Eschew Obfuscation!

by Jeff Aberle on Mar 10, 2010 6:08 PM MST reply actions  

78-84

Right in range with the calculator’s estimate of 77-82. After digging deeper into their roster, I’m less scared than I marginally was beforehand. I don’t see any breakout candidates in the minors either

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Mar 10, 2010 6:25 PM MST up reply actions  

Not too worried about the DBacks

I’ve had this debate with others here before. I think they have too many question marks and are simply lacking enough OBP players in their lineup.

"Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona." - George F. Will

by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Mar 10, 2010 6:35 PM MST reply actions  

They probably won't challenge for the NL west

but they are likely to take a game from us if Dan Haren is on the mound. The guy is a superstar.

This guy starts me off with a breaking ball...
l'm taking him downtown.

by Tulo2low on Mar 11, 2010 2:13 AM MST up reply actions  

On the SB Nation

sidebar widget you can read AZ Snakepit’s preview of the D’Backs.

"Shall it be peace, or a sword?" - Excised line from Lincoln's First Inaugural Address

Purple Row - Covering all your Rockies needs!
Diplomatic and Military History Book Review - My other blog where I go all historical on you.

by Russ Oates on Mar 10, 2010 6:38 PM MST reply actions  

I didn't even pay attention to the SBNation schedule.

What a coincidence it came out today. Good to see I was mostly in line with what those close to the team expect as far as position battles.

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Mar 10, 2010 6:53 PM MST up reply actions  

The DBacks have a whole lot of up-and-down players

Up one season, down the next. Up for half a season, down for the other half.
LaRoche has been that way, so has Johnson (both are Braves castoffs for a reason).
Certainly Young & Connor Jackson fit that category. EJax the pitcher has been
inconsistent his whole career, with last year being the aberration, and even then
he tailed off at times.

My take on the D-backs is that they don’t have enough consistent production from
their offensive lineup. A couple of players (Upton, most likely) will indeed have
good years; others will have off years. They don’t have any players with the
day-to-day consistency of a Helton, or (let us hope) Tulo.

And their pitching, while good at the top of the rotation if Webb is healthy, is
thin. Starters 4 & 5 are weak, with not much in reserve if there is an injury
to anyone — and almost all starting rotations have at least one starter go
down for part of the season.

Bottom line: some improvement (mainly getting rid of Byrnes), but too many spotty players to challenge for the division title.

New decade, new result: time for a Rockies' division championship.

by Maris6161 on Mar 10, 2010 7:37 PM MST reply actions  

Im not scared,

cause I’m drunk with Rockies kool-aid. aren’t we all?

Counting Colorado Tacos since 2006!

by fantasyfencing on Mar 10, 2010 8:55 PM MST reply actions  

I'm not scared,

cause I’m drunk with Rockies kool-aid.

Just an average guy with exceptional hair. Nothing more, nothing less.
Bear Naked - My thoughts on sports, music, and life.

by Bryan Kilpatrick on Mar 11, 2010 7:09 AM MST up reply actions  

Ahead of the Giants and Pads?

"Baseball, it is said, is only a game. True. And the Grand Canyon is only a hole in Arizona." - George F. Will

by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Mar 10, 2010 10:08 PM MST up reply actions  

yes

Purple Row: Take this personally
http://www.youtube.com/user/rockiesmagicnumber
Learn about Batting Metrics
Learn about Pitching Metrics

by Andrew Martin on Mar 11, 2010 10:23 AM MST up reply actions  

not too worried

i think it will be a 4 way war for 2/3 of the year then they will battle the Giants for 3rd…while we try to fend off the Dodgers and win our first division title!

TULO = 2010 MVP!

Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."

LETS GO WINGS!

by TuLoRocks2008 on Mar 10, 2010 10:39 PM MST reply actions  

Scared,? no. Annoyed? yes.

Being in the Arizona market has brought me some insight and many painful games listening to Gracie and his sidekick and watching these bozo’s kick around the ball and what could be a dam good team…

IF (huge if) Young and Drew become what they think they are and added to Reynolds (love that special K moniker, thank you sir) and Upton and healthy Conner Jackson and that’s not a bad offensive line-up at all. In fact it is pretty scary, because they seem to love ruining the Rox in games (montero and ojeda seemed to kick us repeatedly in the groin) They remind me of last years Nat’s, a dangerous team individually but when put together as a team, come apart in a steaming pile of …. well, you know.

Pitching wise as well, I hate to see Haren, (the dude is Nails) and never like even an injured Webb, but EJack and Ian will remain to be seen how they pan out (actually looking forward to watching them).

In conclusion I agree with most of Ya’all. they will be improved but not contend, hopefully they get hot against the Giants and Dodgers, not us….But htey can be a HUGE pain in the butt to us as they have been in years past.

And if I have to listen to Gracie and his sidekick too many times I will gouge out my ear canal. They remind me of the class clown who is funny the first week of class but after that its just an annoyance, waste of time and the inside jokes go on FOREVER….

The Big Purple Machine will make a believer outta you!

by El Paso Jeff on Mar 11, 2010 10:41 AM MST reply actions  

The mute button rules!

And the internet allows me to listen to the Rockies feed here in Snake country. You are spot on about the poor quality of the DB’s broadcast crew.

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."
Philip K. Dick

by azdenfan on Mar 11, 2010 10:59 AM MST up reply actions  

Special K

is actually taken from the Snake Pit as something they use there.

There are three things in my life which I really love: God, my family, and baseball. The only problem - once baseball season starts, I change the order around a bit. ~Al Gallagher, 1971
A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings. ~Earl Wilson

JFK

by jrockies on Mar 12, 2010 3:06 PM MST up reply actions  

I think you may be undervaluing by your own calculations

And take this with a grain of salt as I am a D’Backs fan myself, but I think you might not want to begin your base of win increase off of the 70 wins last year. Looking over your old post from your calculation of WAR for NL West teams (which btw, is awesome, and one of the reasons I regularly read the Row even as a division rival), the WAR from last year should have pegged the Backs closer to 83-84 wins rather than the dreggs we actually were.

I understand the system isn’t perfect, but such a disparity between WAR, Pythagorean, and actual win/loss totals seem to indicate the D’Backs were either A) overvalued by WAR (true to an extent, but can’t explain that large of a gap), or B) victims of some bad luck last year (which as a fan who watched most of their games, I’d be more inclined to believe)

So in essence you’re using the win differential from last year’s WAR to this year’s WAR as pretty much the benchmark of actual production, yet ignoring that last year’s WAR put this team at or above .500. Doing that would put the D’Backs closer to 90 wins. It seems like if we’re buying this much into WAR, then we might as well be consistent, no?

Now I’m not going to go as far as to say I think the D’Backs will get 90+ wins or be the favorite in the division. I’m a realist first and a fan second. A lot of stars would have to allign for that to happen, and as you all have already said this team is unbelieveably inconsistent. There’s a good possibility they’ll underperform, but I think this team can’t possibly underperform by more than a dozen games again. I hope.

Also re: the above comment, yes, Grace and Sutton suck. Bad. The radio broadcast, however, I find above average. Give those guys a try.

by SenSurround on Mar 11, 2010 11:12 AM MST reply actions  

thanks for the well thought out reply

As for the basis for adding WAR, I tossed the seven wins on top of the actual wins AND pythagorean wins just for context. I didn’t add it to my calculated WAR for two reasons. 1) the positional projections were already intrinisically on the optimistic side and 2) I discovered my park factor was a little low for chase field, so the offense was a little overvalued in my calculations. Therefore, I stuck with the pyth as an unspoken balance. Were the dbacks a .500 talent/performance team last year? I don’t think so. Maybe 79 wins is as high as I would go, but even the optimistic addition of seven wins off of that doesn’t threaten where Colorado SHOULD be.

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Mar 11, 2010 1:40 PM MST via mobile up reply actions  

And I'm not saying they should be where Colo is right now either

Far from it. However, I disagree that AZ was not a .500 talent last year (even w/o Webb+Jackson), but very much agree the team was a sub .500 performance (talent may have actually kept the season from being worse). Remember this is essentially the same core team going into 2010 from 2007 + Dan Haren + Upton/Reynolds maturity – a few bullpen subtractions. Yes that team overperformed, but I think you’d be tough to argue that a team can have the best record in the NL and get to the NLCS with sub.500 talent. Yes that team mave have been lucky and yes the NL was down that year (90 wins was the top total I believe?), but I find it hard to believe that swapping Webb/Jackson in ’07 for Haren/Upton in ’09 (at 19 in 07 he gave us little) resulted in a drop below sub .500 talent, even if we dropped from 90 wins to 70.

The D’Backs problem with this core team has always been living up to potential, and hey, maybe I’m delusional thinking that the numbers put up in ‘07 by some guys who haven’t brought it back were more than just flash in the pan years. Remember how good Tulo was in ‘07? Then how bad he was in ’08? Then how great he was in ’09 again? Hurt your ’08 season, huh? That falloff essentially happened for 3 of our guys (Jackson, Young, Drew) together in ’09, plus the Webb disaster. I just happen to think that these guys have too much talent and have had too much success in the past to toil in crap, just as Tulo bounced back strong. Obviously Tulo is more talented, but there’s still enough talent in those folks to believe a bounceback is possibly, or even likely. Will it happen for all 4? Doubtful (particularly Young), but if at least two live up to their past that’s a huge bump. Counting on it happening is foolish, which is why I’m not terribly optimistic for next year, but there’s no good reason why it can’t happen. Hence the D’Backs dillema.

It is my honest opinion that if the major cogs of both teams performed at the levels they are capable of, and have shown in the past, these teams would be extremely close in the standings, and I couldn’t give a nod one way or the other. Reality, as it were, however, sides consistency square in the corner for Colorado. Based on ‘09 Colorado SHOULD be 90+ since they did it last year and kept essentially the same team (and minus losing Holliday, have done nothing but get better since the magical ’07 run). Based on ’07 AZ SHOULD have been 90+ in ’08, ’09 (and ’10) since they did nothing but get more talent. AZ has failed to live up to potential, but that doesn’t negate the potential that exists. Think the jump you made from ‘08-’09 (72-75? wins to 90ish? my mind is fuzzy…) and wonder why the D’backs can’t do the same…

So should you be scared? I’ll leave that to you, but I don’t think you can ignore the possibility they could be there in the end.

Sorry for derailing a thread looking at WAR into a talent argument. Continue on…

by SenSurround on Mar 11, 2010 3:16 PM MST up reply actions  

tangential yet applicable aspects of analysis dont derail conversation

How you define “yalent” is important. How much does potential factor in? How much is strict performance?

As afraid as we were early in 2009, Tulo’s resurgence was somewhat predictable, as his 2008 was derailed by a hamstring and hand injury. What caused the fall-off for Drew and Young? I would expect a resurgence from Jackson first, and Drew second. I expect both to be better. I don’t like Young though – his obp has been consistently bad his entire career.

I would argue that Arizona over-performed in 2007, underperformed in 2009 and was about at their level in 2008, so the team’s record since 2007 of a shade over 500 seems accurate

"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein

by Andrew T. Fisher on Mar 11, 2010 4:40 PM MST via mobile up reply actions  

well

The thing I don’t worry about is Jackson. He has always been the most consistent of our young hitters. Getting Valley Fever and having the strength of a six year old girl for 6 months is just terrible luck. He tore up winter ball at full strength and has continued it into the spring (albeit with little power).

Drew (also) had a hamstring issue in late April/early May that only cost him 20 games, but still lingered on all season and he never looked right. The thing I worry about with Drew is motivation, as he’s a Boras client waiting for a big contract. Again I’m a bit flaky on his contract specifics, but if this is his walk year I could believe he’d have a monster year. If he doesn’t hit FA until ‘12, next year will be a monster year and this year will be only an uptick from last year. That’s just my gut feeling from seeing both him and his brother in action. He was a first round pick from a baseball family, and has had at least mild success in the past, he’s very unlikely to flame out w/o injuries playing a part.

Young is a total mystery. His OBP is by all accounts historically awful. This is the one guy I’d concede more than any to at being a flash in the pan (an expensive one, at that). I can’t give you a good reason he’ll be better. He had a good September maybe? He’s got a lot of tools but I doubt will every fully put it together.

And Webb is Webb. If he’s right, he’s top 5 in the NL. If the shoulder’s hurt, he’ll probably not even be average.

Talent, potential, understandably these are all words that notably mean zilch if it doesn’t translate to performance. However, every single starter on this team has “potential” in my mind because they’ve all individually done it before! It’s not a case of counting on calling up a prized prospect with “upside.” Every single starter has at some point done something above-average to special at their position relative to the league in the not-so-distant past. So what’s to stop them from doing it again? They’re not physically getting over the hill (sans possibly Webb). No one has gone through a major injury (again only Webb). Either there’s a mental issue or they haven’t been able to readjust in the constant cat-and-mouse from pitcher to hitter. And frankly I think a lot of that has to do with coaching, which is another story altogether (one that I’m not very happy about).

On another note I think having Adam LaRoche around might be more valuable than just his bat in the lineup. He’s a professional hitter, and has got it done relatively consistantly in the past. The current lineup simply hasn’t had that influence in the everyday lineup before. We’ve never had a Todd Helton type who leads by example, and hopefully can at least toss pointers to the youngsters developing or slumping.

by SenSurround on Mar 11, 2010 5:51 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Colorado Rockies, established 28 April 2005.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Rockies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Jeff_aberle_small
Purple Row Prediction Competition: Week 23
Small
Thoughts on ITR: Farm Report
Ermac_small
That loss hurt
Small
My annual Rockies pilgrimage
Jeff_aberle_small
Purple Row Fantasy League End of August Standings
Jeff_aberle_small
Rockies Anagrams 2010
Jeff_aberle_small
Purple Row Prediction Competition: Week 22
Pip2_small
Into Enemy Territory
Small
Unconventional Conventional wisdom and why we don't need a RH 1b.
Small
Coors Inverse Effect

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Texas Rangers Michael Young, left, is held back by Texas Rangers third base coach Dave Anderson (obscured) after being called out at third by third base umpire Alfonso Marquez, front right, to end a baseball game against the Minnesota Twins, Sunday, Sept. 5, 2010, in Minneapolis.  Rangers manager Ron Washington (wearing sunglasses) looks on. The Twins won 6-5. (AP Photo/Paul Battaglia) +1 updates

Twins Top Rangers 6-5 Thanks To Controversial Ump Decision

LOS ANGELES CA - SEPTEMBER 04:  Jamey Carroll #14 of the Los Angeles Dodgers is pulled off the bag as Darren Ford #34 of the San Francisco Giants steals second base in the eighth inning at Dodger Stadium on September 4 2010 in Los Angeles California. The Giants defeated the Dodgers 5-4.  (Photo by Jeff Gross/Getty Images) +1 updates

Dodgers' Slide Continues With 3-0 Loss To Rival Giants

BOSTON - SEPTEMBER 05: Jonathan Papelbon #58 of the Boston Red Sox heads for the dugout after he is pulled in the ninth inning against the Chicago White Sox on September 5 2010 at Fenway Park in Boston Massachusetts.  (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

White Sox Score Four In 9th, Hand Jonathan Papelbon His Seventh Blown Save Of 2010

More from SBNation.com >

Colorado Sports Blogs

Mile High Report (Denver Broncos)
Mile High Hockey (Colorado Avalanche)
Denver Stiffs (Denver Nuggets)
The Ralphie Report (CU Buffaloes)

Top 30 PuRPs

  1. Christian Friedrich, LHP
  2. Jhoulys Chacin, RHP
  3. Tyler Matzek, LHP
  4. Esmil Rogers, RHP
  5. Wilin Rosario, C
  6. Hector Gomez, SS
  7. Rex Brothers, LHP
  8. Tim Wheeler, OF
  9. Samuel Deduno, RHP
  10. Eric Young, Jr., 2B/OF
  11. Michael McKenry, C
  12. Charlie Blackmon, OF
  13. Nolan Arenado, 3B
  14. Chris Balcom-Miller, RHP
  15. Juan Nicasio, RHP
  16. Chris Nelson, SS/2B
  17. Casey Weathers, RHP
  18. Chaz Roe, RHP
  19. Kiel Roling, 1B
  20. Delta Cleary, OF
  21. Matt Reynolds, LHP
  22. Jordan Pacheco, C
  23. Cole Garner, OF
  24. Eliezer Mesa, OF
  25. Ethan Hollingsworth, RHP
  26. Edgmer Escalona, RHP
  27. Scott Beerer, OF
  28. Darin Holcomb, 3B
  29. Ben Paulsen, 1B
  30. Andrew Johnston, RHP
updated 5/15/2010


Managers

Redrocks_small Russ Oates

Rox_girl_small Rox Girl

Staff

Reynolds_small Silverblood

Crow_small Andrew Martin

Jeff_aberle_small Jeff Aberle

Poison-the-well-the-tropic-rot_small Bryan Kilpatrick

67880020--bled-slovenia_small Andrew T. Fisher

Ip_small WolfMarauder