Franklin Morales and Option Years
While I was continually trying to correct Tracy Ringolsby when he said Morales had option years, it turns out, per Troy Renck, that he was actually correct. Morales has an option year left, and it was used today.
BUT HOW?!
Let's break it down and see if we can solve the mystery.
A player is allowed to be optioned to the minors during three seasons of his career before 5 years of MLB service time. Franklin Morales was optioned during three different seasons. Let's take a look at his transactions history after the jump.
Morales' contract was purchased (added to the 40 man roster) on August 18th, 2007. He was optioned back to the minors on August 29th (there's one year). After being recalled on September 4th, he remained active until April 29th, 2008, where he was optioned down again (there's two years). Morales did not make the team again until the start of 2009, when he was optioned back down on April 8th (there's three years). He was recalled on April 21st to make a start, but ended up injuring himself. He went on the disabled list the next day, where he remained until June 12th, when he was activated, and optioned for the second time this year to the minors. He was recalled on July 7th to enter the bullpen, where he remained the rest of the season. And the rest we know.
Clearly, there seem to be three option years burned here. There are, however, a couple of exceptions.
1. A player who has been playing professional baseball (rookie ball or higher) for less than 5 seasons before the third option is used can gain a fourth option year.
Does Morales apply? No. Frankie Mo has been playing pro ball since 2004, making 2010 his seventh pro season.
2. A player who spends less than 20 total days in the minors during a year in which he is optioned does not burn the option year.
Does Morales apply? Maybe. Initially, I saw his 2009 stats and thought this was the answer. Morales only spent 14 days in the minors in April. However, I had forgotten to include his time in June and July, after his second 2009 option. In 2009, Morales spent a total of not just 14, but 38 days in the minors. That option year counts. So does 2008, where he spent most of the season there.
So why maybe? 2007.
Morales spent a LOT more than 20 days in the minors in 2007. The entire season up until his contract purchase in fact. But notice: he spent only 4 days in the minors while on the active roster after his option.
This means that if the rule specifically means not total time in the minors period, but total time in the minors while concurrently on the 40 man roster, then Morales' 2007 option may not count.
But I am not certain that is the way the exception works.
There's my analysis. Please, add comments if you have better ideas.
Eat. Drink. Be Merry. But the above FanPost does not necessarily reflect the attitudes, opinions, or views of Purple Row's staff (unless, of course, it's written by the staff [and even then, it still might not]).
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
im definitely betting the 07 option doesnt count
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
by Andrew T. Fisher on Jun 30, 2010 5:39 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
It's certainly the explanation that makes the most sense
Get well soon Tulo. The Rockies need you.
by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Jun 30, 2010 5:41 PM MDT up reply actions
Your analysis makes sense to me but this is not my area of expertise
Maybe the clock for those 20 games in the minors doesn’t start until after a player is called up for the first time but I have no idea how to be sure. Other rules involving contracts (like arbitration) seem to revolve around the moment a player is called up to the majors so maybe this does as well.
Interesting stuff; thanks for posting this.
Get well soon Tulo. The Rockies need you.
by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Jun 30, 2010 5:40 PM MDT reply actions
I don't have a comment about Morales' options
other than if the Rox weren’t sure he had one, he wouldn’t be going down.
I do have a comment about the curious replacement choice of Rogers.
I thought Buchholz was almost ready. If so, he’d be much more help,
and they’re going to have to clear a spot for him soon anyway.
Rogers has not pitched well since going down. He doesn’t deserve
a call-up. Perhaps the idea is that he’s a “long” reliever, but I’d
rather have quality of innings than quality. When JDLR returns,
probably Chacin becomes long reliever & Rogers becomes a
spare part. Perhaps he just stays for bullpen depth (i.e. mopup innings)
until JDLR is activated, but based on his recent AAA performance,
I don’t expect anything better than Morales has been doing.
Mediocrity sucks
They won't be moving Chacin to the pen.
by Greg Stanwood on Jun 30, 2010 6:05 PM MDT up reply actions
I think Chacin goes when DLR arrives, and Rogers goes when Buchholz arrives.
by Greg Stanwood on Jun 30, 2010 6:10 PM MDT up reply actions
You're probably right
Just because they have options
I think Chacin is a better pitcher than Cook or Francis now, and
I’d like to see him stay in the rotation, but it probably isn’t to be
Mediocrity sucks
Thanks for the update. Good stuff!
Just when I thought I had option years figured out, it turns out there are exceptions….
I hope to read something authoritative about the exception from Ringolsby. I’m sure the front office tracks the options status better than we do, but I’d love to know the official explanation on which one didn’t count.
Yeah, we got confirmation during the game from Renck and talked about it in the game thread.
We’re just trying to figure out HOW he has options.
yo
we should definitely just leave him down there to work as a starter and refine his control – dude’s only 24. Lets exercise some patience with him the way we did with Ubaldo. Even if we don’t use him as a starter due to guys like Chacin, Friedrich, and whoever taking spots, with improved control he’d be useful in the pen, or an actual trade chip.
"These are thin mints. I put them in the freezer. My favorites. So good."
--Reds outfielder Adam Dunn, on the girl scout cookies he keeps in his locker
lets say he stays in the minors for the rest of the season
going into next season, would he still be able to stay in the minors or will he be totally out of options and have to be either on the big league roster or traded?
I can't say for certain
but I think he’d be able to stay. Beginning a new season in the minors doesn’t count as an option. But hopefully people more knowledgeable than I in this area can chime in.
At some point, he’d become a minor league free agent, but I have even less of an idea how that works.
"These are thin mints. I put them in the freezer. My favorites. So good."
--Reds outfielder Adam Dunn, on the girl scout cookies he keeps in his locker
If he's on the 40-man, he'd use an option
My understanding (which I learned yesterday isn’t as complete as I thought it was) is that after September 1 and through the offseason, the 40-man roster is what counts. If you’re on the 40-man, you’re protected from the Rule V draft. When spring training is winding down, you’ll read that players who are not on the 40-man are “assigned” to this or that minor league team, but players who are on the 40-man are “optioned” to a minor league team. That’s where the option year is used for players who don’t start the year with the big-league club.
The whole purpose of the Rule V draft and option years is to keep teams from stockpiling talented players in the minors as reserves indefinitely, at the detriment of those players’ careers. It wouldn’t work out that way if a team could keep a player on the 40-man roster and in the minors indefinitely just by never calling them up.
you got it
There are three things in my life which I really love: God, my family, and baseball. The only problem - once baseball season starts, I change the order around a bit. ~Al Gallagher, 1971
A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings. ~Earl Wilson
JFK
Yes, it would use an option.
Morales being in the minors for more than 20 days this season means he’s out.
by Greg Stanwood on Jul 2, 2010 1:25 PM MDT up reply actions
bummer
"These are thin mints. I put them in the freezer. My favorites. So good."
--Reds outfielder Adam Dunn, on the girl scout cookies he keeps in his locker
I was right then?
maybe?
There are three things in my life which I really love: God, my family, and baseball. The only problem - once baseball season starts, I change the order around a bit. ~Al Gallagher, 1971
A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings. ~Earl Wilson
JFK
Having looked at the situation and remembering my article on this
It has to be that the 2007 option doesn’t count.
The writer formerly known as Jabberwocky
READ and LEARN about the business of baseball at Purple Row Academy
Eschew Obfuscation!
by Jeff Aberle on Jul 5, 2010 6:17 AM MDT via mobile reply actions

by 






























