2010 Rockies Player Review: Dexter Fowler
Take a look at 2 sample batters from the Rockies in 2010.
|
AVG |
OBP |
SLG |
wOBA |
wRC+ |
UZR |
|
|
Player A |
.255 |
.343 |
.432 |
.336 |
98 |
-2.6 |
|
Player B |
.260 |
.347 |
.410 |
.335 |
97 |
-2.7 |
Both players were disappointments to their offseason predictions.
Both players are normally high-BABIP players who were both seeing decent-sized drops in their BABIP.
One of them switch-hits.
If it wasn't obvious from the article title, one of these players was Dexter Fowler. He's Player B. Player A is 1B/RF Brad Hawpe. Disturbingly similar seasons.
Ultimately, the difference between their contributions were as followed: Hawpe, 0.5 fWAR; Fowler, 1.7 WAR. Extrapolated to a 162-game season, Hawpe would've been roughly 0.92 WAR, Fowler, 2.09 fWAR. Basically put, Hawpe would've ended up right between replacement level and average for the season, Fowler, right above average, if given the full season worth of playing time.
If you followed Fowler's season, this would probably come off as a surprise to you, given that the discrepancy in playing time between Fowler and a full season would likely have been mostly made up had he not been demoted to AAA Colorado Springs. Hawpe wasn't really in a position to be demoted, so he just got benched and then DFA'd, which is where the comparison ends.
But Fowler, there was room to work with Fowler. There were still option years and things to hammer out with this young, raw baseball player. The first observation made was essentially "It's probably just BABIP issues." As someone capable of a .350 BABIP, a .268 BABIP was low enough to warrant "this isn't just bad luck" kinds of comments. The second observation was "Dexter looks lost from the left side, he probably shouldn't be switch hitting". This was the observation that seemed to stick in most people's minds, that because the results weren't coming, clearly it's the part of his game that seems the most suspect - and given the fact that Fowler hadn't started switch-hitting until he became a professional baseball player (down in the minors, that is), this seemed a very likely suspect.
I sincerely hope that this trip to the Springs is going to be the end of v RHP as LHB.
The demands weren't entirely unmitigated, though. Fowler's LHB vs RHB splits were terrible. As a LHB facing RHP, Fowler batted .162/.252/.242. That's a .494 OPS.
As a RHB facing LHP, Fowler batted .350/.462/.500, good for a .962 OPS, nearly doubling his lefty split.
Considering Fowler faced more than twice as many righties as he did lefties (115PA v RHP, 52 v LHP), even an outstanding RHB split wasn't going to save his overall numbers.
The problem with narrowing down the issue as merely switch hitting splits, it was pretty much taken at face value without any further analysis. Yes, a .494 OPS vs .962 OPS seems to be cut and dry enough to leave it at that, but when has a stat guy ever just taken OPS at face value and not tried to dissect it further?
Thing is, the numbers look absolutely catastrophic, but we're also assuming that the .494 OPS v RHP is totally valid as far as saying "wow this guy sucks" but we conveniently dismiss the .962 OPS without saying "there is just no way this guy is this good". I mean, it's the way things work: if something's abnormally bad, we try to fix it; if something's abnormally good, we tend to ignore it as fortune smiles upon us.
Vs RHP, Fowler had a terrible AVG which in turn killed his OPS. His ISO numbers weren't awful, however. A .090 IsoD is right where we'd expect it to be. Well, maybe "not awful" is a bit too strong, as his IsoP v RHP was a mere .080, and he was up over .130 in 2009. The fact of the matter is that the .494 OPS v RHP came along with a .205 BABIP while the .962 OPS came with a .400 BABIP. A .400 BABIP is just too high to sustain, but a .205 BABIP is equally hard to sustain, barring complete and utter collapse. Fowler had his peripherals in line enough to make it seem like he wasn't completely past redemption from the left.
Just for the sake of exploration, let's pretend that Fowler posted his season mark of a .351 BABIP from both sides of the plate during that 2 month stretch to begin 2010. We'd be looking at the following lines:
|
AVG |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
|
|
as LHB v RHP |
.268 |
.344 |
.349 |
.694 |
|
as RHB v LHP |
.306 |
.428 |
.456 |
.884 |
Ok that's still a pretty poor line v RHP. Salvageable, but still very very ugly. Even after this analysis, I still might advocate scrapping the switch. As it stands, league-wide RHB faced a .030 OPS drop from LHP to RHP, so if we assume that same drop for Dex, we'd be guessing at a .854 OPS v RHP, .884 v LHP with those normalized lines above - right?.
There's no way it's just that simple. First of all, Dex hasn't faced RHP as RHB since he became a pro baseball player. Second of all, No, you can't just do that, that's not really how this stuff works. Dex hasn't been a .030 OPS dropoff in his switch hitting career. Third of all, there's no way the org dumps a .357 OBP from the left side (2009) because of 2 bad months in 2010. Something was broken in the LHB swing, and the org was determined to fix it.
So Dex spent June in AAA Colorado Springs, working on whatever was broken. While he was in CSprings, he hit RHP as a LHB to the tune of .347/.440/.611, 1.052 OPS, and LHP as RHB good for .344/.462/.469; .930 OPS. Maybe that fixed it - whatever it was.
But AAA is just that, it's AAA. Lots of MLB players can dominate AAA. We're going to need to see a demonstrable level of improvement to really try and say the problem is "fixed".
So pre-demotion, if you're just tuning in, we saw terrible numbers as a LHB with a even more awful BABIP, and awesome numbers as a RHB with an awesome BABIP.
Post-demotion, things were looking better for Dex. From 6/29/10 and on, Fowler batted .280/.355/.453, good for a .808 OPS. Much better than the beastly .634 OPS that earned him a 90 minute drive to the Springs.
But here's where things got weird. Not only did Dex's line improve, but his LHB splits improved as well - drastically, in fact. Remember that .494 OPS as a LHB? Well, forget it.
After being promoted back to the Colorado Rockies, Fowler batted .312/.369/.532 in 206 PA v RHP, good for a .901 OPS. Now THAT'S more like it. Problem solved, Fowler's hitting righties, let's move on with our -
As RHB v LHP: .228/.333/.325, .658 OPS.
Whoops.
Well, it looks like Fowler is re-broken. Now he should scrap the righty swing and just be a left-handed batter, right? Send him back down until he's flailing from the left side again, that'll fix everything.
Seriously, let's just do the same thing we did with his pre-demotion splits: look at his BABIP.
Fowler's .658 OPS v LHP came with a .299 BABIP - about .050ish points lower than we'd expect. On the flip side of the coin, the .901 OPS was fueled by a .376 BABIP, which is higher than the ~.350 BABIP we're working with as kind of a baseline, but the difference is less this time.
While a .658 OPS sucks, it's nowhere near as bad as a .494 OPS. As much as a .299 BABIP is poor by Fowler's standards, it's downright outstanding compared to .205.
Basically put, the difference between the hot split and the cold split before Fowler's demotion is around a .370 OPS and just shy of a .200 BABIP dropoff.
After the demoton, the ~.250 OPS drop is still rough, but the BABIP dropoff has been whittled to ~.075. While this isn't completely ideal, the fact that the gap between the two sides narrowed a bit, even though the side that was good and the side that was not so good completely flipflopped, shows some sort of improvement. Somewhat.
Just for grins, if we did the same BABIP adjustment (to a .350 BABIP from both sides), we get the following lines:
|
AVG |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
|
|
As LHB v RHP |
.292 |
.351 |
.513 |
.864 |
|
As RHB v LHP |
.267 |
.367 |
.364 |
.731 |
|
Overall |
.283 |
.357 |
.456 |
.813 |
That .813 OPS would probably translate into a ~115 wRC+, so....yeah. It's a "woulda coulda shoulda" evaluation, but it's something to think about.
Ultimately, Fowler's 2010 looked like the following:
as LHB v RHP: .260/.330/.432, .762 OPS, 97 wRC+
as RHB v LHP: .260/.374/.370, .744 OPS, 99 wRC+
Considering that in 2009, Fowler did everything better as a RHB when compared to a LHB, 2010 did show marks of improvement as far as attempting to equalize those splits. Clearly, as a LHB, Fowler has more of a power swing (and he also hit all 6 of his 2010 homers from the left side), and as a RHB, Fowler is more of an on-base machine. I honestly wonder if it would suit him better to bat leadoff v LHP and bat elsewhere v RHP, maybe 6th or 7th or something.
Anyhow, to conclude this rambling review, Fowler had a relatively normal season for a 2nd year player who skipped AAA: He started out strong, tripped, fell flat on his face, got demoted to AAA, came back up, improved greatly, and ultimately finished the season strong. I get the impression that a lot of us miss that because of the switch-hitting splits, when the reality is that lefties AND righties go through slumps.
Final Grade: B
What I DIDN'T mention about Fowler is that his defense seems to have improved, at least according to UZR. We know Fowler glides like a sailboat on a placid lake, but UZR isn't as big of a fan. Taking that into consideration, Fowler was worth -16.2 runs in CF in 2009, and -2.6 in 2010. That's a pretty solid improvement as it is, and it all balanced out to the 1.7 fWAR mentioned in the beginning of the article. Average level of play from a CF isn't something to sneeze at by any means, and I look forward to see Dex's next growth step in 2011.
2011 Outlook:
Short and sweet, projections are calling for a breakout year of sorts from Dex. Marcel sees something relatively mediocre but improved (.264/.351/.414, 112 wRC+) while Bill James is predicting an all-out arrival (.285/.373/.437, 125 wRC+). If Dex can build on what he's done right in the past 2 seasons, I don't think that yet another promised breakout is beyond the realms of possibility.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The article linked yesterday mentioned that Dex is going to try to add bunting on his repitoire...
I’m not so sure that’s a good idea. He’s about as fast as the come, but so was Willy Taveras when we had him (the first time) and his ability to bunt to get on base was only marginally good enough for him to pursue it. In Dex’s case, he clearly has more offensive ability outside of Willy, in terms of making solid contact, drawing walks, and power. It seems to me that Dex is the sort of player who would be worth alot more to us swinging than bunting.
That being said, all other things being equal, theres no doubt that good bunting ability is a plus, especially if it puts pressure on the infielders and widens the gap. Plus bunting on base is obviously easier from the left side of the plate, which is his weaker side, so picking up an ability to bunt could boost his value batting from the left side in particular (although it would also be taking at bats awat from his more powerful side)
Anyway, I’m interested to see if anything comes out of it or if its just one of the legion of spring training vagaries. I am glad that Taveras is there this spring though; he should be able to give Dex some pointers both on bunting (if he pursues it) and basestealing.
by SurfaceThought on Feb 15, 2011 12:29 PM MST reply actions
I don't see Dex as a bunt-for-hits guys outside of just good baseball moves
example, 3B is playing way back or something.
Fowler should be splitting gaps and OPSing .850+.
Please, Jim, don’t turn Fowler into Dave Roberts.
by Andrew Martin on Feb 15, 2011 12:43 PM MST up reply actions
My thoughts exactly
Fortunately, and this is just pure perception with no statistical backing whatsoever, Tracy doesn’t seem near as bunt happy as Hurdle.
by SurfaceThought on Feb 15, 2011 2:59 PM MST up reply actions
I'm going to come in guns blazing if people continue
To criticize management for “senselesslt continuing the switch hitting experiment”
Dude is fine as a lefty.
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 15, 2011 12:48 PM MST via mobile reply actions
When he came back from AAA
He also seemed much more aggressive and his walk rate for the rest of the season was around like 9% as opposed to the 13% he was putting up before.
"These are thin mints. I put them in the freezer. My favorites. So good."
--Reds outfielder Adam Dunn, on the girl scout cookies he keeps in his locker
good point
I was concerned in 2009 that he was walking TOO much on PAs where he could’ve likely gotten a hit.
by Andrew Martin on Feb 15, 2011 1:09 PM MST up reply actions
Yea, if he needs to be more aggressive to hit for good averages, then so be it
but his historically high walk rates have me optimistic that he may be able to keep the gains in aggressiveness while eventually improving his walk rate.
"These are thin mints. I put them in the freezer. My favorites. So good."
--Reds outfielder Adam Dunn, on the girl scout cookies he keeps in his locker
Nice write-up.
I am fairly confident that the post-demotion Dexter will show up in April. He seemed to be pretty consistent in the second half, kind of like he had something figured out. I’m also not worried about his worse RHB vs. LHP splits because the vast majority of his at-bats come as a LHB. Finally, it would be nice to see a little more meat on his bones. 6-4, 175 is skinny.
"My eyes! The goggles do nothing!" - Rainier Wolfcastle
Will be interesting to see his stance in 2011
I loved the low-handed, Eric Davis-like stance Rene Lachemann had him using in the Springs and shortly after his call-up, but he seemed to drift away from it a bit as the season went along. That’s OK, as long as he doesn’t drift too far and get long and loopy.
I share some of the sentiments above about bunting. I would hate to see Dex thinking bunt-first, but I like the idea of him being more of a threat to bunt. Pulling the third baseman in a little bit should help him shoot some extra-base hits down the LF line.
Totally
Don’t get me wrong, when I eschew Fowler bunting, it’s not disregarding the bunt as a potentially potent weapon, but more that I want to see Fowler splitting the gaps more than becoming Juan Pierre: Switch Hitter.
Welcome, and thanks for the comments
by Andrew Martin on Feb 15, 2011 2:37 PM MST up reply actions
Juan Pierre: Switch Hitter
If Juan Pierre is worth a five year deal for 45 Mill then a switch hitting version should be worth ten years for 90 mil right?
by SurfaceThought on Feb 15, 2011 3:04 PM MST up reply actions
Pierre v. Dex? Not really a comparison.
Pierre has a much higher BA and more years experience in MLB. A proven performer. Dex has great potential, but is still a little green.
by Real Perspective on Feb 15, 2011 3:16 PM MST up reply actions
That IS some real perspective.
Just an average guy with exceptional hair. Nothing more, nothing less.
Bear Naked - My thoughts on sports, music, and life.
by Bryan Kilpatrick on Feb 15, 2011 6:08 PM MST up reply actions
I'm pretty sure Real Perspective missed the point
And that’s why AMart put ‘whoosh’
I'm GoRockies!! everybody :P
by CentralCaliRox on Feb 16, 2011 2:02 AM MST via mobile up reply actions
woosh
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 16, 2011 7:36 AM MST via mobile up reply actions
Oh snap!
The writer formerly known as Jabberwocky
READ and LEARN about the business of baseball at Purple Row Academy
Eschew Obfuscation!
Total boxquote fail, as if no one was able to tell
by SurfaceThought on Feb 15, 2011 7:56 PM MST up reply actions
once he improves his offensive game
he will be a complete player…take that step this year Dex
LETS GO RED WINGS!
2011 will be the year....better be....
Troy Tulowitzki: "When people think of the Rockies, I want them to think of a winning organization."
Nice Write Up Amart
I think Dex is the kind of player who, when he’s hot, is going to have a high BABIP because he’s a good line drive hitter and he’s going to run a lot of close ones out. When he’s off though his BABIP will be lower because he’s lifting the ball and rolling it over. There’s not a lot of room in between for him it seems like. There was a stretch last year where he was just flat out unlucky. He was crushing the ball and it just happened to be right at a position player.
My predictions is that as a third year player he will be much more comfortable with his role on the team and not be quite so anxious. I think a higher BABIP is sustainable for him. Maybe not .400 but I’m thinking certainly above average. I also think he’s a .375 OBP guy and should steal 30 bags.
Dex is one of the worst defensive outfielders in the history of Colorado..
according to Fangraphs he’s the 2nd worst UZR in the past 7 seasons. Only Hawpe is worst. But then UZR tells us our best defensive outfield would be (min 200 innings):
Rene Reyes – 11.1
Dustan Mohr – 8.3
Seth Smith – 7.9
To truly know how skewed UZR is against Colorado players look at WillyT’s scores; he’s averaged a +4.4 but when he played for the Rockies he was -5.8, -3.8? C’mon fangraphs!
I just go by the eye test.
And by “eye test,” I count the number of times my eyes pop out of my head whenever Dex makes an awesome catch. He averages about 2.4 EP/9.
"If you can't do something smart, do something right."
use Total Zone and then rerank
Because Dante Bichette? /shudder
by Andrew Martin on Feb 15, 2011 4:18 PM MST up reply actions
The photo above reminds me of something
I observed about Dexter last year, and I’m wondering if anyone else noticed:
I think Dexter gets hosed more than any Rockies player on pitches 3 to 4 inches below the knees being called strikes. When he wore the super-high socks last year, I thought it happened less often, perhaps because the socks reminded the umpire just how damn tall he is. I would like to see him stick with the old-school socks and dump the pajama bottoms, and see if this pattern sticks. Never hurts to shrink your strike zone, even by an inch or two.
Absofreakinglutly
"Why are they outlawin' the spit pitch? The curveball is a cheap 'n easy pitch; the spitter aint" Ty Cobb
"When I was pitching 90's in the seventies; I never thought I'd be pitching 70's in the nineties!" Frank Tanana
I'm just a fan of the high socks overall
So I think it’s a great idea!
Caution: Colorado teams are better than they appear.
by ShadowPenguin on Feb 16, 2011 8:07 AM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm probably misremembering or just making something up entirely
but I think there was an article last year about Dexter’s hitting with and without the socks. He felt like he played better with the socks.
Score a goal. Unit. Basket. Go squadron! Do good! Defeat the opponents soundly in this...skirmish.
I don't remember an article, but
I just think Dexter’s been plagued by umps who call the same low pitches for strikes on him that they would call on, say, Jonny Herrera – when they are actually several inches below his knees. When he wore the high socks, it seemed like he got a more equitable strike zone. I have nothing to back that up other than memory, but I hope he stays with the high socks just in case.
Not to mention, they just look better. Why an athlete like Dexter would want to run around in footie pajamas, I’ll never know.
by Northsider1964 on Feb 16, 2011 1:41 PM MST up reply actions
This is actually a genius idea for a study
find players with and without high socks, or those who switched at some point in the season and look at low called strikes.
Other things to be considered – the height of the previous batter, and the socks of the previous batter.
"These are thin mints. I put them in the freezer. My favorites. So good."
--Reds outfielder Adam Dunn, on the girl scout cookies he keeps in his locker
2011
team leader in steals with 33. To go with his .282/.366/.423
Help paint the town purple!
by Shangri-La Dragon on Feb 16, 2011 7:22 PM MST reply actions

by 

































