2010 Rockies Player Review: Brad Hawpe
Any review of Brad Hawpe's 2010 season is going to include a lot of questions. Several immediately jump to mind, but the most important is: What happened?
I don't intend for this to sound like a eulogy, but Hawpe was a very good hitter. In a Rockpile comment somewhere, I once suggested that he was as good a hitter as Justin Morneau (doesn't mean it's true). Coming into 2010, Hawpe had a career .875 OPS. From 2007 to 2009, he had a .903 OPS. In 2009, he came out to a .903 OPS. That's where the offensive picture starts to crack. As Jeff noted after the 2009 season, Hawpe's season line is greatly inflated by an all-star first half (.973 OPS); the second half performance did not match up (.813 OPS).
Specifically, he was dragged down by a poor July (.763 OPS), but he didn't recover the first half form for the rest of the summer. The July crash was at least partially BABIP driven, as he fell from ~.375 BABIP in the first three months to .311 in July. However, even as his BABIP recovered in August (.389), his bat didn't entirely come back to life (.814 OPS).
Digging deeper, there are a lot of troubling signs from the latter half of 2009.* Despite monthly highs in HR/FB rate during August and September, Hawpe started hitting a ton of ground balls. A ton. A guy who has a career 1.12 GB/FB ratio was suddenly doing twofers on ground balls in July, and was still giving pitchers a break with a buy two GB, get one FB policy in August. It came closer to normal in September, 1.36, but was still high (it dropped back to 1.00 while with the Rox in 2010).
*This is also a good example of where granular statistics sometimes fail. In May '09, Hawpe put up a 26.4% LD rate. After dipping in succeeding months, it rose back to ~23.5% in August and September. At first glance, I'd be led to believe that Hawpe was recovering something. However, reconsider the August '09 BABIP: .389 BABIP + 26% LD shouldn't come out to just an .814 OPS. The 41% K rate in Aug-Sep didn't help, but it's also possible that not all line drives are created equal, and that Hawpe's Aug-Sep line drives were not of the scorching, to the wall variety.
Worse yet, over 2009, Hawpe put up a GB/FB ratio to the pull side, where he's generally gone to more than center or opposite, 5.62, that was more than twice the ratio in 2007 and 2008, 2.02 and 2.48. In 2010, the ratio increased to 7.00 That's either a slower bat, or a lot of failed attempts at the Baltimore Chop. It follows that, again to the pull side, his ISO dropped from .415 in 2008 to .218 in 2009 to .173 in 2010. Not good. There was a corresponding drop in BABIP, which is unsurprising because of all the grounders. It's clear Hawpe lost a lot when attempting to pull the ball.
So, enough with the bad signs. Eulogies Reviews should be at least a little positive. It's not really worth talking about his defense at length, but for what it's worth, in 2010, Total Zone says Hawpe was +3 in 522 RF innings. UZR/150 says he was much improved in 2010, though still -10. Now that we're on the positive track, let's find more things that went right in 2010...
Hawpe had an awesome April. He walked 16% of the time, and only struck out in 19% of his at bats. He actually posted a better OPS (1.174) than NL Player of the Month Kelly Johnson, (1.154). However, Hawpe lost time to injuries during the month and didn't put up the same glamour line as Johnson, who surprisingly hit nine homers.
It was downhill from there. The quad injury led to a DL stint in late April, and was followed by a nagging rib cage injury. All the while, his batting took a dive. In the time spanning his return from the DL on May 10 until his release on August 18, he had a Barmes-esque .698 OPS. The rib injury probably had a lot to do with the .398 SLG, but it's important to keep in mind that he posted SLG numbers below his career average in the last three months of 2009. Hawpe showed a little improvement in July, putting up a .315/.447/.762 line. Not bad, though with the defense and for a corner OF/1B, it's only good relative to his June and August numbers.
August brought, as Taylor Swift might say, a month of tears: .357/.261/.618, and a release. September, her real month of tears, was nearly as bad: .638 OPS (but in only 38 ABs with the Rays).
After walking through the rest of the 2010 numbers, it's tempting to go back to the defensive improvement (maybe resting more plus playing some first really did help), but instead let's look at his L/R splits. In 2010, Hawpe posted a career best 113 wRC+ vs. LHP. Unfortunately, it was in only 86 ABs. Put another way, he had an .821 OPS vs. LHP and a .730 OPS vs. RHP. He didn't experience a similar drop vs. RHP in 2009 (though I'm not looking at first/second half performance vs. RHP), and his 2010 BABIP vs. RHP was 39 points lower than his career average. That's one place to start looking for reasons.
Underneath it all, Hawpe did show some encouraging things during his final season with the Rockies. His K rate (26%) and BB rate (12%) were close to career norms, and not bad numbers for that type of hitter. Following up on the stellar April (and ignoring May and June), he posted a .234 ISO in July (with a .276 BABIP). From 2009 to 2010, his overall groundball percentage dropped three points, with a corresponding rise in his flyball percentage. Unfortunately, his HR/FB% dropped seven points. With health and luck, he might have had a closer to average 2010.
On the flip side, where he was once a phenomenal fastball hitter (+18 wFB value in 2009), Fangraphs says he experienced a big drop in 2010, compiling only +1.7. Again, the rib injury, but that's a substantial drop. And, looking back to the GB/FB pull splits referenced earlier, I wonder if he really lost something against a good fastball.
It's easy to see that for most instances of something positive from 2010, there's something else that's bad. I can't dismiss the rib and quad injuries, but I can't explain everything away with them either. Something started going wrong in the second half of 2009, and, exacerbated by injuries, it continued to deteriorate in 2010. The concern is that Hawpe's power is going to deteriorate rapidly, and moving to Petco isn't going to help that.
2010 Grade: C-. Not as bad as I would have given him before I started writing this. It's pretty clear that the injuries hurt him for most of the year. Yet, the downward trend in his ability to pull the ball in the air with power is troubling. That will be made worse with the switch to Petco, where it's 382-402 feet to center-right.
Going forward: In all, I think Hawpe will put up some decent numbers in 2011. Bill James has him at .362/.445/.807, with 14 HR. Fangraphs' Fan Projections are about the same. I think, like 2009 and 2010, he'll start fast and fade. The NL West pitchers know how to pitch him, and should know how to pitch to their advantage in Petco. If they don't know how to put those together on their own, their pitching coach or someone else will figure it out and tell them. Still, I root for him to do well. Especially if it's against the Giants and not the Rockies.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We'll always remember the "Majestic" swing of the Hopper at he Rox Nation. Good Luck.
Also:
August brought, as Taylor Swift might say, a month of tears: .357/.261/.618
Bill James has him at .362/.445/.807, with 14 HR
I really hope we didn’t release Hawpe after batting 357 in August, and I really really hope he doesn’t put up that triple slash line as a Padre. I think that’s supposed to be .265/.362/.445…
The triple slash I used was OBP/SLG/OPS.
I don’t put a lot of stock in the projections, but I think he’s going to decline rapidly in the next couple of years. Not exactly the right market for that.
I'd advise using the standard AVG/OBP/SLG slash
and then include OPS, wOBA, wRC+ afterwards if you care to
.250/.350/.450; .800 OPS
by Andrew Martin on Feb 3, 2011 11:58 PM MST up reply actions
or at least specify
what slash you’re going to use if it isn’t the standard. It took me a little bit to figure out what was going on.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all. ~Earl Weaver
Baseball fans love numbers. They love to swirl them around their mouths like Bordeaux wine. ~Pat Conroy
JFK
Will do.
In hindsight, I’m not sure why I chose to use that format. In the future, I’ll probably just stick to the components (OBP and SLG), rather than use a slash at all.
I just got feedback from elsewhere that basically said
“don’t expand the slash line, it just looks arrogant/pretentious”
alright then.
by Andrew Martin on Feb 4, 2011 2:32 PM MST up reply actions
Those don't sound like rules
more like strict guidelines. You’re a blogger, make up your own “rules,” as long as they make sense to you and your readers.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all. ~Earl Weaver
Baseball fans love numbers. They love to swirl them around their mouths like Bordeaux wine. ~Pat Conroy
JFK
So what really happened?
If he is going to hit so well this year, why didn’t the Rox sign him instead of letting him go? The injuries he suffered are not career threatening. Was he unhappy in Colorado?
Yes, his numbers dropped, but that’s why you have coaching — to address these things. What’s the inside story?
by Real Perspective on Feb 3, 2011 5:04 PM MST reply actions
I meant to include this in the review
It’s important to remember that he made $7.5M last year, and had a $10M option for 2011. What happened was that he got too expensive for his performance, and fortunately the Rockies didn’t do what the Twins did with Cuddyer.
Coaches can’t necessarily address loss of bat speed, decline in power, losing the zone etc. I don’t have the inside story, but if you combine the obvious move to decline the option with bad defense, poor overall performance since July ‘09, and the availability of younger, cheaper talent at the same positions, you don’t need a map.
Whether he felt jilted by the team’s decisions during and after the season doesn’t matter because there wasn’t really a spot for him and he probably wasn’t going to take a Giambi-like contract just to stay with the Rockies. He’s young enough to rebuild value fairly quickly, so it made sense to go wherever he could get a starting job. See above on whether I think he’ll rebuild that value.
I maintain that the Rockies really missed a great opportunity to get some good value for Hawpe following 2009.
It just seems like a waste to me.
The writer formerly known as Jabberwocky
READ and LEARN about the business of baseball at Purple Row Academy
Eschew Obfuscation!
In total agreement.
It seems like the Rockies always end up giving up a C – B- prospect for a veteran who’s been losing value (Chaz Roe-Jose Lopez, CBM-Delcarmen, Graham-Betancourt, Hynick-Contreras). Not all of those guys have panned out, but the point is that it seems to be a one way street, and, of those, only Betancourt has definitely been worth it.
Maybe I’m missing the other side, but Atkins and Hawpe definitely stand out as opportunities where the situation could have been reversed (the Vizacaino-Marqis trade sort of?).
Definitely worked out
I don’t know anything about the guys who went the other way, but Beimel was probably worth the price. I think the point still stands that these veterans for prospects trades seem like a one way street.
ever injured reliever Ryan Mattheus and A ball non prospect Robinson Fabian
It worked.
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 5, 2011 8:07 AM MST via mobile up reply actions
Yup.
Acquiring prospects for a veteran that a team no longer needs (declining skills, impending free agency, price tag, position redundancy) is generally regarded as a good thing. The quality of the prospects will vary, but something is better than nothing.
I guess Barmes-Paulino fits the bill.
So does Chone Figgins-Kimera Bartee
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 5, 2011 8:26 PM MST up reply actions
don't remind me
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all. ~Earl Weaver
Baseball fans love numbers. They love to swirl them around their mouths like Bordeaux wine. ~Pat Conroy
JFK
0-for-15, 2 BB, 1 HBP, 5 K, 0 SB
He did manage a sacrifice fly though, so there’s that.
"I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
by Andrew T. Fisher on Feb 7, 2011 5:29 PM MST up reply actions
Jeff, you were calling for it during 2009 not just after.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all. ~Earl Weaver
Baseball fans love numbers. They love to swirl them around their mouths like Bordeaux wine. ~Pat Conroy
JFK
I miss Hawpe, but...
He was definitely one of my favorites and I was sad when he was released. But I was not disappointed. Hawpe is a quality person, a striver (check into what he did to get noticed/picked by LSU). I would never accuse him of mailing it in for any reason, contract or otherwise. But whatever the actual reason, that’s what it seemed like. His defense tanked. His swing got too long and he got too selective at the wrong time in counts. I’m inclined to consider that coaching failed here, whether the Baylor stopped coaching or Brad stopped listening. There just didn’t seem to be adjustments or improvements – AB-to-AB was a throwaway.
by Dave in Superior on Feb 4, 2011 8:21 AM MST reply actions
Welcome to Purple Row
I can’t explain Hawpe’s drop anymore than most people, injuries or not making adjustments and so forth. I do not, for one second however, believe that he threw away anything. The team was in a position to win the last couple years and as a leader of that team he has no reason to do that.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all. ~Earl Weaver
Baseball fans love numbers. They love to swirl them around their mouths like Bordeaux wine. ~Pat Conroy
JFK
Agreed
My point was that with his high character and mental makeup, Hawpe would never do that. But the sharp and inexplicable decline throughout his game could give that appearance. I would be shocked beyond belief to learn otherwise.
by Dave in Superior on Feb 4, 2011 12:46 PM MST up reply actions
Sad thing is
with Brad’s sorry performace he still out performed Garry Smith during August and Sept/Oct.
UZR can suck it!!
"Don't be pushed by your problems. Be led by your dreams."
Call me crazy but I see a rebound year coming for Hawpe with San Diego
He’s certainly not an old player yet and if it was injuries that derailed him last season (which I believe it was) then he will be productive for the Padres. (Lets hope he inflicts some serious damage on LA and San Fran this season)
56 more days until the Rockies Home Opener!!!!!!!
by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Feb 4, 2011 10:19 AM MST reply actions
I think he can
but it will definitely be hard to improve a lot in that ballpark.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all. ~Earl Weaver
Baseball fans love numbers. They love to swirl them around their mouths like Bordeaux wine. ~Pat Conroy
JFK
Absolutely!
Through 09 Hawpe did well at PetCo (almost as well as at Chavez Ravine). But SD is not gonna be friendly to the current Hawpe. His whole swing is about elevation (witness the photo at the top of the page). Fly balls die in that heavy marine layer. There’s gonna be a lot of long outs in his future. I hope I am wrong.
I think Hawpe’s days as a plus outfielder are gone.
I’d give Giambi’s spot on the bench to Hawpe any day, especially at 2M, if Hawpe is no longer a starter. If Hawpe finds the old magic, on Helton’s retirement or reduced role, I’d welcome Hawpe to first, though the timing certainly doesn’t favor that.
by Dave in Superior on Feb 4, 2011 12:56 PM MST up reply actions
A truly great Rockie
How many guys in team history will go down as ASG players and also WS HR hitters? Add that to so many other great memories, and he’s one that will always be remembered. Sort of like Vinny Castilla to me: he was never the brightest star at any given time on the team, but he was always a baller and a threat, and a fan fav. He’ll definitely get a standing O from me if I ever get to see him live at Coors again.
I’m definitely with those who thought it was probably best for him to move along before last season while he had value, and I didn’t object to the release (of course, wish it didn’t have to come to that). But here’s to hoping we see him playing many more successful years in the league.

by 





























