The Rockies and BABIP
It's a scene that's played out far too often this season. The Rockies have men on, the batter smokes the pitch, and it finds an opponent's glove. Rockie fans everywhere curse the luck dragon and threaten to rip the BABIP Fairy's voice box out - (Come on, you know you've done it). Whether the Rockies have been unlucky when it comes to BABIP this season is not debatable, the only question is just how unlucky have they been? Let's find out.
Note: (If you're unfamiliar with BABIP, you can read about it here.)
Second Note: All numbers in this piece reflect what they were entering Thursday's game.
Here are the Rockies BABIP splits as a team so far this season.
| Home BABIP | .291 |
| Road BABIP | .276 |
| Overall BABIP | .283 |
Okay, so what does it mean? Without context, an overall BABIP of .283 doesn't sound so unlucky, and certainly not unfortunate enough to have a huge impact on a team's season; but that's only a small piece of the puzzle. To find the real answers, we must dig deeper into the numbers. So let's see how the Rockies overall BABIP ranks among other National League teams.
| 1) | Astros | .316 |
| 2) | Cardinals | .315 |
| 3) | Cubs | .313 |
| 4) | Mets | .305 |
| 5) | Reds | .301 |
| 6) | Dodgers | .296 |
| 7) | Pirates | .290 |
| 8) | Marlins | .289 |
| 9) | D'Backs | .288 |
| 10) | Padres | .287 |
| 11) | Brewers | .287 |
| 12) | Giants | .284 |
| 13) | Rockies | .283 |
| 14) | Phillies | .279 |
| 15) | Braves | .279 |
| 16) | Nationals | .277 |
13th is certainly not satisfying, but it also doesn't look too bad in Washington, Atlanta, and Philadelphia right now either. Looking at this alone, it would seem as though the Rockies BABIP woes this season have been greatly exaggerated. Except for one thing; it fails to take into consideration the most important factor of all - Coors Field; and what it reveals, is astonishing.
Below I have taken the Rockies team BABIP for each of the last ten seasons and calculated where it ranks in the N.L.
| Year | Team BABIP | N.L. Rank |
| 2001 | .322 | 1st |
| 2002 | .311 | 1st |
| 2003 | .302 | 3rd |
| 2004 | .314 | 1st |
| 2005 | .307 | 1st |
| 2006 | .310 | 1st |
| 2007 | .322 | 1st |
| 2008 | .308 | 4th |
| 2009 | .305 | 4th |
| 2010 | .310 | 3rd |
| Average | .311 | / |
Look at what playing half their games at Coors Field does to the Rockies BABIP!!! This should be anything but a surprise but it does do an excellent job of putting that 2011 team BABIP of .283 and NL rank of 13th into perspective. Once you realize that the Rockies average BABIP over the last ten years is 28 points higher than it is right now and that the Rockies have never ranked lower than 4th in this category in team history, you can start to understand just how awful their luck has been this season.
It gets even worse when you just look at the numbers at Coors Field. Here's what they look like over the last 10 years.
| Year | Team BABIP at Home |
| 2001 | .358 |
| 2002 | .342 |
| 2003 | .320 |
| 2004 | .337 |
| 2005 | .337 |
| 2006 | .331 |
| 2007 | .333 |
| 2008 | .316 |
| 2009 | .323 |
| 2010 | .341 |
| Average | .334 |
Now consider that the Rockies have a .291 BABIP at home and a 13-15 record at Coors Field entering this series against the Dodgers. The season suddenly makes a lot more sense. The Rockies have survived on the road (16-17 with a slightly below average BABIP) but have gotten burned at home (the place where they usually excel) by a BABIP that's 43 POINTS below what the average has been over the last ten years. In other words, the Rockies' opponents have been benefitting from the generous BABIP Coors Field provides and they have not.
Nowhere is this truer than in Troy Tulowitzki's splits. Heading into this series against the Dodgers, his numbers were considerably better out on the road than at the friendly confines of Coors Field.
| ~ | PA | BA | OBP | HR | OPS | BABIP |
| Home | 119 | .238 | .298 | 5 | .727 | .220 |
| Road | 143 | .280 | .364 | 6 | .884 | .264 |
What's about to happen here should be obvious. Tulo's remarkably unlucky .220 BABIP at Coors Field will rebound in a huge way and his numbers will soar. (They pretty much has to; Tulo's BABIP is 104 POINTS below his career BABIP at Coors of .324) And the best news of all, whenever Tulo's numbers start to skyrocket, the Rockies record usually follow suit - (See September 2007, June 2009, September 2009, the 15 game stretch last September where Tulo hit 14 HR's, and April of this season for reference).
Throw in the rest of the team who has also been unlucky at Coors this season and the fact that the Rockies are entering a stretch where they play 16 of 22 games at home, and it looks like things are about to get awfully fun in the LoDo.
_____________________
Sources: www.fangraphs.com & www.baseballreference.com
Eat. Drink. Be Merry. But the above FanPost does not necessarily reflect the attitudes, opinions, or views of Purple Row's staff (unless, of course, it's written by the staff [and even then, it still might not]).
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It looks like the turnaround has already started
Let’s hope it continues.
NO, we are NOT going to fire Jim Tracy midseason!!!!!
The Rockies couldn't be any more offensive or less offensive all at the same time.
by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Jun 11, 2011 2:20 AM MDT reply actions
I understand the concept of BABIP
But I fail to see its real statistical value. It just seems to me a way to rationalize underperformance. Can we really quantitatively analyze luck? Ultimately it becomes paralysis by analysis, and in the long run the best advice was stated by “Wee” Willie Keeler over a century ago: “Keep your eye clear, and hit ‘em where they ain’t.”
BABIP has real statistical value because it's an excellent predictor stat
What it predicts here is the both the Rockies record, and Tulo’s numbers at home will improve dramatically. (We can check back in a few months and see if it’s right.)
I do agree that this team has been underforming and that it’s a huge part of why their record is where it is, but I also think they have been incredibly unfortunate as well. (There’s no reason why these events can’t occur simultaneously.) In fact, I’d argue that to have an 8-21 record in the month of May with the talent this team has and the pitching they have gotten, you probably need A TON OF BOTH.
NO, we are NOT going to fire Jim Tracy midseason!!!!!
The Rockies couldn't be any more offensive or less offensive all at the same time.
by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Jun 11, 2011 3:19 PM MDT up reply actions
:-) ROOT Sports was discussing BABIP for the lay people last night
I wonder if they saw this excellent analysis and were inspired to bring it to the light?!
AL is not real baseball. It’s arena football with sticks. - Paleface Destro
by The Toddfather's Goatee on Jun 11, 2011 12:01 PM MDT reply actions
I like seeing the Rockies' unluckiness quantified
but expecting it to reverse is similar to the Gambler’s Fallacy. We can predict that the Rockies and Tulo will start performing at their expected rates, but that doesn’t mean they will start doing even better in order to “even things out.”
Oh I'm not expecting a complete reverse
But a BABIP at Coors closer to .330 from here on out will do wonders for this team; even if it only gets us to something like .315 or .320 by the end of the season and Tulo’s BABIP to about .300 at Coors for the season.
NO, we are NOT going to fire Jim Tracy midseason!!!!!
The Rockies couldn't be any more offensive or less offensive all at the same time.
by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Jun 11, 2011 10:33 PM MDT up reply actions
The BABIP dragon continues to be a master troll.
The 2011 Colorado Rockies - Starring Johnny Herrera as THE ANSWER
sabres derp derpdeprpdprperpdpwpsdppsrp4pyh utjgfh-Q% EqR Atdjxvgxco-
Burgundy Wave - SBnation's Colorado Rapids site
Crystal Palace FC - Eternally a point from relegation (._. )
Everyone knows it's because we can't used
Juiced balls at home anymore.
The Martha Stewart of processed foods.
Super Overlady Of the Ubaldo Lovers Club.
Proud Member of the PR gynocracy.
Video tips on posting links and images to Purple Row - Click Here -
Interesting that the difference between 7th and 15th is just .011
I wonder if there’s really much statistical significance to that. One more ball in play out of every 90 falls for a hit and suddenly we’re a juggernaut?
One could look at these same numbers and say “The Rockies, Giants, and D’backs have all been about the same in terms of BABIP ‘luck’ but the Giants have managed to win a lot more close games and the D’backs have managed to win a lot more walkoffs”
"The game of baseball is made up of many little things. If we do all the little things right, then we'll never have a big thing to worry about" -- Cal Ripken, Sr.
Johnny Herrera Fan Club Member -- "Mr. Fundamental"
Yankee Haters Encouragement Group Member #3
That would be a fine explaination if the Rockies weren't playing half their games in Coors Field
One of the main points of this piece was to show just how much Coors Field drives up BABIP. Once we know that, we can get a better idea of how bad the Rockies have been vs. how unlucky the Rockies have been. While the concept of Coors Field = offense is obvious, it’s important to quantify just how much the Rockie bats should be benefitting from their home park.
When you consider that the Rockies have had an average BABIP at home of .334 over the last decade and compare it to a team like the Giants who have had a home BABIP under .300 in that same time frame, the overall BABIP numbers of these two teams should be nowhere near each unless the Rockies have been getting extremely unlucky. The end result is that the visiting teams are reaping the benefits of the Coors Field BABIP and the Rockies are not.
My main point is, that’s not going to continue.
NO, we are NOT going to fire Jim Tracy midseason!!!!!
The Rockies couldn't be any more offensive or less offensive all at the same time.
by RhodeIslandRoxfan on Jun 15, 2011 7:01 AM MDT up reply actions

by 






























