Monday Morning Rockpile:
The Rockies just completed a stretch of games going back to the beginning of May (April 30, actually) where the only opponent with a winning record that they faced in that span was Arizona. After getting off to a rough start, the team turned around and finished 21-18 overall in that run. Not spectacular by any means, and probably not quite decent enough to be worthy of contention, but I could point to articles in papers in each of these opponent cities (those with losing records) citing the same desire to see their team turn the season around in this soft spot of the schedule. As of this morning, the Rockies are the only one of the underperforming group to close to within five games of .500.
These next twenty-five games leading into the All-Star break, however, represent a considerable step up in the degree of difficulty with a dangerous Houston team being the worst of the bunch and the AL and NL leading Mets and Red Sox being the best. They also will determine a lot about how the rest of the year will shake out.
----------------
It would take an absolute disaster in this stretch, I'm thinking over seventeen losses, to really consider trading Brian Fuentes before the end of July. That's why speculation like this should be ignored for now. Even Jayson Stark's claim that Todd Helton is perpetually on the trade block needs to be taken with a considerable grain of salt.
------------------
Troy E. Renck has a mailbag, in which he says the Rox are going to make a push for yet another multi-million dollar reliever this offseason. I'm telling you, as long as I see this, Casey Weathers looks better and better as a draft choice. Renck also disses on Chris Iannetta, who still has a higher OPS than Torrealba. Come on, Troy, you know better than to just take batting average at face value.
In another article, Renck mentions that the Rockies have leverage over Weathers in contract negotiations, which is to be expected for a college senior. I think he's remiss not to also mention that as an expected fast mover, Weathers is likely to be earning a major league paycheck faster than most if not everybody else in the draft, making the potential difference in signing bonus less a dollar loss than it might seem.
Also from that article, note that JC Romero, as well as Jay Witasick, is available, and both represent upgrades over the leader in the poll to the right-->.
--------------
Tracy Ringolsby points out the .500 road record for the Rockies in his recap, an achievement that may be difficult to maintain in Fenway. I'm eager to see how Matt Holliday's bat plays there, however.
The Hirsh brothers have proven to be accessible, even while Jason struggles at times this season. He's got some really fantastic leadership qualities, and I'm hoping yesterday's start is a sign of good things to come.
0 recs |
18 comments
Comments
well...
I am a bit worried about the Rockies new drafting strategy, if for no other reason than how it has changed in the last several years. The Rockies built the system (at least the first rounders) up by drafting players (at least in the first round) considered best available by conventional wisdom--Stewart, Nelson, Tulowitzki--this is now two straight drafts where this isn't the case and I can't help but conclude that it is driven by budgetary concerns, but another common thread in the last two first round picks is that both players are/were very advanced and should be in the majors fairly quickly. I wonder if O'Dowd and colleagues are feeling pressure to compete sooner rather than later.
by DenverBears on Jun 11, 2007 8:16 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Well,
And don't we want the Rockies to compete now and later on?
by Russ Oates on Jun 11, 2007 8:57 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure...
by DenverBears on Jun 11, 2007 10:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Weathers...
You're wrong. The Giants were prepared to take him at #10 if we didn't (so to say they wouldn't have taken him at #8 if they were picking then would be wrong).
There were also plenty of rumors of teams in the 9-15 range who were interested in him as well(Ari, Cle, Cin)
Neither Reynolds nor Weathers were "over-drafts". Yes they were taken a few picks above what most people predicted they should be taken.....but we're only talking about 2-5 picks higher here (and not 15 picks)
by sg8335aa on Jun 11, 2007 12:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess my point was
I guess I view "best available player" as a player who has the most talent, an advanced feel for the game and is quite signable. I don't have a problem with that approach, but others do because of that last part. I don't believe the Rockies compromised their first round picks this year and last year to get easy signs. These guys are legitimate talents that will help the Rockies win in the immediate future and later on.
by Russ Oates on Jun 11, 2007 12:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Catch the Wave
by RockieRooter on Jun 11, 2007 4:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still don't buy that Weathers isn't the best
This season, however, I'm really beginning to think the Rockies made the right call whether it was money driven or not. The three or four players who everybody points to as who they'd rather have are all high schoolers, none of whom figures on making the Major Leagues until 2011. By then, Weathers will likely have three seasons of value he's already given our club at a near minimum salary, and be nearing the point where trading him will return even greater dividends, similar to where we're at with Fuentes right now.
None of the others will sign for less than $2 million, meaning Arizona's going to have to stretch to get Parker, and an article in Detroit said their chances of signing Porcello (who wants $8 million) are 50-50. Dominguez and Heyward will likely get signed, but I'm not sure it will be fast enough for them to enter the system in time to develop this year. So what it comes down to is that a lot of people are advocating that the Rockies spend more money in the draft to get less back.
If everybody signs and plays to their potential for their selecting club -which won't happen, and we have the guy most likely too- what happens is that Porcello is the next Josh Beckett (giving Detroit ace like value in 2011) and Weathers will have given us just as many innings of top notch performance at that point for a quarter of the price. We could then trade Weathers for a starting position player plus a top, Porcello-like prospect (the going rate) and not have to pay their signing bonuses, either.
by Rox Girl on Jun 11, 2007 9:07 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've avoided draft conversations
But what I don't understand is why people think Weathers isn't a good pick. Like guys that can throw near 100 mph are a dime a dozen. As a senior and a reliever, he is closer to the Bigs, which gives him a much greater chance to actually help the major league club. Sure an OF or a Catcher that are 2 years away from the bigs would be great, but was that guy available when we picked?
Young "projects" seem to make sense to me after the early rounds.
by Redhawk on Jun 11, 2007 9:28 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still unsure about Weathers...
As for last season, nobody had Reynolds that high on their board last year--if I remember correctly, he wasn't even in the top 10 on most projections. Many of us here actually wanted the Rockies to take Longoria at #2, so his success isn't that unexpected--certainly no more so than Reynolds to this point.
by DenverBears on Jun 11, 2007 10:51 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reynolds WAS a Top 10 pick
by sg8335aa on Jun 11, 2007 11:54 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most had him in the Top 10
by Rox Girl on Jun 11, 2007 12:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahahaha
you: "I wonder if O'Dowd and colleagues are feeling pressure to compete sooner rather than later."
maybe... i don't know, you think? what would give you that impression? the rapidly decaying attendance numbers? the 95% negative media response to anything the team does? the fact that they're the 4th most popular team in their own hometown, and dangerously close to being caught by the crush? excuse the sarcasm, but yeah, i think theyre probably feeling just a little bit of pressure. which, as a supporter of them, makes me happy they took weathers. im excited to see him in the bigs no more than a year from now.
by LarryB303 on Jun 11, 2007 12:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Balanced Perspective
Same goes for Russ and David, and the other regular bloggers.
by jlot10 on Jun 11, 2007 9:33 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Last night -
I want to know how they got it that fast, or if they were already planning to make him wear it.
by Squeaky on Jun 11, 2007 10:11 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Spilly had
by Russ Oates on Jun 11, 2007 10:20 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ianetta with RISP
Even if Torrealba was marginally better, Ianetta should be getting the majority of the at bats.
by Onebaseman on Jun 11, 2007 4:19 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm feeling better about...
The scout is referring to Mets' pick Nathan Vineyard, who was selected 47th overall. Even though the scout was trumpeting him for the sixth to eighth round and the Rockies jumped the gun by taking him in the fourth, I'm guessing they probably weren't the only ones to see him, and really, really wanted him in the system.
by Rox Girl on Jun 11, 2007 6:43 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs




















