Purple Row: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


Purple Meanies: Is the Rox lineup still something to fear?

Sal Baxamusa at the Hardball Times makes an interesting and important distinction about average hitters at a position, that it's important to compare your guy with the median hitter in the league, rather than the mean for the position. So, having that as a start point, I thought it might be interesting to take a look at how each NL West team's projected starter fared in 2007. For some, like a lot of the Arizona players, we shouldn't get excited by low figures as many of their guys figure to get better this year. Conversely, older players like Todd Helton have a pretty healthy chance of declining, so I'll also include ages.

Catcher: 83

Arizona: Chris Snyder, 27, 94
Colorado: Yorvit Torrealba, 29, 75
Los Angeles: Russell Martin, 25, 113
San Diego: Josh Bard, 30, 107
San Francisco: Bengie Molina, 33, 86

Backup Catcher:

Arizona: Miguel Montero, 24, 72
Colorado: Chris Iannetta, 25, 71
Los Angeles: Gary Bennett, 36, 61
San Diego: Michael Barrett, 31, 68
San Francisco: Guillermo Rodriguez, 30, 77

First Base: 108

Arizona: Conor Jackson, 26, 94
Colorado: Todd Helton, 34, 133
Los Angeles: James Loney, 24, 131
San Diego: Adrian Gonzalez, 26, 125
San Francisco: Dan Ortmeier, 27, 107

Second Base: 100

Arizona: Orlando Hudson, 30, 106
Colorado: Jayson Nix, 25, you don't want to know the MLE
Los Angeles: Jeff Kent, 40, 121
San Diego: Tad Iguchi, 33, 92
San Francisco: Ray Durham, 36, 65

Third Base: 101

Arizona: Mark Reynolds, 24, 110
Colorado: Garrett Atkins, 28, 112
Los Angeles: Andy LaRoche, 24, 75
San Diego: Kevin Kouzmanoff, 26, 109
San Francisco: Pedro Feliz?, 33, 81

Shortstop: 94

Arizona: Stephen Drew, 25, 72
Colorado: Troy Tulowitzki, 23, 108
Los Angeles: Rafael Furcal, 30, 76
San Diego: Khalil Greene, 28, 100
San Francisco: Omar Vizquel, 41, 62

Backup Corner Infielder:

Arizona: Chad Tracy, 28, 100
Colorado: Jeff Baker, 27, 61
Los Angeles: Nomar Garciaparra, 34, 78
San Diego: Chase Headley, 24, 68
San Francisco: it should be Aurillia, 36, 73

Backup Middle Infielder:

Arizona: Chris Burke, 28, 72
Colorado: Clint Barmes, 29, 33
Los Angeles: Chin-Lung Hu, 24, 86
San Diego: Oscar Robles, 32, 42
San Francisco: Kevin Frandsen, 26, 84

Right Field: 105

Arizona: Justin Upton, 20, 62
Colorado: Brad Hawpe, 29, 129
Los Angeles: Matt Kemp, 23, 125
San Diego: Brian Giles, 37, 109
San Francisco: Randy Winn, 34, 105

Center Field: 88

Arizona: Chris Young, 24, 89
Colorado: Willy Taveras, 26, 89
Los Angeles: Andruw Jones, 31, 88
San Diego: Jim Edmunds, 38, 88
San Francisco: Aaron Rowand, 30, 123

Left Field: 101

Arizona: Eric Byrnes, 32, 104
Colorado: Matt Holliday, 28, 150
Los Angeles: Juan Pierre, 30, 75
San Diego: Scott Hairston, 28, 94
San Francisco: Dave Roberts, 36, 80

Backup Outfielder #1:

Arizona:  Jeff Salazar, 27, 85
Colorado: Ryan Spilborghs, 28, 111
Los Angeles: Andre Ethier, 26, 103
San Diego: Callix Crabbe, 25
San Francisco: Raj Davis, 27, 92

Backup Outfielder #2:

Arizona: Robby Hammock, 31, 52
Colorado: Seth Smith, 25, 271
Los Angeles: Jason Repko, 27, 85(2006)
San Diego: ?
San Francisco: Nate Schierholtz, 24, 85

Okay, a few notes before I try and break this down a bit. First of all, I was basing several of the positions I didn't feel confident projecting from some of our rivals on their team depth charts at the official sites. I deviated from this sometimes, for instance with San Fran's third base situation or our backup infielder battle, as I see the train wrecks involving comfortable players noted above as more likely outcomes until whispers from Spring Training tell me otherwise. Even with that, some deeper bench positions still seem really murky to me, so if you're a fan of one of these other teams, just let me know if I made a mistake.

I just listed OPS+, not PA's, so in some cases like Chase Headley or Seth Smith, teeny sample sizes make players look a lot better or worse than they really are. I'm aware of this.

Positions in 2008 that Colorado can expect to be better than the rest of the division at the plate:

LF
SS

I don't really see that strong of competition for Tulo and Matt this season. There's almost zero chance Matt gets overtaken, I see Furcal (107 OPS+ in 2006) and Drew (still a talented bat) as the two with the best hope to pass Tulo, but last season makes me very much doubt it will happen.

Positions which it's likely Colorado will be one of the top two in the division at the plate:

RF
Backup Catcher
Backup Outfielder #1

Brad's likely going to be passed by Kemp this year, and there's an outside chance Upton does as well with a breakout season, the other two are declining fairly rapidly, and I don't see Hawpe finishing worse than third happening. Iannetta and Montero should duke it out for best backup backstop, but a rebound from Michael Barrett might give San Diego the edge here. Guillermo Rodriguez was kind of a small sample fluke for San Fran last season. The only reason Ryan Spilborghs isn't in the first category is because LA's going to be too proud to bench Juan Pierre.

Likely to be third or better, possibly as high as #1:

1B
3B
Backup Outfielder #2

I see both Loney and Gonzalez ahead of Todd this season, but not by much, and maybe the old man could fend the youngsters off for one more year. It's hard to see Atkins staying ahead of Reynolds and Kouzmanoff, but like Todd, I don't know if he drops that far behind offensively. LaRoche still is probably a season away from being in their company. San Francisco has depth in outfield mediocrity and Los Angeles just has good depth, so either Smith or Cory Sullivan will have to exceed the bar set by Repko/Delwyn Young in LA or Schierholtz/Fred Lewis/whoever in San Fran.

Likely to be middle of the pack:

none

Likely to only be fourth best:

CF
Backup Corner IF

Taveras might well come in fifth, the only player I think he'll outperform here is Jim Edmonds, who's got at least a halfway decent chance to have a strong rebound this year. Baker's placement is a bit more tricky for me to figure out, as Tracy's not going to be healthy the first part of the season and Headley's talented but unproven. I also don't know what really to expect from Garciaparra, but Aurilia's nearly finished, so it should be safe to say that Baker does better than him. It certainly seems at least possible to me that he could be better than the other four as well.

Likely to be the worst in the division offensively:

C
Backup Middle Infielder

Yorvit Torrealba's best chance is passing Molina, but the other three seem too far out of reach. If only Ian Stewart or Jayson Nix played shortstop as well as second.

Wild Card:

2B

Ian Stewart and Jayson Nix are the two most important position players to watch for the Rockies this Spring, specifically to find out if Stewart is ready with his glove here, and if Nix is ready with his bat. If just one is, we're going to be in decent shape, but it's not at all likely we'll pass Los Angeles or Arizona, and even San Diego stretches credibility at this point.

By team, positions I expect will be over the MLB median (backups count as half):

AZ - 4 to 6 (C, 2B, 3B, CF. LF's iffy, but any of 1B, SS or RF could make a big jump.)

CO - 6.5 (1B, 3B, SS, RF, CF, LF, Backup OF#1. CF's right around the median, but low in the division.)

LA - 5.5 (C, 1B, 2B, RF, CF, Backup OF #1. There's a conceivable 6.5 scenario if LaRoche plays like he's capable.)

SD - 5 (C, 1B, 3B, SS, RF. Those last two likely aren't over the median by much.)

SF - 2 (1B, CF. First base and right field are exactly on the dividing line. I gave Ortmeier the benefit of the doubt due to age. Given how Rowand's 2007 has several flukish aspects, there's a decent chance that they actually get zero in this category in 2008)

After doing this exercise, I'd currently rate the lineups as follows:

  1. CO
  2. LA
  3. AZ
  4. SD
  5. SF
But Los Angeles and Arizona are closer to us than they were last season, and either could conceivably pass us if all their young talent comes together. Our best hope for maintaining a clear advantage over the division involves leaps forward by Iannetta at catcher and Stewart at second, but frankly I see this about as likely as the Dodgers' best possible scenario of Pierre getting benched for Ethier, LaRoche producing right away like the scouts say he will, and Furcal having a renaissance year.

0 recs | Comment 8 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good offensive breakdown
As usual, stellar work there.  I am curious just how bad Nix actually projects right now.  I don't think any of us are expecting an All-Star game appearance from him, but the way you phrased that scares me.  I'll ask it this way: higher or lower then Barmes?

Not to overload the psyche today, but ran into another interesting article at the Hardball Times regarding the Best Outfield Arms of 2007:

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/best-outfield-arms-of-2007/

It's surprising just how far Hawpe is down on the list (22 out of 27), and how high Willy T is (2nd among CF).  

President of the Kazuo Matsui Fan Club

by MattTheRock on Jan 7, 2008 1:01 PM MST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Candy arms in LA still.
Andruw's low ranking is a bit surprising to me also. as long as Ethier's not in, I'd try to get the extra base on anything from right center over to the third base line.

I think a good chunk of Hawpe's problem last season was accuracy. He still has a cannon out there, but I noticed he lost a lot of his precision from 2006, with too many throws up the third baseline.

-----

As for Nix, I'm not expecting Barmes or Durham bad offensively, but the highest I see him getting is around a 95 OPS+, which might be good enough to pass Iguchi for third in the division but it won't be above the league median or necessarily close to the other three in division on offense. I think a safer range of projection will be around 80-85. The downside is Barmes or Durham bad. This doesn't take into account defense or base running, which should add some value, however, but it's still not enough to be particularly excited over.

by Rox Girl on Jan 7, 2008 2:44 PM MST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rep is key...
Andruw's still got some skill, but there's no doubt that he's slipped considerably.  It's a wonder how long it will take to for the opposing managers to figure it out.  Although if they play Pierre in left like we're hearing, we might see a lot of 1st to 3rd on balls hit to left.  I think I might enjoy watching the Dodgers play defense this season...
President of the Kazuo Matsui Fan Club

by MattTheRock on Jan 7, 2008 4:10 PM MST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

C/2B/CF
Interestingly, it's right up the gut that the Rox have the most offensive questions. And if Tulo hadn't come as quickly as he has .... well, we wouldn't be in near as good of shape, but that's sort of an understatement.

First of all, I think you're right that Willy could be the worst regular CF, but he could do that and still be better than average. If the arm stats are accurate, when you factor in the defensive help from his plus range and arm, he doesn't have to do as much with the bat to help the club. But I think he, among our young guys, could be poised for a bit of a break out. If he stays healthy for the full year, it could be really big. You figure age 26, 27 and 28 should be big career years for players who base a lot of their game on speed.

Also, I think Yorvit will lose a lot of playing time in the 2nd half when Ianetta and his near .400 OBP start getting comfy in the bigs.

That leaves 2nd base as the Rox biggest area for improvement. It'd be great if Nix hit for some power along with the glove. I'm not in love with moving Stewart unless his glove plays better than most 3B who try to move to 2B. How long till Nelson is ready?

by Thomas on Jan 7, 2008 1:12 PM MST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Taveras should be decent enough
for a season or two more while Fowler gets ready and I agree that at CF and catcher the situation isn't as bad as a divisional ranking right now makes it look. Partly because of Taveras and Iannetta still having some room for growth, but also because several of our rivals have may end up with questions that are more serious than the numbers make it look. For instance, Bard and Barrett don't strike me as the type of catchers that can fend off the steep decline that afflicts most of their kind and are at ages that suggest their glory is behind them. CF seems much improved in LA and San Fran, but Jones isn't going to the best stadium to rebound from an awful 2007, and Rowand put up OPS+ of 93 and 86 the two seasons before last, and the move from CBP to ATT should hurt. Combined with the old and injury prone Edmonds, who's also moving to an extreme pitcher's park, it makes for one scenario in my mind where Taveras could be the second best offensive outfielder in the division. I guess what I'm saying is that his ceiling might not be that high, but his floor is much higher than most in the division.

As for second base, I'm just hoping it doesn't embarrass us too badly, but I've got to acknowledge there's a low floor there that's kind of frightening.

by Rox Girl on Jan 7, 2008 2:30 PM MST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This doesn't inspire any confidence
in the Rockies chances in 2008, given that the pitching side doesn't favor us at all against our division rivals..  All the more reason to (warning: beating a dead horse ahead) upgrade at 2B.

by Roberbola on Jan 7, 2008 4:39 PM MST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd be willing to endorse a trade for Ellis
Somebody mentioned him the other day, and with happenings in Oakland, it seems more likely he'd be more affordable farm talent-wise than a star like Brian Roberts. Esteban German also seems tempting to target. Marcels projects a .780 OPS for him in KC, including a .370 OBP compared to .340 for Ellis. With the Royals having Callaspo now, German seems expendable. Problem is that he's been a defensive liability compared to Ellis and many other players, but he's a decent way of avoiding the life-sucking black hole in the lineup.

by Rox Girl on Jan 7, 2008 5:42 PM MST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Black Hole?
I don't think Torrealba will appreciate that label.  That was a little rough Rox Girl. But the good news is Iannetta, will step in and seal up that life sucking block hole.

by roxtalk on Jan 7, 2008 6:24 PM MST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Colorado Rockies, established 28 April 2005.

Community Guidelines

Start posting about the Rockies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

P1_iannetta_small
At Bat/Entrance Music: 2009 Edition
Apt_visit_2_small
Some July Wallpaper Coming Soon!
Sleepy_jeff_small
Purple Row Fantasy League End of June Standings
Small
Manny being...cheap
Sleepy_jeff_small
Purple Row Prediction Competition Week 12
October_075-1_small
Making My First Trip to OAK and LA to Watch Rockies, Any Pointers?
Rockies_lost_americana_small
Shop PurpleRowCares!
Gvf_small
2009 Draft Pick Signings
Helton_small
What is Morales worth??
Small
Frontier promotion code?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


GM & Manager

Gvf_small Russ

Li_l_rox_girl_small Rox Girl

Coaching Staff

Liquid_small Silverblood

P1_iannetta_small RockiesMagicNumber

Coorsfield3_small theoldgrizzlybear

67880020--bled-slovenia_small Poseidon's Fist

Sleepy_jeff_small Jabberwocky

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports